IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,383,361
Granted Patent B2
US 12,383,361 · App. 18/675,783 · Granted Aug 12, 2025

Layered functionality for a user input mechanism in a computer-assisted surgical system

Inventors: Brandon D. Itkowitz (San Jose, CA); Adrian N. Bedard (Campbell, CA)
Assignee: Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.
A61B34/74A61B34/20A61B90/37G06F3/011A61B2090/373
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,383,361
App. No.
18/675,783
Filed
May 28, 2024
Granted
Aug 12, 2025
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3657
USPC
606/1
Abstract

A computer-assisted surgical system is configured to activate a first mode of operation in which movement of a user control mechanism is translated to movement of a surgical instrument coupled to a manipulator arm; receive, during the first mode of operation, a first user input by way of a user input mechanism associated with the user control mechanism; activate, based on the first user input, a second mode of operation in which the user control mechanism is repositionable without causing the surgical instrument to move; receive, during the first mode of operation, a second user input by way of the user input mechanism, wherein the second user input is different from the first user input; and activate, based on the second user input, a function associated with a third mode of operation different from the first and second modes of operation.

Claims (70)

1. A system comprising:

a memory storing instructions;

a processor communicatively coupled to the memory and configured to execute the instructions to:

activate a first mode of operation in which movement of a user control mechanism is translated to movement of a surgical instrument coupled to a manipulator arm of a computer-assisted surgical system;

receive, during the first mode of operation, a first user input by way of a user input mechanism associated with the user control mechanism;

activate, based on the first user input, a second mode of operation in which the user control mechanism is repositionable without causing the surgical instrument to move;

receive, during the first mode of operation, a second user input by way of the user input mechanism, wherein the second user input is different from the first user input; and

activate, based on the second user input, a function associated with a third mode of operation of the computer-assisted surgical system, the third mode of operation different from the first and second modes of operation.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further configured to differentiate the first user input from the second user input by:

determining information associated with the user input mechanism and the user control mechanism; and

comparing the information to a set of defined criteria.

3. The system of claim 2 , wherein:

the set of defined criteria comprises a defined threshold distance; and

the comparing of the information to the set of defined criteria comprises determining whether a movement of the user control mechanism while the user input mechanism is actuated satisfies the defined threshold distance.

4. The system of claim 2 , wherein:

the set of defined criteria comprises a defined threshold time;

the information associated with the user control mechanism includes a first timestamp indicating when the first input is received and a second timestamp indicating when the second input is received; and

the comparing of the information to the set of defined criteria comprises determining whether a time difference between the first timestamp and the second timestamp satisfies the defined threshold time.

5. The system of claim 2 , wherein:

the set of defined criteria comprises a defined threshold distance;

the information associated with the user control mechanism includes a first position indicating a position of the user control mechanism when the first input is received and a second position indicating a position of the user control mechanism when the second input is received; and

the comparing of the information to the set of defined criteria comprises determining whether a distance difference between the first position and the second position satisfies the defined threshold distance.

6. The system of claim 2 , wherein:

the set of defined criteria comprises a defined threshold velocity;

the information associated with and the user control mechanism includes information indicating a velocity of the user control mechanism; and

the comparing of the information to the set of defined criteria comprises determining whether the velocity satisfies the defined threshold velocity.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the processor is configured to automatically activate the second mode of operation in which the user control mechanism is repositionable without causing the surgical instrument to move upon an actuation of the user input mechanism and deactivate the mode of operation upon a de-actuation of the user input mechanism.

8. The system of claim 1 , wherein:

the third mode of operation includes a measurement mode of operation in which the surgical instrument is configured to be used to measure a distance between two points; and

the function comprises at least one of an activation of the measurement mode and a measurement sampling of the measurement mode.

9. The system of claim 1 , wherein the third mode of operation includes a viewing mode of operation in which a display of imagery of a surgical scene is augmented using fluorescence illumination.

10. A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions that, when executed, direct at least one processor of a computing device to:

detect a first input received by way of a user input mechanism associated with a user control mechanism for controlling a surgical instrument coupled to a manipulator arm of a computer-assisted surgical system, the user input mechanism configured to facilitate activation and deactivation of a clutch mode of operation in which the user control mechanism is decoupled from controlling the surgical instrument;

determine, based on the detecting of the first input, a first set of information associated with the user input mechanism and the user control mechanism;

detect a second input received by way of the user input mechanism;

determine, based on the detecting of the second input, a second set of information associated with the user input mechanism and the user control mechanism;

compare the first set of information and the second set of information to a set of defined criteria; and

perform, when the set of defined criteria is satisfied, a function associated with a different mode of operation of the computer-assisted surgical system.

11. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 10 , wherein the instructions, when executed, further direct the at least one processor to differentiate the first user input from the second user input by:

determining information associated with the user input mechanism and the user control mechanism; and

comparing the information to a set of defined criteria.

12. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein:

the set of defined criteria comprises a defined threshold distance; and

the comparing of the information to the set of defined criteria comprises determining whether a movement of the user control mechanism while the user input mechanism is actuated satisfies the defined threshold distance.

13. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein:

the set of defined criteria comprises a defined threshold time;

the information associated with the user control mechanism includes a first timestamp indicating when the first input is received and a second timestamp indicating when the second input is received; and

the comparing of the information to the set of defined criteria comprises determining whether a time difference between the first timestamp and the second timestamp satisfies the defined threshold time.

14. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein:

the set of defined criteria comprises a defined threshold distance;

the information associated with the user control mechanism includes a first position indicating a position of the user control mechanism when the first input is received and a second position indicating a position of the user control mechanism when the second input is received; and

the comparing of the information to the set of defined criteria comprises determining whether a distance difference between the first position and the second position satisfies the defined threshold distance.

15. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein:

the set of defined criteria comprises a defined threshold velocity;

the information associated with and the user control mechanism includes information indicating a velocity of the user control mechanism; and

the comparing of the information to the set of defined criteria comprises determining whether the velocity satisfies the defined threshold velocity.

16. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 10 , wherein the processor is configured to automatically activate the second mode of operation in which the user control mechanism is repositionable without causing the surgical instrument to move upon an actuation of the user input mechanism and deactivate the mode of operation upon a de-actuation of the user input mechanism.

17. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 10 , wherein:

the third mode of operation includes a measurement mode of operation in which the surgical instrument is configured to be used to measure a distance between two points; and

the function comprises at least one of an activation of the measurement mode and a measurement sampling of the measurement mode.

18. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 10 , wherein the third mode of operation includes a viewing mode of operation in which a display of imagery of a surgical scene is augmented using fluorescence illumination.

19. A computer-implemented method comprising:

activating a first mode of operation in which movement of a user control mechanism is translated to movement of a surgical instrument coupled to a manipulator arm of a computer-assisted surgical system;

receiving, during the first mode of operation, a first user input by way of a user input mechanism associated with the user control mechanism;

activating, based on the first user input, a second mode of operation in which the user control mechanism is repositionable without causing the surgical instrument to move;

receiving, during the first mode of operation, a second user input by way of the user input mechanism, wherein the second user input is different from the first user input; and

activating, based on the second user input, a function associated with a third mode of operation of the computer-assisted surgical system, the third mode of operation different from the first and second modes of operation.

20. The method of claim 19 , further comprising differentiating the first user input from the second user input by:

determining information associated with the user input mechanism and the user control mechanism; and

comparing the information to a set of defined criteria.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 28, 2024
From: ITKOWITZ, BRANDON D.; BEDARD, ADRIAN N.
To: INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 067541/0834 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 17438055
Related Publication 20240307142A1 · Sep 19, 2024
References Cited (49)
US 8004229B2 · Nowlin et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 9386983B2 · Swensgard et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9517106B2 · Hourtash et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9579088B2 · Farritor et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10617479B2 · Itkowitz · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11389171B2 · Goldsmith · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11419687B2 · Itkowitz et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11424027B2 · Shelton, IV · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11510741B2 · Shelton, IV et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11730550B2 · Itkowitz · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11747895B2 · Zhao · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11877816B2 · Goswami · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 11992283B2 · Itkowitz · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 12016646B2 · Itkowitz · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 12035978B2 · Buil et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12164684B2 · Itkowitz · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20060167440A1 · Cooper et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060276686A1 · Tsuji et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20090088775A1 · Swarup et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090163948A1 · Sunaoshi et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100174410A1 · Greer et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100234857A1 · Itkowitz et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110118752A1 · Itkowitz et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110118753A1 · Itkowitz et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120179169A1 · Swarup et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130024024A1 · Namiki · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130211590A1 · Diolaiti et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130303892A1 · Zhao et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130345718A1 · Crawford et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20160100898A1 · Jinno et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170129108A1 · Diolaiti et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180280076A1 · Trees et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180280099A1 · Cone et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20220015851A1 · Itkowitz et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20240261048A1 · Payyavula · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240296608A1 · Itkowitz · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240325098A1 · Itkowitz · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240358462A1 · Griffiths · 2024 [cited by examiner]
KR 101876386B1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012151585A2 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018216501A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
Accurate Parameter Estimation for Master-Slave Operation of a Surgical Robot (Year: 2021). [cited by examiner]
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP20190919306, mailed on Oct. 11, 2022, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
He C., et al., “Research and Realization of a Master-slave Robotic System for Retinal Vascular Bypass Surgery,” Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, Aug. 2018, vol. 31(78), pp. 1-10. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2019/021948, mailed on Sep. 23, 2021, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2019/021948, mailed on Dec. 10, 2019, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Setchi R.M., et al., “Reconfigurability and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems: State-of-the-art Review,” 2nd IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics, 2004, pp. 529-535. [cited by applicant]
Shi H., et al., “Accurate Parameter Estimation for Master-slave Operation of a Surgical Robot,” Machines, 2021, vol. 9, pp. 1-18. [cited by applicant]
Vertut, J., and Coiffet, P., “Robot Technology: Teleoperation and Robotics Evolution and Development,” English translation, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Inglewood Cliffs, NJ, USA 1986, vol. 3A, 332 pages. [cited by applicant]