IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,312,408
Granted Patent B2
US 12,312,408 · App. 18/451,047 · Granted May 27, 2025

Multispecific anti-TCR delta variable 1 antibodies

Inventors: Mihriban Tuna (Cambridge, GB); Mark Uden (London, GB); Joshua Freedman (London, GB); Natalie Mount (London, GB)
Assignees: GammaDelta Therapeutics Ltd; F-star Therapeutics Limited
C07K16/2863C07K16/2809C07K2317/31
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,312,408
App. No.
18/451,047
Granted
May 27, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present invention provides multispecific antibodies comprising a Fab region and an Fc region, wherein the Fab region comprises a binding site specific for an epitope of the variable delta 1 (Vδ1) chain of a γδ T cell receptor (TCR); and the Fc region comprises an EGFR binding site. The present invention also provides compositions and pharmaceutical compositions comprising such multispecific antibodies, and method of making such multispecific antibodies. The present invention also provides methods of treatment and medical uses involving the multispecific antibodies.

Claims (39)

1. A multispecific antibody comprising:

a variable delta 1 (Vδ1) chain of a γδ T cell receptor (TCR) binding site, comprising:

(i) a VHCDR1, a VHCDR2 and a VHCDR3 comprising the amino acid sequences of SEQ ID NO: 130, 131 and 133, respectively, and a VLCDR1, a VLCDR2 and a VLCDR3 comprising the amino acid sequences of SEQ ID NOs: 79, 80 and 83, respectively;

(ii) a VHCDR1, a VHCDR2 and a VHCDR3 comprising the amino acid sequences of SEQ ID NO: 51, 53, and 68, respectively; and a VLCDR1, VLCDR2, and a VLCDR3 of SEQ ID NO: 79, 80 and 95, respectively; or

(iii) a VHCDR1, a VHCDR2 and a VHCDR3 comprising the amino acid sequences of SEQ ID NO: 130, 131 and 136, respectively, and a VLCDR1, a VLCDR2 and a VLCDR3 comprising the amino acid sequences of SEQ ID NOs: 79, 80 and 86, respectively;

and

a fragment crystallizable (Fc) region that comprises an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) binding site in the CH3 domain of the Fc region in which, according to EU antibody numbering:

a. residues 359 to 362 comprise EEGP (SEQ ID NO: 523), residues 384 to 386 comprise TYG (SEQ ID NO:511), and residues 413 to 419 comprise SYWRWYK (SEQ ID NO: 512);

b. residues 359 to 362 comprise EEGP (SEQ ID NO: 523), and residues 413 to 419 comprise SYWRWYK (SEQ ID NO: 512);

c. residues 359 to 362 comprise EEGP (SEQ ID NO: 523) and residues 413 to 415 comprise SYW (SEQ ID NO: 533);

d. residues 359 to 362 comprise EEGP (SEQ ID NO: 523), residues 384 to 386 comprise TYG (SEQ ID NO: 511), and residues 413 to 415 comprise SYW (SEQ ID NO: 533);

e. residues 358 to 361, 361.1 and 362 comprise LDEGGP (SEQ ID NO: 542), residues 384 to 386 comprise TYG (SEQ ID NO: 511), and residues 413 to 419 comprise SYWRWVK (SEQ ID NO: 543);

f. residues 384 to 386 comprise TYG (SEQ ID NO: 511), and residues 413 to 419 comprise SYWRWYK (SEQ ID NO: 512);

g. residues 358 to 362 comprise TDDGP (SEQ ID NO: 560), residues 384 to 386 comprise TYG (SEQ ID NO: 511), and residues 413 to 419 comprise SYWRWYK (SEQ ID NO: 512); or

h. residues 358 to 362 comprise TESGP (SEQ ID NO: 553), residues 384 to 386 comprise KFG (SEQ ID NO: 554), residues 413 to 421 comprise SNLRWTKGH (SEQ ID NO: 555), and residue 378 is valine.

