IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,307,921
Granted Patent B2
US 12,307,921 · App. 16/777,590 · Granted May 20, 2025

Quantitative pilot evaluation during training

Inventors: Can Onur (Bavaria, DE); Pieter van Gils (Madrid, ES); Barend-Jan van Bruchem (Madrid, ES)
Assignee: THE BOEING COMPANY
G09B9/12G09B9/10G09B9/206G09B9/302G09B9/08G09B9/44G09B19/165
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,307,921
App. No.
16/777,590
Granted
May 20, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A device for pilot training includes a memory, an interface, and one or more processors. The memory is configured to store at least one computational model of at least one human sensory system. The interface is configured to receive sensor data and aircraft state data from a flight simulator. The sensor data includes pilot activity data and motion data. The motion data is indicative of detected motion of a simulated aircraft of the flight simulator. The processor(s) are configured to process the motion data and the pilot activity data based on the at least one computational model to predict a pilot estimated aircraft state. The processor(s) are configured to determine an estimated error based on a comparison of the pilot estimated aircraft state and a detected aircraft state. The aircraft state data indicates the detected aircraft state. The processor(s) are configured to provide the estimated error to a second device.

Claims (43)

1. A device for pilot training, the device comprising:

a memory configured to store one or more computational models of one or more human sensory systems;

a plurality of interfaces configured to receive an experience level associated with a pilot using a flight simulator, sensor data, and aircraft state data from the flight simulator, wherein the sensor data comprises pilot activity data and motion data, and wherein the motion data is indicative of detected motion of a simulated aircraft of the flight simulator; and

one or more processors configured to:

adjust the one or more computational models based on the experience level;

process the motion data and the pilot activity data based on the experience level and the one or more computational models to predict a pilot estimated aircraft state;

determine an estimated error based on a comparison of the pilot estimated aircraft state and a detected aircraft state, wherein the aircraft state data indicates the detected aircraft state;

determine a probability that a confidence indicator indicates a confidence in the estimated error;

in response to a determination that the probability is greater than a confidence threshold, determine that the estimated error exceeds an error threshold value, wherein the error threshold value is based on the experience level; and

provide the estimated error to a trainer associated with the flight simulator via a second device to enable the trainer to provide one or more instructions to a user of the flight simulator during use of the flight simulator based on the estimated error exceeding the error threshold value, wherein the one or more instructions comprise an instruction to more frequently observe one or more components of an instrument display.

2. The device of claim 1 , wherein the pilot activity data indicates pilot monitoring activity, pilot control activity, or both.

3. The device of claim 1 , wherein the one or more computational models comprise a vestibular model, a visual model, a proprioceptive model, or a combination thereof.

4. The device of claim 1 , wherein the motion data comprises angular motion data, linear motion data, or both.

5. The device of claim 1 , wherein the detected aircraft state comprises a detected lateral position, a detected longitudinal position, a detected altitude, a detected attitude, a detected linear motion, a detected angular motion, or a combination thereof, of the simulated aircraft.

6. The device of claim 1 , wherein the aircraft state data indicates that the simulated aircraft has the detected aircraft state at a first time, and wherein the one or more processors are configured to predict the pilot estimated aircraft state based, at least in part, on determining that the pilot activity data indicates that an aircraft state indicator is in a line-of-sight of a pilot at a second time and that the second time is within a threshold duration of the first time.

7. The device of claim 6 , wherein the aircraft state indicator comprises the instrument display, a simulated external environmental feature, or both.

8. The device of claim 7 , wherein components of the instrument display comprise an altimeter, an attitude indicator, a heading indicator, an airspeed indicator, a turn coordinator, a vertical speed indicator, a latitude indicator, a longitude indicator, or a combination thereof.

9. The device of claim 1 , wherein the memory is further configured to store an aircraft dynamics model, and wherein the one or more processors are configured to process one or more of the aircraft state data, the motion data, or the pilot activity data based on the aircraft dynamics model to predict the pilot estimated aircraft state.

