IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,346,479
Granted Patent B2
US 12,346,479 · App. 17/745,454 · Granted Jul 1, 2025

Privacy preservation of data over a shared network

Inventors: Ayse Parlak (Princeton, NJ); Leandro Pfleger de Aguiar (Robbinsville, NJ)
Assignee: Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
G06F21/6254G06N3/0455H04L63/0428
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,346,479
App. No.
17/745,454
Granted
Jul 1, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

System and method are disclosed for preserving privacy of shared data over a shared network. A vector encoder transforms received data into a feature vector. An autoencoder includes a neural network-based encoder transforms the feature vector into a fixed size latent space representation of the received data. A neural network-based decoder of the autoencoder is configured to reconstruct the feature vector from the latent space representation. The autoencoder is trained using training data with an objective to minimize reconstruction error. A vector decoder transforms the reconstructed feature vector into reconstructed data. The latent space representation of data from the trained autoencoder is shared as anonymized data with at least one trusted party over the shared network, decoded offline using a replica of the trained decoder.

Claims (18)

1. A computer-based method for preserving privacy of shared data across a shared network, comprising:

transforming, by a vector encoder, input data into a feature vector;

transforming, by a neural network-based encoder of a trained autoencoder, the feature vector into anonymized data comprising a fixed size latent space representation of the input data,

transmitting the anonymized data to a trusted party over a shared network,

reconstructing by a neural network-based decoder of the trained autoencoder used by the trusted party, the feature vector from the anonymized data comprising the latent space representation; and

transforming, by a vector decoder used by the trusted party, the reconstructed feature vector into reconstructed data,

wherein the autoencoder including the neural network-based encoder and the neural net-work-based decoder is trained using training data with an objective of minimizing reconstruction error.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the shared data is text data.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the shared data is image data.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the shared data is sensor data.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the shared data is KKS tags.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

securely transmitting a replica of the trained neural network-based decoder and the vector de-coder to the trusted party subsequent to the training of the autoencoder.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the trusted party uses the replica of the trained neural network-based decoder and the vector decoder offline to decode the latent space representation to obtain reconstructed data corresponding to the input data.

8. A system for preserving privacy of shared data across a shared network, the system comprising:

one or more processors; and

a memory storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the system to perform a method according to claim 1 .

9. A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform a method according to claim 1 .

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 17, 2022
From: PARLAK, AYSE; PFLEGER DE AGUIAR, LEANDRO
To: SIEMENS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 059926/0003 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 17, 2022
From: SIEMENS CORPORATION
To: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
Reel/Frame 059926/0132 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63188569 · May 14, 2021
Related Publication 20220366083A1 · Nov 17, 2022
References Cited (13)
US 20190354806A1 · Chhabra · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20210406673A1 · Pardeshi · 2021 [cited by examiner]
CN 109145001A · 2019 [cited by examiner]
L. Sweeney, “k-anonymity: A model for protecting privacy,” Int. J. Uncertainty, Fuzziness Knowl.-Based Syst., vol. 10, No. 05, pp. 557-570, 2002. [cited by applicant]
A. Friedman, R. Wolff, and A. Schuster, “Providing k-anonymity in data mining,” VLDB J., vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 789-804, 2008. [cited by applicant]
B. C. M. Fung, K. Wang, and P. S. Yu, “Anonymizing classification data for privacy preservation,” IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 711-725, May 2007. [cited by applicant]
S. Kisilevich, L. Rokach, Y. Elovici, and B. Shapira, “Efficient multi-dimensional suppression for K-Anonymity,” IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 334-347, Mar. 2010. [cited by applicant]
J. Li, J. Liu, M. Baig, and R. C.-W. Wong, “Information based data anonymization for classification utility,” Data Knowl. Eng., vol. 70, No. 12, pp. 1030-1045, Dec. 2011. [cited by applicant]
P. Geetha, C. Naikodi, and S. L. N. Setty, “Design of big data privacy framework—A balancing act,” in Advances in Data Sciences, Security and Applications. Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series… [cited by applicant]
C. Dwork, “Differential privacy: A survey of results,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Theory Appl. Models Comput. Changsha, China: Springer, 2008, pp. 1-19. [cited by applicant]
A. Friedman and A. Schuster, “Data mining with differential privacy,” in Proc. 16th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowl. Discovery Data Mining—KDD, 2010, pp. 493-502. [cited by applicant]
J. Soria-Comas, J. Domingo-Ferrer, D. Sanchez, and D. Megias, “Individual Differential Privacy: A Utility Preserving Formulation of Differential Privacy Guarantees,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security, vol. 12, No. 6, … [cited by applicant]
R. Sarathy and K. Muralidhar, “Evaluating Laplace Noise Addition to Satisfy Differential Privacy for Numeric Data,” Transactions on Data Privacy, vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 1-17, 2011. [cited by applicant]