IP Library Granted Patent US 12,369,562
Granted Patent B2
US 12,369,562 · App. 18/204,380 · Granted Jul 29, 2025

Device for lifting an animal in a chute

Inventors: Bryant Hess (Shiocton, WI); Brennen Snow (Appleton, WI); David Hoerning (Appleton, WI)
Assignee: Appleton Steel, Inc.
A01K1/0613A01K13/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,369,562
App. No.
18/204,380
Granted
Jul 29, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

An animal trimming chute for treating animals is described which comprises a belly band for lifting the animal in which a lifting device mounted at or near the front of the chute pulls the belly band upwards, while the sides of the chute are provided with protective shielding.

Claims (20)

1. A chute for treatment of an animal comprising: a frame with front, rear, upper, and side sections and a lifting system, the lifting system comprising a pivot arm having a first end rotatably mounted on the front section of the frame and attached to a belly band, wherein the pivot arm cooperates with a lifting device attached to the upper section of the frame to lift the animal via the belly band, wherein the pivot arm is raised by the lifting device pulling the pivot arm upwards, the chute further comprising protective side shielding along the side sections of the chute extending from the rear section of the chute to a front lateral opening that provides access to a front leg of the animal for treatment.

2. The chute of claim 1 , further comprising at least one grasper mounted to the front section of the frame for grasping a front leg securely and rotating it into place for treatment.

3. The chute of claim 1 , wherein the protective side shielding is substantially free of openings larger than a 2-inch diameter circle below a height of 30 inches.

4. The chute of claim 1 , wherein the belly band has a width of at least 4 inches and wherein the animal being treated is a cow.

5. The chute of claim 1 , wherein the chute further comprises at least one grasper mounted on or near the front section of the chute, wherein the at least one grasper is adapted to move in or through the front lateral opening and to restrain the front leg of an animal.

6. The chute of claim 1 , wherein the chute has a center line extending between the rear section and the front section of the chute, the chute further comprising a guide attached to the frame of the chute adjacent to the pivot arm, the guide having a portion thereof at an angle away from vertical adapted to direct the lateral motion of the pivot arm as it is raised to lift an animal, and such that the pivot arm shifts toward the center line of the chute.

7. The chute of claim 1 , wherein the belly band is adapted to initially move toward the rear section of the chute as it begins to rise from an initially lowered position.

8. The chute of claim 1 , wherein the protective side shielding is substantially free of openings larger than a 2-inch diameter circle below a height of 36 inches.

9. The chute of claim 1 , wherein the protective side shielding is substantially free of openings larger than a 3-inch diameter circle below a height of 44 inches.

10. The chute of claim 1 , further comprising wheels and a hydraulic accumulator.

11. The chute of claim 1 , wherein the lifting device lifts the belly band by contraction.

12. The chute of claim 1 , wherein the lifting system comprises at least one of a hydraulic piston and an electric actuator.

13. The chute of claim 12 , wherein the lifting system comprises an extensible and retractable linkage which is retracted to lift the belly band.

14. The chute of claim 1 , wherein the belly band is connected to an end of the pivot arm via a belly band connection.

15. The chute of claim 14 , wherein a belly band support is connected to the belly band and to the belly band connection.

16. The chute of claim 1 , wherein the pivot arm defines a path with an initial backward motion as the belly band is lifted from an initially lowered position to a suitable height for animal treatment, wherein the extent of backward motion as projected onto a horizontal plane has a length of at least 0.5 inches.

17. The chute of claim 16 , wherein the extent of backward motion as projected onto a horizontal plane has a length of at least 2 inches.

18. A method for hoof trimming, comprising: (1) guiding an animal into a chute, wherein the chute comprises a frame with front, rear, upper, and side sections and the frame comprises a lifting system having a pivot arm with a first end rotatably mounted on the front section of the frame and attached to a belly band, (2) lifting the animal by the belly band, wherein the pivot arm cooperates with a lifting device attached to the upper section of the frame, such that the pivot arm is raised by the lifting device pulling the pivot arm upwards to raise the belly band, and (3) grasping a front leg of the animal with a movable grasper, wherein the side sections comprise two opposing sides with protective shielding and a front lateral opening to permit treating of the front legs of the animal.

19. The method of claim 18 , wherein the protective shielding on each side is substantially free of openings larger than a 2-inch diameter circle below a height of 24 inches between the entrance of the chute to the front lateral opening.

