IP Library Granted Patent US 12,324,754
Granted Patent B1
US 12,324,754 · App. 18/810,416 · Granted Jun 10, 2025

System for residual limbs of amputees

Inventors: Jordan T. Doles (Fort Collins, CO); Paul Goudreau (Edina, MN); Troy Winsand (Maple Grove, MN); Mark Hatcher (Golden Valley, MN); Gary McAdam (Highlands Ranch, CO)
Assignee: JSG IP Ventures, LLC
A61F2/7812A61F2/70A61F2/72A61F2002/5059A61F2002/5061A61F2002/5063A61F2002/5064A61F2002/6827A61F2002/704A61F2002/705A61F2002/707A61F2002/768A61F2002/769A61F2002/7818A61F2002/785
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,324,754
App. No.
18/810,416
Granted
Jun 10, 2025
Kind
B1
Abstract

Various aspects of this disclosure relate to a layered polymer substrate with electrodes and conductive ink embedded in the substrate. In some embodiments, a prosthetic liner may be bonded onto the polymer substrate. The substrate may include an interconnect coupled to the electrodes via the conductive ink. The system may include a controller (e.g., an electrode controller) in communication with the electrodes via the conductive ink. The electrodes may be activated such that they may stimulate nerve fibers in a user's residual limb.

Claims (55)

1. A system for modulating nerve activation in a residual limb of an amputee, comprising:

a substrate configured to contact the residual limb, including:

a first polymer layer including a plurality of electrodes and conductive ink; and

a second polymer layer;

a liner attached to the substrate, wherein the substrate and the liner are configured to receive the residual limb, such that at least one of the plurality of electrodes is in electrical communication with the residual limb;

an electrode controller configured to transmit electrical current to the plurality of electrodes according to one or more inputs;

an interconnect configured for an amputee to interchangeably connect the electrode controller and the substrate when coupled with the conductive ink; and

an external user device to communicate signaling with the electrode controller, including:

a graphical user interface configured to receive the one or more inputs from the amputee, wherein a first input corresponds to selectively activating one or more of the plurality of electrodes such that nerve fibers are stimulated in the residual limb.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of electrodes are recessed relative to an upper surface of the first polymer layer.

3. The system of claim 2 , wherein an upper surface of each electrode of the plurality of electrodes is coplanar with an upper surface of the second polymer layer.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein a thickness of the substrate is between 0.1 mm and 26 mm.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of electrodes are configured to adapt directly to the conductive ink.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the conductive ink is configured to communicate signaling to each electrode from the interconnect, communicate signaling to the interconnect from each electrode, or both.

7. The system of claim 6 , wherein the conductive ink is configured to communicate the signaling to each electrode from the interconnect and communicate the signaling to the interconnect from each electrode when the substrate is stretched in any direction.

8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the conductive ink comprises silver infused nanoparticles, gold infused nanoparticles, a silver coated material, a conductive carbon material, or a combination thereof.

9. The system of claim 1 , further comprising a conductive topical that is configured to conduct with the residual limb.

10. The system of claim 1 , wherein the substrate comprises a cooling material, a moisture wicking material, an antimicrobial material, an antibacterial material or a combination thereof.

11. The system of claim 1 , further comprising:

the interconnect integrated at least partially into the substrate comprising a polymer material.

12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the polymer material of the interconnect is a rigid silicone material.

13. The system of claim 11 , wherein the interconnect is configured as a pin connection for connecting with a power source.

14. The system of claim 1 , wherein the substrate comprises a plurality of traces that comprise the conductive ink, wherein each electrode of the plurality of electrodes is coupled with a respective trace, and wherein the plurality of traces each terminate at an end of the substrate and are configured to connect to the interconnect.

15. The system of claim 1 , wherein the substrate comprises one or more sensors in communication with the residual limb and configured to receive one or more parameters associated with polymer substrate, the residual limb, or a combination thereof.

16. The system of claim 15 , wherein the one or more sensors comprise a stretch sensor, a temperature sensor, a movement sensor, a motion sensor, a moisture sensor, an oxygen sensor, a pressure sensor, a bacterial sensor, a vibrational sensor, a blood glucose sensor, a pulse oxygen sensor, a magnetic flux sensor, or a combination thereof.

17. The system of claim 16 , wherein:

the stretch sensor comprises a piezo resistive sensor;

the movement sensor comprises an accelerometer, a gyroscope, an optical sensor, a hall effect sensor, or a resistive flexion sensor;

the oxygen sensor comprises an optical oximeter;

the pressure sensor comprises a capacitive sensor, a force sensing resistor, an optical sensor, a pneumatic sensor, a strain-gauge sensor, a piezoelectric sensor, or a piezo chromic sensor; and

the vibrational sensor comprises an accelerometer or a gyroscope.

18. The system of claim 15 , wherein the polymer substrate further comprises one or more feedback paths for the one or more sensors.

19. The system of claim 1 , wherein one or more locations of electrode stimulation are alternatively selected by an artificial intelligence algorithm.

