IP Library Granted Patent US 12,372,430
Granted Patent B2
US 12,372,430 · App. 18/133,076 · Granted Jul 29, 2025

Pressure sensor for an inflatable structure

Inventors: Xiaopeng Li (Ann Arbor, MI); Taehwa Lee (Ann Arbor, MI); Ziqi Yu (Ann Arbor, MI); Yuyang Song (Ann Arbor, MI)
Assignees: Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc.; Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
G01M7/025G01L9/0022G01L9/06G01L9/08
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,372,430
App. No.
18/133,076
Granted
Jul 29, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems described herein relate to sensing pressure. In one arrangement, a pressure sensor is disclosed. The pressure sensor includes a circuit including a resistor, an inductor, and a capacitor. The circuit generates an electrical resonance. The resistor is an elastomer having a resistance and connected to an outer surface of an inflatable. The pressure sensor also includes a resonator connected to the circuit. The resonator generates a mechanical resonance coupling with the electrical resonance to create a detuning frequency having a sublinear dependence on the resistance of the elastomer. A pressure of the inflatable correlates with the detuning frequency.

Claims (29)

1. A pressure sensor, comprising:

a circuit including a resistor, an inductor, and a capacitor, wherein the circuit generates an electrical resonance, and wherein the resistor is an elastomer having a resistance and connected to an outer surface of an inflatable; and

a resonator connected to the circuit that generates a mechanical resonance coupling with the electrical resonance to create a detuning frequency having a sublinear dependence on the resistance of the elastomer, and wherein the detuning frequency correlates with a pressure measurement of the inflatable.

2. The pressure sensor of claim 1 , wherein coupling of the mechanical resonance with the electrical resonance results in frequency splitting at an exceptional point, and wherein the frequency splitting results in the detuning frequency.

3. The pressure sensor of claim 2 , wherein the electrical resonance and the mechanical resonance have real and imaginary eigenfrequencies and are coupled together, and wherein the exceptional point occurs at the coalescence of the real and imaginary eigenfrequencies.

4. The pressure sensor of claim 2 , wherein the exceptional point is a function the resistance and the mechanical resonance.

5. The pressure sensor of claim 2 , wherein the exceptional point occurs when the electrical resonance is greater than the mechanical resonance.

6. The pressure sensor of claim 1 , wherein the outer surface changes tension according to the pressure of the inflatable, thereby causing a change in resistance of the elastomer, wherein the change in resistance correlates with the detuning frequency, and wherein the detuning frequency correlates with a pressure measurement of the inflatable.

7. The pressure sensor of claim 1 , wherein, when the outer surface has a high tension, the elastomer has a high resistance, and the inflatable has a high pressure measurement, and wherein, when the outer surface has a low tension, the elastomer has a low resistance, and the inflatable has a low pressure measurement.

8. The pressure sensor of claim 1 , wherein the sublinear dependence is a square-root dependence.

9. The pressure sensor of claim 1 , wherein the resonator is a micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) component including a cantilevered beam that vibrates at a resonance frequency when excited, and further comprising a excitation source connected to the resonator and configured to vibrate the cantilevered beam to generate the mechanical resonance.

10. The pressure sensor of claim 1 , wherein the capacitor is a piezoelectric patch bonded to a surface of the resonator.

11. The pressure sensor of claim 1 , wherein the inductor, the resistor, and the capacitor are connected in series.

12. A pressure sensor, comprising:

a shunting circuit including a resistor, an inductor, and a capacitor connected in series, wherein the circuit generates an electrical resonance, and wherein the resistor is an elastomer having a resistance and connected to an outer surface of an inflatable; and

a resonator connected to and shunted by the shunting circuit, wherein the resonator generates a mechanical resonance that interacts with the electrical resonance to result in frequency splitting at an exceptional point, wherein the frequency splitting results in a detuning frequency having a sublinear dependence on the resistance of the elastomer, and wherein the detuning frequency correlates with a pressure of the inflatable.

13. The pressure sensor of claim 12 , wherein the electrical resonance and the mechanical resonance have real and imaginary eigenfrequencies, and wherein the exceptional point occurs at the coalescence of the real and imaginary eigenfrequencies.

14. The pressure sensor of claim 12 , wherein the sublinear dependence is a square-root dependence.

15. The pressure sensor of claim 12 , wherein the resonator is a micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) component including a cantilevered beam that vibrates at a resonance frequency when excited, and further comprising a excitation source connected to the resonator and configured to vibrate the cantilevered beam to generate the mechanical resonance.