2. The multispecific antibody of claim 1 , wherein the EGFR binding site is in the CH3 domain in which, according to EU antibody numbering:

a. residues 355 to 362 form an AB loop comprising RDELEEGP (SEQ ID NO: 524) and residues 413 to 422 form an EF loop comprising SYWRWYKGNV (SEQ ID NO: 515);

b. residues 355 to 362 form an AB loop comprising RDELEEGP (SEQ ID NO: 524), residues 383 to 391 form a CD loop comprising STYGPENNY (SEQ ID NO: 514) and residues 413 to 422 form an EF loop comprising SYWRWYKGNV (SEQ ID NO: 515);

c. residues 355 to 362 form an AB loop comprising RDELEEGP (SEQ ID NO: 524), residues 383 to 391 form a CD loop comprising SNGQPENNY (SEQ ID NO: 525) and residues 413 to 422 form an EF loop comprising SYWRWYKGNV (SEQ ID NO: 515);

d. residues 355 to 362 form an AB loop comprising RDELEEGP (SEQ ID NO: 524) residues 413 to 422 form an EF loop comprising SYWRWQQGNV (SEQ ID NO: 534);

e. residues 355 to 362 form an AB loop comprising RDELEEGP (SEQ ID NO: 524), residues 383 to 391 form a CD loop comprising STYGPENNY (SEQ ID NO: 514) and residues 413 to 422 form an EF loop comprising SYWRWQQGNV (SEQ ID NO: 534);

f. residues 355 to 362 form an AB loop comprising RDELDEGGP (SEQ ID NO: 544), residues 383 to 391 form a CD loop comprising STYGPENNY (SEQ ID NO: 514), and residues 413 to 422 form an EF loop comprising SYWRWVKGNV (SEQ ID NO: 545);

g. residues 355 to 362 form an AB loop comprising RDELTKNQ (SEQ ID NO: 513), residues 383 to 391 form a CD loop comprising STYGPENNY (SEQ ID NO: 514) and residues 413 to 422 form an EF loop comprising SYWRWYKGNV (SEQ ID NO: 515);

h. residues 355 to 362 form an AB loop comprising RDETDDGP (SEQ ID NO: 561), residues 383 to 391 according to form a CD loop comprising STYGPENNY (SEQ ID NO: 514), residues 413 to 422 form an EF loop comprising SYWRWYKGNV (SEQ ID NO: 515); or

i. residues 355 to 362 form an AB loop comprising RDETESGP (SEQ ID NO: 556), residues 383 to 391 form a CD loop comprising SKFGPENNY (SEQ ID NO: 557), residues 413 to 422 form an EF loop comprising SNLRWTKGHV (SEQ ID NO: 558) and residue 378 is valine.

3. The multispecific antibody of claim 1 , wherein the EGFR binding site CH3 domain does not comprise a CH3 domain in which, according to EU antibody numbering:

a. residues 358 to 362 comprise TDDGP (SEQ ID NO: 560), residues 384 to 386 comprise TYG (SEQ ID NO: 511), and residues 413 to 419 comprise SYWRWYK (SEQ ID NO: 512); or

b. residues 355 to 362 form an AB loop comprising RDETDDGP (SEQ ID NO: 561), residues 383 to 391 form a CD loop comprising STYGPENNY (SEQ ID NO: 514), residues 413 to 422 form an EF loop comprising SYWRWYKGNV (SEQ ID NO: 515).

4. The multispecific antibody of claim 1 , wherein the CH3 domain is a human IgG CH3 domain.

5. The multispecific antibody of claim 4 , wherein the Fc region is a human IgG Fc region.

6. The multispecific antibody of claim 1 , wherein the antibody is Fc enabled.

7. The multispecific antibody of claim 1 , wherein the Vδ1 TCR binding site is in a Fab region of the multispecific antibody.

8. The multispecific antibody of claim 7 , wherein the Fab region comprises an amino acid residue other than serine at position 74, according to the IMGT numbering system.

