IP Library Granted Patent US 12,330,722
Granted Patent B2
US 12,330,722 · App. 17/133,368 · Granted Jun 17, 2025

Synchronized multi-modal robot

Inventors: Soon-Jo Chung (La Cañada, CA); Alireza Ramezani (Pasadena, CA); Elena Sorina Lupu (Pasadena, CA); Patrick Spieler (Pasadena, CA); Kyunam Kim (Pasadena, CA)
Assignee: California Institute of Technology
B62D57/04B62D57/032B64U10/70B64U60/50
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,330,722
App. No.
17/133,368
Granted
Jun 17, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A multi-modal robot that is configured to operate with a bipedal locomotion that may be augmented with aerial locomotion. Many embodiments of a robot may incorporate a robot with a main body portion that houses the various control systems and mechanical controls of the robot. The body of the robot can have a number of different propellers connected to an upper portion of the body and configured to generate lift and/or stability for the body of the robot. Additionally, many embodiments have at least two leg elements connected to a bottom portion of the body by way of a servo mechanism. The legs are configured to provide support for the body of the robot as well as generate a walking locomotion through the movement of the legs.

Claims (52)

1. A multi-modal robot, comprising:

a body;

a plurality of control electronics disposed within the body portion, wherein the plurality of control electronics includes at least a leg controller and at least one flight controller;

a plurality of motor elements disposed within the body;

at least two leg elements each of the at least two leg elements connected to at least one of the plurality of motor elements and having a proximal portion and a distal portion where the proximal portion is move-ably coupled to the motor elements and disposed near a bottom portion of the body and wherein each of the two leg elements has a foot element disposed on the distal portion and having a top and a bottom surface wherein the foot element comprises a contact sensor disposed on the bottom surface, wherein the contact sensor is in communication with the at least one leg controller and the at least one flight controller;

a plurality of propellers disposed on a top portion of the body wherein each of the plurality of propellers are in communication with the at least one flight controller and the at least one leg controller and configured to generate a thrust force;

wherein the robot is configured to operate between at least a walking mode and at least a flight mode and wherein the control electronics operate to smoothly transition between the walking mode and the flight mode, wherein while in the walking mode the at least two leg elements are configured to support the weight of the robot and wherein each of the leg elements can move in a plurality of directions such that the movement of the legs enables the movement of the overall robot, and the plurality of propellers provide a sufficient amount of lift and orientation stabilization via the generated thrust force so as to provide stability of the robot during the walking mode;

wherein while in the flight mode the at least one flight controller is configured to operate the plurality of propellers such that the thrust force generated from the plurality of propellers generates sufficient lift to elevate the robot above the ground and wherein at least one flight controller controls the plurality of propellers to move the robot in any number of directions; and

wherein the contact sensor has an active position and an inactive position, wherein the active position communicates a signal to the leg controller and the at least one flight controller thus indicating the need to perform in the walking mode and wherein when the contact sensor is in the inactive position for an elongated period of time a signal is communicated to the at least one flight controller thus indicating the need to perform in the flight mode.

2. The multi-modal robot of claim 1 , wherein each of the plurality of propellers are positioned at an angle leaning inwards towards the body of the robot.

3. The multi-modal robot of claim 2 , wherein the tilt direction can be at any orientation and the tilt amount can be between 0 and 90 degrees.

4. A multi-modal robot, comprising:

a body;

a plurality of control electronics disposed within the body portion, wherein the plurality of control electronics includes at least a leg controller and at least one flight controller;

a plurality of motor elements disposed within the body;

at least two leg elements each of the at least two leg elements connected to at least one of the plurality of motor elements and having a proximal portion and a distal portion where the proximal portion is move-ably coupled to the motor elements and disposed near a bottom portion of the body and wherein each of the two leg elements has a foot element disposed on the distal portion and having a top and a bottom surface wherein the foot element comprises a contact sensor disposed on the bottom surface, wherein the contact sensor is in communication with the at least one leg controller and the at least one flight controller;