16. The pressure sensor of claim 12 , wherein the capacitor is a piezoelectric patch bonded to a surface of the resonator.

17. A pressure sensor, comprising:

a micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) resonator including a cantilevered beam that vibrates at a resonance frequency when excited to generate a mechanical resonance;

a circuit comprising:

a resistor, wherein the resistor is an elastomer having a resistance and connected to an outer surface of an inflatable;

an inductor connected in series to the resistor; and

a capacitor connected in series to the inductor, wherein the capacitor is a piezoelectric patch, wherein the circuit generates an electrical resonance that couples with the mechanical resonance to create frequency splitting at an exceptional point, wherein the frequency splitting results in a detuning frequency having a sublinear dependence on the resistance of the elastomer, and wherein a pressure of the inflatable correlates with the detuning frequency.

18. The pressure sensor of claim 17 , wherein the electrical resonance and the mechanical resonance have real and imaginary eigenfrequencies, and wherein the exceptional point occurs at the coalescence of the real and imaginary eigenfrequencies.

19. The pressure sensor of claim 17 , wherein the sublinear dependence is a square-root dependence.

20. The pressure sensor of claim 17 , further comprising a excitation source connected to the resonator and configured to vibrate the cantilevered beam to generate the mechanical resonance.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 19, 2025
From: TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA, INC.
To: TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Reel/Frame 072054/0493 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 12, 2023
From: LI, XIAOPENG; LEE, TAEHWA; YU, ZIQI; SONG, YUYANG
To: TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA, INC.; TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Reel/Frame 063626/0641 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63447489 · Feb 22, 2023
Related Publication 20240280426A1 · Aug 22, 2024
References Cited (108)
US 4492246A · Prescott et al. · 1985 [cited by applicant]
US 5499526A · Muro · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 7358503B2 · Fellerman et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7551058B1 · Johnson et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 9411029B2 · Pirkl · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9933503B2 · Vernickel et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10284176B1 · Solal · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10717672B2 · Loh et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10724994B2 · Van Tooren et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11022561B2 · Ziehl · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11162972B2 · Abdolvand et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20090301176A1 · Rowe · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20110107838A1 · Suijlen · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20140053651A1 · Besling · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150308911A1 · Pechstedt et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150338380A1 · Ziehl et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20170115382A1 · Koudar et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180107015A1 · Dümpelmann et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20220051650A1 · Lee et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220190231A1 · Li et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220214312A1 · Lee et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220285604A1 · Li et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20240371349A1 · Li · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240371350A1 · Li · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240372530A1 · Li · 2024 [cited by examiner]
WO 2013076270A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016081915A1 · 2016 [cited by examiner]
Wu et al., “Asymmetric scattering of flexural waves in a parity-time symmetric metamaterial beam,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 146, 2019, pp. 850-862 (13 pages). [cited by applicant]
Schipf et al., “Tunable piezoelectric metamaterial for Lamb waves using periodic shunted circuits,” arXiv:2207.07845v1, Jul. 16, 2022, pp. 1-30 (30 pages). [cited by applicant]
Zhao et al., “Numerical analysis of effective refractive index ultrasonic sensor based on Cantilever arm structure slot-based dual-micro-ring resonator,” International Journal of Modern Physics B, vol. 35, No. 4, 2021, … [cited by applicant]
Durdaut et al., “Phase Sensitivity and Phase Noise of Cantilever-Type Magnetoelastic Sensors Based on the ΔE Effect,” arXiv:2003.01085v1, Mar. 2, 2020, pp. 1-15 (15 pages). [cited by applicant]
