IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,301,429
Granted Patent B2
US 12,301,429 · App. 17/433,154 · Granted May 13, 2025

Method and devices for transfer learning for inductive tasks in radio access network

Inventors: Euhanna Ghadimi (Bromma, SE); Jonas Wiorek (Stockholm, SE)
Assignee: TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
H04L41/16G06N5/04H04L41/147H04W24/02H04W24/10
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,301,429
App. No.
17/433,154
Granted
May 13, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A framework for inductive tasks in RANs includes a source learner, a target learner and an inference entity that can be merged into existing or future RAN functions. The signaling mechanism between different framework entities may also be merged into existing or future network interfaces. The framework can be reused by multiple inductive tasks to perform a variety of tasks such as prediction of some network phenomena or to improve certain KPIs in the network.

Claims (30)

1. A network operator device performing as a source learner in a radio access network, RAN, the network operator device comprising:

processing circuitry; and

a memory containing instructions executable by the processing circuitry, the network operator device operative to:

prepare source inductive parameters, SIPs; and

supply the SIPs to a target learner in the RAN, wherein

the SIPs include an inductive model of an inductive task,

the SIPs enable the target learner to generate a production model of a RAN inductive task using the inductive model of the inductive task,

the inductive task and the RAN inductive task are different,

the target learner is configured to provide the production model to an inference entity in the RAN, and

the target learner and the inference entity are different logical entities.

2. The network operator device of claim 1 , wherein the inductive model is trained using first data and the production model is trained using second data which is different from the first data, and the first data and the second data is any one or more of:

the first data is simulated network data, and the second data is real network data;

the first data is a high volume of correlated low-cost data, and the second data is a low volume of more precise and expensive data than the high volume of correlated low-cost data;

the first data is offline available network data and the second data is online network data; and

the first data is 4G data, the inductive model being related to a 5G inductive task, and the second data is 5G data.

3. The network operator device of claim 1 , wherein the network operator device is further configured to train models included in SIPs and/or validate SIPs using data from the RAN.

4. The network operator device of claim 1 , wherein the RAN inductive task is a machine learning application predicting a certain network metric or measurement, classifying a network-related phenomenon or detecting an event or network status.

5. The network operator device of claim 1 , wherein the source learner is part of a data center of the RAN.

6. A network operator device performing as a source learner in a radio access network, RAN, the network operator device comprising:

processing circuitry; and

a memory containing instructions executable by the processing circuitry, the network operator device operative to:

prepare source inductive parameters, SIPs; and

supply the source inductive parameters, SIPs to a target learner in the RAN, wherein

the SIPs include an inductive model of an inductive task for a cell of a first cell type,

the SIPs enable the target learner to generate a production model of a RAN inductive task using the inductive model of the inductive task,

the inductive task and the RAN inductive task are different,

the target learner is configured to provide the production model to an inference entity in the RAN, and

the target learner and the inference entity are different logical entities.

7. The network operator device of claim 6 , wherein the RAN inductive task is for a cell of a second cell type.

8. The network operator device of claim 6 , wherein the inductive model is generated from data related to multiple cells and the production model is for a specific cell.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 18, 2021
From: GHADIMI, EUHANNA; WIOREK, JONAS
To: TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
Reel/Frame 058155/0242 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220191107A1 · Jun 16, 2022
References Cited (18)
US 11537506B1 · Dasgupta · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20150332165A1 · Mermoud · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20180293488A1 · Dang · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20200034665A1 · Ghanta · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200272859A1 · Iashyn · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210219384A1 · Liao · 2021 [cited by examiner]
EP 3439241A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018164618A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
Lazaric “Transfer in Reinforcement Learning: a Framework and a Survey” Marco Wiering, Martijn van Otterlo. Reinforcement Learning—State of the art, 12, Springer, pp. 143-173, 2012. [cited by applicant]
Carroll et al. “Task Similarity Measures for Transfer in Reinforcement Learning Task Libraries” Brigham Young University BYU Scholars Archive, Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Montreal, … [cited by applicant]
Taylor et al. “Transfer Learning for Reinforcement Learning Domains: A Survey” Journal of Machine Learning Research 10 (2009) 1633-1685. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, issued in corresponding International Application No. PCT/IB2019/051544, dated Nov. 5, 2019, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Baxter “A Model of Inductive Bias Learning” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 12 (2000) 149-198. [cited by applicant]
Shi et al. “Actively Transfer Domain Knowledge” ECML PKDD 2008, Part II, LNAI 5212, pp. 342-357, 2008. [cited by applicant]
O'Shea et al. “An Introduction to Deep Learning for the Physical Layer” IEEE Transactions On Cognitive Communications and Networking, vol. 3, No. 4, Dec. 2017, pp. 563-575. [cited by applicant]
Torrey et al. “Transfer Learning” University of Wisconsin, Madison WI, USA, 2009, 22 pages. [cited by applicant]
Marx et al. “Transfer Learning with an Ensemble of Background Tasks” 2005, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dai et al. “Transferring Naive Bayes Classifiers for Text Classification” Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, 2007, pp. 541-545. [cited by applicant]