IP Library Granted Patent US 12,386,345
Granted Patent B2
US 12,386,345 · App. 17/347,564 · Granted Aug 12, 2025

Predicting a potential failure of a module for use in a magnetic resonance apparatus

Inventors: Johann Sukkau (Herzogenaurach, DE); Mario Zeller (Erlangen, DE)
Assignee: Siemens Healthineers AG
G05B23/0283A61B5/055G01R31/00G06N3/044
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,386,345
App. No.
17/347,564
Granted
Aug 12, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A module for use in a magnetic resonance apparatus, a system, and a method for predicting a potential failure of a module are provided. The module includes at least one sensor configured to detect values of at least one module parameter of the module. The module parameter, such as detected values thereof, is suitable for predicting a potential failure of the module on the basis thereof.

Claims (41)

1. A module for use in a magnetic resonance apparatus, the module comprising:

a flexible surface coil of the magnetic resonance apparatus;

at least one flex sensor configured to detect values of at least one parameter relating to the flexing that acts upon the module, the flex sensor embedded in a planar and/or blanket-shaped layer of the flexible surface coil of the magnetic resonance apparatus;

wherein the at least one parameter is usable for predicting a potential failure of the flexible surface coil of the magnetic resonance apparatus on the basis thereof.

2. The module of claim 1 , further comprising a cable, a cooling line, or a combination thereof.

3. The module of claim 1 , further comprising a temperature sensor embedded in the planar and/or blanket-shaped layer of the flexible surface coil of the magnetic resonance apparatus, the temperature sensor configured to detect values relating to relating to the heat that acts upon the module.

4. A system comprising:

a module for use in a magnetic resonance apparatus, the module comprising at least one flex sensor configured to detect values of at least one module parameter of the module relating to the flexing that acts upon the module, the at least one flex sensor embedded in a planar and/or blanket-shaped layer of the module, wherein the at least one module parameter is usable for predicting a potential failure of the module on the basis thereof, wherein the module is a flexible surface coil;

an evaluation unit;

a transfer unit configured to transfer the detected values of the at least one module parameter to the evaluation unit, and

wherein the evaluation unit is configured to predict a potential failure of the module based on the at least one module parameter.

5. The system of claim 4 , wherein the evaluation unit is configured to receive values of module parameters from modules of various magnetic resonance apparatuses.

6. The system of claim 4 , further comprising at least one additional sensor outside of the at least one module for detecting the at least one module parameter.

7. A method for predicting a possible failure of a module, the method comprising:

detecting, by at least one flex sensor of the module, values of at least one module parameter of the module relating to a flexing that acts on the module;

analyzing, by an evaluation unit, the at least one module parameter; and

outputting a prediction value of a potential failure of the module,

wherein the module is a flexible magnetic resonance coil, the flexible magnetic resonance coil being a flexible surface coil, wherein the at least one flex sensor is embedded in a planar and/or blanket-shaped layer of the flexible surface coil.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the analyzing comprises applying a model, a trained function, or the model and the trained function to input data,

wherein the input data is based on the at least one module parameter.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the analyzing comprises applying the trained function to the input data,

wherein at least one parameter of the trained function is based on a comparison with module parameters that have been detected for other modules.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein the trained function has been trained on detected module parameters and points in time of failure of defective modules.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the trained function has been trained exclusively on the detected module parameters and the points in time of failure of the defective modules.

12. The method of claim 8 , wherein the trained function is based on a neural network.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the neural network is a long short-term memory (LSTM) or gated recurrent unit (GRU) network.

14. The method of claim 8 , wherein the model, the trained function, or the model and the trained function are independent of:

a number of connection procedures of the module to other parts of a magnetic resonance apparatus;

a duration of at least one flexing of the module;

a degree of the flexing of the module;

a change over time of a degree of the flexing of the module;

a point in time of commissioning the module;

an operating time of the module; or

any combination thereof.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the model, the trained function, or the model and the trained function are independent of the duration of the at least one flexing of the module, the duration being a cumulative duration.

