IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,352,703
Granted Patent B2
US 12,352,703 · App. 17/916,932 · Granted Jul 8, 2025

Electrode quality evaluation method and electrode manufacturing method

Inventors: Hyun Sup Lee (Daejeon, KR); Hyun Jin Yang (Daejeon, KR); Kyun Il Rah (Daejeon, KR); Kyoung Ho Kim (Daejeon, KR); Myung Han Lee (Daejeon, KR); Kyung Mee Lee (Daejeon, KR); Won Seok Cho (Daejeon, KR)
Assignee: LG ENERGY SOLUTION, LTD.
G01N21/95G01N21/251H01M4/0404H01M4/0435
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,352,703
App. No.
17/916,932
Granted
Jul 8, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Provided is a method of evaluating electrode quality capable of simply and quickly filtering out defective electrodes by measuring a color coordinate value of electrodes before roll-pressing, which specifically includes: providing an electrode which includes a current collector and an active material layer formed on the current collector and has not been roll-pressed; measuring a color coordinate value of the active material layer using an optical instrument; and evaluating the electrode as a good product when the measured color coordinate value satisfies a predetermined electrode quality evaluation criterion and as defective when the measured color coordinate value does not satisfy the predetermined electrode quality evaluation criterion.

Claims (25)

1. A method of evaluating quality of an electrode comprising a current collector and an active material and not being rolled, comprising:

measuring a color coordinate value of the active material layer using an optical instrument; and

evaluating the quality of the electrode as a good product when the color coordinate value satisfies a predetermined electrode quality evaluation criterion and as defective when the color coordinate value does not satisfy the predetermined electrode quality evaluation criterion.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the color coordinate value is an L* value, and the predetermined electrode quality evaluation criterion for the L* value is 35.4 or more.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the color coordinate value is an a value, and the predetermined electrode quality evaluation criterion for the a* value is 0.78 or more.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the color coordinate value is a whiteness value, and the predetermined electrode quality evaluation criterion for the whiteness value is 7 or more.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the optical instrument is a spectrophotometer or a colorimeter.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the colorimeter is a contact colorimeter or a non-contact colorimeter.

7. A method of manufacturing an electrode, comprising:

forming an active material layer by applying a slurry including an active material, a conductive material, and a binder onto a current collector;

drying the active material layer to manufacture an electrode which is not roll-pressed;

evaluating a quality of the electrode by the method of claim 1 ; and

roll-pressing the electrode which are evaluated as a good product.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the slurry is applied in a loading amount of 0.005 g/cm 2 to 0.050 g/cm 2 .

9. The method of claim 7 , wherein a total heat amount required for the drying satisfies Equation 1:

Total heat amount required for the drying (kW)=(46.30 −L * value)/0.0077,  Equation 1

wherein, in Equation 1, L* value is a predetermined electrode quality evaluation criterion and is 35.4 or more.

10. The method of claim 7 , wherein a total heat amount required for the drying satisfies Equation 2:

Total heat amount required for the drying (kW)=(1.09 −a * value)/2.19×10 −5 ,  Equation 2

wherein, in Equation 2, the a value is a predetermined electrode quality evaluation criterion and is 0.78 or more.

11. The method of claim 7 , wherein a total heat amount required for the drying satisfies Equation 3:

Total heat amount required for the drying (KW)=(13.06−whiteness value)/0.0041,  Equation 3

wherein, in Equation 3, the whiteness value is a predetermined electrode quality evaluation criterion and is 7 or more.

12. The method of claim 7 , wherein the drying is carried out with a total heat amount of 1,000 kW to 1,450 kW.

13. The method of claim 7 , wherein the active material layer has a thickness of 50 μm to 500 μm.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 4, 2022
From: LEE, HYUN SUP; YANG, HYUN JIN; RAH, KYUN IL; KIM, KYOUNG HO; LEE, MYUNG HAN; LEE, KYUNG MEE; CHO, WON SEOK
To: LG ENERGY SOLUTION, LTD.
Reel/Frame 061310/0395 →
Priority Claims (2)
KR 10-2020-0044899 · Apr 13, 2020 · national
KR 10-2020-0119927 · Sep 17, 2020 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230152214A1 · May 18, 2023
References Cited (30)
US 8097365B2 · Iwama · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 9911972B2 · Takahata · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 11971344B2 · Lee · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 12209805B2 · Kim · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20140178766A1 · Kato et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20200194792A1 · Han et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200240915A1 · Son et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20230127402A1 · Lee · 2023 [cited by examiner]
CN 103733399A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
JP H09283123A · 1997 [cited by applicant]
JP 2003004632A · 2003 [cited by applicant]
JP 2005172646A · 2005 [cited by applicant]
JP 2008010320A · 2008 [cited by examiner]
JP 2010102873A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 2011100565A · 2011 [cited by examiner]
JP 5318303B1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 2013239348A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 5492528B2 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
JP 2020516021A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
KR 1020100089319A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
KR 1020140051323A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
KR 101947565B1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
KR 1020190084470A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014118934A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016121687A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
Office Action dated Aug. 29, 2024 issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 202180024352.9. [cited by applicant]
Office Action dated Oct. 10, 2023, issue in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2022-560123. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report issued in corresponding European patent application 21788268.7 dated Dec. 20, 2023. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report (with partial translation) and Written Opinion dated Jul. 20, 2021, for corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/KR2021/004070. [cited by applicant]
Office Action issued on May 14, 2025 in Korean Patent Application No. 10-2020-0119927. [cited by applicant]