IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,400,140
Granted Patent B2
US 12,400,140 · App. 18/354,985 · Granted Aug 26, 2025

Heralding of amplitude damping decay noise for quantum error correction

Inventors: Aleksander Marek Kubica (Los Angeles, CA); Alex Retzker (Pasadena, CA)
Assignee: Amazon Technologies, Inc.
G06N10/70H03M13/1111
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,400,140
App. No.
18/354,985
Granted
Aug 26, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and method for indicating, via a heralding signal, that an amplitude damping decay event has occurred within a quantum low-density parity-check code is disclosed. Logical information may be encoded into a superconducting qubit using one or more transmons, wherein a first level and a second level are encoded into a code space of the qubit, and at least one intermediate level outside of the code space characterizes an amplitude damping decay channel which is then used to herald an amplitude damping decay event. Dynamical decoupling pulse sequences may be used to drive such qubit structures and bias noise towards the amplitude damping decay channel. The one or more heralding signals within a lower-level code may then be used as input to a quantum low-density parity-check code for decoding syndrome measurements with the knowledge of occurrences of amplitude damping decay as indicated via the one or more heralding signals.

Claims (70)

1. A system, comprising:

a quantum computing device configured to:

implement a rotated surface code; and

herald that one or more amplitude damping decay events have occurred with respect to a qubit of the rotated surface code; and

a classical computing device configured to:

receive a heralding signal indicating that an amplitude damping decay event has occurred; and

decode syndrome measurements, taking into account the heralding signal.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the quantum computing device is further configured to:

bias stochastic noise of the quantum computing device by applying dynamical decoupling pulse sequences.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein, to decode the syndrome measurements, the classical computing device is further configured to:

adjust the decoding of syndrome measurements for the rotated surface code, based, at least in part, on the heralding signal.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the classical computing device is further configured to:

adjust a fidelity threshold used in the decoding of the syndrome measurements, in response to the reception of the heralding signal.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the rotated surface code comprises:

one or more transmons, used to detect the one or more amplitude damping decay events.

6. A method of performing quantum computation that reduces errors caused by noise, the method comprising:

encoding a qubit into a code space, wherein:

the encoding uses multiple levels of one or more transmons comprising:

a first level of the one or more transmons which is mapped to a first level of the code space; and

a second level of the one or more transmons which is mapped to a second level of the code space; and

there is at least one intermediate level of the one or more transmons between the first and second levels which is outside of the code space; and

providing a heralding signal indicating an event of amplitude damping decay, wherein the amplitude damping decay is detected via one or more measurements indicating a leakage outside of the code space.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein:

the multiple levels are implemented using a single transmon;

the first level of the code space corresponds to a ground state of the transmon;

the second level of the code space corresponds to a second excited state of the transmon; and

the intermediate level outside of the code space indicating amplitude damping decay corresponds to a first excited state of the transmon.

8. The method of claim 6 , wherein:

the multiple levels are implemented using a plurality of transmons;

the first level is chosen from amongst the available energy states of the plurality of transmons;

the second level is chosen from amongst the remaining energy states of the plurality of transmons; and

the intermediate levels comprising the remaining energy states apart from the first and second levels chosen for the code space are used to indicate amplitude damping decay.

9. The method of claim 6 , further comprising:

engineering dynamical decoupling pulse sequences that bias stochastic noise of a quantum computing device performing the quantum computation to a noise channel corresponding to amplitude damping noise; and

applying the dynamical decoupling pulse sequences to the quantum computing device to bias noise towards the amplitude damping noise channel and away from other stochastic noise channels.

10. The method of claim 6 , further comprising:

using the heralding signal as input to the rotated surface code to indicate to the rotated surface code an occurrence of amplitude damping decay.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein:

the heralding signal is indicated as an additional one or more qubits in the rotated surface code; and

the one or more additional qubits encode the presence, or lack of presence, of amplitude damping decay.

12. The method of claim 10 , further comprising:

erasing a qubit from being considered in decoding syndrome measurements of the rotated surface code based, at least in part, on the heralding signal indicating an amplitude damping decay event associated with the qubit being erased.

13. The method of claim 12 , further comprising:

diagnosing said erasing a qubit by performing a two-outcome positive operator valued measurement, wherein:

a first outcome confirms the erasure event; and

a second outcome confirms the erasure event has not occurred.

