IP Library Granted Patent US 12,340,709
Granted Patent B2
US 12,340,709 · App. 17/517,949 · Granted Jun 24, 2025

Adaptive tutoring system for machine tasks in augmented reality

Inventors: Karthik Ramani (West Lafayette, IN); Gaoping Huang (West Lafayette, IN); Alexander J Quinn (West Lafayette, IN); Yuanzhi Cao (Redmond, WA); Tianyi Wang (West Lafayette, IN); Xun Qian (West Lafayette, IN)
Assignee: Purdue Research Foundation
G09B19/0069G06N20/00G06T13/40G06T19/006G06V10/25G06V40/23G09B5/02G09B19/24G06T2210/36
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,340,709
App. No.
17/517,949
Granted
Jun 24, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A machine task tutorial system is disclosed that utilizes augmented reality to enable an expert user to record a tutorial for a machine task that can be learned by different trainee users in an adaptive manner. The machine task tutorial system advantageously utilizes an adaptation model that focuses on spatial and bodily visual presence for machine task tutoring. The machine task tutorial system advantageously enables adaptive tutoring in the recorded-tutorial environment based on machine state and user activity recognition. The machine task tutorial system advantageously utilizes AR to provide tutorial recording, adaptive visualization, and state recognition. In this way, the machine task tutorial system supports more effective apprenticeship and training for machine tasks in workshops or factories.

Claims (44)

1. A method for providing tutorial guidance for performing a machine task, the method comprising:

storing, in a memory, tutorial data defining a plurality of steps of a machine task, the plurality of steps including interactions with a machine in an environment;

displaying, on a display, an augmented reality graphical user interface including graphical tutorial elements that convey information regarding the plurality of steps of the machine task, the graphical tutorial elements being superimposed on at least one of (i) the machine and (ii) the environment;

monitoring, with at least one sensor, motions of a first person and states of the machine during a performance of the machine task by the first person by (i) detecting a position of a respective component of the machine in the environment, (ii) determining a bounding box in an image that encompasses the respective component of the machine within the image based on the position of the respective component of the machine, and (iii) determining a state of the respective component using a machine learning model based on the image cropped by the bounding box;

determining, with a processor, during a performance of a respective step of the plurality of steps involving a respective component of the machine, that the first person is stuck in the performance of the respective step based on the monitored motions of the first person and the monitored states of the machine; and

increasing, with the processor, a level of detail of the graphical tutorial elements in the graphical user interface that are displayed with respect to the respective component in response to determining that the first person is stuck in the performance of the machine task.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the graphical tutorial elements include a virtual representation of a human that is animated to show a human motion required to perform at least one of the plurality of steps of the machine task.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the graphical tutorial elements include a virtual representation of a component of the machine that is animated to show a manipulation of the component required to perform at least one of the plurality of steps of the machine task.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the graphical tutorial elements include a virtual arrow superimposed in the environment to indicate a direction of the manipulation of the component required to perform the at least one of the plurality of steps of the machine task.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the graphical tutorial elements include at least one of (i) a text description and (ii) a graphical representation of an expected outcome of a respective step in the plurality of steps of the machine task.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the graphical tutorial elements include at least one of (i) a text description and (ii) a graphical representation of an expected outcome of a respective group of consecutive steps in the plurality of steps of the machine task.

7. The method according to claim 1 , the monitoring further comprising:

determining whether the first person is looking at a region of interest for a particular step in the plurality of steps of the machine task, the region of interest being defined in the tutorial data.

8. The method according to claim 7 , the determining that the first person is stuck in the performance respective step further comprising:

determining that the first person is stuck in response to the first person looking away from the region of interest for longer than a first threshold amount of time, without interacting with any components of the machine.

9. The method according to claim 7 , the determining that the first person is stuck in the performance respective step further comprising:

determining that the first person is stuck in response to the first person looking at the region of interest for longer than a second threshold amount of time, without interacting with any components of the machine.