Casadei et al., “Piezoelectric resonator arrays for tunable acoustic waveguides and metamaterials,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 112, 2012, pp. 1-6 (6 pages). [cited by applicant]
Casadei et al., “Broadband vibration control through periodic arrays of resonant shunts: experimental investigation on plates,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 19, No. 1, 2010, pp. 1-13 (13 pages). [cited by applicant]
Cardella et al., “Manipulating waves by distilling frequencies: a tunable shunt-enabled rainbow trap,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 25, 2016, pp. 1-15 (15 pages). [cited by applicant]
Jain et al., “Emerging Ideas in Nanocantilever based Biological Sensors,” arXiv:1305.5729, 2013, pp. 1-17 (17 pages). [cited by applicant]
Airoldi et al., “Design of tunable acoustic metamaterials through periodic arrays of resonant shunted piezos,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 13, Nov. 2011, pp. 1-21 (22 pages). [cited by applicant]
Chen et al., “Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity,” Nature, vol. 548, 2017, pp. 192-197 (16 pages). [cited by applicant]
Su et al., “Research on damage visualization of concrete structures based on electrical resistance tomography,” Frontiers in Physics, 2022, pp. 1-12 (12 pages). [cited by applicant]
Ashida et al., “Non-Hermitian Physics,” Advances in Physics 69 (3) (2020), pp. 249-435 (186 pages). [cited by applicant]
Guo et al., “Observation of PT-symmetry breaking in complex optical potentials,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 103, Issue 9, 2009, pp. 1-4 (4 pages). [cited by applicant]
Lee et al., “Topolectrical circuits,” Communications Physics 1 (1), 2018, pp. 1-9 (9 pages). [cited by applicant]
Yoshida et al., “Exceptional rings protected by emergent symmetry for mechanical systems,” Physical Review B, vol. 100, Issue 5, 2019, pp. 1-17 (17 pages). [cited by applicant]
Fleury et al., “An invisible acoustic sensor based on parity-time symmetry,” Nature Communications 6 (1), 2015, pp. 1-7 (7 pages). [cited by applicant]
Zangeneh-Nejad et al., “Active times for acoustic metamaterials,” Reviews in Physics, vol. 4, Nov. 2019, pp. 1-17 (17 pages). [cited by applicant]
Ding et al., “Emergence, coalescence, and topological properties of multiple exceptional points and their experimental realization,” Physical Review X, vol. 6, Issue 2, 2016, pp. 1-13 (13 pages). [cited by applicant]
Gear et al., “Unidirectional zero reflection as gauged parity-time symmetry,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 19, Issue 12, 2017, pp. 1-10 (10 pages). [cited by applicant]
Lin et al., “Unidirectional invisibility induced by pt-symmetric periodic structures,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 106, Issue 21, 2011, pp. 1-4 (4 pages). [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “Experimental demonstration of extremely asymmetric flexural wave absorption at the exceptional point,” Extreme Mechanics Letters, vol. 52, Apr. 2022, pp. 1-6 (6 pages). [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., “Extremely asymmetrical acoustic metasurface mirror at the exceptional point,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 123, Issue 21, Nov. 2019, pp. 1-5 (5 pages). [cited by applicant]
Hodaei et al., “Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order exceptional points,” Nature, vol. 548 (7666), Aug. 2017, pp. 187-192 (15 pages). [cited by applicant]
Assawaworrarit et al., “Robust wireless power transfer using a nonlinear parity-time-symmetric circuit,” Nature, vol. 546 (7658), Jun. 2017, pp. 387-390 (13 pages). [cited by applicant]
Peng et al., “Parity-time-symmetric whispering-gallery microcavities,” Nature Physics, vol. 10, Issue 5, May 2014, pp. 394-398 (5 pages). [cited by applicant]
Yi et al., “Asymmetric viscoelastic metamaterials for broad bandgap design and unidirectional zero reflection,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 162, Jan. 2022, pp. 1-15 (15 pages). [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., “Coherent perfect absorption at an exceptional point,” Science, vol. 373, Issue 6560, Sep. 2021, pp. 1261-1265 (6 pages). [cited by applicant]
Sweeney et al., “Perfectly absorbing exceptional points and chiral absorbers,” Physical review letters, vol. 122, Issue 9, Mar. 2019, pp. 1-6 (6 pages). [cited by applicant]
Zhu et al., “Simultaneous observation of a topological edge state and exceptional point in an open and non-Hermitian acoustic system,” Physical review letters, vol. 121, Issue 12, Sep. 2018, pp. 1-14 (14 pages). [cited by applicant]
Liu et al., Willis metamaterial on a structured beam, Physical Review X, vol. 9, Issue 1, 2019, pp. 1-21 (21 pages). [cited by applicant]
Domínguez-Rocha et al., “Environmentally induced exceptional points in elastodynamics,” Physical Review Applied 13 (1), 2020, pp. 1-8 (8 pages). [cited by applicant]