9. A pharmaceutical composition comprising the multispecific antibody of claim 1 and a pharmaceutically acceptable diluent or carrier.

10. A method of treating an EGFR expressing cancer in a subject, comprising administering to the subject the multispecific antibody of claim 1 .

11. The multispecific antibody of claim 7 , wherein the Vδ1 TCR binding site comprises the VHCDR1, the VHCDR2 and the VHCDR3 comprising the amino acid sequences of SEQ ID NO: 130, 131 and 133, respectively, and the VLCDR1, the VLCDR2 and the VLCDR3 comprising the amino acid sequences of SEQ ID NOs: 79, 80 and 83, respectively.

12. The multispecific antibody of claim 1 , wherein the Vδ1 TCR binding site comprises the VHCDR1, the VHCDR2 and the VHCDR3 comprising the amino acid sequences of SEQ ID NO: 130, 131 and 136, respectively, and the VLCDR1, the VLCDR2 and the VLCDR3 comprising the amino acid sequences of SEQ ID NOs: 79, 80 and 86, respectively.

13. The multispecific antibody of claim 1 , wherein the Vδ1 TCR binding site comprises the VHCDR1, the VHCDR2 and the VHCDR3 comprises the amino acid sequences of SEQ ID NO: 51, 53 and 68, respectively, and the VLCDR1, the VLCDR2 and the VLCDR3 comprises the amino acid sequences of SEQ ID NOs: 79, 80 and 95, respectively.

