IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,401,408
Granted Patent B2
US 12,401,408 · App. 18/365,857 · Granted Aug 26, 2025

Method and apparatus for composite beam operation and overhead reduction

Inventors: Ahmad AlAmmouri (Richardson, TX); Jianhua Mo (Allen, TX); Mustafa Furkan Ozkoc (Plano, TX); Boon Loong Ng (Plano, TX)
Assignee: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
H04B7/06952H04B7/0639H04B17/327
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,401,408
App. No.
18/365,857
Granted
Aug 26, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method includes identifying child beams of a current composite beam. The method also includes determining an order at which the child beams of the current composite beam are measured based on a likelihood that each child beam of the current composite beam is an optimal beam, among the child beams, to be a serving narrow beam. The method also includes determining a threshold for use in deciding whether to measure one or more additional child beams or select an already measured child beam when selecting the optimal beam. The method also includes selecting the optimal beam, among the child beams, to be the serving narrow beam based on the determined order and the determined threshold.

Claims (81)

1. A method comprising:

identifying child beams of a current composite beam;

determining an order at which the child beams of the current composite beam are measured based on a likelihood that each child beam of the current composite beam is an optimal beam, among the child beams, to be a serving narrow beam;

determining a threshold for use in deciding whether to measure one or more additional child beams or select an already measured child beam when selecting the optimal beam; and

selecting the optimal beam, among the child beams, to be the serving narrow beam based on the determined order and the determined threshold, wherein the threshold is determined based on a reference signal received power (RSRP) of each child beam and wherein the RSRP of each child beam is to support a required data rate of a user equipment (UE).

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

computing the likelihood that each child beam is the optimal beam to be the serving narrow beam based on information associated with previously used narrow beams and composite beams.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the likelihood that each child beam is the optimal beam is computed based on at least one of:

a spatial distance between each of the child beams and a previously used narrow beam;

an angular distance between each of the child beams and the previously used narrow beam; and

a UE mobility pattern.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the order at which the child beams are measured is an order from mostly likely to be the optimal beam to least likely to be the optimal beam.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the threshold is determined based on at least one of:

a speed of the UE;

a beam width of the current composite beam;

a serving distance between a base station (BS) and the UE;

a line-of-sight (LOS)/non-line-of-sight (NLOS) state of the UE;

a RSRP of the current composite beam; and

a RSRP of a previously used narrow beam.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the threshold is determined based on at least one of:

a RSRP of a previous serving narrow beam in a previous time slot;

and

an average RSRP of the previous serving narrow beam over a previous time interval.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein selecting the optimal beam, among the child beams, to be the serving narrow beam comprises at least one of:

ceasing measurement of the one or more additional child beams and selecting the already measured child beam to be the serving narrow beam when a RSRP of the already measured child beam is higher than the threshold; and

selecting one of the one or more additional child beams to be the serving narrow beam when the RSRP of the already measured child beam is lower than the threshold and a RSRP of the selected one additional child beam is higher than the RSRP of the already measured child beam.

8. A device comprising:

a transceiver; and

a processor operably connected to the transceiver, the processor configured to:

identify child beams of a current composite beam;

determine an order at which the child beams of the current composite beam are measured based on a likelihood that each child beam of the current composite beam is an optimal beam, among the child beams, to be a serving narrow beam;

determine a threshold for use in deciding whether to measure one or more additional child beams or select an already measured child beam when selecting the optimal beam; and

select the optimal beam, among the child beams, to be the serving narrow beam based on the determined order and the determined threshold,

wherein the threshold is determined based on a reference signal received power (RSRP) of each child beam, and

wherein the RSRP of each child beam is to support a required data rate of a user equipment (UE).

9. The device of claim 8 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

compute the likelihood that each child beam is the optimal beam to be the serving narrow beam based on information associated with previously used narrow beams and composite beams.

10. The device of claim 9 , wherein the likelihood that each child beam is the optimal beam is computed based on at least one of:

a spatial distance between each of the child beams and a previously used narrow beam;

an angular distance between each of the child beams and the previously used narrow beam; and

a UE mobility pattern.