a plurality of propellers disposed on a top portion of the body wherein each of the plurality of propellers are in communication with the at least one flight controller and the at least one leg controller and configured to generate a thrust force;

wherein the robot is configured to operate between at least a walking mode and at least a flight mode and wherein the control electronics operate to smoothly transition between the walking mode and the flight mode, wherein while in the walking mode the at least two leg elements are configured to support the weight of the robot and wherein each of the leg elements can move in a plurality of directions such that the movement of the legs enables the movement of the overall robot, and the plurality of propellers provide a sufficient amount of lift and orientation stabilization via the generated thrust force so as to provide stability of the robot during the walking mode;

wherein while in the flight mode the at least one flight controller is configured to operate the plurality of propellers such that the thrust force generated from the plurality of propellers generates sufficient lift to elevate the robot above the ground and wherein at least one flight controller controls the plurality of propellers to move the robot in any number of directions;

wherein each of the plurality of propellers are positioned at an angle leaning inwards towards the body of the robot; and

wherein the tilt is directed inwards at a 25 degrees angle with respect to the torso vertical axis and directed inwards at a 45 degrees angle in the horizontal plane with respect to the forward direction.

5. The multi-modal robot of claim 1 , wherein each of the two leg elements comprise a plurality of moveably interconnected segments, wherein the moveably interconnected segments form an upper kinematic loop and a lower kinematic loop such that each of the kinematic loops can be controlled in a manner so as to allow the robot to operate.

6. The multi-modal robot of claim 1 , further comprising a control computer disposed in the body of the robot wherein the control computer is in signal communication with the at least one leg controller and the at least one flight controller to communicate a transition between the walking mode and the flight mode.

7. The multi-modal robot of claim 6 , further comprising a plurality of sensors disposed around the body of the robot and in signal communication with the control computer, and wherein each of the plurality of sensors transmits a sensor signal to the control computer wherein the control computer utilizes the sensor signal to determine the movement needed from the legs and the propellers in order to navigate the robot.

8. The multi-modal robot of claim 7 , wherein each of the plurality of sensors is selected from a group consisting of gyroscope, magnetometer, camera, ultrasonic sensor, and IR sensor.

9. The multi-modal robot of claim 1 , wherein the foot element further comprises a heel element and a toe element disposed on the bottom surface of the foot element and configured to allow the multi-modal robot to stand with the propellers deactivated.

10. The multi-modal robot of claim 9 , wherein the contact sensor is disposed within the toe element of the foot element.

11. The multi-modal robot of claim 1 , wherein the movement of the multi-modal robot in the walking mode is based on an inverted pendulum.

12. A method for operating a multi-modal robot comprising;

utilizing a control computer disposed within a body of the robot to receive signal inputs from a plurality of sensors;

determining a mode of operation based on the signal inputs from the plurality of sensors;

activating a leg controller in response to the signal inputs and initiating a walking mode, wherein the walking mode utilizes the leg controller to control the movement of at least two legs such that the movement of the at least two legs moves the robot;

activating a flight controller in response to the signal inputs such that the flight controller activates a plurality of propellers such that the propellers generate an amount of lift to the robot so as to provide stability for walking;

wherein at least one of the plurality of sensors is a contact sensor disposed on a bottom portion of each of the at least two legs such that the impact of each of the two legs with a solid surface will place the contact sensor in an active state; and

removing each of the at least two legs from the solid surface thereby placing the contact sensor in a deactivated state and transmits the deactivated state to the leg controller and the flight controller such that the flight controller engages the plurality of rotors to generate sufficient lift to raise the robot off of the solid surface and begin a flight mode.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the mode of operation is selected from a group consisting of flight, walking, and transition.

14. The method of claim 12 , wherein each of the plurality of propellers are configured at an angle towards the body of the robot.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the tilt direction can be at any orientation and the tilt amount can be between 0 and 90 degrees.

16. The method of claim 12 , wherein the tilt is directed inwards at a 25 degrees angle with respect to the torso vertical axis and directed inwards at a 45 degrees angle in the horizontal plane with respect to the forward direction.

