IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,304,021
Granted Patent B2
US 12,304,021 · App. 17/813,995 · Granted May 20, 2025

Determining tool and shape determining method

Inventors: Katsubumi Iida (Tokyo, JP); Hirotoshi Hoshikawa (Tokyo, JP)
Assignee: DISCO CORPORATION
B23Q17/20B23Q17/0995
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,304,021
App. No.
17/813,995
Granted
May 20, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A determining tool for use in determining the shape of the tip end of a machining tool that machines a workpiece held on a table while the machining tool moves relatively to the table includes a bottom surface adapted to be held on the table and a flat slanting surface inclined to the bottom surface and oriented across a direction in which the machining tool moves relatively to the table, the flat slanting surface being adapted to be cut through by the tip end of the machining tool.

Claims (17)

1. A determining tool for use in determining a shape of a tip end of a machining tool that machines a workpiece held on a table while the machining tool moves relatively to the table, the determining tool comprising:

a bottom surface adapted to be held on the table; and

a flat slanting surface inclined to the bottom surface and oriented across a direction in which the machining tool moves relatively to the table, the flat slanting surface being adapted to be cut through by the tip end of the machining tool.

2. The determining tool according to claim 1 , wherein an angle formed between the bottom surface and the slanting surface is in a range of 30° to 60°.

3. The determining tool according to claim 1 , wherein the determining tool is made of silicon or carbon.

4. The determining tool according to claim 2 , wherein the determining tool is made of silicon or carbon.

5. A shape determining method of determining a shape of a tip end of a machining tool that machines a workpiece held on a table while the machining tool moves relatively to the table, the method comprising:

holding, on the table, a bottom surface of a determining tool that includes the bottom surface and a flat slanting surface inclined to the bottom surface;

causing the tip end of the machining tool to cut into the determining tool in such a manner as to cut through the slanting surface while the slanting surface is directed across a direction in which the machining tool moves relatively to the table; and

checking a shape of a machining mark left on the slanting surface by the tip end of the machining tool that has cut through the slanting surface, from a side of the determining tool that is opposite to the bottom surface, thereby determining the shape of the tip end of the machining tool.

6. The shape determining method according to claim 5 , wherein the causing the tip end of the machining tool to cut into the determining tool includes causing the tip end of the machining tool to cut into the determining tool while the tip end of the machining tool stays clear of an end of the slanting surface that is closer to the bottom surface.

7. The shape determining method according to claim 5 , wherein the causing the tip end of the machining tool to cut into the determining tool includes causing the tip end of the machining tool to cut into the determining tool while moving the machining tool and the table relatively to each other in the abovementioned direction.

8. The shape determining method according to claim 6 , wherein the causing the tip end of the machining tool to cut into the determining tool includes causing the tip end of the machining tool to cut into the determining tool while moving the machining tool and the table relatively to each other in the abovementioned direction.

9. The shape determining method according to claim 5 , wherein the determining the shape of the tip end of the machining tool includes determining that the tip end of the machining tool is round, if an end of the machining mark checked from the side of the determining tool that is opposite to the bottom surface is curved.

10. The shape determining method according to claim 6 , wherein the determining the shape of the tip end of the machining tool includes determining that the tip end of the machining tool is round, if an end of the machining mark checked from the side of the determining tool that is opposite to the bottom surface is curved.

11. The shape determining method according to claim 7 , wherein the determining the shape of the tip end of the machining tool includes determining that the tip end of the machining tool is round, if an end of the machining mark checked from the side of the determining tool that is opposite to the bottom surface is curved.

12. The shape determining method according to claim 8 , wherein the determining the shape of the tip end of the machining tool includes determining that the tip end of the machining tool is round, if an end of the machining mark checked from the side of the determining tool that is opposite to the bottom surface is curved.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 21, 2022
From: IIDA, KATSUBUMI; HOSHIKAWA, HIROTOSHI
To: DISCO CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 060578/0626 →
Priority Claims (1)
JP 2021-126525 · Aug 2, 2021 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230032327A1 · Feb 2, 2023
References Cited (33)
US 2926345A · Roeger · 1960 [cited by examiner]
US 4170158A · Weaver · 1979 [cited by examiner]
US 4494434A · Young · 1985 [cited by examiner]
US 4693038A · Vetter · 1987 [cited by examiner]
US 4831365A · Thomas · 1989 [cited by examiner]
US 5148730A · McCaw · 1992 [cited by examiner]
US 5197365A · Clifton · 1993 [cited by examiner]
US 6434852B1 · Tarris · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 6978552B1 · Sluder · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 7677955B2 · Kajiyama · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 8160738B2 · Nishikawa · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 10265787B2 · Lawlor · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10786925B1 · Barker · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10919122B2 · Hegele · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11007615B2 · Isobe · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11162899B2 · Teshima · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11285576B2 · Morihashi · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11577353B2 · Yasukochi · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11738420B2 · Wheeler · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11752587B2 · Trifoni · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11919114B2 · Nomaru · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 12228906B2 · Wu · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20210027440A1 · Sakuyama · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210379681A1 · Dano · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220397387A1 · Oda · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230052650A1 · Gerber · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240181588A1 · Gass · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240399534A1 · Akiyama · 2024 [cited by examiner]
JP 05253837A · 1993 [cited by applicant]
JP 2000087282A · 2000 [cited by applicant]
JP 2007296604A · 2007 [cited by applicant]
JP 2015030089A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
Office Action issued in counterpart German patent application No. 10 2022 207 637.0, dated Aug. 21, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Cited By (1)
US 12,576,480