14. The method of claim 6 , further comprising:

performing syndrome measurements for the rotated surface code used in the quantum computation, wherein the syndrome measurements comprise information about the mapping of the code space.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the multiple levels are implemented using a ground state and a second excited state of a transmon, and wherein said performing the syndrome measurements comprises:

performing one or more projective measurements onto the code space to detect leakage, or lack thereof, outside of the code space.

16. The method of claim 14 , wherein:

the multiple levels are implemented using energy states of more than one transmon; and

said performing the syndrome measurements comprises:

performing one or more projective measurements onto the code space to detect leakage, or lack thereof, outside of the code space.

17. One or more non-transitory, computer-readable, storage media storing program instructions, that when executed using a quantum computing device, cause the quantum computing device to:

perform quantum computation that reduces errors caused by noise, wherein:

a qubit is encoded into a code space used in the quantum computation;

the code space is encoded using multiple levels of one or more transmons comprising:

a first level of the one or more transmons which is mapped to a first level of the code space; and

a second level of the one or more transmons which is mapped to a second level of the code space; and

there is at least one intermediate level between the first and second levels that is outside of the code space; and

provide a heralding signal indicating an event of amplitude damping decay, wherein the amplitude damping decay signal corresponds to leakage detected outside of the code space.

18. The one or more non-transitory, computer-readable, storage media of claim 17 , wherein the program instructions, when executed on or across the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to:

decode syndrome measurements, based, at least in part, on the heralding signal indicating the event of amplitude damping decay; and

apply the heralding signal as input to a rotated surface code to indicate to the rotated surface code an occurrence of amplitude damping decay, wherein the qubit is mapped within the rotated surface code.

19. The one or more non-transitory, computer-readable, storage media of claim 17 , wherein the program instructions, when executed on or across the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to:

decode syndrome measurements based, at least in part, on the heralding signal indicating the event of amplitude damping decay; and

adjust a fidelity threshold used in the decoding syndrome measurements in response to the reception of the heralding signal, indicating that the one or more amplitude damping decay events have occurred.

20. The one or more non-transitory, computer-readable, storage media of claim 19 , wherein to decode the syndrome measurements, the program instructions, when executed on or across the one or more processors, further cause the one or more processors to:

erase a qubit from being considered in the decoding of the syndrome measurements in a rotated surface code based, at least in part, on the heralding signal indicating an amplitude damping decay event associated with the qubit being erased, wherein the qubit is mapped within the rotated surface code.