10. The method of claim 1 , the monitoring the motions of the first person further comprising:

classifying a current state of the first person based on the monitored motions of the first person.

11. The method of claim 10 , the classifying the current state of the first person further comprising at least one of:

determining whether the first person is changing perspective of the environment; and

determining whether the first person is statically observing the environment.

12. The method of claim 10 , the classifying the current state of the first person further comprising at least one of:

determining whether the first person is interacting with a component of the machine.

13. The method according to claim 12 , the determining that the first person is stuck in the performance respective step further comprising:

determining that the first person is stuck in response to the first person interacting with a component that is not the respective component of the machine for longer than a third threshold amount of time.

14. The method according to claim 12 , the determining that the first person is stuck in the performance respective step further comprising:

determining that the first person is stuck in response to the first person interacting with the respective component of the machine for longer than a fourth threshold amount of time, without setting a state of the respective component to a target state.

15. The method according to claim 1 , the determining that the first person is stuck in the performance respective step further comprising:

operating a finite state machine having a plurality of states based on the monitored motions of the first person and the monitored states of the machine; and

determining that the first person is stuck in response to the finite state machine remaining at a respective state in the plurality of states of the state machine for longer than a respective threshold amount of time.

16. The method according to claim 1 , the increasing the level of detail of the graphical tutorial elements further comprising:

increasing, in the graphical user interface, a number of graphical tutorial elements that are displayed with respect to the respective component of the machine.

17. The method according to claim 1 further comprising:

decreasing, in the graphical user interface, a number of graphical tutorial elements that are displayed with respect to respective component of the machine in response to the first person completing the respective step in the plurality of steps of the machine task that involved the respective component.

18. The method of claim 1 , wherein the tutorial data was previously recorded and generated by a second person.

19. An augmented reality device for providing tutorial guidance for performing a machine task, augmented reality device comprising:

a memory configured to store tutorial data defining a plurality of steps of a machine task, the plurality of steps including interactions with a machine in an environment;

a display screen configured to display an augmented reality graphical user interface including graphical tutorial elements that convey information regarding the plurality of steps of the machine task, the graphical tutorial elements being superimposed on at least one of (i) the machine and (ii) the environment;

at least one sensor configured to measure sensor data; and

a processor operably connected to the memory, the display screen, and the at least one sensor, the processor being configured to:

monitor, based on the sensor data, motions of a first person and states of the machine during a performance of the machine task by the first person by (i) detecting a position of a respective component of the machine in the environment, (ii) determining a bounding box in an image that encompasses the respective component of the machine within the image based on the position of the respective component of the machine, and (iii) determining a state of the respective component using a machine learning model based on the image cropped by the bounding box;

determine, during a performance of a respective step of the plurality of steps involving a respective component of the machine, that the first person is stuck in the performance of the respective step based on the monitored motions of the first person and the monitored states of the machine; and

