IP Library Granted Patent US 12,397,889
Granted Patent B2
US 12,397,889 · App. 17/726,468 · Granted Aug 26, 2025

Duo-propellers and single propellers

Inventor: Gregory C. Sharrow (Grosse Pointe Park, MI)
Assignee: Sharrow Engineering LLC
B63H1/265B63H5/10
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,397,889
App. No.
17/726,468
Granted
Aug 26, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A duo propeller disclosed having a forward propeller having increased loading distribution and high swirl near the tip. The duo propeller has an aft propeller with a more optimal loading distribution that can cancel the high tip swirl from the forward propeller. The duo-propeller an enhanced ability for the aft propeller to capture the energy lost to the swirling flow of the forward propeller's outflow.

Claims (37)

1. A method of increasing propeller efficiency swirl in a duo propeller, the duo propeller comprising a forward propeller and an aft propeller operating in series on co-axial counter rotating shafts, the method comprising:

selecting the diameter of the aft propeller to be in the range of 100% to 175% of the forward propeller, and

controlling the generation of swirl energy by the forward propeller and recovery of the swirl energy by the aft propeller by varying the camber and pitch angle (tip loading) while minimizing tip vortices.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising varying the diameter of the aft propeller to reduce interference of the fluid flow generated by the forward propeller with the efficiency of the aft propeller.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein pitch angle is in the range of 0 to +75 degrees.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein chamber is in the range of −0.2 to +0.2.

5. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

selecting rake values and skew values which together form a loop-shaped blade having an inlet root and an outlet root attached to a hub;

spacing the inlet root and the outlet root part on the hub such that a portion of the hub is part of the loop;

selecting the value of rake to be greater at the tip that at the inlet root; and

selecting the value of skew to be greater at the tip that at the inlet root.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein the selected values of skew for at least one of the forward or aft propeller are the range of −135 degrees to +135 degrees.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein the selected values of skew for at least one of the forward or aft propeller are in the range of −120 degrees to +120 degrees.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein the selected values of rake for at least one of the forward or aft propellers are in the range of −0.9 OD to +0.9 OD wherein OD is the outer diameter of the propeller.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein the selected values of rake for at least one of the forward or aft propellers are in the range of −0.5 OD to +0.5 OD wherein OD is the outer diameter of the propeller.

10. The method of claim 1 wherein the selected values of rake angle for at least one of the forward or aft propellers are in the range of −60 degrees to +60 degrees.

11. The method of claim 1 wherein the selected values of rake angle for at least one of the forward or aft propellers are in the range of −45 degrees to +45 degrees.

12. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

designing the duo-propeller as a system including basing the design of the aft propeller in part on water acceleration of the first propeller including wakes created by the forward propeller.

13. The method of claim 1 comprising selecting the diameter of the aft propeller to be in the range of 100% to 130% of the forward propeller.

14. The method of claim 1 comprising configuring the duo-propeller so the forward propeller and the aft propeller nest so that a leading edge of the aft propeller inlet roughly follows an outlet trailing edge of the forward propeller.

15. The method of claim 1 comprising configuring the propeller so an inlet wake path is substantially parallel to an outlet blade wake path for at least one of the forward or aft propellers.

16. The method of claim 1 comprising for at least one of the forward or aft propellers defining rake and skew from an inlet based near an inlet root and determining rake angle from an average of the inlet root and/or an outlet root.

17. A duo propeller comprising:

a forward propeller and an aft propeller operating in series on co-axial counter rotating shafts, wherein the diameter of the aft propeller is within the range of 100% to 175% of the forward propeller; and

a pitch angle and camber to optimize generation of swirl energy by the forward propeller and recovery of swirl energy by the aft propeller while minimizing tip vortices.

18. The duo propeller of claim 17 wherein pitch angle is in the range of 0 to +75 degrees.

19. The duo propeller of claim 17 wherein camber/cord is in the range of −0.2 to +0.2.

20. The duo propeller of claim 17 wherein at least one of the forward or aft propeller has skew value in the range of −135 degrees to +135 degrees.

