IP Library Granted Patent US 12,393,755
Granted Patent B2
US 12,393,755 · App. 17/846,181 · Granted Aug 19, 2025

Machine learning techniques for circuit design debugging

Inventors: Venkateswaran Padmanabhan (Bengaluru, IN); Guha Lakshmanan (Bengaluru, IN); Kriyangbhai Shah (Bengaluru, IN); Ibinu Alaudeen Nadeera (Bengaluru, IN)
Assignee: TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED
G06F30/3308G06N3/08G06F2119/12
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,393,755
App. No.
17/846,181
Granted
Aug 19, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method includes obtaining input signal values and output signal values from an integrated circuit and providing the obtained input signal values and output signal values to a machine learning model. The method further includes obtaining, from the machine learning model, a predicted set of signal values, wherein the predicted set of signal values correspond to signals internal to the integrated circuit and comparing the predicted set of signal values to one or more expected signal values for debugging the integrated circuit.

Claims (34)

1. A method, comprising:

obtaining input signal values and output signal values from an integrated circuit;

providing the obtained input signal values and output signal values to a machine learning model;

obtaining, from the machine learning model, a predicted set of signal values, wherein the predicted set of signal values correspond to signals internal to the integrated circuit;

comparing the predicted set of signal values to one or more expected signal values for debugging the integrated circuit.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the machine learning model predicts a finite state machine (FSM) state based on the provided input signal values and output signal values.

3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising obtaining, from the machine learning model, a predicted finite state machine state for the integrated circuit.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the machine learning model includes one or more sub-models.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the one or more sub-models of the machine learning model predicts an output of a circuit block of the integrated circuit.

6. The method of claim 4 , wherein the one or more sub-models of the machine learning model predicts a finite state machine (FSM) state.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more expected signal values are obtained based on simulations of the integrated circuit.

8. A non-transitory program storage device comprising instructions stored thereon to cause one or more processors to:

obtain input signal values and output signal values from an integrated circuit;

provide the obtained input signal values and output signal values to a machine learning model;

obtain, from the machine learning model, a predicted set of signal values, wherein the predicted set of signal values correspond to signals internal to the integrated circuit;

compare the predicted set of signal values to one or more expected signal values for debugging the integrated circuit.

9. The non-transitory program storage device of claim 8 , wherein the machine learning model predicts a finite state machine (FSM) state based on the provided input signal values and output signal values.

10. The non-transitory program storage device of claim 9 , wherein the instructions further cause the one or more processors to obtain, from the machine learning model, a predicted finite state machine state for the integrated circuit.

11. The non-transitory program storage device of claim 8 , wherein the machine learning model includes one or more sub-models.

12. The non-transitory program storage device of claim 11 , wherein the one or more sub-models of the machine learning model predicts an output of a circuit block of the integrated circuit.

13. The non-transitory program storage device of claim 11 , wherein the one or more sub-models of the machine learning model predicts a finite state machine (FSM) state.

14. The non-transitory program storage device of claim 8 , wherein the one or more expected signal values are obtained based on simulations of the integrated circuit.

15. A system for debugging an integrated circuit, comprising:

a memory; and

one or more processors operatively coupled to the memory, wherein the one or more processors are configured to execute instructions causing the one or more processors to:

obtain input signal values and output signal values from the integrated circuit;

provide the obtained input signal values and output signal values to a machine learning model;

obtain, from the machine learning model, a predicted set of signal values, wherein the predicted set of signal values correspond to signals internal to the integrated circuit;

compare the predicted set of signal values to one or more expected signal values for debugging the integrated circuit.

16. The system of claim 15 , wherein the machine learning model predicts a finite state machine (FSM) state based on the provided input signal values and output signal values.

17. The system of claim 16 , wherein the instructions further cause the one or more processors to obtain, from the machine learning model, a predicted finite state machine state for the integrated circuit.

18. The system of claim 15 , wherein the machine learning model includes one or more sub-models.

19. The system of claim 18 , wherein the one or more sub-models of the machine learning model predicts an output of a circuit block of the integrated circuit.

20. The system of claim 18 , wherein the one or more sub-models of the machine learning model predicts a finite state machine (FSM) state.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 22, 2022
From: PADMANABHAN, VENKATESWARAN; LAKSHMANAN, GUHA; SHAH, KRIYANGBHAI; ALAUDEEN NADEERA, IBINU
To: TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 060272/0411 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 17845784 · Jun 21, 2022
Related Publication 20230409790A1 · Dec 21, 2023
References Cited (2)
US 11017139B1 · Roy · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11836435B1 · Kang · 2023 [cited by examiner]