operate the display screen to increase a level of detail of the graphical tutorial elements in the graphical user interface that are displayed with respect to the respective component in response to determining that the first person is stuck in the performance of the machine task.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 16, 2025
From: RAMANI, KARTHIK; HUANG, GAOPING; QUINN, ALEXANDER J; CAO, YUANZHI; WANG, TIANYI; QIAN, XUN
To: PURDUE RESEARCH FOUNDATION
Reel/Frame 071423/0393 →
Continuity (3)
Provisional Application 63162108 · Mar 17, 2021
Provisional Application 63109154 · Nov 3, 2020
Related Publication 20220139254A1 · May 5, 2022
References Cited (72)
US 20120075343A1 · Chen · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20180315329A1 · D'Amato · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190316912A1 · Maggiore · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20210035333A1 · Wright · 2021 [cited by examiner]
Balasaravanan Thoravi Kumaravel, Fraser Anderson, George Fitzmaurice, Bjoern Hartmann, and Tovi Grossman. 2019. Loki: Facilitating Remote Instruction of Physical Tasks Using Bi-Directional Mixed-Reality Telepresence. In… [cited by applicant]
Balasaravanan Thoravi Kumaravel, Cuong Nguyen, Stephen DiVerdi, and Björn Hartmann. 2019. TutoriVR: A Video-Based Tutorial System for Design Applications in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on … [cited by applicant]
Unity. 2019. Unity Real-Time Development Platform. Retrieved Sep. 1, 2019 from https://unity.com/. [cited by applicant]
Kurt VanLehn. 2011. The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist 46, 4 (2011), 197-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.611369. [cited by applicant]
Anne Wegerich and Matthias Rötting. 2011. A Context-Aware Adaptation System for Spatial Augmented Reality. In Digital Human Modeling, Vincent G. Duffy (Ed.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 417-425. [cited by applicant]
Giles Westerfield, Antonija Mitrovic, and Mark Billinghurst. 2015. Intelligent Augmented Reality Training for Motherboard Assembly. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 25, 1 (2015), 157-172. ht… [cited by applicant]
Frederik Winther, Linoj Ravindran, Kasper Paabøl Svendsen, and Tiare Feuchtner. 2020. Design and Evaluation of a VR Training Simulation for Pump Maintenance Based on a Use Case at Grundfos. In IEEE VR 2020. IEEE. [cited by applicant]
Li Da Xu, Eric L Xu, and Ling Li. 2018. Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends. International Journal of Production Research 56, 8 (2018), 2941-2962. [cited by applicant]
M. Yamashita and S. Sakane. 2001. Adaptive annotation using a human-robot interface system PARTNER. In Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164), vol. 3. 2661-26… [cited by applicant]
Z. Zhu, V. Branzoi, M. Wolverton, G. Murray, N. Vitovitch, L. Yarnall, G. Acharya, S. Samarasekera, and R. Kumar. 2014. AR-mentor: Augmented reality based mentoring system. In 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed … [cited by applicant]
Paula Martiskainen, Mikko Järvinen, Jukka-Pekka Skön, Jarkko Tiirikainen, Mikko Kolehmainen, and Jaakko Mononen 2009. Cow behaviour pattern recognition using a three-dimensional accelerometer and support vector machines… [cited by applicant]
Dominic Gorecky, Mathias Schmitt, Matthias Loskyll, and Detlef Zühlke. 2014. Human-machine-interaction in the industry 4.0 era. In 2014 12th IEEE international conference on industrial informatics (INDIN). IEEE, 289-294. [cited by applicant]
Ping-Hsuan Han, Yang-Sheng Chen, Yilun Zhong, Han-Lei Wang, and Yi-Ping Hung. 2017. My Tai-Chi Coaches: An Augmented-Learning Tool for Practicing Tai-Chi Chuan. In Proceedings of the 8th Augmented Human International Co… [cited by applicant]
Bradley Herbert, Barrett Ens, Amali Weerasinghe, Mark Billinghurst, and Grant Wigley. 2018. Design considerations for combining augmented reality with intelligent tutors. Computers and Graphics (Pergamon) 77 (2018), 166… [cited by applicant]
