IP Library Granted Patent US 12,326,367
Granted Patent B2
US 12,326,367 · App. 16/770,038 · Granted Jun 10, 2025

Color matching sample databases and systems and methods for the same

Inventors: Larry E. Steenhoek (Wilmington, DE); Robert V. Canning (Bear, DE); Dominic V. Poerio (Wilmington, DE); Neil Murphy (Audubon, NJ)
Assignee: AXALTA COATING SYSTEMS IP CO., LLC
G01J3/463G01J3/46G06F16/51G06F16/535G06F16/5838G06T7/001G06T7/33G06T7/90G06V10/56G06V10/757H04N1/6008H04N1/6047G06T2207/10024G06T2207/20081G06T2207/30108G06T2207/30156H04N1/6052
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,326,367
App. No.
16/770,038
Granted
Jun 10, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods for a sample database are provided, where the sample database is for matching a target coating. In one embodiment, the system comprises a sample database stored on a storage device. The sample database includes a sample coating formula and a sample image feature with at least one sample coating formula linked to at least one sample image feature. At least one sample image feature includes a spatial micro-color analysis that includes a value determined by a sample pixel feature difference between at least two sample pixels.

Claims (20)

1. A system for matching a target coating comprising:

a storage device for storing information, wherein a sample database is stored on the storage device, and wherein the sample database comprises a sample coating formula and a sample image feature wherein at least one sample coating formula is linked to at least one sample image feature, wherein each of the at least one sample coating formulas include a list of components and component quantities for a sample coating, and wherein the at least one sample image feature has been measured from the sample coating;

wherein the at least one sample image feature comprises a spatial micro-color analysis, wherein the spatial micro color analysis comprises a value determined by a sample pixel feature difference between at least two sample pixels of one sample image, wherein the spatial micro-color analysis comprises one or more of a sparkle area of a black and white version of the sample image, a sparkle intensity of the black and white version of the sample image, a sparkle grade of the black and white image of the sample image, a sparkle color determination of the sample image, a sparkle clustering of the sample image, a sparkle color differences determination within the sample image, and a wavelet coefficient determination of the sample image at the sample pixel level, wherein the sample image is an image of the sample coating, and wherein the sample image comprises a plurality of sample pixels.

2. The system of claim 1 wherein the sample coating formula comprises a sample base coat formula and a sample clear coat formula, and wherein the sample coating formula comprises a sample effect coat formula.

3. A system for matching a target coating comprising:

a storage device for storing information, wherein a sample database is stored on the storage device, and wherein the sample database comprises a sample coating formula and a sample image feature wherein at least one sample coating formula is linked to at least one sample image feature, wherein each of the at least one sample coating formulas include a list of components and component quantities for a sample coating, and wherein the at least one sample image feature has been measured from the sample coating;

wherein the at least one sample image feature comprises a spatial micro-color analysis, wherein the spatial micro color analysis comprises a value determined by a sample pixel feature difference between a least two sample pixels of one sample image, wherein the spatial micro-color analysis comprises one or more of an overall image color entropy of the sample image, an image entropy of one or more of the L*a*b* planes as a function of the 3 rd dimension of the sample image, and an image entropy of one or more RGB planes as a function of the 3 rd dimension of the sample image, wherein the sample image is an image of the sample coating, and wherein the sample image comprises a plurality of sample pixels.

4. The system of claim 1 wherein the sample coating formula comprises an effect additive, and wherein the effect additive is selected from a metallic flake effect additive, a pearlescent crystal effect additive, or a combination thereof.

5. The system of claim 1 wherein the sample coating is linked to at least two different sample image features that each comprise one or more spatial micro-color analysis.

6. The system of claim 1 wherein the spatial micro-color analysis further comprises one or more of:

an overall image color entropy of the sample image; an image entropy of one or more of the L*a*b* planes as a function of the 3 rd dimension of the sample image; and an image entropy of one or more RGB planes as a function of the 3 rd dimension of the sample image.

7. The system of claim 1 further comprising:

one or more data processors configured to execute instructions to:

receive a target image feature;

compare the target image feature to the at least one sample image features; and

determine a calculated match sample image that substantially satisfies one or more pre-specified matching criteria for the target image feature, wherein the at least one sample image feature is linked to the calculated match sample image in the sample database.