17. The method of claim 12 , wherein each of the two leg elements comprise a plurality of moveably interconnected segments, wherein the moveably interconnected segments form an upper kinematic loop and a lower kinematic loop such that each of the kinematic loops can be controlled along with the plurality of propellers in a manner such that the robot is capable of operating in the walking mode and to transition into the flight mode.

18. A method for operating a multi-modal robot of claim 1 , comprising;

utilizing a control computer to receive signal inputs from a plurality of sensors;

determining a mode of operation and transition between modes based on the signal inputs from the plurality of sensors;

activating a flight or a transition controller in response to the signal inputs such that the flight or the transition controller activates a plurality of propellers such that the propellers generate an amount of lift sufficient to produce a flight mode for the robot and wherein the plurality of rotors further generate the orientation stabilization and lift necessary to maintain a stable flight mode; and

activating a walking controller in response to the signal input such that both the thrust force from the plurality of propellers is minimized to provide only stabilization support using the plurality of propellers for the walking mode.

19. The multi-modal robot of claim 4 , wherein each of the two leg elements comprise a plurality of moveably interconnected segments, wherein the moveably interconnected segments form an upper kinematic loop and a lower kinematic loop such that each of the kinematic loops can be controlled in a manner so as to allow the robot to operate.

20. The multi-modal robot of claim 4 , further comprising a control computer disposed in the body of the robot wherein the control computer is in signal communication with the at least one leg controller and the at least one flight controller to communicate a transition between the walking mode and the flight mode.

21. The multi-modal robot of claim 20 , further comprising a plurality of sensors disposed around the body of the robot and in signal communication with the control computer, and wherein each of the plurality of sensors transmits a sensor signal to the control computer wherein the control computer utilizes the sensor signal to determine the movement needed from the legs and the propellers in order to navigate the robot.

22. The multi-modal robot of claim 21 , wherein each of the plurality of sensors is selected from a group consisting of gyroscope, magnetometer, camera, ultrasonic sensor, and IR sensor.

23. The multi-modal robot of claim 4 , wherein the foot element further comprises a heel element and a toe element disposed on the bottom surface of the foot element and configured to allow the multi-modal robot to stand with the propellers deactivated.

24. The multi-modal robot of claim 23 , wherein the contact sensor is disposed within the toe element of the foot element.

