IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,364,609
Granted Patent B2
US 12,364,609 · App. 16/468,586 · Granted Jul 22, 2025

Biomimetic implants

Inventors: Yacov Koffler (La Jolla, CA); Shaochen Chen (La Jolla, CA); Mark Tuszynski (La Jolla, CA); Wei Zhu (La Jolla, CA)
Assignee: The Regents of the University of California
A61F2/44A61F2/30771A61F2/30942A61L27/3834A61L27/3856A61L27/3878A61F2002/30062A61F2002/30784A61F2002/30838A61F2002/30985A61F2002/4495A61L2430/38
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,364,609
App. No.
16/468,586
Filed
Jun 11, 2019
Granted
Jul 22, 2025
Kind
B2
Examiner
HU, ANN M
Art Unit
3774
USPC
424/422
Abstract

Implantable devices for spinal cord and peripheral nerve injury are described. The implants include a three-dimensional printed structure having stem cells disposed therein. Also disclosed are methods of treating neuronal injuries with the disclosed implants.

Claims (24)

1. A biomimetic nerve or spinal cord implant comprising:

a three-dimensional (3D) implant body comprising: a first end and a second end formed in a biomimetic shape which mimics structure of a nerve or spinal cord injury site as to host axon organization; and

a plurality of linear channels within the body originating at the first end and terminating at the second end, wherein the plurality of linear channels within the body mimics host axon organization ex vivo and in vivo, wherein the plurality of linear channels comprise a channel wall thickness up to 100 micrometers,

wherein the plurality of linear channels retain their pre-implantation structure for at least 4 weeks in vivo, and

wherein the implant comprises an elastic modulus from about 260 kPa to about 300 kPa.

2. The implant of claim 1 , wherein implant is produced by 3D printing.

3. The implant of claim 1 , further comprising at least one type of stem cell included in the plurality of linear channels, wherein the at least one type of stem cell is a neural stem cell.

4. The implant of claim 3 , wherein the neural stem cell is an embryonic stem cell, a iPSC derived stem cell, a directly differentiated neural stem cell, or a combination thereof.

5. The implant of claim 3 , wherein the at least one type of stem cell is a mesenchymal stem cell.

6. The implant of claim 3 , wherein the stem cell is engineered to express BDNF, NT3, GDNF, or a combination thereof.

7. The implant of claim 1 , wherein the implant comprises polyethylene glycol diacrylate or gelatin methacrylol, or a combination thereof.

8. The implant of claim 1 , wherein the implant is biomimetic to a spinal cord injury.

9. The implant of claim 1 , wherein the implant is biomimetic to a peripheral nerve injury.

10. The implant of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of linear channels comprise microchannels.

11. The implant of claim 10 , wherein the plurality of linear channels comprise a diameter of about 200 micrometers.

12. The implant of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of linear channels are parallel to each other.

13. The implant of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of linear channels are configured to guide regenerating axons from the first end to the second end.

14. The implant of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of linear channels comprise hexagonal cross-sections clustered as a honeycomb structure.

15. The implant of claim 1 , wherein the implant comprises a structure without discrete layers.

16. The implant of claim 15 , wherein the implant is composed of a matrix comprising gelatin methacrylate and Poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA).

17. The implant of claim 16 , wherein the plurality of linear channels retain their pre-implantation structure for at least 6 months in vivo.

18. The implant of claim 1 , wherein the core comprises gelatin methacrylate, PEGDA, and lithium phenyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate.

19. The implant of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of linear channels are aligned parallel relative to a host axon and continuously extend from the first end to the second end.

