IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,394,325
Granted Patent B2
US 12,394,325 · App. 17/571,277 · Granted Aug 19, 2025

Optimized weather and threat depiction based on aircraft flight plan

Inventors: Venkata A. Sishtla (Cedar Rapids, IA); Jacob G. Teague (West Melbourne, FL); Krystina Rodriguez (West Melbourne, FL)
Assignee: Rockwell Collins, Inc.
G08G5/76G01S13/953G01S13/955G08G5/52G08G5/53G08G5/55G08G5/59G06T11/206
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,394,325
App. No.
17/571,277
Granted
Aug 19, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A weather depiction system for an aircraft is disclosed. A radar is configured to scan a surrounding environment of the aircraft and provide weather data. An aircraft computing device is configured to: detect weather patterns using the weather data, receive a flight trajectory of the aircraft from a flight management system (FMS), compare the flight trajectory to an altitude of each of the weather patterns, identify the weather pattern as relevant or non-relevant based on the comparison, and present symbols corresponding to the relevant weather patterns on the weather display and exclude symbols corresponding to the non-relevant weather patterns on the weather display.

Claims (32)

1. A weather depiction system for an aircraft, comprising:

a radar configured to scan a surrounding environment of the aircraft and provide weather data; and

an aircraft computing device including one or more processors configured to execute program instructions causing the one or more processors to:

detect a plurality of weather patterns using the weather data, wherein each of the weather patterns is detected at a detected altitude, and wherein the detected altitude is defined as a top of each of the weather patterns during a descent mode of the aircraft, or as a bottom of each of the weather patterns during an ascent mode of the aircraft;

receive a flight trajectory of the aircraft from a flight management system (FMS);

for each of the weather patterns;

responsive to the detected altitude of a weather pattern being within a threshold distance in elevation from the flight trajectory, identify the weather pattern as one of a plurality of relevant weather patterns; and

responsive to the detected altitude of the weather pattern being outside the threshold distance in elevation from the flight trajectory, identify the weather pattern as one of a plurality of non-relevant weather patterns; and

present symbols corresponding to the plurality of relevant weather patterns on a top-down flight plan view of a weather display, wherein the symbols comprise weather radar patterns comprising graphical images in colors corresponding to a severity of the weather,

exclude symbols corresponding to the plurality of non-relevant weather patterns from the weather display responsive to the aircraft being in a cruising mode.

2. The weather depiction system of claim 1 , wherein the symbols corresponding to the plurality of relevant weather patterns are presented on the weather display responsive to the aircraft being in the ascent mode or the descent mode.

3. The weather depiction system of claim 1 , wherein, responsive to the identification of the relevant weather patterns, a vertical tilt angle of one or more antennas of the radar is adjusted to improve the detection the relevant weather patterns.

4. The weather depiction system of claim 1 , wherein one or more antennas of the radar utilize two or more beams to detect the weather patterns.

5. The weather depiction system of claim 4 , wherein, responsive to the identification of the relevant weather patterns, the one or more antennas of the radar utilize one or more auxiliary beams to improve detection of the relevant weather patterns in addition to the two or more beams.

6. The weather depiction system of claim 1 , wherein one or more antennas of the radar comprise an electronically scanned array (ESA).

7. The weather depiction system of claim 6 , responsive to the identification of the relevant weather patterns, the ESA utilizes a beam sharpening mode to detect the relevant weather patterns, wherein the beam sharpening mode utilizes at least one of a monopulse technique, a split aperture technique, or a conical scan technique.

8. The weather depiction system of claim 1 , wherein the weather data includes external weather data provided by at least one of a ground-based weather system or a satellite based system.

9. A weather depiction method for an aircraft, comprising:

scanning, using a radar, a surrounding environment of the aircraft and providing weather data;

detecting a plurality of weather patterns using the weather data, wherein each of the weather patterns is detected at a detected altitude, and wherein the detected altitude is defined as a top of each of the weather patterns during a descent mode of the aircraft, or as a bottom of each of the weather patterns during an ascent mode of the aircraft;

using an aircraft computing device, receiving a flight trajectory of the aircraft from a flight management system (FMS);

for each of the weather patterns:

responsive to the detected altitude of a weather pattern being within a threshold distance in elevation from the flight trajectory, identifying the weather pattern as one of a plurality of relevant weather patterns; and

responsive to the detected altitude of the weather pattern being outside the threshold distance in elevation from the flight trajectory, identifying the weather pattern as one of a plurality of non-relevant weather patterns;

presenting symbols corresponding to the relevant weather patterns on a top-down flight plan view of a weather display, wherein the symbols comprise weather radar patterns comprising graphical images in colors corresponding to a severity of the weather; and

exclude symbols corresponding to the plurality of non-relevant weather patterns from the weather display responsive to the aircraft being in a cruising mode.

10. The weather depiction method of claim 9 , wherein the symbols corresponding to the plurality of relevant weather patterns are presented on the weather display responsive to the aircraft being in an ascent mode or a descent mode.

11. The weather depiction method of claim 9 , wherein, responsive to the identification of the relevant weather patterns, a vertical tilt angle of one or more antennas of the radar is adjusted to improve the detection the relevant weather patterns.

12. The weather depiction method of claim 9 , wherein one or more antennas of the radar utilize two or more beams to detect the weather patterns.

13. The weather depiction method of claim 12 , wherein, responsive to the identification of the relevant weather patterns, the one or more antennas of the radar utilize one or more auxiliary beams to improve detection of the relevant weather patterns in addition to the two or more beams.

14. The weather depiction method of claim 9 , wherein one or more antennas of the weather radar comprise an electronically scanned array (ESA), and, responsive to the identification of the relevant weather patterns, the ESA utilizes a beam sharpening mode to improve detection of the relevant weather patterns, wherein the beam sharpening mode utilizes at least one of a monopulse technique, a split aperture technique, or a conical scan technique.

15. The weather depiction method of claim 9 , wherein the weather data includes external weather data provided by at least one of a ground-based weather system or a satellite based weather system.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 1, 2022
From: SISHTLA, VENKATA A.; TEAGUE, JACOB G.; RODRIGUEZ, KRYSTINA
To: ROCKWELL COLLINS, INC.
Reel/Frame 059130/0472 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230222922A1 · Jul 13, 2023
References Cited (23)
US 6388608B1 · Woodell · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 6424288B1 · Woodell · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 6603425B1 · Woodell · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 7417579B1 · Woodell · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 7427943B1 · Kronfeld et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7889117B1 · Woodell et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8077078B1 · Woodell et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8643533B1 · Woodell et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8977491B1 · McCusker et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9024805B1 · Jinkins et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9244167B1 · Oransky et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9297896B1 · Andrews · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 9562788B1 · Jinkins et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9952310B2 · Wang et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10494108B1 · Finley · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10605912B1 · Godfrey et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20080165051A1 · Khatwa · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20130006450A1 · Del Amo Blanco · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20160011741A1 · Khatwa · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20190114931A1 · De Villele · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20210247513A1 · Song et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
EP 2966467A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report dated Jun. 1, 2023; European Application No. 23150306.1. [cited by applicant]