IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,304,538
Granted Patent B2
US 12,304,538 · App. 17/077,899 · Granted May 20, 2025

Railway safety notification system and device with proportional warnings

Inventors: Brad Cross (McLeansboro, IL); Destry Diefenbach (Benton, IL); Pete Ksycki (McLeansboro, IL); Nicholas Freed (Thompsonville, IL)
Assignee: STC, Inc.
B61L23/06B61L15/0027B61L23/34B61L25/021B61L25/025G08G9/00B61L2205/04
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,304,538
App. No.
17/077,899
Granted
May 20, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and devices that will notify train system maintenance workers of an approaching vehicle and, conversely, will notify the operators and administrators of train systems of train system maintenance workers within the vicinity of an approaching section of track. Embodiments of the safety systems and methods disclosed herein may use proportional warnings based on the speed or proximity of approaching vehicles as well as the specific location of such approaching vehicles relative to worker positions to help avoid worker warning fatigue.

Claims (16)

1. A method for alerting a worker to potential danger, the method comprising:

equipping a worker with a personal notification unit (PNU);

equipping a vehicle with a vehicle communication unit (VCU);

establishing a work zone where workers are potentially in danger from an approaching vehicle;

establishing a safe zone where workers are not in danger from an approaching vehicle;

said VCU transmitting vehicle information, said vehicle information including at least one of a speed of said vehicle, a direction of travel of said vehicle, an estimated time of arrival of said vehicle to a predetermined point, or a location of said vehicle relative said work zone, to said PNU;

said PNU determining if said PNU is within said work zone or said safe zone upon receiving said vehicle information;

if said determining determines said PNU is within said safe zone, said PNU not issuing an alert to said worker; and

if said determining determines said PNU is within said work zone:

said PNU determining a level of danger said worker equipped with said PNU is in from said vehicle based at least in part on said vehicle information; and

said PNU issuing an alert to said worker, said alert being proportional to said level of danger; and

said PNU ceasing said alert if said PNU is determined to move from said work zone to said safe zone.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein said VCU utilizes satellite location information to determine said speed of said vehicle, said direction of travel of said vehicle, said estimated time of arrival of said vehicle to a predetermined point, and/or said location of said vehicle relative said work zone.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein said PNU determines if said PNU is within said work zone or said safe zone by using satellite location information.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein said PNU is unable to utilize satellite location information to determine if said PNU is within said work zone or said safe zone.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein said PNU utilizes location relative to a beacon placed in said work zone to determine if said PNU is within said work zone or said safe zone.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 25, 2021
From: CROSS, BRAD; DIEFENBACH, DESTRY; KSYCKI, PETE; FREED, NICHOLAS
To: STC, INC.
Reel/Frame 056665/0921 →
Continuity (7)
Continuation In Part 16027700 · Jul 5, 2018
Continuation 15370655 · Dec 6, 2016
Continuation 13652217 · Oct 15, 2012
Provisional Application 62924513 · Oct 22, 2019
Provisional Application 62924522 · Oct 22, 2019
Provisional Application 61547387 · Oct 14, 2011
Related Publication 20210107542A1 · Apr 15, 2021
References Cited (27)
US 5539398A · Hall et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5661474A · Douglas · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 6064319A · Matta · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 7624952B1 · Bartek · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 8477021B2 · Slack · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 9542852B2 · Cross et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10029716B2 · Cross et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20020186135A1 · Wagner · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20040075562A1 · Land · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050068169A1 · Copley et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050134450A1 · Kovach · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20100271214A1 · Frederick · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20110006912A1 · Sheardown et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110278401A1 · Sheardown · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20130143586A1 · Williams et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20150060608A1 · Carlson et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20190039627A1 · Yamamoto · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20210026881A1 · Nakabayashi et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 109254298A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 2006224737A · 2006 [cited by examiner]
JP 2008176600A · 2008 [cited by examiner]
KR 20040060261A · 2002 [cited by examiner]
KR 200326769Y1 · 2003 [cited by examiner]
KR 20110032276A · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018158711A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
Final Office Action from related U.S. Appl. No. 17/077,879, dated Dec. 7, 2023, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Final Office Action in related U.S. Appl. No. 17/077,879, dated Jan. 9, 2024, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]