IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,369,825
Granted Patent B2
US 12,369,825 · App. 18/643,565 · Granted Jul 29, 2025

Methods, systems, and devices for calibration and optimization of glucose sensors and sensor output

Inventors: Keith G. Nogueira (Mission Hills, CA); Peter Ajemba (Canyon Country, CA); Michael E. Miller (Culver City, CA); Steven C. Jacks (Culver City, CA); Jeffrey Nishida (Redwood City, CA); Andy Y. Tsai (Pasadena, CA); Andrea Varsavsky (Santa Monica, CA)
Assignee: Medtronic MiniMed, Inc.
A61B5/1495A61B5/14532A61B5/1468A61B5/14865A61B5/6849A61B5/686G01N27/026G06N5/022G16H20/17G16H40/40G16H50/30G16H50/70A61B5/0075A61B5/02055A61B5/021A61B5/024A61B5/1118A61B5/14546A61B5/1455A61B5/7203A61B5/7221A61B5/7267A61B5/742A61B2505/07A61B2560/0223A61B2560/0252A61B2560/0257A61B2562/028A61B2562/029A61B2562/164
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,369,825
App. No.
18/643,565
Granted
Jul 29, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A continuous glucose monitoring system may utilize externally sourced information regarding the physiological state and ambient environment of its user for externally calibrating sensor glucose measurements. Externally sourced factory calibration information may be utilized, where the information is generated by comparing metrics obtained from the data used to generate the sensor's glucose sensing algorithm to similar data obtained from each batch of sensors to be used with the algorithm in the future. The output sensor glucose value of a glucose sensor may also be estimated by analytically optimizing input sensor signals to accurately correct for changes in sensitivity, run-in time, glucose current dips, and other variable sensor wear effects. Correction actors, fusion algorithms, EIS, and advanced ASICs may be used to implement the foregoing, thereby achieving the goal of improved accuracy and reliability without the need for blood-glucose calibration, and providing a calibration-free, or near calibration-free, sensor.

Claims (199)

1. A method for measuring a level of glucose in a body of a user using a glucose sensor, the glucose sensor comprising physical sensor electronics, a microcontroller, and a working electrode, the method comprising:

periodically measuring, by the physical sensor electronics, electrode current (Isig) signals for the working electrode;

performing, by the microcontroller, an Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) procedure to generate EIS-related data for the working electrode;

calculating, by the microcontroller, an adjusted calibration factor for the glucose sensor based on the EIS-related data;

calculating, by the microcontroller, an adjusted offset value for the glucose sensor based on at least one of an adjustment of a stabilization time of the glucose sensor or an adjustment of a non-linear response of the glucose sensor; and

providing, by the microcontroller, a measured glucose value (SG) based on the adjusted calibration factor and the adjusted offset value,

wherein SG=(adjusted calibration factor)×(Isig+adjusted offset value), and

wherein the adjusted calibration factor is calculated based on a stabilization response for the glucose sensor.

2. The method of claim 1 , further including displaying the measured glucose value to the user.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the glucose sensor further comprises a counter electrode and the adjusted calibration factor is further calculated based on an oxygen response, wherein the oxygen response is calculated as:

oxygen

⁢

response

=

c

1

×

Vcntr

2

+

c

2

×

Vcntr

+

c

3

,

wherein Ventr is a counter voltage input and c 1 , c 2 , and c 3 are experimentally determined calibration coefficients.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the adjusted calibration factor is further calculated based on a dip adjustment response, wherein the dip adjustment response is calculated as:

dip

⁢

adjustment

⁢

response

=

c

1

×

e

IsigTrend

×

c

2

+

c

3

,

wherein IsigTrend is a long-term sensor current trend input and c 1 , c 2 and c 3 are experimentally determined calibration coefficients.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the glucose sensor further comprises a counter electrode and the stabilization response is calculated as:

stabilization

⁢

response

=

c

1

×

Vcntr

+

c

2

,

where Vcntr is a counter voltage input and c 1 and c 2 are experimentally determined calibration coefficients.