Shaun W. Lawson and John R. G. Pretlove. 1998. Augmented reality for underground pipe inspection and maintenance. In Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies V, Matthew R. Stein (Ed.), vol. 3524. International Soci… [cited by applicant]
D. Rodenburg, P. Hungler, S. A. Etemad, D. Howes, A. Szulewski, and J. Mclellan. 2018. Dynamically adaptive simulation based on expertise and cognitive load. In 2018 IEEE Games, Entertainment, Media Conference (GEM). 1-… [cited by applicant]
S. Yonemoto. 2013. Seamless Annotation Display for Augmented Reality. In 2013 International Conference on Cyberworlds. 387-387. [cited by applicant]
J. Zhu, S.K. Ong, and A.Y.C. Nee. 2015. A context-aware augmented reality assisted maintenance system. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 28, 2 (2015), 213-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2… [cited by applicant]
2020. Oculus. https://www.oculus.com/. [cited by applicant]
Andrea F. Abate, Vincenzo Loia, Michele Nappi, Stefano Ricciardi, and Enrico Boccola. 2008. ASSYST: Avatar baSed SYStem mainTenance. 2008 IEEE Radar Conference, RADAR 2008 1 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/RADAR.2008.47… [cited by applicant]
M. Beyyoudh, M. K. Idrissi, and S. Bennani. 2018. A new approach of designing an intelligent tutoring system based on adaptive workflows and pedagogical games. In 2018 17th International Conference on Information Techno… [cited by applicant]
Andrew Thomas Bimba, Norisma Idris, Ahmed Al-Hunaiyyan, Rohana Binti Mahmud, and Nor Liyana Bt Mohd Shuib. 2017. Adaptive feedback in computerbased learning environments: a review. Adaptive Behavior 25, 5 (2017), 217- 2… [cited by applicant]
Peter Brusilovsky and Hoah-Der Su. 2002. Adaptive Visualization Component of a Distributed Web-Based Adaptive Educational System. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Stefano A. Cerri, Guy Gouardères, and Fàbio Paraguaçu (E… [cited by applicant]
Alisa Burova, John Mäkelä, Jaakko Hakulinen, Tuuli Keskinen, Hanna Heinonen, Sanni Siltanen, and Markku Turunen. 2020. Utilizing VR and Gaze Tracking to Develop AR Solutions for Industrial Maintenance. In Proceedings of… [cited by applicant]
Yuanzhi Cao, Xun Qian, Tianyi Wang, Rachel Lee, Ke Huo, and Karthik Ramani. [n.d.]. An Exploratory Study of Augmented Reality Presence for Tutoring Machine Tasks. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Facto… [cited by applicant]
Jean-Rémy Chardonnet, Guillaume Fromentin, and José Outeiro. 2017. Augmented reality as an aid for the use of machine tools. In 15th Management and Innovative Technologies (MIT) Conference. Sinaia, Romania, 1-4. https: … [cited by applicant]
Pei-Yu Chi, Sally Ahn, Amanda Ren, Mira Dontcheva, Wilmot Li, and Björn Hartmann. 2012. MixT: automatic generation of step-by-step mixed media tutorials. In Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM symposium on User interface… [cited by applicant]
Albert T. Corbett, Kenneth R. Koedinger, and John R. Anderson. 1997. Chapter 37—Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction (Second Edition) (second edition ed.), Marting G. Helander, Thomas … [cited by applicant]
F. De Crescenzio, M. Fantini, F. Persiani, L. Di Stefano, P. Azzari, and S. Salti. 2011. Augmented Reality for Aircraft Maintenance Training and Operations Support. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 31, 1 (2011), … [cited by applicant]
Paula J. Durlach. 2019. Fundamentals, Flavors, and Foibles of Adaptive Instructional Systems. In Adaptive Instructional Systems, Robert A. Sottilare and Jessica Schwarz (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 7… [cited by applicant]
Pavel Dvorak, Radovan Josth, and Elisabetta Delponte. 2017. Object State Recognition for Automatic AR-Based Maintenance Guidance. In 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW). 124… [cited by applicant]
Andreas Fender, Philipp Herholz, Marc Alexa, and Jörg Muller. 2018. OptiSpace: Automated Placement of Interactive 3D Projection Mapping Content. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Sy… [cited by applicant]