10. A method of pilot training, the method comprising:

receiving, at a device, sensor data and aircraft state data from a flight simulator, wherein the sensor data comprises pilot activity data and motion data, and wherein the motion data is indicative of detected motion of a simulated aircraft of the flight simulator;

adjusting, at the device, one or more computational models of at least one human sensory system based on an experience level associated with a pilot using the flight simulator;

processing, at the device, the motion data and the pilot activity data based on the experience level and based on the one or more computational models to predict a pilot estimated aircraft state;

determining, at the device, an estimated error based on a comparison of the pilot estimated aircraft state and a detected aircraft state, wherein the aircraft state data indicates the detected aircraft state;

determining a probability that a confidence indicator indicates a confidence in the estimated error;

in response to a determination that the probability is greater than a confidence threshold, determining that the estimated error exceeds an error threshold value, wherein the error threshold value is based on the experience level; and

providing the estimated error to a trainer associated with the flight simulator via a second device to enable the trainer to provide one or more instructions to a user of the flight simulator during use of the flight simulator based on the estimated error exceeding the error threshold value, wherein the one or more instructions comprise an instruction to more frequently observe one or more components of an instrument display.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the pilot activity data comprises first activity sensor data received from a non-contact sensor, second activity sensor data received from a contact sensor, or both.

12. The method of claim 10 , wherein the pilot estimated aircraft state comprises an estimated lateral position, an estimated longitudinal position, an estimated altitude, an estimated attitude, an estimated linear motion, an estimated angular motion, or a combination thereof, of the simulated aircraft.

13. The method of claim 10 , wherein the aircraft state data indicates that the simulated aircraft has the detected aircraft state at a first time, and wherein the pilot estimated aircraft state is predicted based, at least in part, on determining that the pilot activity data indicates that an aircraft state indicator is in a line-of-sight of a pilot at a second time and that the second time is within a threshold duration of the first time.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the aircraft state indicator comprises the instrument display, a simulated external environmental feature, or both.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the instrument display comprises an altimeter, an attitude indicator, a heading indicator, an airspeed indicator, a turn coordinator, a vertical speed indicator, a latitude indicator, a longitude indicator, or a combination thereof.

16. A computer-readable storage device storing instructions that, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to initiate, perform, or control operations to:

receive sensor data and aircraft state data from a flight simulator, wherein the sensor data comprises pilot activity data of a pilot and motion data, and wherein the motion data is indicative of detected motion of a simulated aircraft of the flight simulator;

adjust one or more computational models based on an experience level of the pilot;

process the motion data and the pilot activity data based on the experience level and based on one or more computational models to predict a pilot estimated aircraft state;

determine an estimated error based on a comparison of the pilot estimated aircraft state and a detected aircraft state, wherein the aircraft state data indicates the detected aircraft state;

determine a probability that a confidence indicator indicates a confidence in the estimated error;

in response to a determination that the probability is greater than a confidence threshold, determine that the estimated error exceeds an error threshold value, wherein the error threshold value is based on the experience level; and

provide the estimated error to a trainer associated with the flight simulator via a device to enable the trainer to provide one or more instructions to a user of the flight simulator during use of the flight simulator based on the estimated error exceeding that error threshold value, wherein the one or more instructions comprise an instruction to more frequently observe one or more components of an instrument display.

17. The computer-readable storage device of claim 16 , wherein the detected aircraft state comprises a detected lateral position, a detected longitudinal position, a detected altitude, a detected attitude, a detected linear motion, a detected angular motion, or a combination thereof, of the simulated aircraft.

18. The computer-readable storage device of claim 17 , wherein the pilot estimated aircraft state comprises an estimated lateral position, an estimated longitudinal position, an estimated altitude, an estimated attitude, an estimated linear motion, an estimated angular motion, or a combination thereof, of the simulated aircraft.

19. The computer-readable storage device of claim 18 , wherein the estimated error is based on one or more of a difference between the detected lateral position and the estimated lateral position, the detected longitudinal position and the estimated longitudinal position, the detected altitude and the estimated altitude, the detected attitude and the estimated attitude, the detected linear motion and the estimated linear motion, or the detected angular motion and the estimated angular motion.

