IP Library Granted Patent US 12,372,619
Granted Patent B2
US 12,372,619 · App. 18/590,470 · Granted Jul 29, 2025

Polarization sensitive LiDAR system

Inventors: Gary W. Kamerman (Plainsboro, NJ); Christopher John Trowbridge (Dexter, MI); Viorel C. Negoita (Plainsboro, NJ)
Assignee: LG INNOTEK CO., LTD.
G01S7/4811G01S7/4802G01S7/4815G01S7/499G01S17/06G02B27/10
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,372,619
App. No.
18/590,470
Granted
Jul 29, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A light detection and ranging (LiDAR) system including a plurality of light emitters, wherein the plurality of light emitters are configured to emit a plurality of beams, and the plurality of light emitters are configured to form a beam polarization pattern of the plurality of beams to be emitted toward an object external to the LiDAR system, a receiver that is configured to receive light reflected from the object, and an analyzer that comprises a processor and programming instructions that are configured to cause the processor to determine characteristic differences between the beam polarization pattern of the beams emitted toward the object and an intensity pattern of the light reflected from the object, determine a reflection position that is associated with the light reflected from the object, and use the determined characteristic differences to determine whether the reflection position is a position of the object or a position of a ghost.

Claims (38)

1. A method of analyzing data by a sensor system, the method comprising:

analyzing, by a processor, characteristics of beams of reflected light received by the sensor system, wherein the beams of the reflected light correspond to beams of light directed toward an object; and

determining, by the processor using the characteristic of an intensity pattern of the beams of the reflected light, whether a reflection position is a position of the object or not,

wherein if the characteristic of the intensity pattern is continuity of the intensity pattern, the reflection position is not the position of the object,

wherein the beams of emitted light have substantially the same intensity, and

wherein the characteristics of the beams of the reflected light include a similarity of a polarization pattern as the beams of emitted light or a lack of difference of the polarization pattern than the beams of the emitted light.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the beams of emitted light have a well-defined state of polarization that is not the same across an entire array.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein analyzing characteristics of beams of reflected light further comprises:

analyzing a substantially similarity of a polarization of a received light with an expected polarization, or whether a depolarization ratio of the received light is near zero, and

wherein the received light is the reflected light received by sensor system.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

modifying, using a polarization modifier, polarization of a subset of the beams of the emitted light to create the polarization pattern.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein modifying the polarization of the subset of the beams further comprises:

mounting a quarter-wave waveplate to a laser emitter that emits polarized laser beams by varying an orientation of the quarter-wave plate, and

wherein the polarization modifier comprises the quarter-wave plate.

6. The method of claim 4 , wherein modifying the polarization of the subset of the beams further comprises:

mounting a plurality of half-wave plates to a laser emitter that emits polarized laser beams.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

changing an orientation of some portion of laser emitters mounted to within a housing of the sensor, polarization of a subset of the beams of the emitted light to create the polarization pattern.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein changing the orientation of some portion of laser emitters further comprises:

mounting a first portion of the laser emitters within the housing of the sensor system in a first orientation; or

mounting a second portion of the laser emitters within the housing in a second orientation that is different from the first orientation.

9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

filtering, by the processor, the reflected light determined as the reflection position is not the position of the object.

10. The method of claim 4 , wherein modifying the polarization of the subset of the beams further comprises:

mounting a plurality of beam-steering mirrors to a portion of laser emitters that emits polarized laser beams; or

positioning the plurality of the beam-steering mirrors in front of the portion of the laser emitters that emits polarized laser beams, and

wherein the polarization modifier comprises the plurality of the beam-steering mirrors.

11. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

splitting, using a polarization beam splitter, a received light into vertical and horizontal polarizations,

wherein the received light is the reflected light received by sensor system, and

wherein the sensor system comprises the polarization beam splitter.

12. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining, by the processor, characteristic differences between a polarization pattern of the beams of the emitted light and the intensity pattern of the beams of the reflected light; and

using the determined characteristic differences to determine whether the reflection position is the position of the object or a position of a ghost.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein using the determined characteristic differences to determine whether the reflection position is the position of the object or the position of the ghost comprises:

if the polarization pattern of the beams of the emitted light substantially corresponds to the intensity pattern of the beams of the reflected light, determining that the reflection position is the position of the ghost; and

if the polarization pattern of the beams of the emitted light does substantially not correspond to the intensity pattern of the beams of the reflected light, determining that the reflection position is the position of the object.

Continuity (3)
Continuation 17664178 · May 19, 2022
Continuation 16385048 · Apr 16, 2019
Related Publication 20240201329A1 · Jun 20, 2024
References Cited (34)
US 5192978A · Keeler · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5900975A · Sussman · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6163379A · de Groot · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 7580127B1 · Mayor et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 8115925B1 · Mathur et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 9971150B1 · Robbins · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10018725B2 · Liu · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10018726B2 · Hall et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10181200B1 · Chao et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 11402472B2 · Negoita et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20140247357A1 · Sekiguchi · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160178736A1 · Chung · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160363669A1 · Liu · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170299697A1 · Swanson · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170350983A1 · Hall et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180081031A1 · Yuan · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180156895A1 · Hinderling et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180267151A1 · Hall et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180275274A1 · Bao et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20200033477A1 · Scaggs · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200249326A1 · Bhaskaran · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210389436A1 · Johnson · 2021 [cited by applicant]
DE 102015200027A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
DE 102016201599A1 · 2017 [cited by examiner]
EP 3182158A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
JP 7134026A · 1995 [cited by applicant]
KR 1020150009177A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
KR 1020150027543A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018055449A2 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
Hassebo, Y.Y. et al., “Polarization discrimination technique to maximize LIDAR signal-to-noise ratio for daylight operations,” Optical Remote Sensing Laboratory—The City College of the City University of New York. [cited by applicant]
Node.js—Event Loop tutorial, https://www.tutorialspoint.com/nodejs/nodejs_event_loop.htm, printed Jan. 12, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Richmond, R.D. et al., “Polarimetric Imaging Laser Radar (PILAR) Program,” Advanced Sensory Payloads for UAV, pp. 19-1-19-14, Meeting Proceedings RTO-MP-SET-092, paper 19, 2005. [cited by applicant]
Scheduling Calls to Regular Functions —PyMOTW3 webpage, https://pymotw.com/3/asyncio/scheduling.html, printed Jan. 12, 2019. [cited by applicant]
The Node.js Event Loop, Timers, and process.nextTick() webpage, https://nodejs.org/en/docs/guides/event-loop-timers-and-nexttick/, printed Jan. 12, 2019. [cited by applicant]