6. The method of claim 3 , wherein the adjusted calibration factor is calculated based on a foreign body response of the glucose sensor, the oxygen response, and the stabilization response for the glucose sensor.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the adjustment of the stabilization time for calculation of the adjusted offset value is calculated as:

adjustment of the

stabilization

⁢

time

=

c

1

×

e

age

×

c

2

+

c

3

,

wherein age is a sensor age, and c 1 , c 2 and c 3 are experimentally determined calibration coefficients.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the sensor age is measured from one of sensor warm-up completion, sensor insertion, or sensor calibration completion.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the adjustment of the non-linear response for calculation of the adjusted offset value is calculated as:

adjustment of the non-linear response=c 1 +(age×c 2 +c 3 )×Isig,

wherein age is the sensor age, and c 1 , c 2 and c 3 are experimentally determined calibration coefficients.

10. An apparatus comprising:

a glucose sensor for measuring a level of glucose in a body of a user, the glucose sensor comprising:

physical sensor electronics;

a working electrode; and

a microcontroller configured to execute instructions to at least perform:

periodically measuring, by the physical sensor electronics, electrode current (Isig) signals for the working electrode;

performing, by the microcontroller, an Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) procedure to generate EIS-related data for the working electrode;

calculating, by the microcontroller, an adjusted calibration factor for the glucose sensor based on the EIS-related data;

calculating, by the microcontroller, an adjusted offset value for the glucose sensor based on at least one of an adjustment of a stabilization time of the glucose sensor or an adjustment of a non-linear response of the glucose sensor; and

providing, by the microcontroller, a measured glucose value (SG) based on the adjusted calibration factor and the adjusted offset value,

wherein SG=(adjusted calibration factor)×(Isig+adjusted offset value), and

wherein the adjusted calibration factor is calculated based on a stabilization response for the glucose sensor.

11. The apparatus of claim 10 , further comprising a display screen configured to display the measured glucose value to the user.

12. The apparatus of claim 10 , wherein the glucose sensor further comprises a counter electrode and the adjusted calibration factor is further calculated based on an oxygen response, wherein the oxygen response is calculated as:

oxygen

⁢

response

=

c

1

×

Vcntr

2

+

c

2

×

Vcntr

+

c

3

,

wherein Ventr is a counter voltage input and c 1 , c 2 , and c 3 are experimentally determined calibration coefficients.

13. The apparatus of claim 10 , wherein the adjusted calibration factor is further calculated based on a dip adjustment response, wherein the dip adjustment response is calculated as:

dip

⁢

adjustment

⁢

response

=

c

1

×

e

IsigTrend

×

c

2

+

c

3

,

wherein IsigTrend is a long-term sensor current trend input and c 1 , c 2 and c 3 are experimentally determined calibration coefficients.

14. The apparatus of claim 10 , wherein the glucose sensor further comprises a counter electrode and the stabilization response is calculated as:

stabilization

⁢

response

=

c

1

×

Vcntr

+

c

2

,

where Ventr is the counter voltage input and c 1 and c 2 are experimentally determined calibration coefficients.

15. The apparatus of claim 13 , wherein the adjusted calibration factor is calculated based on a foreign body response of the glucose sensor, the dip adjustment response, and the stabilization response for the glucose sensor.

16. The apparatus of claim 10 , wherein the adjustment of the stabilization time for calculation of the adjusted offset value is calculated as:

adjustment of the

stabilization

⁢

time

=

c

1

×

e

age

×

c

2

+

c

3

,

wherein age is a sensor age, and c 1 , c 2 and c 3 are experimentally determined calibration coefficients.

17. The apparatus of claim 16 , wherein the sensor age is measured from one of sensor warm-up completion, sensor insertion, or sensor calibration completion.