25. The multi-modal robot of claim 4 , wherein the movement of the multi-modal robot in the walking mode is based on an inverted pendulum.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 30, 2024
From: SPIELER, PATRICK; KIM, KYUNAM; LUPU, ELENA SORINA
To: CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Reel/Frame 068453/0464 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 30, 2024
From: RAMEZANI, ALIREZA
To: CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Reel/Frame 068453/0485 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 30, 2024
From: CHUNG, SOON-JO
To: CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Reel/Frame 068453/0544 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62953094 · Dec 23, 2019
Related Publication 20210370733A1 · Dec 2, 2021
References Cited (102)
US 7774177B2 · Dariush · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 7835822B2 · Goswami · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 10189519B2 · Hurst et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10576620B1 · Chou · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11000945B2 · Asada · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20040060746A1 · Furuta · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20040172165A1 · Iribe · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20050209535A1 · Dariush · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20100017028A1 · Suga · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20110066283A1 · Hammam · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20130079929A1 · Lim · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20150196403A1 · Kim · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20170121034A1 · Fisher · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180127092A1 · del Castillo · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190127052A1 · Chen · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200122822A1 · Bosworth · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200140070A1 · George · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210047035A1 · Hoshide · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210114203A1 · Christensen · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210237265A1 · Zhu · 2021 [cited by examiner]
CN 107943021A · 2018 [cited by examiner]
JP 6168158B2 · 2017 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2009096048A1 · 2009 [cited by examiner]
WO 2021102402A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Zhao, M., Anzai, T., & Nishio, T. (2023). Design, Modeling and Control of a Quadruped Robot SPIDAR: Spherically Vectorable and Distributed Rotors Assisted Air-Ground Quadruped Robot. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters… [cited by examiner]
L. Daler, J. Lecoeur, p. B. Hählen and D. Floreano, “A flying robot with adaptive morphology for multi-modal locomotion,” 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Tokyo, Japan, 2013, pp.… [cited by examiner]
“Hopping Simulation: 4DoF Spherical Parallel Mechanism based Bipedal Robot”, Youtube, Oct. 24, 2020, https://www.youtube.com/shorts/vlBgMg9WFfA. [cited by applicant]
“Mechanical Leg Walking Simulation”, Youtube, Oct. 29, 2016, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7-6dLCkdC8. [cited by applicant]
“Robotic Leg Mechanism”, Youtube, Apr. 13, 2020, Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhUXnRzbqGI. [cited by applicant]
Abourachid et al., “The legs: A key to bird evolutionary success”, Journal of Ornithology, Aug. 2012, vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 193-198, published online May 17, 2012, DOI: 10.1007/s10336-012-0856-9. [cited by applicant]
Ackerman, “Delivery drones use bird-inspired legs to jump into the air”, IEEE Spectrum, Jan. 17. 2019, printed Apr. 30, 2021 from https://spectrm/ieee.org/automaton/robotics/dronees/delivery-drones-use-birdinspired-legs… [cited by applicant]
Asif et al., “On the Improvement of Multi-Legged Locomotion over Difficult Terrains using a Balance Stabilization Method”, International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 2012, vol. 9, pp. 1-13DOI: 10.5772/7789. [cited by applicant]
Bachman et al., “Drive train design enabling locomotion transition of a small hybrid air-land vehicle”, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Oct. 2009, pp. 5647-5652, Doi: 10.1109/IR… [cited by applicant]
Baek et al., “Ladybird beetle-inspired compliant origami”, Science Robotics, Apr. 15, 2020, vol. 5, eaaz6262, 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Bandyopadhyay et al., “Nonlinear Attitude Control of Spacecraft with a Large Captured Object”, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Apr. 4, 2016, vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 754-769, doi: 10.2514/1.G001341. [cited by applicant]
