IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,360,272
Granted Patent B2
US 12,360,272 · App. 17/252,484 · Granted Jul 15, 2025

Cascaded machine-learning workflow for salt seismic interpretation

Inventors: Anisha Kaul (Houston, TX); Cen Li (Missouri City, TX); Hiren Maniar (Houston, TX); Aria Abubakar (Sugar Land, TX)
Assignee: SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
G01V1/302G01V1/50G06N20/00G01V2210/1234G01V2210/64
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,360,272
App. No.
17/252,484
Granted
Jul 15, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method includes determining a top of salt (TOS) surface in a seismic volume based on a crossline direction of the seismic volume and an inline direction of the seismic volume. The method also includes determining a binary mask based upon the TOS surface. The method also includes sampling seismic data in the seismic volume to obtain a training seismic slice. The method also includes sampling the binary mask to obtain a mask slice. The method also includes selecting a first coordinate in the training seismic slice to produce a first tile. The method also includes selecting a second coordinate in the mask slice to produce a second tile. The method also includes generating or updating a model of the seismic volume based upon the first tile and the second tile.

Claims (82)

1. A method, comprising:

training a first machine learning model using data from a crossline direction and an inline direction of a seismic volume;

determining, using the first machine learning model, a top of salt (TOS) surface in the seismic volume based on crossline direction slices of the seismic volume and inline direction slices of the seismic volume;

determining a binary mask based upon the determined TOS surface;

initializing training data of the seismic volume based on output from the trained first machine learning model;

determining a depth in the seismic volume above which a predicted salt surface has a predetermined level of clarity;

sampling seismic data in the seismic volume in a depth direction to obtain a training seismic slice, wherein the training seismic slice includes information from the crossline direction, the inline direction, and the depth direction;

sampling the binary mask in the depth direction to obtain a mask slice;

selecting a first coordinate in the training seismic slice to produce a first tile;

selecting a second coordinate in the mask slice to produce a second tile;

updating the training data of the seismic volume based upon the first tile and the second tile;

training a second machine learning model using the updated training data;

determining, using the second machine learning model, a presence of a salt body in an evaluation seismic slice;

generating, by the second machine learning model, a three-dimensional (3D) model of a subterranean formation with the salt body delineated in the seismic volume;

displaying the 3D model of the subterranean formation with the salt body in the seismic volume;

determining, based on the 3D model of the subterranean formation, fluid flow characteristics of a reservoir in a field of the subterranean formation; and

controlling, based on the 3D model of the subterranean formation, drilling in the reservoir.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the seismic data is sampled in from a top of the seismic volume to the depth to obtain the training seismic slice.

3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising sampling the seismic data in the seismic volume to obtain the evaluation seismic slice, wherein the seismic data is sampled from the top of the seismic volume to a bottom of the seismic volume to obtain the evaluation seismic slice, and wherein the depth is between the top and the bottom.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising generating, by the second machine learning model, a three-dimensional (3D) matrix based upon the evaluation seismic slice, wherein the 3D matrix indicates the presence of the salt body.

5. The method of claim 4 , further comprising:

extracting, by the second machine learning model, a geobody from the 3D matrix; and

extracting, by the second machine learning model, a surface from the geobody.

6. The method of claim 5 , further comprising determining, by the second machine learning model, a presence of hydrocarbons in the seismic volume based upon the 3D matrix, the geobody, the surface, or a combination thereof.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

sending, using an acoustic energy source, sound vibrations into a subsurface in the field; and

receiving, in response to sending the sound vibrations, a seismic survey of the seismic volume with electric signals embedded with information of the subsurface captured and recorded from seismic wave reflections off the subsurface.