20. The system of claim 19 , wherein a second input corresponds to user feedback from the amputee and the second input is configured to provide data to personalize the artificial intelligence algorithm to the amputee.

21. The system of claim 1 , wherein the substrate and the liner include polymer compatible materials.

22. The system of claim 1 , wherein the substrate and the liner are different materials.

23. The system of claim 1 , wherein the second polymer layer is a protective barrier between the liner, and the electrodes and the conductive ink.

24. The system of claim 1 , wherein the external user device is a mobile device, a computer, or a wearable device.

25. The system of claim 24 wherein the external user device is wirelessly connected to the electrode controller.

26. The system of claim 1 , wherein a second input corresponds to selecting a first sensation such that the selectively activated electrodes electrically stimulate the nerve fibers in the residual limb with the first sensation.

27. The system of claim 26 , wherein the first sensation is selected from tapping sensation, a kneading sensation, a rolling sensation, a cupping sensation, or a scraping sensation.

28. The system of claim 26 , wherein a third input corresponds to user feedback from the amputee, selected from pain feedback, mental health feedback, or preferred setting feedback.

29. A system for modulating nerve activation in a residual limb of an amputee, comprising:

a substrate configured to contact the residual limb, including:

a first polymer layer including a plurality of electrodes;

a plurality of conductive ink traces printed on the first polymer layer and coupled with each of the plurality of electrodes;

a second polymer layer over the plurality of conductive ink traces and the electrodes;

a liner attached to the substrate, wherein the substrate and the liner are configured to receive the residual limb such that at least one of the plurality of electrodes is in electrical communication with the residual limb;

an electrode controller configured to transmit electrical current to the plurality of electrodes according to one or more inputs;

an interconnect configured for an amputee to interchangeably connect the electrode controller and the substrate when coupled with the conductive ink; and

an external user device to communicate wireless signaling with the electrode controller, the external user device selected from a mobile phone, a computer, or a wearable device, and including:

a graphical user interface configured to receive the one or more inputs from the amputee,

wherein a first input corresponds to selectively activating one or more of the plurality of electrodes such that nerve fibers are stimulated at one or more locations in the residual limb,

wherein a second input corresponds to selecting a first sensation selected from tapping sensation, a kneading sensation, a rolling sensation, a cupping sensation, or a scraping sensation such that the selectively activated electrodes stimulate the nerve fibers in the residual limb at the one or more locations with the first sensation, and

