IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,370,374
Granted Patent B2
US 12,370,374 · App. 17/968,392 · Granted Jul 29, 2025

Methods of and apparatus for treatment with flash radiotherapy

Inventors: Ricky Anupam Sharma (Palo Alto, CA); Sophia Pfister (Redwood City, CA); Marta Vilalta (Palo Alto, CA); Brita Singers Sørensen (Aarhus, DK); Per Rugaard Poulsen (Aarhus, DK); Gael Luis Boivin (Zurich, CH)
Assignees: Varian Medical Systems, Inc.; Aarhus University; Central Denmark Region
A61N5/10A61N2005/1087
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,370,374
App. No.
17/968,392
Granted
Jul 29, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present disclosure relates to the field of radiotherapy, in particular, methods of and apparatus for treating cancer using ultra-high dose rate radiotherapy (FLASH). The apparatus may comprise a device configured to administer to the subject no more than five fractions of proton ultra-high dose rate radiotherapy (FLASH), said fractions having a range of radiation from 1.5 Gy to 60 Gy, collectively. The device may be configured such that the treatment is sufficient to prevent further growth of the tumor for at least 10% longer than standard of care radiotherapy, induce at least 10% more tumor regression than standard of care radiotherapy and/or delay tumor regrowth by at least about 2 months longer than standard of care radiotherapy.

Claims (23)

1. A method for treating cancer in a subject, the method comprising administering to the subject no more than five fractions of proton ultra-high dose rate radiotherapy (FLASH), said fractions having a range of radiation from 1.5 Gy to 60 Gy, collectively, wherein the treatment is sufficient to prevent further growth of a tumor for at least 10% longer than standard of care radiotherapy.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein a dose of proton FLASH is equitoxic to a dose of conventional dose rate radiotherapy.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the collective dose of radiation delivered by proton FLASH radiotherapy is contraindicated in the subject.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the collective dose of radiation delivered by proton FLASH to the tumor is about 1.1 times, 1.2 times, 1.5 times, about 2 times, about 3 times, about 4 times, about 5 times, about 10 times or about 15 times a dose of conventional dose rate radiotherapy indicated for the cancer.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the collective dose of radiation delivered to the tumor is about 10%, about 20%, about 30%, about 40%, about 50%, about 60%, about 70%, about 80%, about 90%, or about 100% higher than a dose of conventional dose rate radiotherapy indicated for the cancer.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the cancer is a cancer for which radiotherapy is not indicated.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the cancer is lung cancer, head and neck cancer, brain cancer, breast cancer or skin cancer.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the subject is human.

9. A method for treating cancer in a subject, the method comprising administering to the subject no more than five fractions of proton ultra-high dose rate radiotherapy (FLASH), said fractions having a range of radiation from 1.5 Gy to 60 Gy, collectively, wherein the treatment is sufficient to induce at least 10% more tumor regression than standard of care radiotherapy.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein a dose of proton FLASH is equitoxic to a dose of conventional dose rate radiotherapy.

11. The method of claim 9 , wherein the collective dose of radiation delivered by proton FLASH radiotherapy is contraindicated in the subject.

12. The method of claim 9 , wherein the collective dose of radiation delivered by proton FLASH to the tumor is about 1.1 times, 1.2 times, 1.5 times, about 2 times, about 3 times, about 4 times, about 5 times, about 10 times or about 15 times a dose of conventional dose rate radiotherapy indicated for the cancer.

13. The method of claim 9 , wherein the collective dose of radiation delivered to the tumor is about 10%, about 20%, about 30%, about 40%, about 50%, about 60%, about 70%, about 80%, about 90%, or about 100% higher than a dose of conventional dose rate radiotherapy indicated for the cancer.

14. The method of claim 9 , wherein the cancer is a cancer for which radiotherapy is not indicated.

15. The method of claim 9 , wherein the cancer is lung cancer, head and neck cancer, brain cancer, breast cancer or skin cancer.

16. A method for treating cancer in a subject, the method comprising administering to the subject no more than five fractions of proton ultra-high dose rate radiotherapy (FLASH), said fractions having a range of radiation from 1.5 Gy to 60 Gy, collectively, wherein the treatment results in at least 10% less, at least 20% less, at least 30% less, at least 40% less, at least 50% less, at least 60% less, at least 70% less, at least 80% less, or more than 80% less healthy tissue toxicity than standard of care radiotherapy.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein the healthy tissue toxicity is skin toxicity, muscle toxicity, or neurotoxicity.