14. The multispecific antibody of claim 8 , wherein the residue at position 74 according to the IMGT numbering system is a leucine residue.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 14, 2025
From: ADAPTATE BIOTHERAPEUTICS LTD
To: F-STAR THERAPEUTICS LIMITED
Reel/Frame 070825/0575 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 14, 2025
From: ADAPTATE BIOTHERAPEUTICS LTD
To: GAMMADELTA THERAPEUTICS LTD
Reel/Frame 070825/0581 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 14, 2025
From: TUNA, MIHRIBAN; UDEN, MARK; FREEDMAN, JOSHUA; MOUNT, NATALIE
To: ADAPTATE BIOTHERAPEUTICS LIMITED
Reel/Frame 070825/0630 →
Priority Claims (2)
GB 2102224 · Feb 17, 2021 · national
GB 2111685 · Aug 14, 2021 · national
Continuity (2)
Continuation PCTEP2022054011 · Feb 17, 2022
Related Publication 20240132599A1 · Apr 25, 2024
References Cited (105)
US 9334331B2 · Igawa · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 10421807B2 · Gonzales · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 11629193B2 · Tuna · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20190119634A1 · Jakobovits et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20220403025A1 · Mount et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230028110A1 · Tuna · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230090901A1 · Polyakova et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240376215A1 · Tuna · 2024 [cited by examiner]
JP 2019519210A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO03080672A1 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016166544A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016198480A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017197347A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019147735A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020060406A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020159368A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021032960A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021032961A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021032963A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2022175414A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
Al Qaraghuli et al. (2020, Nature Scientific Reports 10:13969). [cited by examiner]
Edwards et al. (2003, JMB 334:103-118). [cited by examiner]
Lloyd et al. (2009, Protein Engineering, Eng. Design & Selection 22(3): 159-168). [cited by examiner]
Goel et al. (2004, J. Immunol. 173: 7358-7367). [cited by examiner]
Khan et al. (2014, J. Immunol. 192: 5398-5405). [cited by examiner]
Poosarla et al. (2017, Biotechn. Bioeng. 114(6): 1331-1342). [cited by examiner]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/GB2020/051959, mailed Mar. 3, 2022. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/GB2020/051959, mailed Oct. 30, 2020. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/EP2022/054011, mailed May 30, 2022. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/EP2022/054011, mailed Aug. 31, 2023. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/EP2022/054004, mailed May 24, 2022. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/EP2022/054004, mailed Aug. 31, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Almagro et al., Progress and Challenges in the Design and Clinical Development of Antibodies for Cancer Therapy. Front Immunol. Jan. 4, 2018:8:1751. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01751. eCollection 2017. [cited by applicant]
Brown et al., Tolerance of single, but not multiple, amino acid replacements in antibody VH CDR 2: a means of minimizing B cell wastage from somatic hypermutation? J Immunol. May 1, 1996;156(9):3285-91. [cited by applicant]
Chitadze et al., The Ambiguous Role of γδ T Lymphocytes in Antitumor Immunity. Trends Immunol. Sep. 2017;38(9):668-678. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2017.06.004. Epub Jul. 11, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Chiu et al., Antibody Structure and Function: The Basis for Engineering Therapeutics. Antibodies (Basel). Dec. 3, 2019;8(4):55. doi: 10.3390/antib8040055. [cited by applicant]
Davey et al., Clonal selection in the human V81 T cell repertoire indicates γδ TCR-dependent adaptive immune surveillance. Nat Commun. Mar. 1, 2017;8:14760. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14760. [cited by applicant]
De Bruin et al., A bispecific nanobody approach to leverage the potent and widely applicable tumor cytolytic capacity of Vγ9Vδ2-T cells. Oncoimmunology. Oct. 20, 2017;7(1):e1375641. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2017.1375641. e… [cited by applicant]
De Weerdt et al., A Bispecific Single-Domain Antibody Boosts Autologous Vγ9Vδ2-T Cell Responses Toward CD1d in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. Mar. 15, 2021;27(6):1744-1755. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-… [cited by applicant]
Deniger et al., Clinical applications of gamma delta T cells with multivalent immunity. Front Immunol. Dec. 11, 2014;5:636. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00636. eCollection 2014. [cited by applicant]