8. A method, comprising:

training a first machine learning model using data from a crossline direction and an inline direction of a seismic volume;

determining, using the first machine learning model, a top of salt (TOS) surface in the seismic volume based on crossline direction slices of the seismic volume and inline direction slices of the seismic volume;

determining a binary mask based upon the determined TOS surface;

initializing training data of the seismic volume based on output from the trained first machine learning model;

determining a depth in the seismic volume above which a predicted salt surface has a predetermined level of clarity;

sampling seismic data in the seismic volume in a depth direction to obtain a training seismic slice, wherein the training seismic slice includes information from the crossline direction, the inline direction, and the depth direction;

sampling the binary mask in the depth direction to obtain a mask slice;

selecting a first coordinate in the training seismic slice to produce a first tile;

selecting a second coordinate in the mask slice to produce a second tile;

updating the training data of the seismic volume based upon the first tile and the second tile

training a second machine learning model using the updated training data;

sampling, by the second machine learning model, the seismic data in the seismic volume to obtain an evaluation seismic slice;

determining, by the second machine learning model, a presence of a salt body in the evaluation seismic slice based upon the seismic data in the evaluation seismic slice;

generating, by the second machine learning model, a three-dimensional (3D) matrix based upon the evaluation seismic slice, wherein the 3D matrix indicates the presence of the salt body;

generating, by the second machine learning model, a 3D model of a subterranean formation with the salt body delineated in the seismic volume;

displaying the 3D model of the subterranean formation with the salt body identified in the evaluation seismic slice;

determining, based on the 3D model of the subterranean formation, fluid flow reservoir characteristics of a reservoir in a field of the subterranean formation; and

controlling, based on the 3D model of the subterranean formation, drilling in the reservoir.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the binary mask comprises a binary two-dimensional (2D) matrix.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein the seismic data is sampled in a downward direction from a top of the seismic volume to the depth to obtain the training seismic slice, and wherein the seismic data is sampled in the downward direction from the top of the seismic volume to a bottom of the seismic volume to obtain the evaluation seismic slice, wherein the depth is between the top and the bottom.

11. The method of claim 8 , wherein the first coordinate and the second coordinate have a common X value and a common Y value.

12. The method of claim 11 , further comprising performing a plurality of recursions on the first tile and the second tile for a plurality of X values and a plurality of Y values.

13. The method of claim 8 , further comprising performing a plurality of recursions on the training seismic slice and the mask slice.

14. The method of claim 8 , wherein the 3D matrix has a same size and shape as the seismic volume.

15. The method of claim 8 , further comprising performing a plurality of recursions on the evaluation seismic slice.

16. The method of claim 8 , further comprising extracting, by the second machine learning model, a geobody from the 3D matrix.

17. The method of claim 16 , further comprising extracting, by the second machine learning model, a surface from the geobody.

18. The method of claim 17 , further comprising determining, by the second machine learning model, a presence of hydrocarbons in the seismic volume based upon the 3D matrix, the geobody, the surface, or a combination thereof.

19. A computing system comprising:

one or more processors; and

a memory system comprising one or more non-transitory computer-readable media storing instructions that, when executed by at least one of the one or more processors, cause the computing system to perform operations, the operations comprising:

training a first machine learning model using data from a crossline direction and an inline direction of a seismic volume;

determining, using the first machine learning model, a top of salt (TOS) surface in the seismic volume based upon crossline direction slices of the seismic volume and inline direction slices of the seismic volume;

determining a binary mask based upon the determined TOS surface, wherein the binary mask comprises a binary two-dimensional (2D) matrix;

initializing training data of the seismic volume based on output of the trained first machine learning model;

sampling seismic data in the seismic volume to a first depth in the seismic volume above which a predicted salt surface has a predetermined level of clarity to obtain a training seismic slice, wherein the training seismic slice includes information from the crossline direction, the inline direction, and a depth direction;

sampling the binary mask to obtain a mask slice;

selecting a first coordinate in the training seismic slice to produce a first tile;

selecting a second coordinate in the mask slice to produce a second tile;

updating the training data of the seismic volume based upon the first tile and the second tile;

training a second machine learning model using the updated training data;

sampling, by the second machine learning model, the seismic data in the seismic volume to a second depth to obtain an evaluation seismic slice, wherein the second depth is greater than the first depth;