11. The device of claim 8 , wherein the order at which the child beams are measured is an order from mostly likely to be the optimal beam to least likely to be the optimal beam.

12. The device of claim 8 , wherein the processor is configured to determine the threshold based on at least one of:

a speed of the UE;

a beam width of the current composite beam;

a serving distance between a base station (BS) and the UE;

a line-of-sight (LOS)/non-line-of-sight (NLOS) state of the UE;

a RSRP of the current composite beam; and

a RSRP of a previously used narrow beam.

13. The device of claim 8 , wherein the processor is configured to determine the threshold based on at least one of:

a RSRP of a previous serving narrow beam in a previous time slot;

and

an average RSRP of the previous serving narrow beam over a previous time interval.

14. The device of claim 8 , wherein to select the optimal beam, among the child beams, to be the serving narrow beam, the processor is configured to at least one of:

cease measurement of the one or more additional child beams and select the already measured child beam to be the serving narrow beam when a RSRP of the already measured child beam is higher than the threshold; and

select one of the one or more additional child beams to be the serving narrow beam when the RSRP of the already measured child beam is lower than the threshold and a RSRP of the selected one additional child beam is higher than the RSRP of the already measured child beam.

15. A non-transitory computer readable medium comprising program code that, when executed by a processor of a device, causes the device to:

identify child beams of a current composite beam;

determine an order at which the child beams of the current composite beam are measured based on a likelihood that each child beam of the current composite beam is an optimal beam, among the child beams, to be a serving narrow beam;

determine a threshold for use in deciding whether to measure one or more additional child beams or select an already measured child beam when selecting the optimal beam; and

select the optimal beam, among the child beams, to be the serving narrow beam based on the determined order and the determined threshold,

wherein the threshold is determined based on a reference signal received power (RSRP) of each child beam, and

wherein the RSRP of each child beam is to support a required data rate of a user equipment (UE).

16. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the program code further causes the device to:

compute the likelihood that each child beam is the optimal beam to be the serving narrow beam based on information associated with previously used narrow beams and composite beams.

17. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 16 , wherein the likelihood that each child beam is the optimal beam is computed based on at least one of:

a spatial distance between each of the child beams and a previously used narrow beam;

an angular distance between each of the child beams and the previously used narrow beam; and

a UE mobility pattern.

18. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the order at which the child beams are measured is an order from mostly likely to be the optimal beam to least likely to be the optimal beam.

19. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the program code causes the device to determine the threshold based on at least one of:

a speed of the UE;

a beam width of the current composite beam;

a serving distance between a base station (BS) and the UE;

a line-of-sight (LOS)/non-line-of-sight (NLOS) state of the UE;

a RSRP of the current composite beam; and

a RSRP of a previously used narrow beam.

20. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the program code causes the device to determine the threshold based on at least one of:

a RSRP of a previous serving narrow beam in a previous time slot;

and

an average RSRP of the previous serving narrow beam over a previous time interval.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 4, 2023
From: ALAMMOURI, AHMAD; MO, JIANHUA; OZKOC, MUSTAFA FURKAN; NG, BOON LOONG
To: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 064500/0536 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63400266 · Aug 23, 2022
Related Publication 20240072873A1 · Feb 29, 2024
References Cited (22)
US 10834615B2 · Raghavan et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11146321B2 · Yoon et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20040204114A1 · Brennan · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20200136708A1 · Pan · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200275287A1 · Kumagai · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200389800A1 · Laghate et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200396749A1 · Zhou et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210167821A1 · Chen · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220038163A1 · Va et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220045727A1 · Mehta · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220077977A1 · Zhang et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220294513A1 · Landstrom et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220368438A1 · Yang et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230006714A1 · Mo et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230032241A1 · Mo et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230075012A1 · Laghate et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
KR 1020220040988A · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015143898A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021096402A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2023060487A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued Nov. 13, 2023 regarding International Application No. PCT/KR2023/012279, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report issued Mar. 25, 2025 regarding Application No. 23857660.7, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]