Cummer et al., “Controlling sound with acoustic metamaterials,” Nature Reviews Materials, vol. 1, Issue 3, Mar. 2016, pp. 1-13 (13 pages). [cited by applicant]
Chen et al., “A review of tunable acoustic metamaterials,” Applied Sciences, vol. 8, Issue 9, 2018, pp. 1-21 (21 pages). [cited by applicant]
Ji et al., “Recent progress in acoustic metamaterials and active piezoelectric acoustic metamaterials—a review,” Applied Materials Today, vol. 26, Mar. 2022, pp. 1-28 (28 pages). [cited by applicant]
Popa et al., “Non-reciprocal and highly nonlinear active acoustic metamaterials,” Nature Communications, vol. 5, Issue 1, 2014, pp. 1-5 (5 pages). [cited by applicant]
Popa et al., “Active acoustic metamaterials reconfigurable in real-time,” Physical Review B, vol. 91, Issue 22, 2015, pp. 1-7 (7 pages). [cited by applicant]
Akl et al., “Analysis and experimental demonstration of an active acoustic metamaterial cell,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 111, Issue 4, 2012, pp. 1-9 (9 pages). [cited by applicant]
Chen et al., “An active mechanical Willis meta-layer with asymmetric polarizabilities,” Nature Communications, vol. 11, Issue 1, 2020, pp. 1-8 (8 pages). [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “Shaping elastic wave mode conversion with a piezoelectric-based programmable meta-boundary,” Extreme Mechanics Letters, vol. 39, Sep. 2020, pp. 1-18 (18 pages). [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “An active meta-layer for optimal flexural wave absorption and cloaking,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 149, Feb. 2021, pp. 1-35 (35 pages). [cited by applicant]
Chen et al., “Realization of active metamaterials with odd micropolar elasticity,” Nature Communications, vol. 12, Issue 1, 2021, pp. 1-12 (12 pages). [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “Acoustic metamaterials capable of both sound insulation and energy harvesting,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 25, No. 4, 2016, pp. 1-5 (5 pages). [cited by applicant]
Airoldi et al., “Design of tunable acoustic metamaterials through periodic arrays of resonant shunted piezos,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 13, Issue 11, Nov. 2011, pp. 1-21 (22 pages). [cited by applicant]
Thomes et al., “Space-time wave localization in electromechanical metamaterial beams with programmable defects,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 167, Part B, Mar. 2022, pp. 1-16 (16 pages). [cited by applicant]
Trainiti et al., “Time-periodic stiffness modulation in elastic metamaterials for selective wave filtering: theory and experiment,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 122, Issue 12, Mar. 2019, pp. 1-11 (17 pages). [cited by applicant]
Chen et al., “Enhanced flexural wave sensing by adaptive gradient-index metamaterials,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, Issue 1, 2016, pp. 1-11 (11 pages). [cited by applicant]
Zhu et al., “Experimental study of an adaptive elastic metamaterial controlled by electric circuits,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 108, Issue 1, 2016, pp. 1-5 (6 pages). [cited by applicant]
Hu et al., “Metamaterial beam with graded local resonators for broadband vibration suppression,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 146, Jan. 2021, pp. 1-20 (20 pages). [cited by applicant]
Yi et al., “Programmable metamaterials with digital synthetic impedance circuits for vibration control,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 29, No. 3, 2020, pp. 1-21 (21 pages). [cited by applicant]
Sugino et al., “Digitally programmable resonant elastic metamaterials,” Physical Review Applied, vol. 13, Issue 6, 2020, pp. 1-5 (5 pages). [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., “Multi-resonant piezoelectric shunting induced by digital controllers for subwavelength elastic wave attenuation in smart metamaterial,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 26, No. 2, 2017, pp. 1-20 (20 pa… [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “A self-adaptive metamaterial beam with digitally controlled resonators for subwavelength broadband flexural wave attenuation,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 27, No. 4, 2018, pp. 1-13 (13 pages). [cited by applicant]
Gripp et al., “Vibration and noise control using shunted piezoelectric transducers: A review,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 112, Nov. 2018, pp. 359-383 (25 pages). [cited by applicant]
Chen et al., “Elastic-electro-mechanical modeling and analysis of piezoelectric metamaterial plate with a self powered synchronized charge extraction circuit for vibration energy harvesting,” Mechanical Systems and Sign… [cited by applicant]
Nassar et al., “Nonreciprocity in acoustic and elastic materials,” Nature Reviews Materials, vol. 5, Issue 9, 2020, pp. 667-685 (34 pages). [cited by applicant]
