IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,303,256
Granted Patent B2
US 12,303,256 · App. 17/413,918 · Granted May 20, 2025

Systems, devices, and methods for assessment of brain injury

Inventors: Michael G. Fanton (Stanford, CA); David B. Camarillo (Aptos, CA); Kaveh Laksari (Stanford, CA); Lyndia Chun Wu (Stanford, CA); Mehmet Kurt (Stanford, CA); Taylor H. Nguyen (Stanford, CA)
Assignee: The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University
A61B5/1122A61B5/0002A61B5/6803A61B5/7267G16H50/50A61B2503/10A61B2562/0219
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,303,256
App. No.
17/413,918
Granted
May 20, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems, methods and devices for detecting a concussive event are provided. A computational classifier may be trained and utilized for detecting a concussive event in real-time. Head kinematics can be measured and a head kinematic metric determined, which can be utilized within the classifier to detect a concussive event.

Claims (37)

1. A system for assessment of head kinematics and real-time detection of concussive events, comprising:

a head-mounted device configured to being worn on or secured to a head of an individual, wherein the head-mounted device comprises one or more accelerometers for measuring angular head motion when worn or secured to the head of the individual; and

a computer system in communication with the head-mounted device via an interface, wherein the computer system comprises a memory and a processor that reads instructions stored in the memory, wherein the instructions direct the processor to:

capture in real time, utilizing the one or more accelerometers, brain angle measurements in one or more anatomical directions;

compute in real time, utilizing the captured brain angle measurements as input in a mathematical mass-spring-damper model, a brain angle metric for the one or more anatomical directions; and

determine in real time, utilizing the brain angle metric as input within a trained classifier, that a concussive event occurs, wherein the trained classifier is trained to classify whether the computed brain angle metric is indicative of a concussive event or a non-concussive event.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the brain angle metric is a maximum brain angle.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the brain angle metric is a vector of three peak brain angle values for three anatomical directions.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the mathematical mass-spring-damper model models a rotational deformation of a brain from skull loading.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the mathematical mass-spring-damper model computes motion for each anatomical direction utilizing:

I ({umlaut over (θ)} brain +{umlaut over (θ)} skull )=− kθ brain −c{dot over (θ)} brain

wherein I is a moment of inertia of a mass, k and c are a stiffness and damping values of the system, respectively, and θ brain and θ skull represent angles of a brain and a skull, respectively.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the classifier is a regression model.

7. The system of claim 6 , wherein the regression model is:

p injury =(1 +e −β 0 −Σβ i x i ) −1

where p injury is a probability of concussive event, x i are components of an injury criterion, and β i are fitted coefficients, with i=1, . . . , n, representing each of the at least one anatomical directions and n representing a number of anatomical directions.

8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the concussive event is determined by a risk curve that determines a percent likelihood that a head impact was the concussive event.

9. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more accelerometers comprises a rotational accelerometer or an array of linear accelerometers.

10. The system of claim 1 , wherein the head-mounted device is: a helmet, a mouthguard, a hat, an ear protection, an eye-wear, a skin-mounted sensor, or a head band.

11. A real-time method for assessment of head kinematics and detection of concussive events, comprising:

fitting a head-mounted device on a head of an individual, wherein the head-mounted device comprises one or more accelerometers for measuring angular head motion;

capturing in real time, utilizing the one or more accelerometers, brain angle measurements in one or more anatomical directions;

computing in real time, utilizing the captured brain angle measurements as input in a mathematical mass-spring-damper model and a computer system, a brain angle metric for the one or more anatomical directions; and

determining in real time, utilizing the brain angle metric as input within a trained classifier and the computer system, that a concussive event occurs, wherein the trained classifier is trained to classify whether the brain angle metric is a concussive event or a non-concussive event.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the brain angle metric is a maximum brain angle.

13. The method of claim 11 , wherein the brain angle metric is a vector of three peak brain angle values for three anatomical directions.

14. The method of claim 11 , wherein the mathematical mass-spring-damper model models a rotational deformation of a brain from skull loading.

15. The method of claim 11 , wherein the mathematical mass-spring-damper model computes motion for each anatomical direction utilizing:

I ({umlaut over (θ)} brain +{umlaut over (θ)} skull )=− kθ brain −c{dot over (θ)} brain

wherein I is a moment of inertia of a mass, k and c are a stiffness and damping values of the system, respectively, and θ brain and θ skull represent angles of a brain and a skull, respectively.

