IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,340,279
Granted Patent B2
US 12,340,279 · App. 18/543,790 · Granted Jun 24, 2025

Techniques for controlling small angle Mølmer-Sørensen gates and for handling asymmetric spam errors

Inventors: Jwo-Sy Chen (Greenbelt, MD); Neal Pisenti (Laurel, MD); Yunseong Nam (North Bethesda, MD)
Assignee: IonQ, Inc.
G06N10/70G06F11/1004G06F30/20G06N10/20G06N10/40
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,340,279
App. No.
18/543,790
Granted
Jun 24, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The disclosure describes various techniques to control of small angle Mølmer-Sørensen (MS) gates and to handle asymmetric errors. A technique is described for handling asymmetric errors in quantum information processing (QIP) systems. An exemplary method includes implementing a quantum circuit in the QIP system that has first and second qubit lines, with a first qubit state having a greater measurement error than a second qubit state; swapping the roles of the first and second qubit states at a quantum circuit level in response to at least one of the first qubit line and the second qubit line being expected to be at the first qubit state at a measurement; and enabling a quantum simulation using the quantum circuit with the first and second qubit states reassigned in at least one of the first qubit line and the second qubit line after the swapping of the respective roles.

Claims (47)

1. A method for calibrating quantum gates in a quantum computing system, the method comprising:

determining an amount of entanglement θ of at least a pair of quantum gates in the quantum computing system;

comparing the determined amount of entanglement θ to a target entanglement value based on a parity signal obtained from a calibration circuit of the quantum computing system; and

when the determined amount of entanglement θ is not the target entanglement value, adjusting at least one of an optical and a radio frequency (RF) power applied to the pair of quantum gates until the parity signal corresponds to the target entanglement value.

2. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising, in response to the determined amount of entanglement θ being the target entanglement value, completing the calibration and enabling the pair of quantum gate for use in a quantum operation by the quantum computing system.

3. The method according to claim 2 , wherein the pair of quantum gates are Mølmer-Sørensen (MS) gates.

4. The method according to claim 2 , further comprising performing the quantum operation using the calibrated pair of quantum gates.

5. The method according to claim 4 , wherein the quantum operation is one of a quantum chemistry simulation, a quantum approximate optimization algorithm or a quantum machine learning algorithm.

6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the determining of the amount of entanglement θ comprises receiving calibration information that describes a relationship between the parity signal and respective values of entanglement θ within a range for the pair of quantum gates.

7. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising applying the at least one of the optical and radio frequency (RF) power to run the calibration circuit.

8. The method according to claim 7 , further comprising measuring the parity signal in response to the running of the calibration circuit.

9. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

detecting a deviation of the at least one of the optical or RF power from an optimal value used to apply the pair of quantum gates; and

adjusting the at least one of the optical or RF power used to apply the pair of quantum gates until the parity signal from the calibration circuit again corresponds to the target entanglement value for recalibrating the pair of quantum gates.

10. The method according to claim 9 , wherein the detecting and the adjusting are part of a closed-loop feedback control system to actively servo the amount of entanglement of the pair of quantum gates.

11. The method according to claim 1 , wherein θ=π/2 represents a full entanglement and the values of θ are those for which |θ|<<π/2.

12. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

applying the at least one of the optical or RF power to run the calibration circuit for a different target entanglement value of θ;

measuring a parity signal from running the calibration circuit to determine if the corresponding value of θ is the different target entanglement value of θ;

in response to the corresponding value of θ being the different target entanglement value of θ, completing the calibration and enabling of a different quantum gate in the quantum computing system for use in a same quantum operation as the pair of quantum gates; and

in response to the corresponding value of θ not being the different target entanglement value of θ, adjusting the at least one of the optical or RF power being applied to the pair of quantum gates until the measured parity signal corresponds to the different target entanglement value of θ for completing the calibration and enabling the different quantum gate for use in the same quantum operation as the pair of quantum gates.