Sugino et al., “Nonreciprocal piezoelectric metamaterial framework and circuit strategies,” Physical Review B 102 (1), 2020, pp. 1-7 (7 pages). [cited by applicant]
Wu et al., “Asymmetric scattering of flexural waves in a parity-time symmetric metamaterial beam,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 146, Iss. 1, 2019, pp. 850-862 (13 pages). [cited by applicant]
Doppler et al., “Dynamically encircling an exceptional point for asymmetric mode switching,” Nature, vol. 537, 2016, pp. 1-13 (13 pages). [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., “Dynamically encircling exceptional points: in situ control of encircling loops and the role of the starting point,” Physical Review X, vol. 8, Issue 2, Apr. 2018, pp. 1-18 (18 pages). [cited by applicant]
Preumont, “Vibration control of active structures: an introduction,” 3rd edition, vol. 246, Springer, 2018, pp. 1-202 (202 pages). [cited by applicant]
Tang et al., “Active-passive hybrid piezoelectric networks for vibration control: comparisons and improvement,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 10, No. 4, 2001, pp. 794-806 (14 pages). [cited by applicant]
Neubauer et al., “Vibration damping with shunted piezoceramics: fundamentals and technical applications,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 36, Issue 1, 2013, pp. 36-52 (17 pages). [cited by applicant]
Haus et al., “Waves and fields in optoelectronics,” Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984, 402. [cited by applicant]
Fan et al., “Temporal coupled-mode theory for the fano resonance in optical resonators,” JOSA A, vol. 20, Issue 3, 2003, pp. 569-572 (4 pages). [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., “A metamaterial beam with inverse nonlinearity for broadband micro-vibration attenuation,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 159, Oct. 2021, pp. 1-13 (13 pages). [cited by applicant]
Allik et al., “Finite element method for piezoelectric vibration,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 2, Issue 2, 1970, pp. 151-157 (7 pages). [cited by applicant]
Leng et al., “Limits of flexural wave absorption by open lossy resonators: reflection and transmission problems,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 21, May 2019, pp. 1-11 (11 pages). [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “An active meta-layer for optimal flexural wave absorption and cloaking,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 149, Feb. 15, 2021, pp. 1-35 (35 pages). [cited by applicant]
Hsu et al., “Bound states in the continuum,” Nature Reviews Materials 1, Article No. 16048, 2016, pp. 1-44 (44 pages). [cited by applicant]
Li et al. “Observation of an exceptional point with an LR-shunted resonator,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 196, Aug. 1, 2023, pp. 1-25 (26 pages). [cited by applicant]
Li et al. “Experimental study of a tunable perfect flexural wave absorber with a piezoelectric shunted resonator,” Frontiers in Physics, vol. 10, Dec. 13, 2022, pp. 1-7 (7 pages). [cited by applicant]
Iizuka et al., “Temporal coupled mode theory linking to surface-wave dispersion relations in near-field electromagnetic heat transfer,” Journal of Applied Physics, 2016, 10 pages, vol. 120, No. 194301, pp. 1-9 (10 pages… [cited by applicant]
He et al., “A novel ring-shaped vibration damper based on piezoelectric shunt damping: Theoretical analysis and experiments,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2020, 16 pages, vol. 468, No. 115125, pp. 1-16 (16 pages). [cited by applicant]
Özdemir et al., “Parity-time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics,” Nature Materials, vol. 18, Aug. 2019, pp. 783-798, (16 pages). [cited by applicant]
Caruso, “A critical analysis of electric shunt circuits employed in piezoelectric passive vibration damping,” Smart Materials and Structures, 2001, vol. 10, pp. 1059-1068 (11 pages). [cited by applicant]
Hagood et al., “Damping of Structural Vibrations With Piezoelectric Materials and Passive Electrical Networks,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 146, No. 2, 1991, pp. 243-268 (26 pages). [cited by applicant]
El-Ganainy et al., “Non-Hermitian physics and PT symmetry,” Nature Physics, vol. 14, Jan. 2018, pp. 11-19 (9 pages). [cited by applicant]
Lin et al., “Experimental observation of the dual behavior of PT-symmetric scattering,” Physical Review A, vol. 85, No. 5, 2012, pp. 1-4 (4 pages). [cited by applicant]
Ramezani et al., “Bypassing the bandwidth theorem with PT symmetry,” Physical Review A, vol. 85, No. 6, 2012, pp. 1-5 (5 pages). [cited by applicant]
Maksimov et al., “Escape dynamics of a Bose-Hubbard dimer out of a trap,” Physical Review A, vol. 89, No. 6, 2014, pp. 1-8 (8 pages). [cited by applicant]
Bender et al., “Real Spectra in Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians Having PT Symmetry,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 80, No. 24, Jun. 15, 1998, pp. 5243-5246 (4 pages). [cited by applicant]