Fisher et al., Engineering Approaches in Human Gamma Delta T Cells for Cancer Immunotherapy. Front Immunol. Jun. 26, 2018;9:1409. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01409. eCollection 2018. [cited by applicant]
Garber, γδ T cells bring unconventional cancer-targeting to the clinic—again. Nat Biotechnol. Apr. 2020;38(4):389-391. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0487-2. [cited by applicant]
Knight et al., Human Vdeltal gamma-delta T cells exert potent specific cytotoxicity against primary multiple myeloma cells. Cytotherapy. Oct. 2012;14(9):1110-8. doi: 10.3109/14653249.2012.700766. Epub Jul. 17, 2012. [cited by applicant]
Oberg et al., Bispecific antibodies enhance tumor-infiltrating T cell cytotoxicity against autologous HER-2-expressing high-grade ovarian tumors. J Leukoc Biol. Jun. 2020;107(6):1081-1095. doi: 10.1002/JLB.5MA1119-265R.… [cited by applicant]
Oberg et al., Novel bispecific antibodies increase γδ T-cell cytotoxicity against pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Res. Mar. 1, 2014;74(5):1349-60. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0675. Epub Jan. 21, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Romagné et al., Structural analysis of γδ TCR using a novel set of TCR γ and δ chain-specific monoclonal antibodies generated against soluble γδ TCR: Evidence for a specific conformation adopted by the Jδ2 region and fo… [cited by applicant]
Rudikoff et al., Single amino acid substitution altering antigen-binding specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Mar. 1982;79(6):1979-83. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.6.1979. [cited by applicant]
Sebestyen et al., Translating gammadelta (y8) T cells and their receptors into cancer cell therapies. Nat Rev Drug Discov. Mar. 2020;19(3):169-184. doi: 10.1038/s41573-019-0038-z. Epub Sep. 6, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Siegers et al., Cytotoxic and regulatory properties of circulating Vδ1+ γδ T cells: a new player on the cell therapy field? Mol Ther. Aug. 2014;22(8):1416-1422. doi: 10.1038/mt.2014.104. Epub Jun. 4, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees for Application No. PCT/GB2021/050459, mailed Jun. 7, 2021. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/GB2021/050459, mailed Jul. 28, 2021. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/GB2021/050459, mailed Sep. 9, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Abeler-Dörner et al., Butyrophilins: an emerging family of immune regulators. Trends Immunol. Jan. 2012;33(1):34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2011.09.007. Epub Oct. 24, 2011. [cited by applicant]
Almeida et al., Delta One T Cells for Immunotherapy of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Clinical-Grade Expansion/Differentiation and Preclinical Proof of Concept. Clin Cancer Res. Dec. 1, 2016;22(23):5795-5804. doi: 10.115… [cited by applicant]
Aruda et al., Impact of gd T cells on clinical outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood Adv. 2019; 3 (21): 3436-3448. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.201900068… [cited by applicant]
Blink et al., γδ T cell subsets play opposing roles in regulating experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Cell Immunol. Jul. 2014;290(1):39-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2014.04.013. Epub May 10, 2014. Author Manuscript… [cited by applicant]
Catellani et al., Expansion of Vdeltal T lymphocytes producing IL-4 in low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphomas expressing UL-16-binding proteins. Blood. Mar. 1, 2007;109(5):2078-85. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-06-028985. Epub Sep. … [cited by applicant]
Cordova et al., Characterization of human γδ T lymphocytes infiltrating primary malignant melanomas. Plos ONE. 2012;7(11):e49878. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049878. Epub Nov. 26, 2012. [cited by applicant]
Davodeau et al., Surface expression of two distinct functional antigen receptors on human gamma delta T cells. Science. Jun. 18, 1993;260(5115):1800-2. doi: 10.1126/science.8390096. [cited by applicant]
De Libero et al., Selection by two powerful antigens may account for the presence of the major population of human peripheral gamma/delta T cells. J Exp Med. Jun. 1, 1991;173(6):1311-22. doi: 10.1084/jem.173.6.1311. [cited by applicant]
Di Lorenzo et al., Broad Cytotoxic Targeting of Acute Myeloid Leukemia by Polyclonal Delta One T Cells. Cancer Immunol Res. Apr. 2019;7(4):552-558. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0647. Epub Mar. 20, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Dondelinger et al., Understanding the Significance and Implications of Antibody Numbering and Antigen-Binding Surface/Residue Definition. Front Immunol. Oct. 16, 2018:9:2278. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02278. eCollection 2… [cited by applicant]