13. A quantum information processing (QIP) system for calibrating quantum gates, the QIP system comprising:

a calibration component configured to control one or more components of the QIP system for:

implementing a two-qubit calibration circuit that includes a pair of quantum gates having an amount of entanglement θ between the pair of quantum gates,

running the calibration circuit for a range of values of θ to generate calibration information,

comparing the amount of entanglement θ to a target entanglement value based on a parity signal obtained from two-qubit calibration circuit, and

when the amount of entanglement θ is not the target entanglement value, adjusting at least one of an optical and a radio frequency (RF) power applied to the pair of quantum gates until the parity signal corresponds to the target entanglement value; and

a memory configured to store the calibration information,

wherein the calibration component is configured to access the calibration information in the memory to provide the calibration information to the one or more components of the QIP system to calibrate the pair of quantum gates in a quantum operation.

14. The QIP system according to claim 13 , wherein the one or more components of the QIP system include one or more of a trap, an optical controller, and an algorithms component.

15. The QIP system according to claim 13 , wherein the pair of quantum gates are Mølmer-Sørensen (MS) gates.

16. The QIP system according to claim 13 , wherein the calibration component is further configured to control the one or more components of the QIP system for:

detecting a deviation of the at least one of the optical or RF power from an optimal value used to apply the pair of quantum gates; and

adjusting the at least one of the optical or RF power used to apply the pair of quantum gates until the parity signal from the calibration circuit again corresponds to the target entanglement value for recalibrating the pair of quantum gates.

17. The QIP system according to claim 16 , wherein the detecting and the adjusting are part of a closed-loop feedback control system to actively servo the amount of entanglement of the pair of quantum gates.

18. The QIP system according to claim 13 , wherein the calibration component is further configured to control the one or more components of the QIP system for:

applying the at least one of the optical or RF power to run the calibration circuit for a different target entanglement value of θ;

measuring a parity signal from running the calibration circuit to determine if the corresponding value of θ is the different target entanglement value of θ;

in response to the corresponding value of θ being the different target entanglement value of θ, completing the calibration and enabling of a different quantum gate in the quantum computing system for use in a same quantum operation as the pair of quantum gates; and

in response to the corresponding value of θ not being the different target entanglement value of θ, adjusting the at least one of the optical or RF power being applied to the pair of quantum gates until the measured parity signal corresponds to the different target entanglement value of θ for completing the calibration and enabling the different quantum gate for use in the same quantum operation as the pair of quantum gates.

19. A quantum information processing (QIP) system for calibrating quantum gates, comprising:

a memory storing calibration information that describes a relationship between parity signals and respective values of θ within a range for at least a pair of quantum of the QIP system, where θ represents an amount of entanglement of the pair of quantum gates; and

a calibration component configured to control one or more components of the QIP system for:

determining an amount of entanglement θ of at least a pair of quantum gates in the quantum computing system;

comparing the determined amount of entanglement θ to a target entanglement value based on a parity signal obtained from a calibration circuit of the quantum computing system; and

when the determined amount of entanglement θ is not the target entanglement value, adjusting at least one of an optical and a radio frequency (RF) power applied to the pair of quantum gates until the parity signal corresponds to the target entanglement value.

20. The QIP system according to claim 19 , wherein the one or more components of the QIP system include one or more of a trap, an optical controller, and an algorithms component.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 19, 2023
From: CHEN, JWO-SY; PISENTI, NEAL; NAM, YUNSEONG
To: IONQ, INC.
Reel/Frame 065907/0575 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 17887003 · Aug 12, 2022
Division 16708207 · Dec 9, 2019
Provisional Application 62797014 · Jan 25, 2019
Related Publication 20240185114A1 · Jun 6, 2024
References Cited (14)
US 10733524B1 · Feig et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10846366B1 · Otterbach et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11645568B2 · Chen et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11658660B1 · Finck · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 12093788B2 · Brown · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20180365585A1 · Smith et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190042677A1 · Matsuura et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190095811A1 · Antonio et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190205783A1 · Nam et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200193302A1 · Wiebe et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200293937A1 · Babbush · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210304054A1 · Neill · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220343203A1 · Brown · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230359923A1 · Niu et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]