IP Library Granted Patent US 12,399,138
Granted Patent B2
US 12,399,138 · App. 18/645,781 · Granted Aug 26, 2025

CT scanner calibration

Inventors: Sergey Nikolskiy (Coto de Caza, CA); Fedor Chelnokov (Khimki, RU); Grant Karapetyan (Moscow, RU)
Assignee: James R. Glidewell Dental Ceramics, Inc.
G01N23/046A61B6/51G01N23/083G01N2223/04G01N2223/303G01N2223/419
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,399,138
App. No.
18/645,781
Granted
Aug 26, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and method can determine one or more CT scanner calibration parameters from a plurality of calibration object projections in a plurality of radiographs.

Claims (36)

1. A computer-implemented method of determining CT calibration settings, the method comprising:

receiving a plurality of radiographs from a CT scanner, each of the plurality of radiographs comprising a plurality of calibration object projections;

determining one or more calibration object projection radiuses in the first radiograph;

determining a projective transformation of each calibration object in the plurality of radiographs;

determining trajectory parameters from the projective transformation of each calibration object; and

determining one or more CT scanner calibration parameters from the trajectory parameters prior to CT reconstruction of the plurality of radiographs.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the CT scanner is a cone beam scanner.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more CT scanner calibration parameters comprise one or more from the group consisting of a projected horizontal axis shift, a projected rotational axis inclination angle, a vertical shift, detector distance, and axis of rotation distance.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining one or more CT scanner calibration parameters comprises determining a first projection position of each of the plurality of calibration objects in a first projection of the plurality of radiographs.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising tracking the plurality of calibration objects in the plurality of radiographs.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining a rotation direction from the plurality of radiographs.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising pre-processing the plurality of radiographs.

8. A system for determining CT calibration settings, comprising: a processor; and

a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium comprising instructions executable by the processor to perform steps comprising:

receiving a plurality of radiographs from a CT scanner, each of the plurality of radiographs comprising a plurality of calibration object projections;

determining one or more calibration object projection radiuses in the first radiograph;

determining a projective transformation of each calibration object in the plurality of radiographs;

determining trajectory parameters from the projective transformation of each calibration object; and

determining one or more CT scanner calibration parameters from the trajectory parameters prior to CT reconstruction of the plurality of radiographs.

9. The system of claim 8 , wherein the CT scanner is a cone beam scanner.

10. The system of claim 8 , wherein the one or more CT scanner calibration parameters from the projective transformation comprise one or more from the group consisting of a projected horizontal axis shift, a projected rotational axis inclination angle, a vertical shift, detector distance, and axis of rotation distance.

11. The system of claim 8 , wherein determining one or more CT scanner calibration parameters comprises determining a first projection position of each of the plurality of calibration objects in a first projection of the plurality of radiographs.

12. The system of claim 8 , further comprising tracking the plurality of calibration objects in the plurality of radiographs.

13. The system of claim 8 , further comprising determining a rotation direction from the plurality of radiographs.

14. The system of claim 8 , further comprising pre-processing the plurality of radiographs.

15. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing executable computer program instructions to determine CT calibration settings, the computer program instructions comprising instructions for:

receiving a plurality of radiographs from a CT scanner, each of the plurality of radiographs comprising a plurality of calibration object projections;

determining one or more calibration object projection radiuses in the first radiograph;

determining a projective transformation of each calibration object in the plurality of radiographs;

determining trajectory parameters from the projective transformation of each calibration object; and

determining one or more CT scanner calibration parameters from the trajectory parameters prior to CT reconstruction of the plurality of radiographs.

16. The medium of claim 15 , wherein the CT scanner is a cone beam scanner.

17. The medium of claim 15 , wherein the one or more CT scanner calibration parameters from the projective transformation comprise one or more from the group consisting of a projected horizontal axis shift, a projected rotational axis inclination angle, a vertical shift, detector distance, and axis of rotation distance.

18. The medium of claim 15 , wherein determining one or more CT scanner calibration parameters comprises determining a first projection position of each of the plurality of calibration objects in a first projection of the plurality of radiographs.

19. The medium of claim 15 , further comprising tracking the plurality of calibration objects in the plurality of radiographs.

20. The medium of claim 15 , further comprising determining a rotation direction from the plurality of radiographs.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 17, 2024
From: NIKOLSKIY, SERGEY; CHELNOKOV, FEDOR; KARAPETYAN, GRANT
To: JAMES R. GLIDEWELL DENTAL CERAMICS, INC.
Reel/Frame 067452/0280 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 18170309 · Feb 16, 2023
Continuation 16887437 · May 29, 2020
Related Publication 20240272095A1 · Aug 15, 2024
References Cited (59)
US 5224037A · Jones et al. · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5872829A · Wischmann et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6813374B1 · Karimi et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6991371B2 · Georgeson et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7085352B2 · Youmis et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7251307B2 · Chen · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7330528B2 · Jefferson · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7700909B2 · Holt · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7922390B2 · Holt et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7940884B2 · Bruder et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8723866B2 · Buyanovskiy · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8777485B2 · Holt · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8842904B2 · Chen · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9155514B2 · Panin et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9498177B2 · Bruder et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 10229517B2 · Raupach et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10539515B2 · Fischer et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10974074B2 · Hale et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11222435B2 · Nikolskiy et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11585766B2 · Nikolskiy · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20050094771A1 · Basu et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050113680A1 · Ikeda et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060110068A1 · Lou et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060291612A1 · Nishide et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070274456A1 · Holt · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20100195893A1 · Fuchigami et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100246918A1 · Kappler et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110142316A1 · Wang et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110164031A1 · Shi · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20130016125A1 · Mainguet · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130223587A1 · Moriyasu · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130243276A1 · Souza et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140056495A1 · Janssens · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140064458A1 · Jobst · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140169650A1 · Sakimoto et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150216498A1 · Schulze · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150221080A1 · Yamamoto · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150305696A1 · Yamakawa et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160095668A1 · Kuo et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170112462A1 · O'Hare · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170154413A1 · Yu et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170294034A1 · Zhou · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170301114A1 · Yang et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170311918A1 · Qi et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170345190A1 · Shi et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180132982A1 · Nikolskiy et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190235100A1 · Kimmig · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200178910A1 · Suzuki et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200205943A1 · Elbaz et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210072168A1 · Sasaki et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210085279A1 · Asano et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220160323A1 · Maur et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
EP 825457 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017191162 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
Ghia et al., “Reliable method for calculating the center of rotation in parrallelbeam tomography,” [cited by applicant]
Kak et al., “Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging,” [cited by applicant]
Pan et al., “Automatic Detection of Rotation Centers Using GPU from Projection Data for Microtomography in Synchrotron Radiation,” [cited by applicant]
Radke et al., “Efficiently estimating Projective Transformations,” Jun. 27, 2001, 27 pages. [cited by applicant]
Walter et al., “Photon Counting and Energy Discriminating X-Ray Detectors—Benefits and Applications,” [cited by applicant]