IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,301,676
Granted Patent B2
US 12,301,676 · App. 17/892,337 · Granted May 13, 2025

System and method for modifying a preference

Inventor: Sean Rad (Los Angeles, CA)
Assignee: MATCH GROUP, LLC
H04L67/306G06F16/24G06Q30/02G06Q50/01
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,301,676
App. No.
17/892,337
Granted
May 13, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for profile matching includes receiving, from a first user, a first preference regarding a second user. The method includes receiving, from the second user, a second preference regarding the first user. The method also includes determining, based on the first preference and the second preference, to allow the first user to modify the first preference. The method also includes receiving, from the first user, a request to modify the first preference. The method also includes modifying the first preference.

Claims (49)

1. An online dating system for profile matching, comprising:

one or more processors operable to:

receive, from a first terminal of a first user, a first indication submitted by the first user indicating a first preference regarding a second user;

determine that at least one condition is met:

the first preference is a negative preference for not initiating the communication for online dating with the second user, and

the second user has not expressed a positive preference for the first user:

based on determining that the at least one condition is met, determine that modifying the first preference by the first user is allowed

and enable a modification button on a display associated with the first terminal of the first user for modification of the first preference; and

based on receiving, from a second terminal associated with the second user, a second indication indicating a positive preference of the second user, remove the modification button from the display associated with the first terminal of the first user.

2. The online dating system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are operable to:

receive a second indication from the first user, the second indication indicating a second preference for a third user; and

determine that modifying the second preference is not allowed by determining that at least one of the following conditions is met:

the second preference is a positive preference indication; and

the third user has expressed a positive preference for the first user; and

prohibit the first user from modifying the second preference.

3. The online dating system of claim 1 , wherein the first indication is associated with a swiping gesture received from the first user via the display.

4. The online dating system of claim 1 , wherein:

a positive preference is indicated by swiping in one direction via the display of the first user or the second user, and

a negative preference is indicated via swiping in another direction via the display of the first user or the second user.

5. A non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising computer code, the computer code, when executed by at least one processor, operable to:

receive, from a first terminal of a first user, a first indication submitted by a first user indicating a first preference regarding a second user, the first indication received on an electronic device;

determine that at least one condition is met:

the first preference is a negative preference for not initiating communication for online dating with the second user, and

the second user has not expressed a positive preference for the first user:

based on determining that the at least one condition is met, determining that modifying the first preference by the first user is allowed

and enabling a modification button on a display associated with the first terminal of the first user for modification of the first preference; and

based on receiving, from a second terminal associated with the second user, a second indication indicating a positive preference of the second user, remove the modification button from the display associated with the first terminal of the first user.

6. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 5 , wherein the computer code is further operable to:

receive a second indication submitted by the first user indicating a second preference regarding a third user, the second indication received on an electronic device;

determine that modifying the second preference is not allowed by determining that at least one of the following conditions is met:

the second preference is a positive preference indication; and

the third user has expressed a positive preference for the first user; and

prohibit the first user from modifying the second preference.

7. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 5 , wherein the first indication is associated with a swiping gesture received from the first user via the display.

8. An online dating method for profile matching, comprising:

receiving, from a first terminal of a first user, a first indication submitted by a first user indicating a first preference regarding a second user, the first indication received on an electronic device;

determining that at least one condition is met:

the first user has expressed a negative preference for not initiating communication for online dating with the second user, and

the second user has not expressed a positive preference for the first user:

based on determining that the at least one condition is met, determining, by the one or more processors, that modifying the first preference by the first user is allowed

and enabling a modification button on a display associated with the first terminal of the first user for modification of the first preference; and

based on receiving, from a second terminal associated with the second user, a second indication indicating a positive preference of the second user, removing the modification button from the display associated with the first terminal of the first user.

9. The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

receiving a second indication submitted by the first user indicating a second preference regarding a third user, the second indication received on an electronic device;

determining that modifying the second preference is not allowed by determining that at least one of the following conditions is met:

the second preference is a positive preference indication; and

the third user has expressed a positive preference for the first user; and

prohibiting the first user from modifying the second preference.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein the first indication is associated with a swiping gesture received from the first user via the display.

Assignments (1)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Oct 14, 2025
From: MATCH GROUP, LLC
To: TINDER LLC
Reel/Frame 073065/0384 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 14927789 · Oct 30, 2015
Provisional Application 62073073 · Oct 31, 2014
Related Publication 20230231923A1 · Jul 20, 2023
References Cited (84)
US D30711S · Speakman · 1899 [cited by applicant]
US D430120S · Yasui et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6480885B1 · Olivier · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 7103853B1 · Patil · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US D553147S · Hally et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7743100B2 · Cheah · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US D633920S · Luke et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7917448B2 · Smola et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US D637606S · Luke et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8060463B1 · Spiegel · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8180804B1 · Narayanan et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US D675639S · Anzures et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US D682262S · Akana et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US D682301S · DiJulio et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8566327B2 · Carrico et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US D692915S · Brinda et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US D701227S · Lee · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US D701503S · Akana et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US D726759S · Brinda et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US D732049S · Amin · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US D738394S · Chaudhri et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9171084B1 · Skatell et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9798832B1 · Lessin · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20010046657A1 · Dorn · 2001 [cited by examiner]
US 20030018797A1 · Dunning et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030043194A1 · Lif · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030078976A1 · Gordon · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20040093334A1 · Scherer · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040249811A1 · Shostack et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050021750A1 · Abrams · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050027707A1 · Syed · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20060059147A1 · Weiss et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060085419A1 · Rosen · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060106780A1 · Dagan · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060256959A1 · Hymes · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070037574A1 · Libov et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070073687A1 · Terrill et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070073802A1 · Terrill · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070073803A1 · Terrill et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070286383A1 · Fan · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20080009263A1 · Pousti · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080051033A1 · Hymes · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080086534A1 · Bardak et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080147743A1 · Taylor et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080250332A1 · Farrell · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080294624A1 · Kanigsberg et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080301118A1 · Chien et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090106040A1 · Jones · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090113006A1 · McWana · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090144780A1 · Toebes · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090271212A1 · Savjani · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090307610A1 · Ryan · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100145869A1 · Brown · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110078247A1 · Jackson · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110087974A1 · Kulas · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110196927A1 · Vance · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110219310A1 · Robson · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110243533A1 · Stern et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110258065A1 · Fordyce, III et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110320320A1 · Dearlove et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120047267A1 · Mehr et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120290978A1 · Devecka · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130067312A1 · Rose · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130110731A1 · Wey · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130167059A1 · Legris · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130262984A1 · Mehr et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140040368A1 · Janssens · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140156750A1 · De Cristofaro · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140207610A1 · Erez et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150039526A1 · Davidson · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150066749A1 · Zdorovtsov · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150089396A1 · Song · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150128095A1 · Cheng · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150334065A1 · Yan et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150381842A1 · Mori · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160048537A1 · Epstein et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160104253A1 · Song et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160132607A1 · Skatell et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160179847A1 · Epstein et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160196337A1 · Epstein et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160248864A1 · Loia · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170199920A1 · Pearson · 2017 [cited by examiner]
Google Mobile Blog News and notes from the Google Mobile team, “The Iterative Web App: New Stacked Cards Interface for Gmail on iPad”, http://googlemobile.blogspot.com/2010/08/iterative-web-app-new-stacked-cards.html, d… [cited by applicant]
Duncan, Geoff, “Alas, HyperCard!”, TidBITS Apple news for the rest of us, http://tidbits.com/article/5155, dated Nov. 1998, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]