IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,346,637
Granted Patent B2
US 12,346,637 · App. 17/338,905 · Granted Jul 1, 2025

Automated modelling system

Inventors: Radhakrishnan Mariappasamy (Troy, MI); Raymond E. Chaney (Auburn Hills, MI)
Assignee: Detroit Engineered Products, Inc.
G06F30/17G06F30/23
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,346,637
App. No.
17/338,905
Granted
Jul 1, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

An automated modelling system for automatically and quickly creating computer-aided-engineering model of body in white structures such as members, braces, and joints based on limited inputs from a user. The automated modelling system generally includes a computer system which receives various inputs from the user, including but not limited to trajectories, axis along height, any base components, height, width, angle, size, radius, thickness, and the like. Using these inputs, the computer system will automatically create the desired elements, such as members, braces, or joints, based on user inputs. The computer system may also adjust existing elements, mesh elements, and parameterize elements based on user inputs received via an interface displayed on the computer system.

Claims (28)

1. A method for automated generation of a member in a finite element model by a computer system, comprising:

receiving, from a user, a cross-section input identifying a cross-section of the member to be automatically generated in the finite element model by the computer system;

receiving, from the user, an identification of a base component of the finite element model to which the member to be automatically generated in the finite element model is to be connected in the finite element model by the computer system;

receiving, from the user, a trajectory input identifying a trajectory of the member to be generated by the computer system;

receiving, from the user, an instruction as to whether the member is to follow the base component in the finite element model by the computer system;

creating a one-dimensional mesh for the member to be generated in the finite element model by the computer system;

creating a two-dimensional mesh for the member to be generated in the finite element model by the computer system; and

automatically generating the member in the finite element model by the computer system without use of pre-existing CAD data based on the cross-section input and the trajectory input received from the user by the computer system;

wherein the member is automatically generated so as to follow a contour of the base component by the computer system if the user instruction was to follow the base component;

wherein the member is automatically generated so as to not follow the contour of the base component by the computer system if the user instruction was to not follow the base component.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one-dimensional mesh is created for the member by the computer system based on the cross-section input received from the user by the computer system.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the two-dimensional mesh is created for the member by the computer system based on the one-dimensional mesh and the trajectory input received from the user by the computer system.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the step of receiving, from the user, an identification of a direction of extension of the member to be generated in the finite element model by the computer system.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the step of preventing any intersection or penetration of the member with the base component by the computer system when automatically generating the member in the finite element model.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the step of automatically parameterizing the member as a onetime morph by the computer system.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the step of changing one or more dimensions of the member as a onetime morph by the computer system.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the cross-section input of the member is comprised of a sketch, received from the user, of the cross-sectional information of the member.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the trajectory input is comprised of a trajectory of the member extracted from an existing finite element mesh.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the trajectory input of the member is comprised of a sketch, received from the user, of the trajectory of the member.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the trajectory of the member is imported from an external source, by the user, to the computer system.

12. A method for automated generation of a member in a finite element model by a computer system, comprising:

receiving, from a user, a cross-section input identifying a cross-section of the member to be automatically generated in the finite element model by the computer system;

receiving, from the user, an identification of a base component of the finite element model to which the member to be automatically generated in the finite element model is to be connected in the finite element model by the computer system;

receiving, from the user, a trajectory input identifying a trajectory of the member to be generated by the computer system;

creating a one-dimensional mesh for the member to be automatically generated in the finite element model by the computer system based on the cross-section input received from the user;

creating a two-dimensional mesh for the member to be automatically generated in the finite element model by the computer system based on both the one-dimensional mesh and the trajectory input received from the user; and

automatically generating the member in the finite element model by the computer system without use of pre-existing CAD data based on the cross-section input and the trajectory input received from the user by the computer system.

13. The method of claim 12 , further comprising the step of receiving, from the user, an instruction as to whether the member is to follow the base component in the finite element model by the computer system, wherein the member is automatically generated so as to follow a contour of the base component by the computer system if the instruction was to follow the base component, and wherein the member is automatically generated so as to not follow the contour of the base component by the computer system if the instruction was to not follow the base component.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 4, 2021
From: MARIAPPASAMY, RADHAKRISHNAN; CHANEY, RAYMOND E.
To: DETROIT ENGINEERED PRODUCTS, INC.
Reel/Frame 056438/0642 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 16666566 · Oct 29, 2019
Provisional Application 62753253 · Oct 31, 2018
Related Publication 20210294938A1 · Sep 23, 2021
References Cited (19)
US 7467074B2 · Faruque · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 8751202B2 · Powell · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 10019543B1 · Kanthasamy · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20070038422A1 · Wang · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070046695A1 · Bamberg · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20120209577A1 · Powell · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20140277669A1 · Nardi · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20160008095A1 · Matov · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160364512A1 · Grip · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170091900A1 · Mariappasamy · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20190030751A1 · Czinger · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190096120A1 · Remy · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190138673A1 · Roberts · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017142953A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
Munipalli R, Szema KY, Huang PY, Rowell CM, Ying A, Abdou M. CAD-centric computation management system for a virtual TBM. HyPerComp Inc.; May 3, 2011. (Year: 2011). [cited by examiner]
https://abaqus-docs.mit.edu/2017/English/SIMACAECAERefMap/simacae-c-mgnconcmeshingbumethods.htm; “Bottom-Up Meshing Methods” Webpage from MIT; 2017. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2019/059005; Jan. 14, 2020. [cited by applicant]
“Digital Planning Validation in Automotive Industry”; Science Direct Article for Computers in Industry; Gunter Wohlke; Mar. 31, 2005. [cited by applicant]
“Integrating Case-Based with Rule-Based Reasoning in Body-in-White Fixture Design”; Article from The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology; Junhua Zhang; 2016. [cited by applicant]