wherein a third input corresponds to user feedback from the amputee, selected from pain feedback, mental health feedback, and preferred setting feedback.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 22, 2024
From: DOLES, JORDAN T.; GOUDREAU, PAUL; WINSAND, TROY; HATCHER, MARK; MCADAM, GARY
To: JSG IP VENTURES, LLC
Reel/Frame 068367/0382 →
References Cited (106)
US 4142532A · Ware · 1979 [cited by applicant]
US 4558704A · Petrofsky · 1985 [cited by applicant]
US 5044368A · Putz · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 5466244A · Morgan · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5505201A · Grill et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5888213A · Sears · 1999 [cited by examiner]
US 7003348B1 · Brewer et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7107097B2 · Stern et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7697995B2 · Cross et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8131374B2 · Moore et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8591599B1 · Kaliki et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8897870B2 · De Ridder · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8911505B2 · Kirn · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8945236B2 · Leiniger et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9358138B2 · Kelley et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9421366B2 · Tyler et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9615944B2 · Will et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9937065B2 · Laghi et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10045843B2 · Kim et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10111763B2 · Zheng et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10512555B2 · John et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10617354B2 · Berg et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10828177B2 · Strbac et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10833245B2 · Chen et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10898351B2 · Herr et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11213409B2 · Wernke et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11234616B2 · Herr · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11433238B2 · Fisher et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11464438B2 · Wernke et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11510841B2 · Realmuto et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11577045B2 · Perry et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11809629B1 · Segil · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11833064B1 · Doles · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11986402B2 · Doles · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12201536B2 · Doles et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20060206162A1 · Wahlstrand et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20080312580A1 · Barsness et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090216339A1 · Hanson et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100114238A1 · Muccio · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100298895A1 · Ghaffari et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110118853A1 · Kirn · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120101595A1 · Jung et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120296445A1 · Leiniger et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130041235A1 · Rogers et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140163444A1 · Ingvarsson et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140188251A1 · Mosler · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140277583A1 · Kuntaegowdanahalli et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150142129A1 · Kirn · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150360030A1 · Cartledge et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160015280A1 · Hyde et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160263345A1 · Shuster et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160331561A1 · Raspopovic et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160346164A1 · Ward et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170056682A1 · Kumar et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170136238A1 · Hartig et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170311827A1 · Choi et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170348117A1 · Strbac · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180153430A1 · Ang et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180296822A1 · Schroeder et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190117417A1 · Raspopovic et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190254845A1 · Wernke et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200139138A1 · Sit et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200289295A1 · Koppe · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200367823A1 · Chahine et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200376272A1 · Block et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210069458A1 · Perry et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210113356A1 · Laszczak et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210186719A1 · Laghi et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220031480A1 · Bause et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220386935A1 · Lo et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220387195A1 · Souply et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220395229A1 · Everett et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230293318A1 · Kaltenborn et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230398004A1 · Messner et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
DE 202010005472U1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
DE 102015009828A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
DE 102021125702A1 · 2022 [cited by examiner]
EP 2962726B1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019025838A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2023064323A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
“Loss of Sight and Enhanced Hearing: A Neural Picture”, PLoS Biology vol. 3, No. 2, Jan. 25, 2005, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
“International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority,” issued in connection with Int'l Appl. No. PCT/US2024/023642, dated Jul. 18, 2024 (14 pages). [cited by applicant]
Al-Chalabi M, et al., “Neuroanatomy, Spinothalamic Tract”, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29939601, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Canizales et al., “The influence of visual perspective on the somatosensory steady-state response during pain observation”, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 7, No. 849, Dec. 9, 2013, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Cardinali, A., et al., “Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Postoperative Pain, Pulmonary Function, and Opioid Consumption Following Cardiothoracic Procedures: A Systematic Review”, Neuromodulati… [cited by applicant]
Chahine, L., et al., “Phantom limb syndrome: a review”, Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology., vol. 19, No. 2, 2007, pp. 345-355. [cited by applicant]
Chan, et al., “Mirror Therapy for Phantom Limb Pain”, New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 357, No. 21, 2007, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Culp, C. J., “Current Understanding of Phantom Pain and its Treatment”, Pain Physician, 2022, vol. 25, pp. E941-E957. [cited by applicant]
Guenther, K., et al., “‘It's All Done With Mirrors’: V.S. Ramachandran and the Material Culture of Phantom Limb Research”, Medical History, vol. 60, No. 3, 2016, pp. 342-358. doi: 10.1017/mdh.2016.27. [cited by applicant]
Hall, N., et al., “Phantom limb pain: a review of pharmacological management”, British Journal of Pain, vol. 12, No. 14, 2018, pp. 202-207. [cited by applicant]
Hanyu-Deutmeyer, A.A, et al., “Phantom Limb Pain”, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28846343, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Harsha, R., et al., “Neuroanatomy, Somatosensory Cortex”, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32310375, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Kim, et al., “Mirror Therapy for Phantom Limb Pain”, The Korean Journal of Pain, vol. 25, No. 4, 2012, pp. 272-274. [cited by applicant]
Ko, Siu-Teing, et al., “A Scoping Review of Pressure Measurements in Prosthetic Sockets of Transfemoral Amputees during Ambulation: Key Considerations for Sensor Design”, Sensors, vol. 15, No. 21, 2021, 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
Marvellous P. Mark, Sensory feedback system for prosthetic arm, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289148931, Jan. 2015. [cited by applicant]
Mendell, L. M., et al., “Constructing and deconstructing the gate theory of pain” Pain, vol. 155, No. 2, 2014, pp. 210-216. [cited by applicant]
Mulvey et al., “Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Phantom Pain and Stump Pain in Adult Amputees”, Pain Pract, vol. 13, No. 4, Aug. 30, 2012, pp. 289-296. [cited by applicant]
Nguyen, J. D., et al., “Neurosurgery, Sensory Homunculus”, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31751031, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Polat et al., “Factors related to phantom limb pain and its effect on quality of life”, Somatosensory & Motor Research, vol. 38, No. 4, Sep. 6, 2021, pp. 322-326. [cited by applicant]
Reissman, T., et al., “A novel gel liner system with embedded electrodes for use with upper limb myoelectric prostheses.”, Retrieved on Dec. 18, 2023 from https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal. po… [cited by applicant]
Steen et al., “The demographics of persistent opioid consumption following limb amputation”, Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, vol. 64, No. 3, Oct. 24, 2019, pp. 361-367. [cited by applicant]
System for Excitation of Phantom Sensations, Meier-Koll et al, translation for DE 102015009828 (Year: 2017). [cited by applicant]
Tilak, M., et al., “Mirror Therapy and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Management of Phantom Limb Pain in Amputees—A Single Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial”, Physiotherapy Research International, vol… [cited by applicant]
Yam, M., et al., “General Pathways of Pain Sensation and the Major Neurotransmitters Involved in Pain Regulation”, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 19, No. 8, 2018, pp. 2164. [cited by applicant]
Zarei, A. A., et al., “Short-Term Suppression of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials and Perceived Sensations in Healthy Subjects Following TENS”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering , vol. 68, No. 7, 2021, pp. 2261… [cited by applicant]
Mulvey et al: “Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Phantom Pain and Stump Pain in Adult Amputees”, pp. 1-8. (Year: 2012). [cited by applicant]
Cited By (5)
US 12,558,532 US 12,558,541 US 12,569,359 US 12,661,510 US 12,691,283