Bhattacharya et al., “Spherical rolling robot: a design and motion planning studies”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Dec. 2000, vol. 6, Issue 6, pp. 835-839, DOI: 10.1109/70.897794. [cited by applicant]
Boria et al., “A Sensor Platform Capable of Aerial and Terrestrial Locomotion”, Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2005, pp. 3959-3964. [cited by applicant]
Brescianini et al., “An omni-directional multirotor vehicle”, Mechatronics, Nov. 2018, vol. 55, pp. 76-93, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2018.08.005. [cited by applicant]
Chan et al., “Review of modelling and control of two-wheeled robots”, Annual Reviews in Control, Apr. 2013, vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 89-103, DOI: 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2013.03.004. [cited by applicant]
Crespi et al., “AmphiBot I: an amphibious snake-like robot”, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Mar. 31, 2005, vol. 50, Issue 4, pp. 163-175, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2004.09.015. [cited by applicant]
Crowther et al., “Kinematic Analysis and Control Design for a Nonplanar Multirotor Vehicle”, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, July-Aug. 2011, vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 1157-1171, doi: 10.2514/1.51186. [cited by applicant]
Daler et al., “A Flying Robot with Adaptive Morphology for Multi-Modal Locomotion”, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Nov. 3-7, 2013, Tokyo, Japan, p. 13961-1366. [cited by applicant]
Dangol et al., “Performance satisfaction in Harpy, a thruster-assisted bipedal robot”, arXiv:2004.14337 [cs/RP], Apr. 29, 2020, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
De Wagter et al., “Design, control, and visual navigation of the DelftaCopter VTOL tail-sitter UAV”, Journal of Field Robotics, Sep. 2018, vol. Issue 6, 99. 937-960, first published Apr. 10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.100… [cited by applicant]
Dudek et al., “AQUA: An amphibious autonomous robot”, Computer, IEEE Xplore, Feb. 2007, vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 46-53, Doi: 10.1109/MC.2007.6. [cited by applicant]
Earls, “Kinematics and Mechanics of Ground Take-Off in the Starling Sturnis Vulgaris and the Quail Coturnix Coturnix”, The Journal of Experimental Biology, 2000, vol. 203, pp. 725-739, published online Jan. 2000. [cited by applicant]
Fagogenis et al., “Autonomous robotic intracardiac catheter navigation using haptic vision”, Science Robotics, Apr. 24, 2019, vol. 4, eaaw1977, 13 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Feng et al., “Optimization-based Full Body Control for the DARPA Robotics Challenge”, Journal of Field Robotics, Dec. 2014, pp. 1-20, DOI: 10.1002/rob.21559. [cited by applicant]
George et al., “Biomimetic sensory feedback through peripheral nerve stimulation improves dexterous use of a bionic hand”, Science Robotics, Jul. 24, 2019, vol. 4, eaax2352, 12 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Ghassemi et al., “Feasibility study of a novel robotic system BALLU: Buoyancy assisted lightweight legged unit”, Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Conference of Humanoid Robots, 2016, pp. 144. [cited by applicant]
Grizzle et al., “Models, feedback control, and open problems of 3D bipedal robotic walking”, Automatica, Aug. 2014, vol. 50, Issue 8, pp. 1955-1988, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2014.04.021. [cited by applicant]
Grotzinger et al., “Mars Science Laboratory Mission and Science Investigation”, Space Sci. Rev., 2012, vol. 170, pp. 5-56, DOI 10.1007/s11214-012-9892-2. [cited by applicant]
Haldane et al., “Robotic vertical jumping agility via series-elastic power modulation”, Science Robotics, Dec. 6, 2016, vol. 1, eaag2048, 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Hang et al., “Perching and resting—A paradigm for UAV maneuvering with modularized landing gears”, Science Robotics, Mar. 13, 2019, vol. 4, eaau6637, 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Heredia et al., “Control of a multirotor outdoor aerial manipulator”, 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2014), Sep. 2014, pp. 3417-3422, DOI: 10.1109/IROS.2014.6943038. [cited by applicant]
Hoover et al., “RoACH: An autonomous 2.4g crawling hexapod robot”, IEEE Xplore, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2008, Oct. 2008, pp. 26-33., DOI: 10.1109/IROS.2008.4651149. [cited by applicant]
Hubicki et al., “Walking and Running with Passive Compliance: Lessons from Engineering a Live Demonstration of the ATRIAS Biped”, IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, Sep. 2016, pp. 1-16. [cited by applicant]
