IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,330,022
Granted Patent B2
US 12,330,022 · App. 17/614,208 · Granted Jun 17, 2025

Rehabilitation system

Inventors: David Gavin LLoyd (Queensland, AU); Claudio Pizzolato (Queensland, AU); Dinesh Palipana (Queensland, AU); David John Saxby (Queensland, AU); Laura Elizabeth Diamond (Queensland, AU)
Assignee: Griffith University
A63B24/0062A61N1/36003A61N1/36031A63B22/0605A63B71/0622G06F3/015G16H20/30G16H40/67A63B2022/0094A63B2022/0652A63B2071/0625A63B2071/0638A63B2071/0655A63B2071/0666A63B2213/004A63B2220/30A63B2220/54A63B2220/836
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,330,022
App. No.
17/614,208
Granted
Jun 17, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present invention relates to a rehabilitation system for rehabilitating a person with a neurological condition, such as a spinal cord injury (SCI). The system includes exercise equipment for enabling the person to exercise. One or more sensors are provided for sensing information from the person during exercise. The system also includes a model of the exercising person configured to receive the sensed information from the sensors and generate electrical stimulation for the person. Advantageously, the personalized computer model may be used to generate suitable electrical stimulation for the person, and avoid excessive stresses on the person which can lead to the fracturing of bones.

Claims (39)

1. A rehabilitation system for lower limb rehabilitation of a person with a neurological condition, the system including:

exercise equipment for enabling the person to exercise using at least one lower limb;

a human machine interface including one or more body sensors for sensing information from the person during exercise;

one or more equipment sensors for sensing information of the exercise equipment; and

a personalized computer model which is a neuromusculoskeletal model including a digital twin of the person exercising using the exercise equipment, wherein the personalized computer model is configured to;

receive the sensed information from the one or more body sensors and from the one or more equipment sensors,

generate electrical stimulation and actuation assistance for the person exercising with the exercise equipment using the at least one lower limb, and

generate somatosensory data to be provided to the person through extended reality.

2. The rehabilitation system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the personalized computer model generates suitable electrical stimulation while avoiding-avoids excessive stresses on the person-which can lead to fracturing of bones.

3. The rehabilitation system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the one or more body sensors include biomechanical and/or physiological biosensors.

4. The rehabilitation system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the sensed information relates to one or more of electromyography, inertial measurement units, heart rate, electrocardiogram, and respiration.

5. The rehabilitation system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the one or more equipment sensors include speed or torque sensors.

6. The rehabilitation system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the somatosensory data is further provided via visual, auditory and/or haptic feedback.

7. The rehabilitation system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the personalized computer model is configured to receive the person's intention of movement data from a brain-computer interface.

8. The rehabilitation system as claimed in claim 7 , wherein the human machine interface provides somatosensory feedback enabled by extended reality feedback, wherein the extended reality feedback includes a virtual or augmented reality headset with visual, auditory and/or tactile feedback.

9. The rehabilitation system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the one or more body sensors include wearable sensors configured to be worn by the person.

10. The rehabilitation system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the exercise equipment includes a recumbent ergometer.

11. The rehabilitation system as claimed in claim 1 , further including an actuator for actuating the exercise equipment.

12. The rehabilitation system as claimed in claim 11 , wherein the actuator includes a motor.

13. The rehabilitation system as claimed in claim 12 , wherein the extended reality feedback includes virtual reality, tactile via haptic feedback, or auditory by ear phones.

14. A rehabilitation system for lower limb rehabilitation of a person with a neurological condition, the system including:

exercise equipment for enabling the person to exercise using at least one lower limb;

a human machine interface with one or more body sensors for sensing information from the person during exercise, the human machine interface being configured to provide somatosensory feedback enabled by extended reality feedback;

one or more equipment sensors for sensing information of the exercise equipment; and

a personalized computer model which is a neuromusculoskeletal model including a digital twin of the person exercising using the exercise equipment, wherein the personalized computer model is configured to:

receive the sensed information from the one or more body sensors and from the one or more equipment sensors,

generate electrical stimulation and actuation assistance, assisted by actuators, for the person exercising with the exercise equipment using the at least one lower limb, and

synthesize and generate somatosensory data to be provided to the person through the extended reality feedback.