16. The method of claim 11 , wherein the classifier is a regression model.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein the regression model is:

p injury =(1 +e −β 0 −Σβ i x i ) −1

where p injury is a probability of the concussive event, x i are components of an injury criterion, and β i are fitted coefficients, with i=1, . . . , n, representing each of the at least one anatomical directions and n representing a number of anatomical directions.

18. The method of claim 11 , wherein the concussive event is determined by a risk curve that determines a percent likelihood that a head impact was the concussive event.

19. The method of claim 11 , wherein the one or more accelerometers comprises a rotational accelerometer or an array of linear accelerometers.

20. The method of claim 11 , wherein the head-mounted device is: a helmet, a mouthguard, a hat, an ear protection, an eye-wear, a skin-mounted sensor, or a head band.

Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62778879 · Dec 12, 2018
Related Publication 20220061702A1 · Mar 3, 2022
References Cited (73)
US 8761437B2 · Kirovski et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9129499B2 · Howard et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9289176B2 · Benzel et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9308642B2 · Sugar et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20090158509A1 · Ghajar · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20120041330A1 · Prichep et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120220893A1 · Benzel et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130217977A9 · Cooner · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20160321425A1 · Ji et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170156635A1 · Kuo et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170238850A1 · Gonzales et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020123875A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2019/066088, Report issued Jun. 8, 2021, Mailed on Jun. 24, 2021, 15 Pgs. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/066088, search completed on Feb. 5, 2020, Mailed on Feb. 25, 2020, 23 Pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Standard Performance Specification for Newly Manufactured Football Helmets”, National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment, NOCSAE Doc: (ND)002-11m12, May 2012, 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Baugh et al., “Chronic traumatic encephalopathy: neurodegeneration following repetitive concussive and subconcussive brain trauma”, Brain Imaging and Behavior, vol. 6, Issue 2, Jun. 2012, pp. 244-254. [cited by applicant]
Bland et al., “STAR Methodology for Bicycle Helmets”, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia Tech Helmet Lab, May 30, 2018, 6 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Broglio et al., “National Athletic Trainers' Association Position Statement: Management of Sport Concussion”, Journal of Athletic Training, vol. 49, No. 2, Mar./Apr. 2014, pp. 245-265. [cited by applicant]
De Long et al., “Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach”, Biometrics, Sep. 1998, vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 837-845. [cited by applicant]
Dekosky et al., “Acute and chronic traumatic encephalopathies: pathogenesis and biomarkers”, Nature Reviews Neurology, vol. 9, Apr. 5, 2013, pp. 192-200. [cited by applicant]
Echemendia et al., “The Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 5th Edition (SCAT5)”, British Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 51, Feb. 14, 2017, pp. 851-858. [cited by applicant]
Elliott et al., “Accounting for sampling variability, injury under-reporting, and sensor error in concussion injury risk curves”, Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 48, No. 12, Sep. 18, 2015, pp. 3059-3065. [cited by applicant]
Ewing et al., “The Effect of Duration, Rate of Onset, and Peak Sled Acceleration on the Dynamic Response of the Human Head and Neck”, SAE Technical Paper 760800, Feb. 1, 1976, 40 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Fanton et al., “Dependency of Head Impact Rotation on Head-Neck Positioning and Soft Tissue Forces”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 66, No. 4, Aug. 20, 2018, pp. 988-999. [cited by applicant]
Gabler et al., “Assessment of Kinematic Brain Injury Metrics for Predicting Strain Responses in Diverse Automotive Impact Conditions”, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 44, No. 12, Dec. 2016, pp. 3705-3718. [cited by applicant]
Gabler et al., “Development of a Second-Order System for Rapid Estimation of Maximum Brain Strain”, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 47, No. 9, Dec. 2018, pp. 1971-1981. [cited by applicant]