20. The implant of claim 19 , wherein the plurality of linear channels are spaced apart by about 66 micrometers.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 9, 2019
From: KOFFLER, YACOV; CHEN, SHAOCHEN; ZHU, WEI; TUSZYNSKI, MARK
To: THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Reel/Frame 050010/0905 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62433142 · Dec 12, 2016
Related Publication 20190350720A1 · Nov 21, 2019
References Cited (107)
US 5092871A · Aebischer · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 5370681A · Herweck · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5925053A · Hadlock · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6337198B1 · Levene et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6676675B2 · Mallapragada · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6716225B2 · Li · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 8075904B2 · Sakamoto · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8246680B2 · Betz et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8275594B2 · Lin et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8728817B2 · Ogle et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8926886B2 · Pandit · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9555583B1 · Dirk · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9585666B2 · Yu · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9968705B2 · Christ · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10426872B2 · Sakamoto · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 11110207B2 · Sakamoto · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20030039676A1 · Boyce · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20030040112A1 · Muir · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20040037813A1 · Simpson · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20040220672A1 · Shadduck · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050113923A1 · Acker et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060002978A1 · Shea · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20060136182A1 · Vacanti et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070010831A1 · Romero-Ortega · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070259020A1 · Langer et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080125870A1 · Carmichael et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20100047310A1 · Chen · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100068240A1 · Chiu · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20110032139A1 · Bowlin · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110245852A1 · Downes · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110313542A1 · Forgacs · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120221025A1 · Simpson et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120276068A1 · Sabaawy · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120330423A1 · Lin et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130096685A1 · Ciupik et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130344601A1 · Soman · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140017284A1 · Yang · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150023911A1 · Schilling · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150202351A1 · Kaplan · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160067375A1 · Holmes · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160129155A1 · Lin et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20180280580A1 · Sakamoto et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 102166140A · 2011 [cited by applicant]
EP 3241524A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
JP 201589433A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2007127790A2 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
WO 2011032139A2 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO 2011097330A2 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013040087A2 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013058670A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2015103149A1 · 2015 [cited by examiner]
WO 2016077830A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016077839A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017062845A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018111900A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018144135A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020146658A2 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Koffler et al. “Biomimetic 3-D printed scaffolds for spinal cord injury repair,” Nature Medicine 25:263-269, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0296-z, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Laporte et al. :Vascular endothelial growth factor and fibroblast growth factor 2 delivery from spinal cord bridges to enhance angiogenesis following injury, J Biomed Mater Res Part A 98A:372-382, 2011. [cited by applicant]
Laporte et al. “Plasmid releasing multiple channel bridges for transgene expression after spinal cord surgery,” Molecular Therapy 17:318-326, 2009. [cited by applicant]
Laporte et al. “Local gene delivery from ECM coated poly(lactide-co-glycolide) multiple channel bridges after spinal cord surgery,” Biomaterials 30:2361-2368, 2009. [cited by applicant]
Yang et al. “Multiple Channel Bridges for Spinal Cord Injury: Cellular Characterization of Host Response,” Tissue Engineering: Part A 15:2383-2395, 2009. [cited by applicant]
IP Australia, Notice of Acceptance for Patent Application No. 2017375956 dated May 15, 2023, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Japan Patent Office, Translation of Notification of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2022-163769 dated Sep. 5, 2023, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
IP Office Canada, Office Action for Canadian Application No. 3,046,959, mailed on May 1, 2024. [cited by applicant]
EPO, Summons to Oral Proceedings for European Application No. 17882172.4, mailed on Jul. 18, 2024, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Fairbanks, B.D. et al., “Photoinitiated polymerization of PEG-diacrylate with lithium phenyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate: polymerization rate and cytocompatibility”, Biomaterials 30:6702-6707, 2009. [cited by applicant]
