IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,343,088
Granted Patent B2
US 12,343,088 · App. 18/371,530 · Granted Jul 1, 2025

Lower extremities leg length calculation method

Inventors: Daniel Odermatt (Weston, FL); Matthew Thompson (Fort Lauderdale, FL)
A61B34/10A61B5/055A61B5/107A61B6/032A61B6/505A61B6/5217A61B8/00A61B34/20A61B34/25A61B34/30A61B90/50A61B8/0875A61B8/5223A61B17/1666A61B2034/101A61B2034/104A61B2034/105A61B2034/108
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,343,088
App. No.
18/371,530
Filed
Sep 22, 2023
Granted
Jul 1, 2025
Kind
B2
Art Unit
2187
USPC
703/1
Abstract

A method of calculating leg length discrepancy of a patient including: receiving patient bone data associated with a lower body of the patient; identifying anatomical landmarks in the patient bone data; orienting a first proximal landmark and a second proximal landmark relative to each other and an origin in a coordinate system; aligning a first axis associated with a first femur and a second axis associated with a second femur with a longitudinal axis extending in a distal-proximal direction, wherein the first and second distal landmarks are adjusted according to the alignment of the first and second axes; calculating a distance between the first and second distal landmarks in the distal-proximal direction along the longitudinal axis; and displaying at least one of the distance or a portion of the patient bone data on a display screen.

Claims (21)

1. A method of calculating leg length discrepancy of a lower body of a patient comprising a pelvic region, femurs, tibias, and fee, the method comprising:

receiving patient bone data representative of at least a portion of the lower body of the patient including the pelvic region, femurs, tibias, and fee, the patient bone data having been generated via a medical imaging device;

generating computer models of the lower body from the patient bone data, the computer models including the first and second side pelvic models, first and second femur models, first and second tibia models, and first and second models;

orienting the first and second side pelvic models relative to an origin in a coordinate system;

identifying an orientation of the first and second femur models, first and second tibia models, and first and second foot models relative to the first and second side pelvic models;

adjusting the orientation of one of the first and second femur models, first and second tibia models, or first and second foot models with respect to an anteroposterior or mediolateral axis relative to the orientation of another of the first and second femur models, first and second tibia models, or first and second foot models;

calculating the leg length of discrepancy based upon a difference in length between a first landmark in the first foot model and a second landmark in the second foot model in a direction of the longitudinal axis extending from the first and second foot models to the first and second side pelvic models; and

displaying at least one of the difference or a portion of the computer models on a display screen.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the patient bone data comprises at least one of the CT images, MR images, or X-ray images.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first landmark is a first point in or on a talus bone of the first foot model, and the second landmark is a second point in or on a talus bone of the second foot model.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the patient bone data comprises information associated with the statistical bone model.

5. A computer program stored on one or more tangible, non-transitory, computer readable storage media having executable instructions for performing the computer program on a computing device system, the computer program comprising:

receiving patient bone data;

generating computer models from the patient bone data, the computer models including first and second side pelvic models, first and second femur models, first and second tibia models, and first and second foot models;

orienting the first and second side pelvic models relative to an origin in a coordinate system:

identifying an orientation of the first and second femur models, first and second tibia models, and first and second feet models relative to the first and second side pelvic models;

adjusting the orientation of one of the first and second femur models, first and second tibia models, or first and second foot models with respect to an anteroposterior or mediolateral axis relative to the orientation of another of the first and second femur models, first and second tibia models, or first and second foot models;

calculating a difference in length between a first landmark in the first foot model and a second landmark in the second foot model in a direction of a longitudinal axis extending from the first and second foot models to the first and second side pelvic models.

6. The computer program of claim 5 , wherein the patient bone data comprises at least one of the CT images, MR images, or X-ray images.

7. The computer program of claim 5 , wherein the first landmark is a first point in or on a talus bone of the first foot model, and the second landmark is a second point in or on a talus bone of the second foot model.

8. The computer program of claim 5 , wherein the patient bone data comprises of information associated with a statistical bone model.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 22, 2023
From: ODERMATT, DANIEL; THOMPSON, MATT
To: MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
Reel/Frame 064992/0833 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 17113850 · Dec 7, 2020
Continuation 15743625
Provisional Application 62191890 · Jul 13, 2015
Related Publication 20240008927A1 · Jan 11, 2024
References Cited (67)
US 7001346B2 · White · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 7885705B2 · Murphy · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 7955280B2 · Radinsky · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 8010180B2 · Quaid · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 8092465B2 · Metzger · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 8737700B2 · Park · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 8911447B2 · van der Walt · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 9307929B2 · Colwell, Jr. · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 9445909B2 · Cohen · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 9532845B1 · Dossett · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 10363149B2 · van der Walt · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10485450B2 · Gupta · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10624711B2 · Podsdkowski · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10881464B2 · Odermatt · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11033300B2 · Pavlovskaia · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20040111909A1 · Pourmanafzadeh · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20040133276A1 · Lang · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20040230199A1 · Jansen · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20060122541A1 · Tuma · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20060142657A1 · Quaid · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20060189864A1 · Paradis · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20060264731A1 · Murphy · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20060293614A1 · Radinsky · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20070021644A1 · Woolson · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070173815A1 · Murase · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070179626A1 · de la Barrera · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070198022A1 · Lang · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20080004633A1 · Arata · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080033442A1 · Amiot · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080146969A1 · Kurtz · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080243127A1 · Lang · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080312659A1 · Metzger · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080319449A1 · Tuma · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20090125117A1 · Paradis · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20110029116A1 · Jordan · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110082468A1 · Hagag · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110092858A1 · Burger · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110166609A1 · Duggal · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110295378A1 · Bojarski · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120041446A1 · Wong · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120209394A1 · Bojarski · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130072821A1 · Odermatt · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130197526A1 · Park · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130204382A1 · Walker · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130211531A1 · Steines · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140188240A1 · Lang · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140208578A1 · Linderman · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140316526A1 · Grotz · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140330281A1 · Aghazadeh · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150018719A1 · Aghazadeh · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150032215A1 · Slamin · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150057756A1 · Lang · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150164728A1 · Kreuzer · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150223558A1 · Qureshi-Pierce · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160008143A1 · Mahfouz · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160220391A1 · Duval · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160331467A1 · Slamin · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170325892A1 · Aghazadeh · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180235641A1 · McAuliffe · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190201155A1 · Gupta · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200188026A1 · de Souza · 2020 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2008112996A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014127354A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
Sabharwal et al. (“Methods for Assessing Leg Length Discrepancy”, Springer, 2008, pp. 2910-2922) (Year: 2008). [cited by examiner]
Ogawa et al.(“Accurate Leg Length Measurement in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Comparison of Computer Navigation and a Simple Manual Measurement Device”, The Korean Orthopaedic Association, 2014, pp. 153-158) (Year: 2014). [cited by examiner]
Guo et al.(“Calculation method to predict postoperative limb length in patients undergoing THA following developmental dysplasia of hips, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders” (2019), pp. 1-7) (Year: 2019). [cited by examiner]
European Search Report, EP16825126.2, dated Feb. 12, 2019, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]