Gabler et al., “Development of a Single-Degree-of-Freedom Mechanical Model for Predicting Strain-Based Brain Injury Responses”, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 140, No. 3, Jan. 17, 2018, 13 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Gadd, “Use of a Weighted-Impulse Criterion for Estimating Injury Hazard”, Proceedings of the 10th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Technical Paper 660793, Feb. 1, 1966, 6 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Gennarelli, “Future Directions in Brain Injury Research”, Progress in Neurological Surgery, vol. 28, 2014, pp. 243-250. [cited by applicant]
Gennarelli et al., “Directional Dependence of Axonal Brain Injury due to Centroidal and Non-Centroidal Acceleration”, SAE Technical Paper 872197, Nov. 1, 1987, 5 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Giordano et al., “Evaluation of Axonal Strain as a Predictor for Mild Traumatic Brain Injuries Using Finite Element Modeling”, SAE Technical Paper 2014-22-0002, Nov. 10, 2014, 33 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Giordano et al., “The influence of anisotropy on brain injury prediction”, Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 47, No. 5, Mar. 21, 2014, pp. 1052-1059. [cited by applicant]
Henn et al., “Crash Tests and the Head Injury Criterion”, Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, vol. 17, No. 4, Dec. 1, 1998, pp. 162-170. [cited by applicant]
Hernandez et al., “Six Degree-of-Freedom Measurements of Human Mild Traumatic Brain Injury”, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 43, No. 8, Aug. 2015, pp. 1918-1934. [cited by applicant]
Hernandez et al., “Voluntary Head Rotational Velocity and Implications for Brain Injury Risk Metrics”, Journal of Neurotrauma, vol. 36, No. 7, Oct. 22, 2018, pp. 1125-1135. [cited by applicant]
Kimpara et al., “Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Predictors Based on Angular Accelerations During Impacts”, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 40, No. 1, Jan. 2012, pp. 114-126. [cited by applicant]
King et al., “Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data”, Society for Political Methodology, Political Analysis, vol. 9, Feb. 16, 2001, pp. 137-163. [cited by applicant]
Kleiven, “Predictors for Traumatic Brain Injuries Evaluated through Accident Reconstructions”, Stapp Car Crash Journal, vol. 51, Oct. 2007, 35 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Kleiven et al., “Correlation of an FE Model of the Human Head with Local Brain Motion—Consequences for Injury Prediction”, Stapp Car Crash Journal, vol. 46, Nov. 2002, pp. 123-144. [cited by applicant]
Kornhauser, “Theoretical Prediction of the Effect of Rate-of-onset on Man's G-tolerance”, Aerospace Medicine, vol. 32, May 1961, pp. 412-421. [cited by applicant]
Kuo et al., “Pilot Findings of Brain Displacements and Deformations during Roller Coaster Rides”, Journal of Neurotrauma, vol. 34, No. 22, Nov. 15, 2017, pp. 3198-3205. [cited by applicant]
Kurt et al., “Modeling and Optimization of Airbag Helmets for Preventing Head Injuries in Bicycling”, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 45, No. 4, Apr. 2017, pp. 1148-1160. [cited by applicant]
Laksari et al., “Computational simulation of the mechanical response of brain tissue under blast loading”, Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, vol. 14, No. 3, Jun. 2015, pp. 459-472. [cited by applicant]
Laksari et al., “Constitutive model for brain tissue under finite compression”, Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 45, No. 4, Feb. 23, 2012, pp. 642-646. [cited by applicant]
Laksari et al., “Mechanistic Insights into Human Brain Impact Dynamics through Modal Analysis”, Physical Review Letters, vol. 120, No. 13, Mar. 30, 2018, 138101, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Laksari et al., “Multi-directional dynamic model for traumatic brain injury detection”, https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.07731, Dec. 19, 2018, 42 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Laksari et al., “Resonance of human brain under head acceleration”, Journal of the Royal Society Interface, vol. 12, No. 108, Jul. 6, 2015, 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Low et al., “A Lumped Parameter Approach to Simulate the Rotational Head Motion”, International Research Council on Biokinetics of Impacts (IRCOBI), 1987, pp. 203-215. [cited by applicant]
Margulies et al., “A proposed tolerance criterion for diffuse axonal injury in man”, Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 25, No. 8, Aug. 1992, pp. 917-923. [cited by applicant]
Mckee et al., “Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy in Athletes: Progressive Tauopathy After Repetitive Head Injury”, Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, vol. 68, No. 7, Jul. 2009, pp. 709-735. [cited by applicant]