18. The method of claim 16 , wherein the collective dose of radiation delivered by proton FLASH radiotherapy is contraindicated in the subject.

19. The method of claim 16 , wherein the collective dose of radiation delivered by proton FLASH to the tumor is about 1.1 times, 1.2 times, 1.5 times, about 2 times, about 3 times, about 4 times, about 5 times, about 10 times or about 15 times a dose of conventional dose rate radiotherapy indicated for the cancer.

20. The method of claim 16 , wherein the collective dose of radiation delivered to the tumor is about 10%, about 20%, about 30%, about 40%, about 50%, about 60%, about 70%, about 80%, about 90%, or about 100% higher than a dose of conventional dose rate radiotherapy indicated for the cancer.

21. The method of claim 16 , wherein the cancer is a cancer for which radiotherapy is not indicated.

22. The method of claim 16 , wherein the cancer is lung cancer, head and neck cancer, brain cancer, breast cancer or skin cancer.

23. A method of treating brain cancer in a subject, the method comprising administering to the subject a total dose of about 10 Gy to about 60 Gy proton FLASH radiotherapy in five fractions or less at a dose rate of 40 Gy/sec or higher, wherein the cancer is brain cancer, heard and neck cancer, or breast cancer.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 16, 2024
From: SØRENSEN, BRITA SINGERS
To: AARHUS UNIVERSITY
Reel/Frame 068914/0920 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 16, 2024
From: POULSEN, PER RUGAARD
To: AARHUS UNIVERSITY; CENTRAL DENMARK REGION
Reel/Frame 068914/0985 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 14, 2023
From: SHARMA, RICKY A.; PFISTER, SOPHIA X.; VILALTA-COLOMER, MARTA; BOIVIN, GAEL
To: VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 064253/0134 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63257211 · Oct 19, 2021
Related Publication 20230141933A1 · May 11, 2023
References Cited (15)
US 11925818B2 · Michaud · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20160287905A1 · Liger · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20190022411A1 · Parry et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20210024564A1 · Rich · 2021 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2019166702A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2022/078290, mailed on Feb. 8, 2023, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Colangelo, N. et al., “The Importance and Clinical Implications of FLASH Ultra-High Dose-Rate Studies for Proton and Heavy Ion Radiotherapy,” Radiat Res., Jan. 2020, 193(1):1-4. [cited by applicant]
Cunningham, S. et al., “FLASH Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Irradiation Minimizes Radiation-Induced Leg Contracture and Skin Toxicity in Mice,” Cancers, Mar. 1, 2021, 13(1012):1-15. [cited by applicant]
Durante, M. et al., “Faster and safer? FLASH ultra-high dose rate in radiotherapy,” Br J Radiol 2018, 91(20170628):1-4. [cited by applicant]
Liu, H. et al. “Proton therapy in clinical practice,” Chin J Cancer., May 2011, 30(5):315-326. [cited by applicant]
Montay-Gruel, P. et al. “Hypo-fractionated FLASH-RT: An effective treatment against glioblastoma that significantly reduces neurocognitive side effects in mice,” Clin. Cancer Res., Feb. 1, 2021, 27(3):775-784. [cited by applicant]
Sørensen, B. et al. “In vivo validation and tissue sparing factor for acute damage of pencil beam scanning proton FLASH,” Radiotherapy and Oncology, 2022, 167:109-115. [cited by applicant]
Sørensen, B. et al. “Pencil beam scanning proton FLASH maintains tumor control while normal tissue damage is reduced in a mouse model,” Radiotherapy and Oncology, 2022, 175:178-184. [cited by applicant]
Williams, M. et al. “Cognitive and behavioral effects of whole brain conventional or high dose rate (FLASH) proton irradiation in a neonatal Sprague Dawley rat model,” PLoS ONE, 2022, 17(9):1-28. [cited by applicant]
Wilson, J. et al., Ultra-High Dose Rate (FLASH) Radiotherapy: Silver Bullet or Fool's Gold? Frontiers in Oncology, Jan. 17, 2020, 9(1563):1-12. [cited by applicant]
Cited By (1)
US 12,569,700