determining, by the second machine learning model, a presence of a salt body in the evaluation seismic slice based upon the seismic data in the evaluation seismic slice;

generating, by the second machine learning model, a three-dimensional (3D) matrix based upon the evaluation seismic slice, wherein the 3D matrix indicates the presence of the salt body;

extracting, by the second machine learning model, a geobody from the 3D matrix;

extracting, by the second machine learning model, a surface from the geobody;

determining, by the second machine learning model, a presence of hydrocarbons in the seismic volume based upon the 3D matrix, the geobody, the surface, or a combination thereof;

generating, by the second machine learning model, a three-dimensional (3D) model of a subterranean formation with the hydrocarbons in the seismic volume;

displaying the 3D model of the subterranean formation with the hydrocarbons;

determining, based on the 3D model of the subterranean formation, fluid flow characteristics of a reservoir in a field of the subterranean formation; and

controlling, based on the 3D model of the subterranean formation, drilling in the reservoir.

20. The computing system of claim 19 , wherein the operations comprise:

sending, using an acoustic energy source, sound vibrations into a subsurface in the field; and

receiving, in response to sending the sound vibrations, a seismic survey of the seismic volume with electric signals embedded with information of the subsurface captured and recorded from seismic wave reflections off the subsurface.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 16, 2020
From: KAUL, ANISHA; LI, CEN; MANIAR, HIREN; ABUBAKAR, ARIA
To: SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 054660/0180 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62694404 · Jul 5, 2018
Related Publication 20210270983A1 · Sep 2, 2021
References Cited (25)
US 10139509B2 · Sun et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20090119018A1 · Priezzhev et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20120209526A1 · Imhof · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20150185346A1 · Nemeth · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160086352A1 · Birkbeck et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160202374A1 · Kainkaryam et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 102121995A · 2011 [cited by applicant]
CN 104459768A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 105659111A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 105700015A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016154104A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
Yang, Tao, Bing Zhang, and Jinghuai Gao. “A fast algorithm for coherency estimation in seismic data based on information divergence.” Journal of Applied Geophysics 115 (2015): 140-144. (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
Asjad, Amin, and Deriche Mohamed. “A new approach for salt dome detection using a 3D multidirectional edge detector.” Applied Geophysics 12.3 (2015): 334-342. (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
Amin, Asjad, and Mohamed Deriche. “A hybrid approach for salt dome detection in 2D and 3D seismic data.” 2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). IEEE, 2015. (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) issued in European Patent Application 19830819.9 dated Dec. 18, 2023, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ferreira et al., “Multi-scale Evaluation of Texture Features for Salt Dome Detection”, 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM), Dec. 11, 2016, pp. 632-635. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 19830819.9 dated Mar. 3, 2022; 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/039160 dated Jan. 5, 2021, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ian F. Jones and Ian Davison (2014). “Seismic imaging in and around salt bodies.” Interpretation, 2(4), SL1-SL20. [cited by applicant]
G. Pass, R. Zabith, “Comparing Images Using Joint Histograms”, Multimedia Systems, vol. 7, pp. 234-240, 1999. [cited by applicant]
Sean P. Engelson and Drew V. McDermott. Image signatures for place recognition and map construction. In SPIE Sensor Fusion IV, pp. 282-293, 1991. [cited by applicant]
Amin, A. et al., ‘Salt-Dome Detection Using a Codebook-Based Learning Model’, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 13, No. 11, Nov. 2016, pp. 1636-1640. [cited by applicant]
Chaki, S. et al., ‘Well-Log and Seismic Data Integration for Reservoir Characterization, A signal processing and machine-learning perspective’, Subsurface Exploration: Recent Advances in Geo-Signal Processing, Interpret… [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in the PCT Application PCT/US2019/039160, dated Aug. 12, 2019 (10 pages). [cited by applicant]
First Office Action issued in China Patent Application No. 2019800430458 dated Jun. 28, 2023, 23 pages with English translation. [cited by applicant]