Dutta et al., Apoptosis Induced via Gamma Delta T Cell Antigen Receptor “Blocking” Antibodies: A Cautionary Tale. Front Immunol. Jun. 30, 2017:8:776. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00776. eCollection 2017. [cited by applicant]
Ferrarini et al., Killing of laminin receptor-positive human lung cancers by tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes bearing yo+ T-cell receptors. J Natl Cancer Inst. Apr. 3, 1996;88(7):436-41. doi: 10.1093/jnci/88.7.436. [cited by applicant]
Fisher et al., Neuroblastoma killing properties of Vδ2 and Vδ2-negative γδT cells following expansion by artificial antigen-presenting cells. Clin Cancer Res. Nov. 15, 2014;20(22):5720-32. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-… [cited by applicant]
Gentles et al., The prognostic landscape of genes and infiltrating immune cells across human cancers. Nat Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC May 2, 2016. Published in final edited form as: Nat Med. Aug. 2015; 21(8… [cited by applicant]
Godder et al., Long term disease-free survival in acute leukemia patients recovering with increased gammadelta T cells after partially mismatched related donor bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. Jun. 2… [cited by applicant]
Groh et al., Broad tumor-associated expression and recognition by tumor-derived gamma delta T cells of MICA and MICB. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jun. 8, 1999;96(12):6879-84. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.12.6879. [cited by applicant]
Jefferis et al., Human immunoglobulin allotypes: possible implications for immunogenicity. Mabs. Jul.-Aug. 2009;1(4):332-8. doi: 10.4161/mabs.1.4.9122. [cited by applicant]
Khairallah et al., γδ T cells confer protection against murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV). PLoS Pathog. Mar. 6, 2015;11(3):e1004702. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004702. eCollection Mar. 2015. [cited by applicant]
Kim et al., Spectrum of EGFR Gene Copy No. Changes and KRAS Gene Mutation Status in Korean Triple Negative Breast Cancer Patients. PLoS One. Oct. 30, 2013;8(10):e79014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079014. eCollection 201… [cited by applicant]
Kitayama et al., Functional analysis of TCR gamma delta+ T cells in tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) of human pancreatic cancer. Clin Exp Immunol. Sep. 1993;93(3):442-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.1993.tb08198.x. [cited by applicant]
Langerak et al., Immunophenotypic and immunogenotypic characteristics of TCRgammadelta+ T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia. Feb. 1999;13(2):206-14. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2401276. [cited by applicant]
Licitra et al., Evaluation of EGFR gene copy No. as a predictive biomarker for the efficacy of cetuximab in combination with chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinom… [cited by applicant]
Luoma et al., Crystal structure of Vδ1 T cell receptor in complex with CD1d-sulfatide shows MHC-like recognition of a self-lipid by human γδ T cells. Immunity. Dec. 12, 2013;39(6):1032-42. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.11.… [cited by applicant]
Maeurer et al., Human intestinal Vdelta1+ lymphocytes recognize tumor cells of epithelial origin. J Exp Med. Apr. 1, 1996;183(4):1681-96. doi: 10.1084/jem.183.4.1681. [cited by applicant]
Mahvi et al., Overexpression of 27-kDa heat-shock protein in MCF-7 breast cancer cells: effects on lymphocyte-mediated killing by natural killer and gamma delta T cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother. Aug. 1993;37(3):181-6.… [cited by applicant]
Mayassi et al., Chronic Inflammation Permanently Reshapes Tissue-Resident Immunity in Celiac Disease. Cell. Feb. 21, 2019;176(5):967-981.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.039. Epub Feb. 7, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Mikulak et al., NKp46-expressing human gut-resident intraepithelial VδT cell subpopulation exhibits high antitumor activity against colorectal cancer. JCI Insight. Dec. 19, 2019;4(24):e125884. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.1… [cited by applicant]
No Author Listed, Purified anti-mouse TCR V[gamma]4 Antibody Antigen. Biolegend. Version 1. Last revised: Aug. 10, 2020. Retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://www.biolegend.com/en-ie/global-elements/pdf-popup/purifi… [cited by applicant]
Poccia et al., Anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus immune responses: the role played by V gamma 9V delta 2 T cells. J Infect Dis. May 1, 2006;193(9):1244-9. doi: 10.1086/502975. Epub Mar. 27, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Sela-Culang et al., The structural basis of antibody-antigen recognition. Front Immunol. Oct. 8, 2013:4:302. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00302. [cited by applicant]
Tamura et al., Structural Correlates of an Anticarcinoma Antibody: Identification of Specificity-Determining Residues (SDRs) and Development of a Minimally Immunogenic Antibody Variant by Retention of SDRs Only. J Immun… [cited by applicant]