8. The system of claim 1 wherein the sample database comprises a plurality of different related match coating formulas that are configured to link with the same at least one sample image feature, wherein the plurality of related match coating formulas comprise a plurality of different grades of the sample coating.

9. The system of claim 1 wherein the sample database further comprises a calculated match sample image linked with the sample coating formula for displaying to a user.

10. The system of claim 9 further comprising:

one or more data processors configured to execute instructions to display the calculated match sample image on a display.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 4, 2020
From: STEENHOEK, LARRY E.; CANNING, ROBERT V.; POERIO, DOMINIC V.; MURPHY, NEIL
To: AXALTA COATING SYSTEMS IP CO., LLC
Reel/Frame 052844/0835 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation In Part 15833597 · Dec 6, 2017
Related Publication 20200387742A1 · Dec 10, 2020
References Cited (82)
US 5929998A · Kettler et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6163622A · Abdel-Mottaleb et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6362885B1 · Osumi et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6788413B2 · Torfs et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6804390B2 · McClanahan · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6870614B2 · Graf et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6941287B1 · Vaidyanathan et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6959111B2 · Hirayama et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7035464B2 · Masuda · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7062083B2 · Lim et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7743055B2 · Rodrigues et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7885482B2 · Kansal · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7991596B2 · Steenhoek · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8065314B2 · Prakash et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8271242B2 · Berlin et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8407014B2 · Prakash et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8629882B2 · Henry · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8885934B2 · Lings et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8909574B2 · Mohammadi et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9256959B1 · Li · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9292744B2 · Rodrigues et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9390077B2 · Baluja · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9600908B2 · Gordon et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9607403B2 · Beymore et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9798949B1 · Du et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20010036309A1 · Hirayama · 2001 [cited by examiner]
US 20030067475A1 · Hirayama · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20040073526A1 · McClanahan · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040218182A1 · Alman et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040252308A1 · Prakash et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050052705A1 · Hersch · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20060210153A1 · Sara et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070032965A1 · McClanahan et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070146713A1 · Alman et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080291449A1 · Rodrigues et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090019086A1 · Prakash et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090157212A1 · Mcclanahan et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090274827A1 · Anderson et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090296152A1 · Mestha et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100169255A1 · Fujieda · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20120026354A1 · Hamada · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120069170A1 · Gesley · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130041858A1 · Fujieda et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140118494A1 · Wu · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140242271A1 · Prakash · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140278251A1 · Norris · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140278253A1 · Beymore · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140278254A1 · Beymore · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150026298A1 · Kirchner et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150110348A1 · Solanki et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150134299A1 · Norris · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160005187A1 · Prakash · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160040985A1 · Nagai et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160110584A1 · Remiszewski et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160117844A1 · Beymore et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160187199A1 · Brunk et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160353054A1 · Gilmutdinov · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170242570A1 · Beymore et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170243362A1 · Neisen · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 101630363 · 2010 [cited by examiner]
CN 101646929A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
CN 101730835A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
CN 1646330 · 2010 [cited by examiner]
CN 102959541A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
CN 203385671U · 2014 [cited by applicant]
CN 104114985A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
CN 104504716A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 107330188 · 2023 [cited by examiner]
EP 2130013A1 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
EP 2161555A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 201019732A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
RU 2489705C1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 9731247A1 · 1997 [cited by applicant]
WO 2008042393A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO 2008103405A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013049792A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013049796A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 201472563A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
EPO, European Extended Search Report issued in EP App. No. 18886579.4, dated May 7, 2021. [cited by applicant]
EPO, European Extended Search Report issued in EP App. No. 18886662.8, dated May 3, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Zachary, An Information Theoretic Approach to Content Based Image Retrieval, LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 2000, 7404, Louisiana State University. [cited by applicant]
Han Yueping “Technology and Application of X-ray Visual Automatic Detection” Publishing House, National Defense Industry Press, 2012. [cited by applicant]