Andreas Fender, David Lindlbauer, Philipp Herholz, Marc Alexa, and Jörg Müller. 2017. HeatSpace: Automatic Placement of Displays by Empirical Analysis of User Behavior. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on… [cited by applicant]
Christoph Froschl. 2005. User modeling and user profiling in adaptive e-learning systems. Graz, Austria: Master Thesis (2005). [cited by applicant]
Markus Funk. 2016. Augmented reality at the workplace : a context-aware assistive system using in-situ projection. http://dx.doi.org/10.18419/opus-8997. [cited by applicant]
Benjamin Goldberg, Keith Brawner, and Robert Sottilare. 2012. Use of Evidencebased Strategies to Enhance the Extensibility of Adaptive Tutoring Technologies. Proceedings of the Interservice /Industry Training, Simulatio… [cited by applicant]
Michihiko Goto, Yuko Uematsu, Hideo Saito, Shuji Senda, and Akihiko Iketani. 2010. Task support system by displaying instructional video onto AR workspace. In 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Rea… [cited by applicant]
Fernando Gutierrez and John Atkinson. 2011. Adaptive feedback selection for intelligent tutoring systems. Expert Systems with Applications 38, 5 (2011), 6146-6152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.058. [cited by applicant]
Zhen-Yu He and Lian-Wen Jin. 2008. Activity recognition from acceleration data using AR model representation and SVM. In 2008 international conference on machine learning and cybernetics, vol. 4. IEEE, 2245-2250. [cited by applicant]
S. J. Henderson and S. Feiner. 2009. Evaluating the benefits of augmented reality for task localization in maintenance of an armored personnel carrier turret. In 2009 8th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmen… [cited by applicant]
S. J. Henderson and S. K. Feiner. 2011. Augmented reality in the psychomotor phase of a procedural task. In 2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. 191-200. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2… [cited by applicant]
Jean-Michel Hoc. 2001. Towards a Cognitive Approach to Human-Machine Cooperation in Dynamic Situations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 54, 4 (2001), 509-540. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2000.0454. [cited by applicant]
Lars-Erik Janlert. 2014. The Ubiquitous Button. Interactions 21, 3 (May 2014), 26-33. https://doi.org/10.1145/2592234. [cited by applicant]
Karen Kear, Frances Chetwynd, Judith Williams, and Helen Donelan. 2012. Web conferencing for synchronous online tutorials: Perspectives of tutors using a new medium. Computers & Education 58, 3 (2012), 953-963. [cited by applicant]
Seungwon Kim, Gun Lee, Weidong Huang, Hayun Kim, Woontack Woo, and Mark Billinghurst. 2019. Evaluating the Combination of Visual Communication Cues for HMD-Based Mixed Reality Remote Collaboration. In Proceedings of the… [cited by applicant]
A. Kotranza, D. Scott Lind, C. M. Pugh, and B. Lok. 2009. Real-time in-situ visual feedback of task performance in mixed environments for learning joint psychomotor-cognitive tasks. In 2009 8th IEEE International Sympos… [cited by applicant]
Wallace S. Lages and Doug A. Bowman. 2019. Walking with Adaptive Augmented Reality Workspaces: Design and Usage Patterns. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Marina del Ra… [cited by applicant]
Michael Laielli, James Smith, Giscard Biamby, Trevor Darrell, and Bjoern Hartmann. [n.d.]. LabelAR: A Spatial Guidance Interface for Fast Computer Vision Image Collection. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium… [cited by applicant]
Jung Lee and O Park. 2008. Adaptive instructional systems. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2008), 469-484. [cited by applicant]
David Lindlbauer, Anna Maria Feit, and Otmar Hilliges. 2019. Context-Aware Online Adaptation of Mixed Reality Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (New Or… [cited by applicant]