Van Dorp et al., Therapeutic Potential of Gammadelta T-Cells in Controlling CMV After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2011; 17(2): S217. [cited by applicant]
Wu et al., An innate-like Vδ1+ γδ T cell compartment in the human breast is associated with remission in triple-negative breast cancer. Sci Transl Med. Oct. 9, 2019;11(513):eaax9364. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aax9364. [cited by applicant]
Wu et al., Ex vivo expanded human circulating Vδ1 γδT cells exhibit favorable therapeutic potential for colon cancer. OncoImmunology. Jan. 22, 2015;4(3):e992749. doi: 10.4161/2162402X.2014.992749. eCollection Mar. 2015. [cited by applicant]
Xu et al., Crystal structure of a γδ T-cell receptor specific for the human MHC class I homolog MICA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Feb. 8, 2011;108(6):2414-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1015433108. Epub Jan. 24, 2011. [cited by applicant]
Yamashiro et al., Stimulation of human butyrophilin 3 molecules results in negative regulation of cellular immunity. J Leukoc Biol. Oct. 2010;88(4):757-67. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0309156. Epub Jul. 7, 2010. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., Epidermal growth factor receptor expression and gene copy No. analysis in gastric carcinoma samples from Chinese patients. Oncol Lett. Jan. 2016;11(1):173-181. doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.3875. Epub Nov. 5, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Zhao et al., Protective Role of y8 T Cells in Different Pathogen Infections and Its Potential Clinical Application. J Immunol Res. Jul. 10, 2018:2018:5081634. doi: 10.1155/2018/5081634. eCollection 2018. [cited by applicant]
An et al., IgG2m4, an engineered antibody isotype with reduced Fc function. MAbs. Nov.-Dec. 2009;1(6):572-9. doi: 10.4161/mabs.1.6.10185. [cited by applicant]
Crescioli et al., IgG4 Characteristics and Functions in Cancer Immunity. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. Jan. 2016;16(1):7. doi: 10.1007/s11882-015-0580-7. [cited by applicant]
Gonzales et al., Minimizing the Immunogenicity of Antibodies for Clinical Application. Tumour Biol. Jan.-Feb. 2005;26(1):31-43. doi: 10.1159/000084184. [cited by applicant]
Kontermann, Strategies to Extend Plasma Half-Lives of Recombinant Antibodies. BioDrugs. 2009;23(2):93-109. doi: 10.2165/00063030-200923020-00003. [cited by applicant]
Kunik et al., Structural Consensus among Antibodies Defines the Antigen Binding Site. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(2):e1002388. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002388. Epub Feb. 23, 2012. [cited by applicant]
Liu, Pharmacokinetics of monoclonal antibodies and Fc-fusion proteins. Protein Cell. Jan. 2018;9(1):15-32. doi: 10.1007/s13238-017-0408-4. Epub Apr. 19, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Lucchese et al., How a single amino acid change may alter the immunological information of a peptide. Front Biosci (Elite Ed). Jan. 1, 2012;4(5):1843-52. doi: 10.2741/e506. [cited by applicant]
Mix et al., Immunoglobulins—Basic considerations. J Neurol. Sep. 2006:253 Suppl 5:V9-17. doi: 10.1007/s00415-006-5002-2. [cited by applicant]
Panka et al., Variable region framework differences result in decreased or increased affinity of variant anti-digoxin antibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. May 1988;85(9):3080-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.9.3080. [cited by applicant]
Strohl et al., Therapeutic antibody classes. Chapter 9 in: Therapeutic Antibody Engineering: Current and Future Advances Driving the Strongest Growth Area in the Pharmaceutical Industry. 1st edition. Woodhead Publishing… [cited by applicant]
Ternant et al., Pharmacokinetics and concentration-effect relationships of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies and fusion proteins. Expert Opin Biol Ther. Sep. 2005:5 Suppl 1:S37-47. doi: 10.1517/14712598.5.1.s37. [cited by applicant]
Vidarsson et al., IgG subclasses and allotypes: from structure to effector functions. Front Immunol. Oct. 20, 2014:5:520. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00520. eCollection 2014. [cited by applicant]
Wark et al., Latest technologies for the enhancement of antibody affinityB. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. Aug. 7, 2006;58(5-6):657-70. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2006.01.025. Epub May 22, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Wu et al., Humanization of a Murine Monoclonal Antibody by Simultaneous Optimization of Framework and CDR Residues. J Mol Biol. Nov. 19, 1999;294(1):151-62. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3141. [cited by applicant]
Xenaki et al., Antibody or Antibody Fragments: Implications for Molecular Imaging and Targeted Therapy of Solid Tumors. Front Immunol. Oct. 12, 2017:8:1287. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01287. eCollection 2017. [cited by applicant]
Cited By (2)
US 12,698,328 US 12,703,746