20. The computer-readable storage device of claim 16 , wherein the aircraft state data indicates that the simulated aircraft has the detected aircraft state at a first time, and wherein the pilot estimated aircraft state is predicted based, at least in part, on determining that the pilot activity data indicates that an aircraft state indicator is in a line-of-sight of a pilot at a second time and that the second time is within a threshold duration of the first time.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 30, 2020
From: ONUR, CAN; VAN GILS, PIETER; VAN BRUCHEM, BAREND-JAN
To: THE BOEING COMPANY
Reel/Frame 051677/0461 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20210241645A1 · Aug 5, 2021
References Cited (30)
US 5075881A · Blomberg · 1991 [cited by examiner]
US 20080082372A1 · Burch · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20130268146A1 · Baudry · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130323688A1 · Whitlow et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20150022380A1 · Conner et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150251771A1 · Whitlow et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150269860A1 · Shaw · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160210871A1 · Wokurka · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170148340A1 · Popa-Simil · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170243505A1 · Dimock · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20190130769A1 · Bravo et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200118366A1 · Ryan · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20220111852A1 · Harris · 2022 [cited by examiner]
“NASA TLX Task Load Index,” National Aeronautics and Space Administration, retrieved Nov. 21, 2019, 1 pg. [cited by applicant]
Boy, Guy Andre, “Requirements for Single Pilot Operations in Commercial Aviation: A First High-Level Cognitive Function Analysis,” Complex Systems Design and Management International Conference, Paris, France, 2014, 8 p… [cited by applicant]
Brandt, Summer L. et al., “Pilot situation awareness and its implications for single pilot operations: Analysis of a human-in-the-loop study,” Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 3, 2015, pp. 3017-3024. [cited by applicant]
Charles, Rebecca L. et al., Measuring mental workload using physiological measures: A systematic review,: Applied Ergonomics vol. 74, 2019, pp. 221-232. [cited by applicant]
Chen, Haibing et al., “Pilot Control Behavior Analysis Using Cutoff Frequency and Power Frequency for a Civil Transport Aircraft Encountering Turbulence Based on Flight Simulation,” Science Direct, Procedia Engineering,… [cited by applicant]
Merfeld, Danieli M. et al., “A Multidimensional Model of the Effect of Gravity on the Spatial Orientation of the Monkey,” Journal of Vestibular Research, vol. 3, 1993, pp. 141-161. [cited by applicant]
Newman, David G., “An overview of spatial disorientation as a factor in aviation accidents and incidents,” ATSB Transport Safety Investigation Report, Aviation Research and Analysis Report , 2007, 44 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Onur, Can, “Developing a Computational Model of the Pilot's Best Possible Expectation of Aircraft State Given Vestibular and Visual Cues,” A Thesis Presented to the Academic Faculty in partial fulfillment of the Require… [cited by applicant]
Onur, Can, et al., Pilot Perception and Control Behavior Models as a Tool to Assess Motion-Cueing Algorithms, AIAA Aviation Forum, Jun. 2017, AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, pp. 1-14. [cited by applicant]
Pilot Flying (PF) and Pilot Monitoring (PM) , retrieved Jan. 29, 2019, 3 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Pommellet, Pierre E., “Suboptimal Estimator for the Spatial Orientation of a Pilot,” Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics at the Massac… [cited by applicant]
Roscoe, A. H., “Assessing pilot workload. Why measure heart rate, HRV and respiration?” Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1992, Biological Psychology, vol. 34, pp. 259-287. [cited by applicant]
Wilson, G. F., et al., “Physiological Data Used to Measure Pilot Workload in Actual Flight and Simulator Conditions,” Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 31st Annual Meeting, 1987, pp. 779-783. [cited by applicant]
Young, L. R., “The Current Status of Vestibular System Models,” Automatica, vol. 5,Pergamon Press, pp. 369-383. [cited by applicant]
Bozan, Anil et al., “Applying a model-based observer to estimate pilot expectation,I” IEEE/AIAA 33rd Digital Avionics Systems Conference, IEEE, Oct. 5, 2014, DOI: 10.1109/DASC.2014.6979426, pp. 2C1-1-2C1-2. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for application No. 21154431.7 dated Jul. 13, 2021, 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for application No. 21154431.7, dated Feb. 21, 2024, pp. 1-9. [cited by applicant]