18. The apparatus of claim 10 , where the adjustment of the non-linear response for calculation of the adjusted offset value is calculated as:

adjustment to the

non

-

linear

⁢

response

=

c

1

+

(

age

×

c

2

+

c

3

)

×

Isig

,

wherein age is the sensor age, and c 1 , c 2 and c 3 are experimentally determined calibration coefficients.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 16, 2026
From: MEDTRONIC MINIMED, INC.; COMPANION MEDICAL, INC.
To: CITIBANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 074394/0237 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 25, 2024
From: NOGUEIRA, KEITH; TSAI, ANDY Y.; VARSAVSKY, ANDREA; AJEMBA, PETER; MILLER, MICHAEL E.; JACKS, STEVEN C.; NISHIDA, JEFFREY
To: MEDTRONIC MINIMED, INC.
Reel/Frame 067824/0597 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 17737236 · May 5, 2022
Continuation 16117733 · Aug 30, 2018
Provisional Application 62558248 · Sep 13, 2017
Related Publication 20240285199A1 · Aug 29, 2024
References Cited (87)
US 2942844A · Neate · 1960 [cited by applicant]
US 4755173A · Konopka et al. · 1988 [cited by applicant]
US 5391250A · Cheney, II et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5485408A · Blomquist · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5522803A · Teissen-Simony · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5665065A · Colman et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5800420A · Gross et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5807375A · Gross et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5925021A · Castellano et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5954643A · VanAntwerp et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6017328A · Fischell et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6186982B1 · Gross et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6246992B1 · Brown · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6248067B1 · Causey, III et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6248093B1 · Moberg · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6355021B1 · Nielsen et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6379301B1 · Worthington et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6544212B2 · Galley et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6558351B1 · Steil et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6591876B2 · Safabash · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6641533B2 · Causey, III et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6736797B1 · Larsen et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6749587B2 · Flaherty · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6766183B2 · Walsh et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6801420B2 · Talbot et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6804544B2 · Van Antwerp et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 7003336B2 · Holker et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7029444B2 · Shin et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7066909B1 · Peter et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7137964B2 · Flaherty · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7303549B2 · Flaherty et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7399277B2 · Saidara et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7442186B2 · Blomquist · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7602310B2 · Mann et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7647237B2 · Malave et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7699807B2 · Faust et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7727148B2 · Talbot et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7785313B2 · Mastrototaro · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7806886B2 · Kanderian, Jr. et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7819843B2 · Mann et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7828764B2 · Moberg et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7879010B2 · Hunn et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7890295B2 · Shin et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7892206B2 · Moberg et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7892748B2 · Norrild et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7901394B2 · Ireland et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7946985B2 · Mastrototaro et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7955305B2 · Moberg et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7963954B2 · Kavazov · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7977112B2 · Burke et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7979259B2 · Brown · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7985330B2 · Wang et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8024201B2 · Brown · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8100852B2 · Moberg et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8114268B2 · Wang et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8114269B2 · Cooper et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8137314B2 · Mounce et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8181849B2 · Bazargan et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8182462B2 · Istoc et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8192395B2 · Estes et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8195265B2 · Goode, Jr. et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8202250B2 · Stutz, Jr. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8207859B2 · Enegren et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8226615B2 · Bikovsky · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8257259B2 · Brauker et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8267921B2 · Yodfat et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8275437B2 · Brauker et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8277415B2 · Mounce et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8292849B2 · Bobroff et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8298172B2 · Nielsen et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8303572B2 · Adair et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8305580B2 · Aasmul · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8308679B2 · Hanson et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8313433B2 · Cohen et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8318443B2 · Norrild et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8323250B2 · Chong et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8343092B2 · Rush et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8352011B2 · Van Antwerp et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8353829B2 · Say et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 11344235B2 · Nogueira et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11963768B2 · Nogueira et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20070123819A1 · Mernoe et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20100160861A1 · Causey, III et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20120262298A1 · Bohm et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20140184422A1 · Mensinger et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150164387A1 · Varsavsky · 2015 [cited by applicant]
Latha et al. Design And Development Of A Microcontroller Based System For The Measurement Of Blood Glucose; 2012. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com vol.… [cited by examiner]