IP Library Granted Patent US 12,346,410
Granted Patent B2
US 12,346,410 · App. 17/449,774 · Granted Jul 1, 2025

Tissue microenvironment analysis based on tiered classification and clustering analysis of digital pathology images

Inventors: Rohit Bhargava (Urbana, IL); Shachi Mittal (Urbana, IL)
Assignee: The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
G06F18/2431G06F18/23213G06N3/08G06T7/0012G06T7/11G06V10/40G06V10/95G16H10/40G16H15/00G16H30/40G06T2207/20084G06T2207/30068G06T2207/30096G06V2201/03
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,346,410
App. No.
17/449,774
Granted
Jul 1, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Segmentation or other classification of digital pathology images with a deep learning model allows for sophisticated spatial features for cancer diagnosis to be extracted in an automated, fast, and accurate manner. A tiered analysis of tissue structure based in part on deep learning methods is provided. First, tissues depicted in a digital pathology image are segmented into cellular compartments (e.g., epithelial and stromal compartments). Second, the heterogeneity in the different cellular compartments are examined based on a clustering algorithm. Tissue can then be characterized in terms of inertia (or other spatial measures or features), which can be used to recognize disease. In some instances, multidimensional inertia (i.e., inertia computed in different cellular compartments or clustered components) can be used as an indicator of disease and its outcome.

Claims (25)

1. A method for characterizing a tissue based on analysis of digital pathology images of the tissue, the method comprising:

(a) accessing segmented digital pathology image data with a computer system, wherein the segmented digital pathology image data comprise digital pathology images of a tissue that have been segmented into two or more different cellular compartments of the tissue;

(b) applying the segmented digital pathology image data to a clustering algorithm using the computer system, generating output as clustered feature data comprising clusters of the segmented digital pathology image data that indicate separated tissue microenvironment components of the tissue;

(c) computing spatial feature parameter data for clusters in the clustered feature data using the computer system; and

(d) generating a report with the computer system, wherein the report characterizes the tissue based on the spatial feature parameter data, wherein the report indicates a likelihood of disease in the tissue.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the two or more different cellular components include epithelial and stromal compartments.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the tissue microenvironment components include at least one of immune cells and cancer associated with fibroblasts.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the clustering algorithm is an unsupervised clustering algorithm.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the unsupervised clustering algorithm is a K-mean clustering algorithm.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the K-mean clustering algorithm uses a number of clusters ranging from two to five clusters.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the tissue is breast tissue.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein accessing the segmented digital pathology image data with the computer system comprises:

accessing digital pathology image data with the computer system, wherein the digital pathology image data comprise digital pathology images of the tissue; and

segmenting the digital pathology image data with the computer system, generating output as the segmented digital pathology image data.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein segmenting the digital pathology image data with the computer system comprises:

accessing a deep learning model with the computer system, wherein the deep learning model has been trained to segment digital pathology images into different cellular components; and

applying the digital pathology image data to the deep learning model using the computer system, generating output as the segmented digital pathology image data.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the deep learning model is a convolutional neural network (CNN) model.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the CNN model has been trained on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained images.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the H&E stained images used to train the CNN model comprise H&E images obtained from specimens including normal breast tissue, usual hyperplasia, atypical hyperplasia with columnar change, and atypical hyperplasia without columnar change, and ductal carcinoma in-situ.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein computing the spatial feature parameter data for clusters in the clustered feature data comprise computing inertia for clusters in the clustered feature data.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the report characterizes the tissue based on the inertia computed for the clusters in the clustered feature data.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the two or more different cellular components include epithelial and stromal compartments, and the report characterizes the tissue based on the inertia computed for clusters in at least one of the epithelial compartment and the stromal compartment.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the report characterizes the tissue based on the inertia computed for both the epithelial compartment and the stromal compartment.