16. In a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium that stores instructions executable by an evaluation unit to predict a possible failure of a module, the instructions comprising:

detecting, by at least one flex sensor of the module embedded in a planar and/or blanket-shaped layer of the flexible surface coil of the magnetic resonance apparatus, values of at least one module parameter of the module;

analyzing the at least one module parameter; and

outputting a prediction value of a potential failure of the module,

wherein the module is a flexible magnetic resonance coil, the flexible magnetic resonance coil being a flexible surface coil,

wherein the at least one module parameter describes a flexing that acts on the module.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 20, 2023
From: SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH
To: SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
Reel/Frame 066267/0346 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 27, 2022
From: SUKKAU, JOHANN; ZELLER, MARIO
To: SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH
Reel/Frame 060035/0097 →
Priority Claims (1)
DE 10 2020 207 363.5 · Jun 15, 2020 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20210389759A1 · Dec 16, 2021
References Cited (44)
US 5097252A · Harvill et al. · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 6127672A · Danisch · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 7560920B1 · Ouyang · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 9002431B2 · Jones · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 10184997B2 · Piferi · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10267875B2 · Van Leeuwen · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10444277B2 · Van Wieringen · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 11191973B2 · Escalona · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11903715B1 · Deka · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20080278175A1 · Wexler · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20110245733A1 · Goldbeck et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120001635A1 · Ookawa · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120200301A1 · Ganesh · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20140275973A1 · Schuele · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150227838A1 · Wang et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150293188A1 · Haider · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160327606A1 · Van Wieringen · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170205478A1 · Brinker · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170343626A1 · Tomiha · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170367767A1 · Blumenkranz · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20190072624A1 · Biber · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190154774A1 · Hushek · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190304600A1 · Mogatadakala · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190339337A1 · Sharma · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190347177A1 · Citirik · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200185085A1 · Mavrieudus et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210293915A1 · Fenchel et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 101303399A · 2008 [cited by applicant]
CN 102309325A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 106506576A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
EP 2255727A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
EP 3882648A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
JP 2017213371A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
KR 20180050487A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
ARMIN: “Making stuff: bend sensor”, https://www.amphioxus.org/content/making-stuff-bend-sensor (posted on Jan. 2, 2011.). [cited by applicant]
German Office Action for German Application No. 10 2020 207 363.5 dated May 5, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Jeong, Useok, and Kyu-Jin Cho. “A novel low-cost, large curvature bend sensor based on a Bowden-cable.” Sensors 16.7 (2016): 961. pp. 1-20. [cited by applicant]
Kuhnert, Nadine, Lea Pflüger, and Andreas Maier. “Prediction of mri hardware failures based on image features using time series classification.” Jan. 5, 2020. Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden, 2020. 131-136. [cited by applicant]
Majeau, Lucas, et al. “Dataglove for consumer applications.” 2011 7th International Workshop on Fibre and Optical Passive Components. IEEE, 2011. [cited by applicant]
Mehmann, Andreas, et al. “On the bending and stretching of liquid metal receive coils for magnetic resonance maging.” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 66.6 (2018): 1542-1548. [cited by applicant]
Wikipedia: PHOSFOS, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PHOSFOS, researched on May 20, 2020. pp. 1-5. [cited by applicant]
Liu Long:“Research on Several Methods for Structural Damage Identification Based on Vibration Testing”, p. 1-16, with English summary, Apr. 30, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Shen Chungen, et al:“UG NX 8.5 Finite Element Analysis and Case Study, 2nd edition”, Machinery Industry Press, p. 1-18, with English summary, Mar. 31, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Zeng Chuanqing et al:“Sensing Technology and Engineering Applications”, p. 25-29, with English abstract, Aug. 30, 2011. [cited by applicant]