IP Library Granted Patent US 12,384,538
Granted Patent B2
US 12,384,538 · App. 18/046,809 · Granted Aug 12, 2025

Adaptive airdrop system and method

Inventors: Karl F. Roenigk (Baltimore, MD); Thomas Dobbins (Plymouth, MN); Matthew D. Wiebold (Plymouth, MN)
Assignee: HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
B64D1/02B64D45/00B64D47/00G05B17/02G01S17/95
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,384,538
App. No.
18/046,809
Filed
Oct 14, 2022
Granted
Aug 12, 2025
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3667
USPC
701/25
Abstract

An adaptive airdrop system for an aircraft includes a wind measurement system and a processing system. The wind measurement system measures at least atmospheric wind velocity and supplies wind velocity data representative thereof. The processing system is configured to adaptively sample the wind velocity data, implement a computer aided release point (CARP) model, and iteratively process the adaptively sampled wind velocity data to calculate, using the CARP model, a precision release point for a payload.

Claims (60)

1. An adaptive airdrop system for an aircraft flying at a cruising altitude above ground, comprising:

a wind measurement system configured to measure at least atmospheric wind velocity at a plurality of different altitudes from the ground to the cruising altitude of the aircraft and supply wind velocity data representative thereof;

a processing system in operable communication with the wind measurement system and configured to:

(i) adaptively sample the wind velocity data,

(ii) implement a computer aided release point (CARP) model, and

(iii) iteratively process the adaptively sampled wind velocity data to calculate, using the CARP model, a precision release point for a payload and a projected trajectory of the payload if it is released from the precision release point;

and

a flight management system (FMS) in operable communication with the processing system, the FMS configured to implement a flight plan, and further configured to:

(i) receive data representative of the precision release point for the payload,

(ii) update the flight plan to reflect the precision release point, and

(iii) guide the aircraft along the updated flight plan,

wherein the wind measurement system is further configured to:

receive data representative of the projected trajectory of the payload from the processing system;

measure at least the atmospheric wind velocity at different altitudes along the projected trajectory of the payload; and

supply updated wind velocity data.

2. The system of claim 1 , further comprising:

a display device in operable communication with the processing system, the display device configured to at least selectively display the precision release point.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the wind measurement system comprises an ultraviolet LIDAR (UV LIDAR) system.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the wind measurement system is further configured to measure one or more of temperature, density, pressure, and humidity.

5. An adaptive airdrop system for an aircraft flying at a cruising altitude above ground, comprising:

an ultraviolet LIDAR (UV LIDAR) system configured to measure one or more atmospheric conditions at a plurality of altitudes from the ground to the cruising altitude of the aircraft and supply atmospheric condition data representative thereof;

a processing system in operable communication with the UV LIDAR system and configured to:

(i) adaptively sample the atmospheric condition data,

(ii) implement a computer aided release point (CARP) model, and

(iii) iteratively process the adaptively sampled atmospheric condition data to calculate, using the CARP model, a precision release point for a payload and a projected trajectory of the payload if it is released from the precision release point;

and

a flight management system (FMS) in operable communication with the processing system, the FMS configured to implement a flight plan, and further configured to:

(i) receive data representative of the precision release point for the payload,

(ii) update the flight plan to reflect the precision release point, and

(iii) guide the aircraft along the updated flight plan,

wherein the UV LIDAR system is further configured to:

receive data representative of the projected trajectory of the payload from the processing system;

measure at least the atmospheric wind velocity at different altitudes along the projected trajectory of the payload; and

supply updated wind velocity data.

6. The system of claim 5 , further comprising:

a display device in operable communication with the processing system, the display device configured to at least selectively display the precision release point.

7. The system of claim 5 , wherein the one or more atmospheric conditions include wind velocity, temperature, density, pressure, and humidity.

8. An aircraft configured to fly at a cruising altitude above ground, comprising:

a fuselage adapted to have a payload disposed therein; and

a precision airdrop system disposed within the fuselage, the precision airdrop system comprising:

a wind measurement system configured to measure at least atmospheric wind velocity at a plurality of altitudes from the ground to the cruising altitude of the aircraft and supply wind velocity data representative thereof;

a processing system in operable communication with the wind measurement system and configured to:

(i) adaptively sample the wind velocity data,

(ii) implement a computer aided release point (CARP) model,

and

(iii) iteratively process the adaptively sampled wind velocity data to calculate, using the CARP model, a precision release point for the payload and a projected trajectory of the payload if it is released from the precision release point;

and

a flight management system (FMS) in operable communication with the processing system, the FMS configured to implement a flight plan, and further configured to:

(i) receive data representative of the precision release point for the payload,

(ii) update the flight plan to reflect the precision release point,

and

(iii) guide the aircraft along the updated flight plan,

wherein the wind measurement system is further configured to:

receive data representative of the projected trajectory of the payload from the processing system;

measure at least the atmospheric wind velocity at different altitudes along the projected trajectory of the payload; and

supply updated wind velocity data.

9. The aircraft of claim 8 , further comprising:

a display device disposed within the fuselage and in operable communication with the processing system, the display device configured to at least selectively display the precision release point.

10. The aircraft of claim 8 , wherein the wind measurement system comprises an ultraviolet LIDAR (UV LIDAR) system.

11. The aircraft of claim 8 , wherein the wind measurement system is further configured to measure one or more of temperature, density, pressure, and humidity.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 14, 2022
From: ROENIGK, KARL F.; DOBBINS, THOMAS; WIEBOLD, MATTHEW D.
To: HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.
Reel/Frame 061430/0375 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63371798 · Aug 18, 2022
Related Publication 20240059414A1 · Feb 22, 2024
References Cited (28)
US 5724125A · Ames · 1998 [cited by examiner]
US 6808144B1 · Nicolai · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 8427649B2 · Hays et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8781719B1 · Bernhardt · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 8930049B2 · Mamidipudi · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 8984938B1 · Bernhardt · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9007570B1 · Beyon · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9086488B2 · Tchoryk, Jr. et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9630715B2 · Takayama · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 10175359B2 · Shapira · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10352706B2 · Arneau et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10527724B2 · Lodden · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11428820B1 · Barr · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20100014066A1 · Becker · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20140025238A1 · So · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140142788A1 · Denton · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20170168161A1 · Shapira · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180162531A1 · Markuzon · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180210636A1 · P R · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190120628A1 · Parras · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190270522A1 · Fields · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200088498A1 · Kenney · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210224725A1 · Ifill · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210319705A1 · Furumoto · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210347460A1 · Watters · 2021 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2022009400A1 · 2022 [cited by examiner]
Wang, Yi, et al., “Neural Network-Based Simulation and Prediction of Precise Airdrop Trajectory Planning,” Aerospace Science and Technology (120 (2022) 107302, Dec. 29, 2021, downloaded from https://www.sciencedirect.co… [cited by applicant]
Yang, Shiyi, et al., “Real-Time Optimal Path Planning and Wind Estimation Using Gaussian Process Regression for Precision Airdrop,” 2017 American Control Conference Sheraton Seattle Hotel, May 24-26, 2017, downloaded fr… [cited by applicant]