IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,317,161
Granted Patent B2
US 12,317,161 · App. 18/266,177 · Granted May 27, 2025

Method for sending a vehicle-to-x message by a sender, method for processing a vehicle-to-x-message, and a vehicle-to-x-communications module

Inventors: Andreas Andrae (Frankfurt am Main, DE); Marc Menzel (Weimar, DE); Richard Scherping (Liederbach am Taunus, DE)
Assignee: Continental Automotive Technologies GmbH
H04W4/40
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,317,161
App. No.
18/266,177
Granted
May 27, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Disclosed is a method for sending a vehicle-to-x-message including an information part and a safety part, wherein the safety part comprises information that can be used to evaluate quality and reliability of the information contained in the information part regarding its usability and qualification for safety-related driving functions and tasks. Also disclosed is a corresponding method for receiving and a corresponding vehicle-to-x-communications module.

Claims (62)

1. Method for sending a vehicle-to-x-message by a sender, wherein the vehicle-to-x-message comprises:

an information part, and

a safety part,

wherein the information part comprises information characterizing the sender and/or data measured and/or calculated by the sender, and

wherein the safety part comprises safety information relating to resistance against technical failures that have not been initiated deliberately of one or more entities of the sender measuring, calculating, transmitting and/or processing the information.

2. The method according to claim 1 ,

wherein the safety part comprises at least one safety level characterizing an entity and/or a provided information grade.

3. The method according to claim 1 ,

wherein the safety part comprises at least one failure rate of a bus system transmitting the information before sending.

4. The method according to claim 1 ,

wherein the safety part comprises at least one indication of a software development process, hardware development process, data generation process, safety engineering standard or processing grade used for developing software of an entity.

5. The method according to claim 1 ,

wherein the safety part comprises a respective predicted validity time for one, some or all information.

6. The method according to claim 5 ,

wherein the validity time is, at least inter alia, calculated based on previous measurements or calculations and/or previous validity values.

7. The method according to claim 1 ,

wherein the safety part comprises at least one indication of an error model of an entity.

8. The method according to claim 1 ,

wherein the safety part comprises at least one confidence, variance, details of an underlying error model of an entity, and/or an absolute or relative validity time of data generated by an entity.

9. The method according to claim 1 ,

wherein the safety part comprises meta-data and/or a multidimensional failure vector.

10. The method according to claim 1 ,

wherein the safety information is continuously updated.

11. The method according to claim 1 ,

wherein the information part comprises one or more of sensor data, speed sensor data, heading data, yaw rate data, acceleration data, curvature data, path history data, radar data, lidar data, steering angle data, position data, camera data, map data, object data, maneuver-related data, intended or planned driving trajectory and/or course data.

12. The method according to claim 1 ,

wherein also vehicle-to-x-messages without a safety part are sent, and

wherein vehicle-to-x-messages including a safety part are only or at least sent in response to one or more pre-defined events and/or automated driving policy or function and/or detected entities near the sender and/or in response to a received request.

13. The method according to claim 1 ,

wherein the information part comprises tolerance bands for one, some or all information.

14. Method for processing a vehicle-to-x-message, the method comprising:

receiving a vehicle-to-x-message comprising an information part and a safety part, wherein the safety part comprises safety information relating to resistance against technical failures that have not been initiated deliberately,

identifying a task and/or function in which the vehicle-to-x-message is relevant,

assessing, based on the safety part and/or the information part, whether information quality or data quality of the vehicle-to-x-message is sufficient for the task, and

performing the task based at least on the vehicle-to-x-message only if the information quality and/or data quality is sufficient.

15. The method according to claim 14 ,

further comprising:

sending a request for further safety data if the data quality and/or safety cannot be determined sufficiently based on the safety data and/or the information.

16. The method according to claim 14 ,

wherein the task is at least one of a lane change, reducing speed and in-lane stopping.

17. Vehicle-to-x-communications module configured to perform the method according to claim 1 .

18. Vehicle-to-x-communications module configured to perform the method according to claim 14 .

19. The method according to claim 15 ,

wherein the task is at least one of a lane change, reducing speed and in-lane stopping.

