IP Library Granted Patent US 12,339,583
Granted Patent B2
US 12,339,583 · App. 17/776,728 · Granted Jun 24, 2025

Optimization using a non-uniform illumination intensity profile

Inventors: Janardan Nath (Norwalk, CT); Christopher John Mason (Newtown, CT); Duan-Fu Stephen Hsu (Fremont, CA); Todd R. Downey (Monroe, CT); Tian Gang (Best, NL)
Assignees: ASML HOLDING N.V.; ASML NETHERLANDS B.V.
G03F1/70G03F1/36
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,339,583
App. No.
17/776,728
Granted
Jun 24, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for source mask optimization or mask only optimization used to image a pattern onto a substrate. The method includes determining a non-uniform illumination intensity profile for illumination; and determining one or more adjustments for the pattern based on the non-uniform illumination intensity profile until a determination that features patterned onto a substrate substantially match a target design. The non-uniform illumination intensity profile may be determined based on an illumination optical system and projection optics of a lithographic apparatus. In some embodiments, the lithographic apparatus includes a slit, and the non-uniform illumination profile is a through slit non-uniform illumination intensity profile. Determining the one or more adjustments for the pattern may include performing optical proximity correction, for example.

Claims (27)

1. A method associated with imaging a pattern, the method comprising:

determining a non-uniform illumination intensity profile for illumination from an illumination optical system; and

adjusting, by a hardware computer system, the pattern and the illumination based on the non-uniform illumination intensity profile until a termination condition is satisfied.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining and adjusting are performed as part of a source mask optimization.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the non-uniform illumination intensity profile is determined based on a population of empirical data and/or a corresponding electronic model.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the method is for a lithographic apparatus, the lithographic apparatus comprising the illumination optical system and projection optics configured to image the pattern onto a substrate;

wherein the non-uniform illumination intensity profile is determined based on the illumination optical system and the projection optics; and

wherein the method further comprises determining one or more adjustments for the projection optics based on the non-uniform illumination intensity profile until the termination condition is satisfied.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the lithographic apparatus comprises a slit, and wherein the non-uniform illumination intensity profile is a through slit non-uniform illumination intensity profile.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the lithographic apparatus comprises a pupil, and wherein the determining the one or more adjustments for one or more selected from: the pattern, the projection optics, or the illumination optical system comprises determining an adjustment for a through slit pupil.

7. The method of claim 4 , wherein the determining the one or more adjustments for one or more selected from: the pattern, the projection optics, or the illumination optical system comprises determining a through slit apodization.

8. The method of claim 4 , wherein determining the one or more adjustments for one or more selected from: the pattern, the projection optics, or the illumination optical system comprises performing optical proximity correction.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the performing optical proximity correction comprises applying one or more rule or model based assist features, and modeling a process for imaging the pattern onto the substrate.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein a model for the modeling comprises a through slit optical proximity correction model configured to model the process for imaging the pattern onto the substrate using the non-uniform illumination intensity profile.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the through slit optical proximity correction model is configured to model the process for imaging the pattern onto the substrate using the non-uniform illumination intensity profile and different doses from the illumination optical system.

12. The method of claim 4 , further comprising adjusting for drift in the non-uniform illumination intensity profile; and

the determining the one or more adjustments for one or more selected from: the pattern, the projection optics, or the illumination optical system is based on a drift-adjusted non-uniform illumination intensity profile until the termination condition is satisfied.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the adjusting for drift comprises positioning one or more beam interceptors in one or more locations in a path of the illumination to intercept one or more corresponding portions of the illumination in the one or more locations.

14. The method of claim 12 , wherein the adjusting for drift comprises modeling a positioning of one or more beam interceptors in one or more locations in a path of the illumination to intercept one or more corresponding portions of the illumination in the one or more locations.

15. The method of claim 12 , wherein the drift is caused by projection optics collector contamination and/or illumination optical system tolerances.

16. The method of claim 4 , wherein the determining the one or more adjustments for one or more selected from: the pattern, the projection optics, or the illumination optical system based on the non-uniform illumination intensity profile is configured to reduce high frequency non-uniformity in the illumination from the illumination optical system relative to illumination from the illumination optical system having a substantially uniform illumination intensity profile.

17. The method of claim 4 , wherein the determining the one or more adjustments for one or more selected from: the pattern, the projection optics, or the illumination optical system comprises determining an adjustment for a through slit dipole X pupil.

18. The method of claim 4 , wherein the determining the one or more adjustments for one or more selected from: the pattern, the projection optics, or the illumination optical system are performed for a semiconductor manufacturing process.

19. The method of claim 18 , wherein the non-uniform illumination intensity profile is used for a pupil and mask co-optimization step of a source mask optimization for the semiconductor manufacturing process.

20. A computer program product comprising a non-transitory computer-readable medium having instructions therein, the instructions, when executed by a computer system, configured to cause the computer system to at least:

determine a non-uniform illumination intensity profile for illumination from an illumination optical system; and

adjust a pattern for imaging with the illumination and the illumination, based on the non-uniform illumination intensity profile until a termination condition is satisfied.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 16, 2022
From: NATH, JANARDAN; MASON, CHRISTOPHER JOHN; DOWNEY, TODD R.
To: ASML HOLDING N.V.
Reel/Frame 059915/0292 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 16, 2022
From: HSU, DUAN-FU STEPHEN; GANG, TIAN
To: ASML NETHERLANDS B.V.
Reel/Frame 059915/0310 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62937478 · Nov 19, 2019
Related Publication 20220390832A1 · Dec 8, 2022
References Cited (24)
US 5229872A · Mumola · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 6046792A · Van Der Werf et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 7936445B2 · Hintersteiner et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8663881B2 · Buurman et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9588438B2 · Hsu et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20060057471A1 · Schenau et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060268248A1 · Noelscher · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070031745A1 · Ye et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070050749A1 · Ye et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080129975A1 · Suda · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080301620A1 · Ye et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080309897A1 · Wong et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090157630A1 · Yuan · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100162197A1 · Ye et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100180251A1 · Ye et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20160062244A1 · Patra · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160246180A1 · Natt et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20190113850A1 · Ma et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 102540754 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 102890424 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
CN 109725487 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in corresponding PCT Patent Application No. PCT/EP2020/082570, dated Feb. 26, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Spence, C.: “Full-Chip Lithography Simulation and Design Analysis—How OPC Is Changing IC Design”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 5751, pp. 1-14 (2005). [cited by applicant]
Office Action issued in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 202080080189, dated Apr. 18, 2025. [cited by applicant]