Continuity (2)
Continuation 17548383 · Dec 10, 2021
Related Publication 20240104416A1 · Mar 28, 2024
References Cited (40)
US 9762262B2 · Ashikhmin · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10942804B2 · Kerman · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20190044543A1 · Chamberland · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200242500A1 · Girvin · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200274554A1 · Aspuru-Guzik · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200334104A1 · Rosenblum · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210232963A1 · Gimeno-Segovia · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220216884A1 · Delfosse · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220222567A1 · Reagor · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20240185113A1 · Cong · 2024 [cited by examiner]
Kueng et al., “Comparing Experiments to the Fault-Tolerance Threshold”, Oct. 21, 2016, Chorus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 170502, pp. 1-5 (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
Y. Suzuki et al., “Q3DE: A fault-tolerant quantum computer architecture for multi-bit burst errors by cosmic rays,” 2022 55th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO), Chicago, IL, USA, 2022, pp. 11… [cited by examiner]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/622,644, filed Mar. 29, 2024, Aleksander Marek Kubica, et al. [cited by applicant]
Peter W. Shor, “Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory,” Physical Review A, vol. 52, No. 4, Oct. 1995, pp. 1-4. [cited by applicant]
A. M. Steane, “Error Correcting Codes in Quantum Theory,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 77, Issue 5, pp. 793-797, Published Jul. 29, 1996. [cited by applicant]
P.W. Shor, “Fault-tolerant quantum computation,” Published in: Proceedings of 37th Conference on Foundations of Computer Science, IEEE, 1996, pp. 56-65. [cited by applicant]
M. Grassl and Th. Beth, “odes for the Quantum Erasure Channel,” pp. 1-6, Phys. Rev. A 56, 33—Published Jul. 1, 1997. [cited by applicant]
“Thomas M. Stace, Sean D. Barrett, and Andrew C. Doherty, ““Thresholds for Topological Codes in the Presence of Loss,”” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 200501—Published May 18, 2009 (retrieved from arXiv:0904.3556v1 [quant-ph] Ap… [cited by applicant]
“Nicolas Delfosse, et al., ““Almost-linear time decoding algorithm for topological codes,”” Quantum 5, p. 595 (2021), pp. 1-12.” [cited by applicant]
S. B. Bravyi, et al., “Quantum codes on a lattice with boundary,” arXiv:quant-ph/9811052v1, 1998, pp. 1-6. [cited by applicant]
Eric Dennis, et al., “Topological quantum memory,” J. Math. Phys. vol. 43, Issue 9, pp. 4452-4505 (2002), pp. 1-54. [cited by applicant]
H. Bombin, et al., “Topological Quantum Distillation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 180501—Published Oct. 30, 2006, pp. 1-4 from arXiv:quant-ph/0605138 v2. [cited by applicant]
Rui Chao, et al., “Optimization of the surface code design for Majorana-based qubits,” Quantum vol. 4, p. 352 (2020) (pp. 1-19 from arXiv:2007.00307v2 [quant-ph]). [cited by applicant]
Fei Yan, et al., “Distinguishing Coherent and Thermal Photon Noise in a Circuit Quantum Electrodynamical System,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 260504—Published Jun. 29, 2018, pp. 1-7. [cited by applicant]
Jonathan J. Burnett, “Decoherence benchmarking of superconducting qubits,” npj Quantum Information vol. 5, Article No. 54 (2019), pp. 1-8. [cited by applicant]
Matthew B. Hastings, et al., “Dynamically Generated Logical Qubits,” Quantum vol. 5, p. 564 (2021) (pp. 1-19 from arXiv:2107.02194v2). [cited by applicant]
Andrew S. Darmawan, et a., “Tensor-Network Simulations of the Surface Code under Realistic Noise,” arXiv preprint: arXiv:1607.06460v2, pp. 1-8, 2017. [cited by applicant]
P. Krantz, et al., “A Quantum Engineer's Guide to Superconducting Qubits,” arXiv preprint: arXiv:1904.06560v5, pp. 1-67, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Eliot Kapit, “Error-transparent quantum gates for small logical qubit architectures,” Department of Physics and Engineering Physics, arXiv preprint: arXiv:1703.09762v1, pp. 1-8 2017. [cited by applicant]
S. Rosenblum, P. Reinhold, M. Mirrahimi, L. Jiang, L. Frunzio, and R. J. Schoelkopf, “Fault-tolerant detection of a quantum error,” Science vol. 361, Issue 6399, pp. 266-270, 2018. [cited by applicant]
E. A. Sete, A. Galiautdinov, E. Mlinar, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Korotkov, “Catch-Disperse-Release Readout for Superconducting Qubits,” Physical review letters 110, 210501. pp. 1-5, (2013). [cited by applicant]
R. Duan, M. Grassl, Z. Ji, and B. Zeng, “Multi-error-correcting amplitude damping codes”, in 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (IEEE, 2010) pp. 2672-2676. [cited by applicant]
M. Grassi, L. Kong, Z. Wei, Z.-Q. Yin, and B. Zeng, “Quantum Error-Correcting Codes for Qudit Amplitude Damping,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 64, 4674, arXiv:1509.06829 [quant-ph], pp. 1-22, 2015. [cited by applicant]
A. Kitaev, “Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons,” Annals of Physics vol. 303, Issue 1, Jan. 2003, pp. 2-30. [cited by applicant]
S. B. Bravyi and A. Y. Kitaev, “Quantum codes on a lattice with boundary,” arXiv preprint quant-ph/9811052, pp. 1-6 (1998). [cited by applicant]
E. Dennis, A. Kitaev, A. Landahl, and J. Preskill, “Topological quantum memory,” Journal of Mathematical Physics 43, 4452 (2002), arXiv prepreint: arXiv:quant-ph/0110143, pp. 1-39 on 2001. [cited by applicant]
N. Delfosse and N. H. Nickerson, “Almost-linear time decoding algorithm for topological codesk,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.06218v3, pp. 1-12 (2021). [cited by applicant]
A. S. Darmawan and D. Poulin, “Tensor-Network Simulations of the Surface Code under Realistic Noise,” Physical review letters 119, 040502 (2017), arXiv prepreint: arXiv:1607.06460 [quant-ph], pp. 1-5. [cited by applicant]
E. Kapit, “Error-Transparent Quantum Gates for Small Logical Qubit Architectures,” Physical review letters 120, 050503 (2018), arXiv prepreint: arXiv:1703.09762 [quant-ph], pp. 1-8 in 2017. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/548,383, filed Dec. 10, 2021, Aleksander Marek Kubica et al. [cited by applicant]