Hwangbo et al., “Learning agile and dynamic motor skills for legged robots”, Science Robotics, Jan. 16, 2019, vol. 4, eaau5872, 14 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Hyun et al., “High speed trot-running: Implementation of a hierarchical controller using proprioceptive impedance control on the MIT Cheetah”, The International Journal of Robotics Research, Sep. 1, 2014, vol. 33, Issue… [cited by applicant]
Ijspeert et al., “From Swimming to Walking with a Salamander Robot Driven by a Spinal Cord Model”, Science, Mar. 9, 2007, vol. 315, Issue 5817, pp. 1416-1420, DOI: 10.1126/science. 1138353. [cited by applicant]
Johnson et al., “Team IHMC's lessons learned from the DARPA robotics challenge trials”, Journal of Field Robotics, Mar. 2015, vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 192-208, DOI: 10.1002/rob.21571. [cited by applicant]
Joshi et al., “Design and analysis of a spherical mobile robot”, Mechanism and Machine Theory, Feb. 2010, vol. 45, Issue 2, pp. 130-136, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2009.04.003. [cited by applicant]
Kalantari et al., “Design and experimental validation of HyTAQ, a Hybrid Terrestrial and Aerial Quadrotor”, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 6-10, 2013, pp. 4445-4450, DOI: 10.1109/ICRA… [cited by applicant]
Kim et al., “Controllability and Design of Unmanned Multirotor Aircraft Robust to Rotor Failure”, AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, 2019, pp. 1-10. [cited by applicant]
Kim et al., “Fully Autonomous Vision-Based Net-Recovery Landing System for a Fixed-Wing UAV”, IEEE/Asme Transactions on Mechatronics, Aug. 2013, vol. 18. No. 4, pp. 1320-1333, DOI: 10.1109/TMECH.2013.2247411. [cited by applicant]
Kim et al., “Operating an unknown drawer using an aerial manipulator”, Proceedings—IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2015 Jun. 2015, pp. 5503-5508, DOI: 10.1109/ICRA.2015.7139968. [cited by applicant]
Kim et al., “Rolling Locomotion of Cable-Driven Soft Spherical Tensegrity Robots”, Soft Robotics, 2020, vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 346-362, DOI: 10.1089/soro.2019.0056. [cited by applicant]
Kossett et al., “A robust miniature robot design for land/air hybrid locomotion”, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 9-13, 2011, pp. 4595-4600, DOI: 10.1109/ICRA.2011.5979845. [cited by applicant]
Kovac et al., “Towards a self-deploying and gliding robot”, Flying Insects and Robots, 2009, pp. 271-284, first online Aug. 22, 2009, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89393-6_19. [cited by applicant]
Lee et al., “A neuro-inspired artificial peripheral nervous system for scalable electronic skins”, Science Robotics, Jul. 17, 2019, vol. 4, eaax2198, 16 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Lim et al., “Robot System of DRC-HUBO+ and Control Strategy of Team KAIST in DARPA Robotics Challenge Finals”, Journal of Field Robotics, Jun. 2017, First Published Sep. 29, 2016, vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 802-829, doi: 10.10… [cited by applicant]
Lohmiller et al., “On Contraction Analysis for Nonlinear Systems”, Automatica, 1998, vol. 34, pp. 683-696. [cited by applicant]
Ma et al., “Controlled Flight of a Biologically Inspired, Insect-Scale Robot”, Science, May 3, 2013, vol. 340, Issue 6132, pp. 603-607, DOI: 10.1126/science.1231806. [cited by applicant]
Maekawa et al., “Pseudo-Locomotion Design with a Quadrotor-Assisted Biped Robot”, Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE, International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, Dec. 12-15, 2018, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, DOI:10.1109… [cited by applicant]
Mahler et al., “Learning ambidextrous robot grasping policies”, Science Robotics, Jan. 16, 2019, vol. 4, eaau4984, 12 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Mahony et al., “Multirotor Aerial Vehicles: Modeling, Estimation, and Control of Quadrotor”, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, Sep. 2012, vol. 9, Issue 3, pp. 20-32, first published Aug. 27, 2012, DOI: 10.1109/MRA.20… [cited by applicant]
Morton et al., “A small hybrid ground-air vehicle concept”, Conference: 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Sep. 2017, pp. 5149-5154, DOI: 10.1109/IROS.2017.8206402. [cited by applicant]
Nelson et al., “The PETMAN and Atlas Robots at Boston Dynamics”, In book: Humanoid Robotics: A Reference, Jan. 2019, pp. 169-186, DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-6046-2_15. [cited by applicant]
Nguyen et al., “A Novel Robotic Platform for Aerial Manipulation Using Quadrotors as Rotating Thrust Generators”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics, Feb. 2018, vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 353-369, DOI: 10.1109/TRO.2018.2791604. [cited by applicant]
Norton et al., “Analysis of Human-robot Interaction at the DARPA Robotics Challenge Trials”, Journal of Field Robotics, Jun. 1, 2017, vol. 36, Issues 5-7, pp. 483-513, first published online Feb. 9, 2017, DOI: 10.1177/0… [cited by applicant]