Newman, “A Generalized Acceleration Model for Brain Injury Threshold (GAMBIT)”, Proceedings of International Research Council on Biokinetics of Impacts, 1986, pp. 121-131. [cited by applicant]
Newman et al., “A Proposed New Biomechanical Head Injury Assessment Function—The Maximum Power Index”, Stapp Car Crash Journal, vol. 44, Nov. 2000, pp. 215-247. [cited by applicant]
Ommaya et al., “Cerebral Concussion and Traumatic Unconsciousness: Correlation of Experimental and Clinical Observations of Blunt Head Injuries”, Brain, vol. 97, No. 1, Jan. 1, 1974, pp. 633-654. [cited by applicant]
Ommaya et al., “Tolerances for cerebral concussion from head impact and whiplash in primates”, Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 4, No. 1, Jan. 1971, pp. 13-21. [cited by applicant]
Pellman et al., “Concussion in Professional Football: Reconstruction of Game Impacts and Injuries”, Neurosurgery, vol. 53, No. 4, Sep. 2003, pp. 799-814. [cited by applicant]
Raghupathi et al., “Traumatic Axonal Injury after Closed Head Injury in the Neonatal Pig”, Journal of Neurotrauma, vol. 19, No. 7, 2002, pp. 843-853. [cited by applicant]
Rowson et al., “Brain Injury Prediction: Assessing the Combined Probability of Concussion Using Linear and Rotational Head Acceleration”, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 41, No. 5, May 2013, pp. 873-882. [cited by applicant]
Rowson et al., “Hockey STAR: A Methodology for Assessing the Biomechanical Performance of Hockey Helmets”, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 43, No. 10, Oct. 2015, pp. 2429-2443. [cited by applicant]
Rowson et al., “Linear and Angular Head Acceleration Measurements in Collegiate Football”, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 131, No. 6, Jun. 2009, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Rowson et al., “Rotational Head Kinematics in Football Impacts: An Injury Risk Function for Concussion”, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 40, No. 1, Jan. 2012, pp. 1-13. [cited by applicant]
Sahoo et al., “Brain injury tolerance limit based on computation of axonal strain”, Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 92, Jul. 2016, pp. 53-70. [cited by applicant]
Sanchez et al., “A reanalysis of football impact reconstructions for head kinematics and finite element modeling”, Clinical Biomechanics, vol. 64, Mar. 14, 2018, pp. 82-89. [cited by applicant]
Stalnaker et al., “Driving Point Impedance Characteristics of the Head”, Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 4, No. 2, Mar. 1971, pp. 127-130, IN1, IN3, 131-139. [cited by applicant]
Sullivan et al., “White matter tract-oriented deformation predicts traumatic axonal brain injury and reveals rotational direction-specific vulnerabilities”, Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, vol. 14, No. 4, A… [cited by applicant]
Sye et al., “High school rugby players' understanding of concussion and return to play guidelines”, British Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 40, No. 12, Dec. 2006, pp. 1003-1005. [cited by applicant]
Takhounts et al., “Development of Brain Injury Criteria (BrIC)”, Stapp Car Crash Journal, vol. 57, Nov. 2013, pp. 243-266. [cited by applicant]
Takhounts et al., “Investigation of Traumatic Brain Injuries Using the Next Generation of Simulated Injury Monitor (SIMon) Finite Element Head Model”, Stapp Car Crash Journal, vol. 52, Nov. 2008, 32 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Tyson et al., “Adult Football STAR Methodology”, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia Tech Helmet Lab, Mar. 30, 2018, 4 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Williamson et al., “Converging evidence for the under-reporting of concussions in youth ice hockey”, British Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 40, No. 2, Jan. 23, 2006, pp. 128-132. [cited by applicant]
Wu et al., “Bandwidth and sample rate requirements for wearable head impact sensors”, Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 49, No. 13, Sep. 6, 2016, pp. 2918-2924. [cited by applicant]
Wu et al., “Detection of American Football Head Impacts Using Biomechanical Features and Support Vector Machine Classification”, Scientific Reports, vol. 8, No. 855, Dec. 21, 2017, 14 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Zou et al., “Separating brain motion into rigid body displacement and deformation under low-severity impacts”, Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 40, No. 6, 2007, pp. 1183-1191. [cited by applicant]
Zou et al., “The Effect of Brain Mass and Moment of Inertia on Relative Brain-Skull Displacement During Low-Severity Impacts”, International Journal of Crashworthiness, vol. 12, No. 4, Oct. 2007, pp. 341-353. [cited by applicant]