21. The duo propeller of claim 17 wherein at least one of the forward or aft propeller has a skew values in the range of −120 degrees to +120 degrees.

22. The duo propeller of claim 17 wherein at least one of the forward or aft propeller has a rake value i in the range of −0.9 OD to +0.9 OD wherein OD is the outer diameter of the propeller.

23. The duo propeller of claim 17 wherein at least one of the forward or aft propeller has a rake value are in the range of −0.5 OD to +0.5 OD wherein OD is the outer diameter of the propeller.

24. The duo propeller of claim 17 wherein at least one of the forward or aft propeller has a rake angle in the range of −45 degrees to +45 degrees.

25. The duo propeller of claim 17 wherein the diameter of the aft propeller is in the range of 100% to 130% of the forward propeller.

26. The duo propeller of claim 17 wherein the diameter of the aft propeller is in the range of 100% to 175% of the forward propeller.

27. The duo propeller of claim 17 wherein the forward propeller and the aft propeller are nested so that a leading edge of the aft propeller inlet roughly follows an outlet trailing edge of the forward propeller.

28. The duo propeller of claim 17 wherein each of the inlet portion and the outlet portion extend from their respective root to where the blade reference line is in the range of 75% to 100% of the blade outer radius and increasing and the tip portion is the remaining portion between the inlet and outlet portions.