20. Method for sending a vehicle-to-x message by a sender, wherein the vehicle-to-x message comprises:

an information part, and

a safety part,

wherein the information part comprises information characterizing the sender and/or data measured and/or calculated by the sender, and

wherein the safety part comprises safety information relating to one or more entities of the sender measuring, calculating, transmitting and/or processing the information,

wherein the safety part comprises at least one safety level characterizing an entity and/or a provided information grade;

wherein the safety part comprises at least one failure rate of a bus system transmitting the information before sending;

wherein the safety part comprises at least one indication of a software development process, hardware development process, data generation process, safety engineering standard or processing grade used for developing software of an entity;

wherein the safety part comprises a respective predicted validity time for one, some or all information;

wherein the validity time is, at least inter alia, calculated based on previous measurements or calculations and/or previous validity values;

wherein the safety part comprises at least one indication of an error model of an entity;

wherein the safety part comprises at least one confidence, variance, details of an underlying error model of an entity, and/or an absolute or relative validity time of data generated by an entity;

wherein the safety part comprises meta-data and/or a multidimensional failure vector;

wherein the safety information is continuously updated;

wherein the information part comprises one or more of sensor data, speed sensor data, heading data, yaw rate data, acceleration data, curvature data, path history data, radar data, lidar data, steering angle data, position data, camera data, map data, object data, maneuver-related data, intended or planned driving trajectory and/or course data;

wherein also vehicle-to-x-messages without a safety part are sent, and

wherein vehicle-to-x-messages including a safety part are only or at least sent in response to one or more pre-defined events and/or automated driving policy or function and/or detected entities near the sender and/or in response to a received request; and

wherein the information part comprises tolerance bands for one, some or all information.

Assignments (1)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE SERIAL NUMBER PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 064510 FRAME: 0459. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Aug 9, 2023
From: ANDRAE, ANDREAS; MENZEL, MARC; SCHERPING, RICHARD
To: CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES GMBH
Reel/Frame 064532/0700 →
Priority Claims (1)
DE 10 2020 215 634.4 · Dec 10, 2020 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240098465A1 · Mar 21, 2024
References Cited (24)
US 9566966B2 · Erdem et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 11388565B2 · Hwang · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11968603B2 · Hwang · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20090254244A1 · Xu et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20180012279A1 · Ricci · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180076958A1 · Narimoto et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180203130A1 · Neubecker · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190232972A1 · Lin · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200258320A1 · Lu · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200365029A1 · Kourous-Harrigan · 2020 [cited by examiner]
DE 102017205230A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
EP 3462754A1 · 2019 [cited by examiner]
WO 2020117073A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 25, 2022 from corresponding International patent application No. PCT/EP2021/083370. [cited by applicant]
“Use Case Description: Co-operative Lane Merge”, 5GAA Working Group 1 meeting; 9th F2F Meeting, Seoul, South Korea Jan. 28-30, 2019, T-190013, (revision of T-180136, T-180246), Ford, Huawei. [cited by applicant]
“Exponential Smoothing”, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponential_smoothing, 2021, Wikipedia. [cited by applicant]
“Intersectional Movement Assist”, 5GAA Working Group 1, T-180229 Conference call #10, Aug. 29, 2017, Ford, BMW, Audi, Denso, Huawei, Nokia, Intel. [cited by applicant]
Juliane Hoebel et al. “Towards a Sensor Failure-Dependent Performance Adaptation Using the Validity Concept”, Springer International Publishing AG 2017 S. Tonetta et al. (Eds.): SAFECOMP 2017, LNCS 10488, pp. 270-286, 2… [cited by applicant]
“Technical Report on CPM Object Quality CAR 2 CAR Communication Consortium”, Communication Consortium, F0014_CPM_ObjectQuality_Deliverable.docx Mar. 15, 2021, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Andreas Andrae “Safety Qualifier for V2X”, 2017 11th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP), 2018, 5GAA Automotive Association. [cited by applicant]
Tino Brade et al. “Validity-based failure algebra for distributed sensor systems”, 2013 IEEE 32nd Intemational Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems IEEE Sep. 30, 2013 (Sep. 30, 2013), pp. 143-152. [cited by applicant]
Antonio Casimiro et al. “The KARYON Project: Predictable and Safe Coordination in Cooperative Vehicular Systems”, 978-1-4799-0181-4/13/$31.00, 2013, IEEE. [cited by applicant]
Marc Menzel et al. “Enable functional safety with V2X communication”, white paper submitted to C2C Consortium on Mar. 30, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Tino Brade et al. “Sensor- and Environment Dependent Performance Adaptation for Maintaining Safety Requirements”, A. Bondavalli et al. (Eds.): SAFECOMP 2014 Workshops, LNCS 8696, pp. 46-54, 2014. Springer International … [cited by applicant]