Paranjape et al., “Novel Dihedral-Based Control of Flapping-Wing Aircraft With Application to Perching”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics, Oct. 2013, vol. 29, Issue 5, pp. 1071-1084, DOI: 10.1109/TRO.2013.2268947. [cited by applicant]
Peterson et al., “A wing-assisted running robot and implications for avian flight evolution”, Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, Dec. 3011, vol. 6, No. 4, 046008. published online Oct. 17, 2011, 8 pgs., DOI: 10.1088/1748-318… [cited by applicant]
Pratt et al., “Dynamic Underactuated Flying-Walking (DUCK) Robot”, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) Stockholm, Sweden, May 16-21, 2016, pp. 3267-3274, DOI: 10.1109/ICRA.2016.7487498. [cited by applicant]
Ramezani et al., “A biomimetic robotic platform to study flight specializations of bats”, Science Robotics, Feb. 1, 2017, vol. 2, eaal2505, 27 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Roderick et al., “Touchdown to take-off: at the interface of flight and surface locomotion”, Interface Focus, Feb. 6, 2017, vol. 7, No. 1, 20160094, pp. 1-15, doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2016.0094. [cited by applicant]
Ruggiero et al., “A multilayer control for multirotor UAVs equipped with a servo robot arm”, Proceedings—IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Jun. 2015, pp. 4014-4020, DOI: 10.1109/ICRA.2015.7139760. [cited by applicant]
Savoie et al., “A robot made of robots: Emergent transport and control of a smarticle ensemble”, Science Robotics, Sep. 18, 2019, vol. 4, eaax4316, 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Shakhatreh et al., “Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): A Survey on Civil Applications and Key Research Challenges”, IEEE Access, Apr. 9, 2019, vol. 7, pp. 48572-48634, DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2909530. [cited by applicant]
Shepherd et al., “Multigait soft robot”, PNAS, Dec. 20, 2011, vol. 108, No. 51, pp. 20400-20403, DOI: 10.1073/pnas. 1116564108. [cited by applicant]
Shi et al., “Adaptive Nonlinear Control of Fixed-Wing VTOL with Airflow Vector Sensing”, 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), May-Aug. 2020, pp. 5321-5327, DOI: 10.1109/ICRA40945.2020.91… [cited by applicant]
Shi et al., “Nonlinear Control of Autonomous Flying Cars with Wings and Distributed Electric Propulsion”, in 2018 IEEE Conference of Decision and Control (CDC), 2018, pp. 5326-5333, DPO: 10.1109/CDC.2018.8619578. [cited by applicant]
Tâche et al., “Magnebike: A magnetic wheeled robot with high mobility for inspecting complex-shaped structures”, Journal of Field Robotics, May 2009, vol. 26, Issue 5, pp. 453-476, https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.20296. [cited by applicant]
Triebel et al., “Spencer: A Socially Aware Service Robot for Passenger Guidance and Help in Busy Airports”, Part of the Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics book series, in Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Field an… [cited by applicant]
Veloso et al., “CoBots: Robust Symbiotic Autonomous Mobile Service Robots”, IJCAI'15: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Jul. 2015, pp. 4423-4429. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., “Design and Modeling of a Novel Transformable Land/Air Robot”, International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Feb. 4, 2019, vol. 2019, Article ID 2064131, 10 pages, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2064131. [cited by applicant]
Wu et al., “Insect-scale fast moving and ultrarobust soft robot”, Science Robotics, Jul. 31, 2019, vol. 4, eaax1594, 10 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Yang et al., “Sliding mode control for trajectory tracking of nonholonomic wheel mobile robots”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Jun. 1999, vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 578-587. [cited by applicant]
Zufferey et al., “A 10-gram Vision-based Flying Robot”, Advanced Robotics, Oct. 2007, vol. 21, No. 14, pp. 1671-1684, DOI: 10.1163/156855307782227417. [cited by applicant]
Daler, Thesis, Ecole polytechnique federale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Kajita et al., “Introduction to Humanoid Robotics”, Springer, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Rezazadeh et al., “Control of ATRIAS in three dimensions: Walking as a forced-oscillation problem”, The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 39, No. 7, May 31, 2020, 23 pgs., DOI: 10.1177/0278364920916777. [cited by applicant]
Yanco et al., “Analysis of Human-robot Interaction at the DARPA Robotics Challenge Trials”, Journal of Field Robotics, May 2015, vol. Issue 3, Special Issue: DARPA Robotics Challenge (DRC), pp. 420-444, https://doi.org/… [cited by applicant]
Cited By (1)
US 12,624,711