17. The method of claim 1 , wherein the report identifies spatial characteristics of early stage disease that are indicative of triaging biopsies from the tissue.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 7, 2022
From: BHARGAVA, ROHIT; MITTAL, SHACHI
To: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS
Reel/Frame 059184/0932 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63086473 · Oct 1, 2020
Related Publication 20220108123A1 · Apr 7, 2022
References Cited (45)
US 12085568B2 · Agus · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20170091937A1 · Barnes · 2017 [cited by examiner]
Digital Assessment of Breast Tissue Images for Comprehensive Tumor and Microenvironment Analysis. (Year: 2019). [cited by examiner]
Abdel-Zaher, Ahmed M., et al. “Breast cancer classification using deep belief networks.” Expert Systems with Applications 46 (2016): 139-144. [cited by applicant]
Araujo, Teresa et al.. “Classification of breast cancer histology images using convolutional neural networks.” PloS one 12, No. 6 (2017): e0177544. [cited by applicant]
Bahreini, Fatemeh et al.. “A meta-analysis on concordance between immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to detect HER2 gene overexpression in breast cancer.” Breast cancer 22, No. 6 (2… [cited by applicant]
Beck, Andrew H. et al. “Systematic analysis of breast cancer morphology uncovers stromal features associated with survival.” Science translational medicine 3, No. 108 (2011): 108ra113-108ra113. [cited by applicant]
Bychkov, Dmitrii et al. “Deep learning based tissue analysis predicts outcome in colorectal cancer.” Scientific reports 8, No. 1 (2018): 1-11. [cited by applicant]
Chollet, Francois. “Xception: Deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions.” In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 1251-1258. 2017. [cited by applicant]
Conklin, Matthew W. et al. “Why the stroma matters in breast cancer: insights into breast cancer patient outcomes through the examination of stromal biomarkers.” Cell adhesion & migration 6, No. 3 (2012): 249-260. [cited by applicant]
Costarelli, Leopoldo et al. “Intraductal proliferative lesions of the breast—terminology and biology matter: premalignant lesions or preinvasive cancer?.” International Journal of Surgical Oncology 2012 (2012). [cited by applicant]
Coudray, Nicolas, et al. “Classification and mutation prediction from non-small cell lung cancer histopathology images using deep learning.” Nature medicine 24.10 (2018): 1559-1567. [cited by applicant]
Dong, Fei, et al. “Computational pathology to discriminate benign from malignant intraductal proliferations of the breast.” PloS one 9.12 (2014): e114885. [cited by applicant]
Doyle, Scott, et al. “Automated grading of breast cancer histopathology using spectral clustering with textural and architectural image features.” 2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano t… [cited by applicant]
Ehteshami Bejnordi, Babak, et al. “Diagnostic assessment of deep learning algorithms for detection of lymph node metastases in women with breast cancer.” Jama 318.22 (2017): 2199-2210. [cited by applicant]
Ehteshami Bejnordi, Babak, et al. “Using deep convolutional neural networks to identify and classify tumor-associated stroma in diagnostic breast biopsies.” Modern Pathology 31.10 (2018): 1502-1512. [cited by applicant]
Ellis, Ian O. “Intraductal proliferative lesions of the breast: morphology, associated risk and molecular biology.” Modern pathology 23.2 (2010): S1-S7. [cited by applicant]
Elmore, Joann G., et al. “Diagnostic concordance among pathologists interpreting breast biopsy specimens.” Jama 313.11 (2015): 1122-1132. [cited by applicant]
Ertosun, Mehmet Gunhan, et al. “Automated grading of gliomas using deep learning in digital pathology images: a modular approach with ensemble of convolutional neural networks.” AMIA annual symposium proceedings. vol. 2… [cited by applicant]
Finak, Greg, et al. “Stromal gene expression predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer.” Nature medicine 14.5 (2008): 518-527. [cited by applicant]
Gecer, Baris, et al. “Detection and classification of cancer in whole slide breast histopathology images using deep convolutional networks.” Pattern recognition 84 (2018): 345-356. [cited by applicant]
