IP Library Granted Patent US 12,366,512
Granted Patent B2
US 12,366,512 · App. 17/759,738 · Granted Jul 22, 2025

Methods and systems for non-destructive estimation of scattering particle size

Inventors: Seemantini Nadkarni (Boston, MA); Zeinab Hajjarian-Kashany (Boston, MA)
Assignee: The General Hospital Corporation
G01N15/0211G01N15/01G01N2015/0222
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,366,512
App. No.
17/759,738
Granted
Jul 22, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for non-destructively estimating an average size of scattering particles in a sample, including: transmitting, using a coherent light source, polarized light to the sample; obtaining, using a detector, polarized light reflected from the sample, the polarized light comprising a parallel polarized component and a perpendicular polarized component; determining, using a processor, speckle decorrelation rates for the parallel polarized component and the perpendicular polarized component; and estimating, using the processor, the average size of scattering particles in the sample based on the speckle decorrelation rates for the parallel polarized component and the perpendicular polarized component.

Claims (60)

1. A method for non-destructively estimating an average size of scattering particles in a sample, comprising:

transmitting, using a coherent light source, polarized light to the sample;

obtaining, using a detector, polarized light reflected from the sample as a function of time, the polarized light comprising a parallel polarized component and a perpendicular polarized component;

determining, using a processor, speckle decorrelation rates for the parallel polarized component and the perpendicular polarized component,

wherein determining the speckle decorrelation rates for the parallel polarized component and the perpendicular polarized component comprises determining relaxation curves for the parallel polarized component and the perpendicular polarized component based on the polarized light reflected from the sample as a function of time; and

estimating, using the processor, the average size of scattering particles in the sample based on the relaxation curves for the parallel polarized component and the perpendicular polarized component.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the detector comprises a plurality of pixels corresponding to a plurality of spatially-distributed locations within the sample, and

wherein obtaining polarized light reflected from the sample comprises:

obtaining polarized light reflected from the sample across the plurality of pixels,

wherein determining speckle decorrelation rates for the parallel polarized component and the perpendicular polarized component comprises:

determining speckle decorrelation rates for the parallel polarized component and the perpendicular polarized component for each of the plurality of pixels, and

wherein estimating the average size of scattering particles in the sample comprises:

estimating the average size of scattering particles for each of the plurality of pixels corresponding to each of the plurality of spatially-distributed locations within the sample.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein estimating the average size of scattering particles in the sample based on the speckle decorrelation rates for the parallel polarized component and the perpendicular polarized component comprises:

estimating the average size of scattering particles in the sample based on determining a ratio of the relaxation curves for the parallel polarized component and the perpendicular polarized component of the polarized light reflected from the sample as a function of time.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining speckle decorrelation rates for the parallel polarized component and the perpendicular polarized component comprises:

determining speckle decorrelation rates for the parallel polarized component and the perpendicular polarized component based on a table of values.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the table of values is generated based on a simulation of speckle density autocorrelation curves for a plurality of particle sizes.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the simulation comprises a Polarization Sensitive Correlation Transfer Monte Carlo Ray Tracing simulation.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein transmitting linearly polarized light to the sample comprises:

transmitting linearly polarized light comprising a plurality of wavelengths to the sample; and

wherein estimating the average size of scattering particles in the sample comprises:

estimating the average size of scattering particles in the sample based on transmitting linearly polarized light comprising a plurality of wavelengths to the sample.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein transmitting linearly polarized light to the sample comprises:

alternately transmitting parallel polarized light and perpendicular polarized light to the sample.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein alternately transmitting parallel polarized light and perpendicular polarized light to the sample comprises:

modulating between parallel polarized light and perpendicular polarized light using a polarization modulator in combination with an optical isolator or polarization isolator based on switching mirrors to select one of the parallel polarized light and the perpendicular polarized light.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the polarized light comprises linearly polarized light.

11. An apparatus for non-destructively estimating an average size of scattering particles in a sample, comprising:

a coherent light source;

a detector; and

a processor in communication with the coherent light source and the detector, the processor being configured to:

control the coherent light source to transmit polarized light to the sample,

control the detector to obtain polarized light reflected from the sample,

the polarized light comprising a parallel polarized component and a perpendicular polarized component,

determine speckle decorrelation rates for the parallel polarized component and the perpendicular polarized component,

wherein determining the speckle decorrelation rates for the parallel polarized component and the perpendicular polarized component comprises determining relaxation curves for the parallel polarized component and the perpendicular polarized component based on the polarized light reflected from the sample as a function of time, and

estimate the average size of scattering particles in the sample based on the relaxation curves for the parallel polarized component and the perpendicular polarized component.

12. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the detector comprises a plurality of pixels corresponding to a plurality of spatially-distributed locations within the sample, and

wherein the processor, when obtaining polarized light reflected from the sample, is further configured to:

obtain polarized light reflected from the sample across the plurality of pixels,

wherein the processor, when determining speckle decorrelation rates for the parallel polarized component and the perpendicular polarized component, is further configured to:

determine speckle decorrelation rates for the parallel polarized component and the perpendicular polarized component for each of the plurality of pixels, and

wherein the processor, when estimating the average size of scattering particles in the sample, is further configured to:

estimate the average size of scattering particles for each of the plurality of pixels corresponding to each of the plurality of spatially-distributed locations within the sample.

13. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the processor, when estimating the average size of scattering particles in the sample based on the speckle decorrelation rates for the parallel polarized component and the perpendicular polarized component, is further configured to:

estimate the average size of scattering particles in the sample based on determining a ratio of the relaxation curves for the parallel polarized component and the perpendicular polarized component of the polarized light reflected from the sample as a function of time.

14. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the processor, when determining speckle decorrelation rates for the parallel polarized component and the perpendicular polarized component, is further configured to:

determine speckle decorrelation rates for the parallel polarized component and the perpendicular polarized component based on a table of values.

15. The apparatus of claim 14 , wherein the table of values is generated based on a simulation of speckle density autocorrelation curves for a plurality of particle sizes.

16. The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the simulation comprises a Polarization Sensitive Correlation Transfer Monte Carlo Ray Tracing simulation.

17. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the processor, when transmitting polarized light to the sample, is further configured to:

transmit polarized light comprising a plurality of wavelengths to the sample; and

wherein the processor, when estimating the average size of scattering particles in the sample, is further configured to:

estimate the average size of scattering particles in the sample based on transmitting polarized light comprising a plurality of wavelengths to the sample.

18. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the processor, when transmitting polarized light to the sample, is further configured to:

alternately transmit parallel polarized light and perpendicular polarized light to the sample.

19. The apparatus of claim 18 , wherein the processor, when alternately transmitting parallel polarized light and perpendicular polarized light to the sample, is further configured to:

modulate between parallel polarized light and perpendicular polarized light using a polarization modulator in combination with an optical isolator or polarization isolator based on switching mirrors to select one of the parallel polarized light and the perpendicular polarized light.

20. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the polarized light comprises linearly polarized light.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 30, 2025
From: NADKARNI, SEEMANTINI; HAJJARIAN-KASHANY, ZEINAB
To: THE GENERAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 070992/0785 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62968308 · Jan 31, 2020
Related Publication 20230083866A1 · Mar 16, 2023
References Cited (39)
US 6100976A · Ackerson · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 10359361B2 · Nadkarni et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 11328185B2 · Zhou · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20020135752A1 · Sokolov · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 20120008143A1 · Ihlefeld et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20150276571A1 · Hajjarian et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20170003271A1 · Nadkarmi et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170248518A1 · Nadkarni · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20190049354A1 · Nadkarni · 2019 [cited by examiner]
Hajjarian, Z., Nadkarni, S. Evaluating the Viscoelastic Properties of Tissue from Laser Speckle Fluctuations. Sci Rep 2, 316 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00316 (Year: 2012). [cited by examiner]
Wenbo Sun et al, For the depolarization of linearly polarized light by smoke particles, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer,vol. 122, 2013,pp. 233-237, ISSN 0022-4073, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.j… [cited by examiner]
A. Dogariu, C. Kutsche, P. Likamwa, G. Boreman, and B. Moudgil, “Time-domain depolarization of waves retroreflected from dense colloidal media,” Opt. Lett. 22, 585-587 (1997) (Year: 1997). [cited by examiner]
Vinayakrishnan Rajan et al, Speckle size and decorrelation time; space-time correlation analysis of coherent light dynamically scattered from turbid media,Optics Communications, vol. 281, Issue 6, 2008, pp. 1755-1760, I… [cited by examiner]
Dmitry A. Zimnyakov, Valery V. Tuchin, and Arjun G. Yodh “Characteristic scales of optical field depolarization and decorrelation for multiple scattering media and tissues,” Journal of Biomedical Optics 4(1), (Jan. 1, 1… [cited by examiner]
Acerbi et al., Human Breast Cancer Invasion and Aggression Correlates with ECM Stiffening and Immune Cell Infiltration, Integrative Biology, 2015, 7(10):1120-1134. [cited by applicant]
Ahmad et al., Magnetomotive Optical Coherence Elastography Using Magnetic Particles to Induce Mechanical Waves, Biomedical Optics Express, 2014, 5(7):2349-2361. [cited by applicant]
Bartek et al., Estimation of Subcellular Particle Size Histograms with Electron Microscopy for Prediction of Optical Scattering in Breast Tissue, Journal of Biomedical Optics, 2006, 11(6):064007, pp. 1-10. [cited by applicant]
Butcher et al., A Tense Situation: Forcing Tumour Progression, Nature Reviews Cancer, 2009, 9(2):108-122. [cited by applicant]
Clark et al., Modes of Cancer Cell Invasion and the Role of the Microenvironment, Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 2015, 36:13-22. [cited by applicant]
Denis et al., Correlating Tumor Stiffness with Immunohistochemical Subtypes of Breast Cancers: Prognostic Value of Comb-Push Ultrasound Shear Elastography for Differentiating Luminal Subtypes, PloS One, 2016, 11(10):e01… [cited by applicant]
Friedl et al., Cancer Invasion and the Microenvironment: Plasticity and Reciprocity, Cell, 2011, 147(5):992-1009. [cited by applicant]
Hajjarian et al., Intravascular Laser Speckle Imaging Catheter for the Mechanical Evaluation of the Arterial Wall, Journal of Biomedical Optics, 2011, 16(2):026005, pp. 1-7. [cited by applicant]
Hajjarian et al., Evaluation and Correction for Optical Scattering Variations in Laser Speckle Rheology of Biological Fluids, PloS One, 2013, 8(5):e65014, pp. 1-12. [cited by applicant]
Hajjarian et al., Correction of Optical Absorption and Scattering Variations in Laser Speckle Rheology Measurements, Optics Express, 2014, 22(6):6349-6361. [cited by applicant]
Hajjarian et al., Estimation of Particle Size Variations for Laser Speckle Rheology of Materials, Optics Letters, 2015, 40(5):764-767. [cited by applicant]
Hajjarian et al., Tutorial on Laser Speckle Rheology: Technology, Applications, and Opportunities, Journal of Biomedical Optics, 2020, 25(5):050801, pp. 1-19. [cited by applicant]
Jeon et al., Laser Speckle Decorrelation Time-Based Platelet Function Testing in Microfluidic System, Scientific Reports, 2019, 9(1):16514, pp. 1-8. [cited by applicant]
Kennedy et al., The Emergence of Optical Elastography in Biomedicine, Nature Photonics, 2017, 11(4):215-221. [cited by applicant]
Larin et al., Optical Coherence Elastography—OCT at Work in Tissue Biomechanics [Invited], Biomedical Optics Express, 2017, 8(2):1172-1202. [cited by applicant]
McKnight et al., MR Elastography of Breast Cancer: Preliminary Results, American Journal of Roentgenology, 2002, 178(6):1411-1417. [cited by applicant]
Nadkarni et al., Characterization of Atherosclerotic Plaques by Laser Speckle Imaging, Circulation, 2005, 112(6):885-892. [cited by applicant]
Nadkarni et al., Measurement of Fibrous Cap Thickness in Atherosclerotic Plaques by Spatiotemporal Analysis of Laser Speckle Images, Journal of Biomedical Optics, 2006, 11(2):021006, pp. 1-8. [cited by applicant]
Nadkarni et al., Laser Speckle Imaging of Atherosclerotic Plaques Through Optical Fiber Bundles, Journal of Biomedical Optics, 2008, 13(5):054016, pp. 1-6. [cited by applicant]
Provenzano et al., Collagen Reorganization at the Tumor-Stromal Interface Facilitates Local Invasion, BMC Medicine, 2006, 4(1):1-15. [cited by applicant]
Samani et al., Elastic Moduli of Normal and Pathological Human Breast Tissues: An Inversion-Technique-Based Investigation of 169 Samples, Physics in Medicine & Biology, 2007, 52(6):1565-1576. [cited by applicant]
Weitz et al., Chapter 16, Diffusing-wave Spectroscopy, in Dynamic Light Scattering: The Method and Some Applications, Oxford University Press, 1993, pp. 652-720. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2021/016066, Jul. 9, 2021, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kuznetsova, L. et al., Study of Relaxation of Thermally Treated Collagenous Tissues with the Cumulant Analysis of Speckle Intensity Fluctuations, Saratov Fall Meeting 2004: Coherent Optics of Ordered and Random Media V,… [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Extended Search Report, Application No. 21747699.3, Jan. 30, 2024, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]