Hu et al., “3D-engineering off Cellularized Conduits for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration,” Scientific Reports, 2016, 6:32184, 1-12. [cited by applicant]
Lu, P. et al.“Long-distance growth and connectivity of neural stem cells after severe spinal cord injury” , Cell 150:1264-1273, 2012. [cited by applicant]
Murphy et al,“Understanding the effect of mean pore size on cell activity in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds,” Cell Adhesion and Migration 4:3, 377-381, 2010. [cited by applicant]
Soman, P. et al., “Digital microfabrication of user-defined 3D microstructures in cell-laden hydrogels”, Biotechnol Bioeng 110:3038-3047, 2013. [cited by applicant]
IP Office Australia, Exam Report No. 1 for Australian Application No. 2017375956, mailed on Jun. 10, 2022, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
CNIPA, First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201780083831.1, mailed on Apr. 27, 2021, 19 pages with English translation. [cited by applicant]
CNIPA, Second Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201780083831.1, mailed on Nov. 25, 2021, 8 pages with English translation. [cited by applicant]
CNIPA, Third Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201780083831.1, mailed on Jul. 4, 2022, 9 pages English machine translation. [cited by applicant]
CNIPA, Fourth Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201780083831.1, mailed on Mar. 31, 2023, 10 pages with English translation. [cited by applicant]
CNIPA, Fifth Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201780083831.1, mailed on Aug. 24, 2023, 14 pages with English translation. [cited by applicant]
CNIPA, Rejection Decision for Chinese Application No. 201780083831.1, mailed on Jan. 29, 2024, 14 pages with English translation. [cited by applicant]
EPO, Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 17882172.4, mailed on Jul. 8, 2020, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
EPO, Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Application No. 17882172.4, mailed on Jul. 21, 2021, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
EPO, Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Application No. 17882172.4, mailed on Mar. 27, 2023, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
EPO, Extended European Search Report and Opinion for European Application No. 20788207.7, mailed on Nov. 25, 2022, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
JPO, Search Report for Japanese Application No. 2019-551919, mailed on Oct. 20, 2021, 19 pages with English translation. [cited by applicant]
JPO, Notice of Reasons for Refusal for Japanese Application No. 2019-551919, mailed on Nov. 16, 2021, 10 pages with English translation. [cited by applicant]
JPO, Decision to Grant a Patent for Japanese Application No. 2019-551919, mailed on Sep. 13, 2022, 6 pages with English translation. [cited by applicant]
JPO, Written Opinion for Japanese Application No. 2019-551919, mailed on Apr. 22, 2022, 8 pages with English translation. [cited by applicant]
JPO, Written Opinion for Japanese Application No. 2022-163769, mailed on Mar. 4, 2024, 7 pages with English translation. [cited by applicant]
JPO, Notice of Reasons for Refusal for Japanese Application No. 2022-163769, mailed on May 9, 2024, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
JPO, Notice of Reasons for Refusal for Japanese Application No. 2021-559949, mailed on Dec. 5, 2023, 11 pages with English translation. [cited by applicant]
JPO, Notice of Reasons for Refusal for Japanese Application No. 2021-559949, mailed on Jun. 25, 2024, 11 pages with English translation. [cited by applicant]
KIPO, Office Action for Korean Application No. 10-2019-7020450, mailed on Sep. 17, 2022, 5 pages (English translation) [cited by applicant]
KIPO, Written Opinion for Korean Application No. 10-2019-7020450, mailed on Mar. 16, 2023, 25 pages with English translation. [cited by applicant]
KIPO, Written Decision on Registration for Korean Application No. 10-2019-7020450, mailed on Jul. 27, 2023, 6 pages with English translation. [cited by applicant]
ISA/US, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/065857, mailed on Mar. 6, 2018, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
ISA, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2020/027773, mailed on Jun. 19, 2020, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Intellectual Property India, First Examination Report for Indian Application No. 202117049666, mailed on Aug. 9, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Zhu, W. et al. “Rapid continuous 3D printing of customizable peripheral nerve guidance conduits,” Mater Today, 21 951-959, 2018. [cited by applicant]
USPTO, Nonfinal Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/602,727, mailed on Jun. 5, 2024, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
USPTO, Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/602,727, mailed on Dec. 5, 2024, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
USPTO, Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/602,727, mailed on Feb. 20, 2025, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
JPO, Decision of Rejection for Japanese Application No. 2022-163769, mailed on Dec. 10, 2024, 4 pages with unofficial English translation. [cited by applicant]
JPO, Decision of Rejection for Japanese Application No. 2021-559949, mailed on Jan. 21, 2025, 14 pages with machine English translation. [cited by applicant]
Shahriari et al., “Peripheral nerve growth within a hydrogel microchannel scaffold supported by a kink-resistant conduit,” J Biomed Mater Res Part A, 2017, vol. 105A, pp. 3392-3399. [cited by applicant]
Srinivasan et al., “Microchannel-based regenerative scaffold for chronic peripheral nerve interfacing in amputees,” Biomaterials, 2014, vol. 41, 34 pages. [cited by applicant]
CIPO, Examiner's Report for Canadian Application No. 3,136,330, mailed on Mar. 20, 2025, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
USPTO, Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/602,727, mailed on Apr. 11, 2025, 22 pages. [cited by applicant]
CNIPA, Office Action for Chinese Application No. 202080036615.3, mailed on Mar. 11, 2025, 27 pages including translation. [cited by applicant]