Ghaznavi, Farzad, et al. “Digital imaging in pathology: whole-slide imaging and beyond.” Annu Rev Pathol 8.1 (2013): 331-359. [cited by applicant]
Giussani, Marta, et al. “Extracellular matrix proteins as diagnostic markers of breast carcinoma.” Journal of cellular physiology 233.8 (2018): 6280-6290. [cited by applicant]
Guo, Yang, et al. “Identification of cancer subtypes by integrating multiple types of transcriptomics data with deep learning in breast cancer.” Neurocomputing 324 (2019): 20-30. [cited by applicant]
Gurcan, Metin N., et al. “Histopathological image analysis: A review.” IEEE reviews in biomedical engineering 2 (2009): 147-171. [cited by applicant]
Hanahan, Douglas, et al. “Accessories to the crime: functions of cells recruited to the tumor microenvironment.” Cancer cell 21.3 (2012): 309-322. [cited by applicant]
Harvey, Hugh, et al. “Deep learning in breast cancer screening.” Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging. Springer, Cham, 2019. 187-215. [cited by applicant]
He, Kaiming, et al. “Deep residual learning for image recognition.” Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2016. [cited by applicant]
Hu, Min, et al. “Distinct epigenetic changes in the stromal cells of breast cancers.” Nature genetics 37.8 (2005): 899-905. [cited by applicant]
Huang, Yongxiang, et al. “Improving high resolution histology image classification with deep spatial fusion network.” Computational Pathology and Ophthalmic Medical Image Analysis. Springer, Cham, 2018. 19-26. [cited by applicant]
Jain, Rohit K., et al. “Atypical ductal hyperplasia: interobserver and intraobserver variability.” Modern Pathology 24.7 (2011): 917-923. [cited by applicant]
Jia, Zhenyu, et al. “Tumor microenvironment: prospects for diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer based on changes in tumor-adjacent stroma.” Precision Molecular Pathology of Prostate Cancer. Springer, Cham, 2018. 2… [cited by applicant]
Komura, Daisuke, et al.. “Machine learning methods for histopathological image analysis.” Computational and structural biotechnology journal 16 (2018): 34-42. [cited by applicant]
Kumar S., et al. “Change in the microenvironment of breast cancer studied by FTIR imaging.” Analyst 138.14 (2013): 4058-4065. [cited by applicant]
Litjens, Geert, et al. “Deep learning as a tool for increased accuracy and efficiency of histopathological diagnosis.” Scientific reports 6.1 (2016): 1-11. [cited by applicant]
Mao, Yan, et al. “Stromal cells in tumor microenvironment and breast cancer.” Cancer and Metastasis Reviews 32.1 (2013): 303-315. [cited by applicant]
Mercan, Ezgi, et al. “Assessment of machine learning of breast pathology structures for automated differentiation of breast cancer and high-risk proliferative lesions.” JAMA network open 2.8 (2019): e198777-e198777. [cited by applicant]
Mishra, Rashika, et al. “Convolutional neural network for histopathological analysis of osteosarcoma.” Journal of Computational Biology 25.3 (2018): 313-325. [cited by applicant]
Mittal, Shachi, et al. “Digital assessment of stained breast tissue images for comprehensive tumor and microenvironment analysis.” Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology (2019): 246. [cited by applicant]
Pantanowitz, Liron, et al. “Review of the current state of whole slide imaging in pathology.” Journal of pathology informatics 2.1 (2011): 36. [cited by applicant]
Postavaru, Stefan, et al. “Adaptation of deep convolutional neural networks for cancer grading from histopathological images.” International Work-Conference on Artificial Neural Networks. Springer, Cham, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Simonyan, Karen, et al. “Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Stalhammar, Gustav, et al. “Digital image analysis outperforms manual biomarker assessment in breast cancer.” Modern Pathology 29.4 (2016): 318-329. [cited by applicant]
Veta, Mitko, et al. “Breast cancer histopathology image analysis: A review.” IEEE transactions on biomedical engineering 61.5 (2014): 1400-1411. [cited by applicant]
Williams, Bethany Jill, et al. “Future-proofing pathology: the case for clinical adoption of digital pathology.” Journal of clinical pathology 70.12 (2017): 1010-1018. [cited by applicant]
Cited By (1)
US 12,657,885