20. The method of claim 18 , wherein the belly band is adapted to initially move backwards toward the rear section of the chute by at least 1 inch as it is lifted.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 2, 2024
From: HESS, BRYANT; SNOW, BRENNEN; HOERNING, DAVID
To: APPLETON STEEL
Reel/Frame 065997/0900 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63358549 · Jul 6, 2022
Related Publication 20240008446A1 · Jan 11, 2024
References Cited (65)
US 123231A · Brusoe · 1872 [cited by examiner]
US 129832A · Kieler · 1872 [cited by examiner]
US 161825A · Relph · 1875 [cited by examiner]
US 304916A · Dougherty · 1884 [cited by examiner]
US 490053A · Underkofler · 1893 [cited by examiner]
US 646251A · Young · 1900 [cited by examiner]
US 671750A · Benedict · 1901 [cited by examiner]
US 866003A · Davis · 1907 [cited by examiner]
US 878347A · Clement · 1908 [cited by examiner]
US 1064367A · Musselman · 1913 [cited by examiner]
US 1083627A · McFadden · 1914 [cited by examiner]
US 1233309A · Tregurtha · 1917 [cited by examiner]
US 1375189A · Tucker · 1921 [cited by examiner]
US 1420349A · Szabo · 1922 [cited by examiner]
US 1621760A · Stader · 1927 [cited by examiner]
US 2278298A · Young · 1942 [cited by examiner]
US 2650567A · Whitworth · 1953 [cited by examiner]
US 2718214A · Walker · 1955 [cited by examiner]
US 3208432A · Fisk · 1965 [cited by examiner]
US 3807361A · Kaplan · 1974 [cited by examiner]
US 4055148A · Brockman · 1977 [cited by examiner]
US 4214555A · Sawby · 1980 [cited by applicant]
US 4663847A · Van Horn · 1987 [cited by applicant]
US 4829937A · Weelink · 1989 [cited by examiner]
US 5184572A · Meier · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5282441A · Ricketts · 1994 [cited by examiner]
US 5331923A · Mollhagen · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5640933A · Bradbury · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5842443A · Steinfort · 1998 [cited by examiner]
US 6425351B1 · Mollhagen · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 7389749B1 · Choate · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 7822695B2 · Solomon · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7918185B2 · Araki et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8066179B2 · Lowe · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8561576B2 · Pingsterhaus · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 9185881B1 · Beavers · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9578852B1 · Riley · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9591829B2 · Beavers · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 10194638B1 · Tomsic · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10721911B2 · Cassell · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10905105B2 · Crouthamel · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10932451B2 · Sharpe et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11083174B2 · Balbian et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20030140870A1 · Daniels · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20060254532A1 · Boriack et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070017455A1 · De Vor · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080223309A1 · Winders · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20110132276A1 · Lanny · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110146591A1 · Pingsterhaus · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20150264889A1 · Beavers · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160192618A1 · Punt · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170354123A1 · Wilson · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180146639A1 · Hager · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20230011038A1 · Mollhagen · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230105772A1 · Hoerning · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230172158A1 · Comte · 2023 [cited by applicant]
CA 2853020 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 213283532U · 2021 [cited by applicant]
JP 2020150841A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
M. Alsaaod et al., “The cow pedogram—Analysis of gait cycle variables allows the detection of lameness and foot pathologies,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 100, No. 2 (Feb. 2017): 1417-1426, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds… [cited by applicant]
Kate Hepworth, Michael Neary, and Simon Kenyon, “Hoof Anatomy, Care and Management in Livestock,” Purdue University Agricultural Communication ID-321-W, Oct. 2004, https://extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/ID/ID-321-W.pdf. [cited by applicant]
F.C. Flower and D.M. Weary, “Effect of hoof pathologies on subjective assessments of dairy cow gait,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 89 (2006): 139-146, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72077-X and https://www.… [cited by applicant]
N. Chapinal and C.B. Tucker, “Validation of an automated method to count steps while cows stand on a weighing platform and its application as a measure to detect lameness,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 95, No. 11 (201… [cited by applicant]
Tom Van Hertem, et al., “Implementation of an automatic 3D vision monitor for dairy cow locomotion in a commercial farm,” Biosystems Engineering, vol. 173 (2018): 166-175, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/a… [cited by applicant]
T. Van Hertem, et al., “Lameness detection based on multivariate continuous sensing of milk yield, rumination, and neck activity,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 96, No. 7 (2013): 4286-4298, https://www.researchgate.net… [cited by applicant]