IP Library Granted Patent US 12,299,781
Granted Patent B2
US 12,299,781 · App. 17/310,771 · Granted May 13, 2025

Deep reinforcement learning for computer assisted reading and analysis

Inventors: Fei Gao (Knoxville, TN); Vijay Shah (Knoxville, TN)
Assignee: Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.
G06T11/008G06F18/2178G06N3/045G06T7/0012G06T2207/10104G06T2207/20081G06T2207/20084
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,299,781
App. No.
17/310,771
Granted
May 13, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods and systems of revising image models for nuclear imaging are disclosed. A system receives first patient scan data corresponding to one or more nuclear imaging scans performed on one or more individuals and generates a first reconstructed image by applying a first image model to the first patient scan data. Feedback is received regarding the first reconstructed image and the feedback is provided as an input to a deep-reinforcement learning process. The deep-reinforcement learning process is configured to generate at least one modification for the first image model based on the feedback regarding the first reconstructed image. A second image model is generated by applying the at least one modification generated by the deep-reinforcement learning process to the first image model.

Claims (53)

1. A method of revising image models for nuclear imaging, comprising:

receiving, by a system, first patient scan data corresponding to a nuclear imaging scan of an individual;

receiving, by the system, preference data associated with the first patient scan data;

selecting, by the system, a first image model from a plurality of image models based on at least a first portion of the preference data, and modifying, by the system, the first image model based on at least a second portion of the preference data;

generating, by the system, a first reconstructed image by applying the first image model to an entirety of the first patient scan data, the first reconstructed image comprising an imaging target at a first location;

receiving, by the system, a feedback regarding the first reconstructed image;

generating weighted feedback based on applying a first weight to a first portion of the feedback and a second weight to a second portion of the feedback;

providing, by the system, the weighted feedback as an input to a deep-reinforcement learning process, wherein the deep-reinforcement learning process is configured to extract features from the weighted feedback, and generate at least one modification for the first image model based on the extracted features of the weighted feedback regarding the first reconstructed image;

generating, by the system, a second image model by applying the at least one modification generated by the deep-reinforcement learning process to the first image model;

generating, by the system, a second reconstructed image by applying the second image model to the entirety of the first patient scan data, the second reconstructed image comprising the imaging target at a second location that is different from the first location.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first image model is a predefined image model.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the feedback comprises system generated feedback or expert generated feedback.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the system generated feedback comprises an artifact reduction, an acquisition protocol, or a reconstruction protocol.

5. The method of claim 3 , wherein the expert generated feedback comprises a score indicative of an acceptability of the first reconstructed image or the at least one modification.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the feedback comprises a modified reconstructed image.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the deep-reinforcement learning process comprises a convolution neural network or a text evaluation network.

8. The method of claim 1 , comprising:

receiving, by the system, second patient scan data corresponding to one or more additional nuclear imaging scans; and

generating, by the system, a third reconstructed image by applying the second image model to the second patient scan data.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the preference data comprises machine-learning training sets.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the method comprises training the deep-reinforcement learning process based on the machine-learning training sets, wherein the trained deep-reinforcement learning process is configured to extract the features from the weighted feedback.

11. A system, comprising:

an imaging modality configured to generate patient scan data in response to a nuclear imaging scan of an individual during a first imaging period; and

a computer configured to:

receive the patient scan data generated during the first imaging period;

receive preference data associated with the first patient scan data;

select a first image model from a plurality of image models based on at least a first portion of the preference data, and modify the first image model based on at least a second portion of the preference data;

generate a first reconstructed image by applying the first image model to an entirety of the patient scan data, the first reconstructed image comprising an imaging target at a first location;

receive a feedback regarding the first reconstructed image;

generate weighted feedback based on applying a first weight to a first portion of the feedback data and a second weight to a second portion of the feedback data;

provide the weighted feedback as an input to a deep-reinforcement learning process, wherein the deep-reinforcement learning process is configured to extract features from the weighted feedback, and generate at least one modification for the first image model based on the extracted features of the weighted feedback regarding the first reconstructed image;

generate a second image model by applying the at least one modification generated by the deep-reinforcement learning process to the first image model;

generate a second reconstructed image by applying the second image model to the entirety of the first patient scan data, the second reconstructed image comprising the imaging target at a second location that is different from the first location.

12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the feedback comprises one or more of system generated feedback or expert generated feedback.