Matthias Loskyll, Ines Heck, Jochen Schlick, and Michael Schwarz. 2012. Contextbased orchestration for control of resource-efficient manufacturing processes. Future Internet 4, 3 (2012), 737-761. [cited by applicant]
Danielle L. Lusk, Amber D. Evans, Thomas R. Jeffrey, Keith R. Palmer, Chris S. Wikstrom, and Peter E. Doolittle. 2009. Multimedia learning and individual differences: Mediating the effects of working memory capacity wit… [cited by applicant]
Stephen Maloney, Michael Storr, Sophie Paynter, Prue Morgan, and Dragan Ilic. 2013. Investigating the efficacy of practical skill teaching: a pilot-study comparing three educational methods. Advances in Health Sciences … [cited by applicant]
Michael A Orey and Wayne A Nelson. 1993. Development principles for intelligent tutoring systems: Integrating cognitive theory into the development of computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Deve… [cited by applicant]
Philo Tan Chua, R. Crivella, B. Daly, Ning Hu, R. Schaaf, D. Ventura, T. Camill, J. Hodgins, and R. Pausch. 2003. Training for physical tasks in virtual environments: Tai Chi. In IEEE Virtual Reality, 2003. Proceedings.… [cited by applicant]
Thammathip Piumsomboon, Gun A. Lee, Jonathon D. Hart, Barrett Ens, Robert W. Lindeman, Bruce H. Thomas, and Mark Billinghurst. 2018. Mini-Me: An Adaptive Avatar for Mixed Reality Remote Collaboration. In Proceedings of … [cited by applicant]
Thammathip Piumsomboon, Gun A. Lee, Andrew Irlitti, Barrett Ens, Bruce H. Thomas, and Mark Billinghurst. 2019. On the Shoulder of the Giant: A Multi-Scale Mixed Reality Collaboration with 360 Video Sharing and Tangible … [cited by applicant]
Shaoqing Ren, Kaiming He, Ross Girshick, and Jian Sun. [n.d.]. Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28, C. Cortes, N. D. La… [cited by applicant]
Alejandro Reyes, Osslan Vergara, Erasmo Bojórquez, Vianey Sánchez, and Manuel Nandayapa. 2016. A mobile augmented reality system to support machinery operations in scholar environments: A Mar System to Support Machinery… [cited by applicant]
Mark Sandler, Andrew Howard, Menglong Zhu, Andrey Zhmoginov, and LiangChieh Chen. 2018. MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogn… [cited by applicant]
Eldon Schoop, Michelle Nguyen, Daniel Lim, Valkyrie Savage, Sean Follmer, and Björn Hartmann. 2016. Drill Sergeant: Supporting physical construction projects through an ecosystem of augmented tools. In Proceedings of th… [cited by applicant]
Marieke H.S.B. Smits, Jo Boon, Dominique M.A. Sluijsmans, and Tamara van Gog. 2008. Content and timing of feedback in a web-based learning environment: effects on learning as a function of prior knowledge. Interactive L… [cited by applicant]
Robert Sottilare and Keith Brawner. [n.d.]. Component Interaction within the Generalized Intelligent Framework for Tutoring ( GIFT ) as a Model for Adaptive Instructional System Standards Toward Standardization through … [cited by applicant]
Robert A. Sottilare, Benjamin Goldberg, Charles Ragusa, and Michael Hoffman. 2013. Characterizing an Adaptive Tutoring Learning Effect Chain for Individual and Team Tutoring. 13033 (2013), 1-13. [cited by applicant]
Lucy Suchman. 2007. Human Machine Reconfigurations Plans and Situated Actions (2 ed.). Cambridge University Press. [cited by applicant]
Alyssa Tanaka, Jeffrey Craighead, Glenn Taylor, and Robert Sottilare. 2019. Adaptive Learning Technology for AR Training: Possibilities and Challenges. In Adaptive Instructional Systems, Robert A. Sottilare and Jessica … [cited by applicant]
Markus Tatzgern, Valeria Orso, Denis Kalkofen, Giulio Jacucci, Luciano Gamberini, and Dieter Schmalstieg. 2016. Adaptive information density for augmented reality displays. Proceedings—IEEE Virtual Reality Jul. 2016, 83… [cited by applicant]
Andrea L. Thomaz and Cynthia Breazeal. 2008. Teachable robots: Understanding human teaching behavior to build more effective robot learners. Artificial Intelligence 172, 6-7 (2008), 716-737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ar… [cited by applicant]
Cited By (1)
US 12,725,369