15. A rehabilitation method for lower limb rehabilitation of a person with a neurological condition, the method including:

exercising the person with exercise equipment using at least one lower limb;

sensing information from the person exercising using one or more body sensors of a human machine interface;

sensing information of the exercise equipment using one or more equipment sensors; and

providing a personalized computer model which is a neuromusculoskeletal model including a digital twin of the person exercising using the exercise equipment, wherein the personalized computer model is configured to:

receive the sensed information from the exercising person and of the exercise equipment,

generate electrical stimulation and actuation assistance for the person exercising with the exercise equipment using the at least one lower limb, and

generate somatosensory data for provision to the person through extended reality.

16. The rehabilitation method as claimed in claim 15 , wherein the personalized computer model generates suitable electrical stimulation while avoiding excessive stresses on the person which can lead to fracturing of bones.

17. The rehabilitation method as claimed in claim 15 , wherein the sensing information from the exercising person includes one or more of somatosensory, visual feedback, tactile and auditory sensing.

18. The rehabilitation method as claimed in claim 15 , further including actuating the exercise equipment.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 28, 2024
From: LLOYD, DAVID; PIZZOLATO, CLAUDIO; PALIPANA, DINESH; SAXBY, DAVID JOHN; DIAMOND, LAURA ELIZABETH
To: GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY
Reel/Frame 066584/0991 →
Priority Claims (1)
AU 2019901921 · Jun 4, 2019 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220249907A1 · Aug 11, 2022
References Cited (43)
US 6152855A · Dean, Jr. · 2000 [cited by examiner]
US 8249714B1 · Hartman et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 9808621B2 · Kelly · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 10130311B1 · De Sapio · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20040172093A1 · Rummerfield · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20060165756A1 · Catani et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060199700A1 · LaStayo et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070179534A1 · Firlik et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20130053734A1 · Barriskill et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140005743A1 · Giuffrida et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140277582A1 · Leuthardt et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160235323A1 · Tadi · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170036022A1 · Kelly · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180036531A1 · Schwarz et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180333575A1 · Bouton · 2018 [cited by examiner]
CN 101961527A · 2011 [cited by applicant]
CN 102579229A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 102727361A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 106492347A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 106994013A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009512516A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2018139975 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
JP 2018139975A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014153201A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2015152122A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018033591A2 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018154042A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
Office Action date Dec. 5, 2023, 13 pages, received in corresponding Japanese patent application No. 2021-572105. [cited by applicant]
Simao Brito da Luz et al., “Feasibility of using MRIs to create subject-specific parallel-mechanism joint models,” [cited by applicant]
Claudio Pizzolato et al., “Finding the sweet spot via personalised Achilles tendon training: the future is within reach,” [cited by applicant]
Claudio Pizzolato et al., “Bioinspired Technologies to Connect Musculoskeletal Mechanobiology to the Person for Training and Rehabilitation,” [cited by applicant]
C. Pizzolato et al., “Real-time inverse kinematics and inverse dynamics for lower limb appli-cations using OpenSim” [cited by applicant]
Rubia van den Brand et al., “Restoring Voluntary Control of Locomotion after Paralyzing Spinal Cord Injury,” [cited by applicant]
Yury P. Gerasimenko et al., “Noninvasive Reactivation of Motor Descending Control after Paralysis,” [cited by applicant]
Dimitry G. Sayenko et al., “Self-Assisted Standing Enabled by Non-Invasive Spinal Stimulation after Spinal Cord Injury,” [cited by applicant]
Megan L. Gill, “Neuromodulation of lumbosacral spinal networks enables independent stepping after complete paraplegia,” [cited by applicant]
Claudia A. Angeli et al., “Recovery of Over-Ground Walking after Chronic Motor Complete Spinal Cord Injury,” N Engl J Med 379;13, Sep. 27, 2018, pp. 1244-1250. [cited by applicant]
Donati, A. R. C. et al., “Long-Term Training with a Brain-Machine Interface-Based Gait Protocol Induces Partial Neurological Recovery in Paraplegic Patients,” [cited by applicant]
The extended European search report, mailed date May 11, 2023, 9 pages, received in corresponding EP application No. 20817609.9. [cited by applicant]
First Office Action dated Jun. 7, 2024 issued on corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 202080041275.3. [cited by applicant]
Notification of Reasons for Rejection dated Dec. 5, 2023 issued on corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-572105. [cited by applicant]
First Written Opinion dated Oct. 30, 2023 issued in corresponding Singapore Patent Application No. 11202113224X. [cited by applicant]
Examination Report issued in Australian Patent Application No. 2020287071 dated Oct. 30, 2024. [cited by applicant]