13. The system of claim 12 , wherein the system generated feedback comprises one or more of an artifact reduction, an acquisition protocol, or a reconstruction protocol.

14. The system of claim 12 , wherein the expert generated feedback comprises one or more of a score indicative of an acceptability of the first reconstructed image or the at least one modification.

15. The system of claim 11 , wherein the feedback comprises a modified reconstructed image.

16. The system of claim 11 , wherein the imaging modality is configured to generate patient scan data during a second imaging period, and wherein the computer is further configured to:

receive the patient scan data generated during the second imaging period; and

generate a third reconstructed image by applying the second image model to the patient scan data generated during the second imaging period.

17. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions configured to cause a computer system to execute the steps of:

receiving first patient scan data corresponding to a nuclear imaging scan of an individual;

receiving preference data associated with the first patient scan data;

selecting, by the system, a first image model from a plurality of image models based on at least a first portion of the preference data, and modifying, by the system, the first image model based on at least a second portion of the preference data;

generating a first reconstructed image by applying the first image model to an entirety of the first patient scan data, the first reconstructed image comprising an imaging target at a first location;

receiving a feedback regarding the first reconstructed image;

generating weighted feedback based on applying a first weight to a first portion of the feedback data and a second weight to a second portion of the feedback data;

providing the weighted feedback as an input to a deep-reinforcement learning process, wherein the deep-reinforcement learning process is configured to extract features from the weighted feedback, and generate at least one modification for the first image model based on the extracted features of the weighted feedback regarding the first reconstructed image;

generating a second image model by applying the at least one modification generated by the deep-reinforcement learning process to the first image model; and

generating a second reconstructed image by applying the second image model to the entirety of the first patient scan data, the second reconstructed image comprising the imaging target at a second location that is different from the first location.

18. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 17 , wherein the instructions are further configured to cause the computing system to execute the steps of:

receiving second patient scan data corresponding to one or more additional nuclear imaging scans; and

generating a third reconstructed image by applying the second image model to the second patient scan data.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 24, 2021
From: GAO, FEI; SHAH, VIJAY
To: SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC.
Reel/Frame 057267/0029 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220044454A1 · Feb 10, 2022
References Cited (20)
US 10032281B1 · Ghesu et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20080240337A1 · Galant · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20090074278A1 · Beaulieu · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20120328173A1 · Sachs · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20170091963A1 · Panin · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170270695A1 · Avinash · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170319154A1 · Andreyev · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180005412A1 · Ma · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180144466A1 · Hsieh · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20200161005A1 · Lyman · 2020 [cited by examiner]
International Search Report for corresponding application No. PCT/US2019/026248, dated Dec. 13, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Mufti Mahmud et al: “Applications of Deep Learning and Reinforcement Learning to Biological Data”, arxiv.org, Cornell University Library, 201 Olin Library Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853, Nov. 10, 2017 (Nov. 10, 201… [cited by applicant]
Chenyang Shen et al: “Intelligent Parameter Tuning in Optimization-based Iterative CT Reconstruction via Deep Reinforcement Learning”, arxiv.0rg, Cornell University Library, 201 Olin Library Cornell University Ithaca, N… [cited by applicant]
Samuel Matej et al: “Efficient 3D TOF PET Reconstruction Using View-Grouped Histo-Images: DIRECT—Direct Image Reconstruction for TOF”, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record; Oct. 29-Nov. 4, 2006; San Die… [cited by applicant]
Wang, Lu et al., “Supervised Reinforcement Learning with Recurrent Neural Network for Dynamic Treatment Recommendation”, arXiv:1807.01473v2 [cs.LG] , Sep. 17, 2018, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Alansary, Amir et al., “Automatic View Planning with Multi-scale Deep Reinforcement Learning Agents”, arXiv:1806.03228v1 [cs.CV], Jun. 8, 2018, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ali, Issa et al., “Lung Nodule Detection via Deep Reinforcement Learning”, Frontiers in Oncology, Apr. 2018, vol. 8, Article 108, p. 1-7. [cited by applicant]
Mnih, Volodymyr et al., “Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning”, Nature, vol. 518, Feb. 26, 2015, pp. 529-533. [cited by applicant]
Segasist Protate Auto-Conturing Software 510(k) Summary, Oct. 10, 2011, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Aljabar, P. and Gooding, M.J., “The cutting edge: Delineating contours with Deep Learning”, 2017, 3. [cited by applicant]