Assignments (4)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 15, 2025
From: SHARROW ENGINEERING INC.
To: BLADES AND WAVES, LLC
Reel/Frame 072575/0470 →
ENTITY CONVERSION Recorded Oct 15, 2025
From: SHARROW ENGINEERING, LLC
To: SHARROW ENGINEERING INC.
Reel/Frame 073078/0744 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 10, 2025
From: SHARROW ENGINEERING, LLC
To: BLADES AND WAVES, LLC
Reel/Frame 070455/0825 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 17, 2023
From: SHARROW, GREGORY C.
To: SHARROW ENGINEERING LLC
Reel/Frame 062728/0489 →
Continuity (3)
Provisional Application 63300887 · Jan 19, 2022
Provisional Application 63177645 · Apr 21, 2021
Related Publication 20220340247A1 · Oct 27, 2022
References Cited (85)
US 467322A · Myers · 1892 [cited by applicant]
US 467323A · Myers · 1892 [cited by applicant]
US 680671A · Brewster · 1901 [cited by applicant]
US 838313A · Fola · 1906 [cited by applicant]
US 868220A · Portelli · 1907 [cited by applicant]
US 1831366A · Reed · 1931 [cited by applicant]
US 1868113A · Ljungstrom · 1932 [cited by applicant]
US 2045383A · Faber · 1936 [cited by applicant]
US 2273756A · Hoenrkamp · 1942 [cited by applicant]
US 2344266A · Reissner · 1944 [cited by applicant]
US 2425353A · Spitzer, Jr. · 1947 [cited by applicant]
US 2473665A · Van Nort · 1949 [cited by applicant]
US 2687182A · Hogan · 1954 [cited by applicant]
US 3087553A · Kostyun · 1963 [cited by applicant]
US 3485462A · Spence · 1969 [cited by applicant]
US 3504990A · Sugden · 1970 [cited by applicant]
US 3782857A · Svilans · 1974 [cited by applicant]
US 4445817A · Wethem · 1984 [cited by applicant]
US 5111576A · Kuhnle et al. · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 5161953A · Burtis · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 5190441A · Murphy · 1993 [cited by examiner]
US 5269647A · Moser · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5405246A · Goldberg · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5411330A · Arutyunov · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5632658A · Chen · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5890875A · Silvano · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6099256A · Silvano · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6247897B1 · Patel · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6364614B1 · Mnatsakanian · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6524073B2 · Winatsakanian · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6736600B1 · Bannasch · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6948910B2 · Polacsek · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7018167B2 · Yoshida · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US D600641S · Starck · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US D630724S · Liu · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20040009063A1 · Polacsek · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040067138A1 · Yoshida · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20080075599A1 · Miller · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090147757A1 · Naka et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20110200445A1 · Takada et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110299991A1 · Shpadi et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120056041A1 · Rhee · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120288374A1 · Avellan · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20140161622A1 · Sharrow · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150037157A1 · Tzeng · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150284071A1 · Veilleux, Jr. et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20180186439A1 · Sharrow · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CA 37791A · 1891 [cited by applicant]
CA 39504A · 1892 [cited by applicant]
DE 3723101A1 · 1989 [cited by applicant]
DE 102011016141A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
EP 0898548B1 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
EP 1365106A1 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
FR 339176A · 1904 [cited by applicant]
FR 357655A · 1906 [cited by applicant]
FR 808801A · 1937 [cited by applicant]
FR 2609506B1 · 1993 [cited by applicant]
GB 427493A · 1935 [cited by applicant]
JP 2003503643A · 2003 [cited by applicant]
JP 2008090548A · 2008 [cited by applicant]
JP 5690564B2 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
KR 1020100128928A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
KR 20110119242B1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
KR 1020140013199A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
RU 2585180C1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2002059464A1 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
WO 2009147757A1 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO 2010053450A2 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO 2011081577 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO 2012050441A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
George Weiss, Flower Turbine in Turbulent Wind, uploaded Dec. 12, 2011, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQauF49MjTg&list-UL. [cited by applicant]
George Weiss, Closed Loop inclinded blades of HAWT for turbulent airflow, uploaded Dec. 10, 2011, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlOs4z6lhUM. [cited by applicant]
M. Gilinsky; John M. Seigner; and Gloyd D. Backley, Screws, Propellers, and Fans based on the Mobius Strip, 4th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Jun. 2-4, 1988, pp. 1-10, Toulouse, Grance. [cited by applicant]
Quentin R. Wald; The arodynamics of propellers, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, Feb. 2006, Abstract Only, vol. 42, Issue 2, 102 Cape George Road, Port Townsend, WA 98368, USA. [cited by applicant]
Parag R. Gogate; Anthony A.C.M. Beenackers; Aniruddha B. Pandit, Multiple-impeller systems with a special emphasis on bioreactors; a critical review, Biochemical Engineering Journal, Oct. 2000, Abstract Only, vol. 6, Is… [cited by applicant]
Ekinci, Serkan: A Practical Approach for Design of Marine Propellers with Systematic Propeller Series, Brodogradnja, 62(2011)2, pp. 123-129. [cited by applicant]
Miller, Marlin, L. Blade Frequency Thrust and Torque on a Loop-Bladed Propeller, David W. Taylor Naval SHip Research and Development Center, Ship Performance Departmental Report No. SPD-530-06, Nov. 1975, Bethesda, Mary… [cited by applicant]
Crown, D.E. and Hendrican A.L., Cavitation Performance of Loop-Bladed Propeller 4667, Naval Ship Research Deveopment Center, Ship Performance Departmental Report No. SPD-530-05, Jul. 1975, Bethesda, Maryland. [cited by applicant]
Okamoto, H., et al., Cavitation Study of Decuted Propellers on Large Ships, Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, pp. 168-190, New Jersey, 1975. [cited by applicant]
Klein I: “Bionik fur die maritime Wirtschaft”, Offshore & Meerestrchnik Kompakt, Schiff & Hafen, Seehafen Verlag GMBH, DE, vol. 59, No. 3, Jan. 1, 2007, p. 90-9 XP001542137, ISSN: 1436-8498. [cited by applicant]
Min-Fu Hsieh et al.: “Integrated Design and Realization of a Hubless Rim-driven Thruster”, Department of Systems and Naval Mechantronic Engineering, National Chen Kung University, The 33rd Annual Conference of the IEEE … [cited by applicant]
Chung Wei Lee et al.: “The Characteristics of Rim-driven Propulsor's Flow Field”, Department of Systems and Naval Mechanotronic Engineering, National Chen Kung University, Taiwan (2011 or earlier). [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jan. 25, 2023 in International Patent Application PCT/US2022/025848. [cited by applicant]
First Office action issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 202110123604.5 on Feb. 11, 2023. [cited by applicant]
European Supplementary Search Report dated Feb. 20, 2025, EP Application No. 22808025.5. [cited by applicant]