IP Library Granted Patent US 12,406,772
Granted Patent B2
US 12,406,772 · App. 17/786,326 · Granted Sep 2, 2025

Systems and methods for predicting individual patient response to radiotherapy using a dynamic carrying capacity model

Inventors: Heiko Enderling (New Tampa, FL); Mohammad Zahid (Tampa, FL)
Assignee: H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC.
G16H50/20G06T7/0016G06T7/62G16H20/40G06T2207/10081G06T2207/10088G06T2207/30096
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,406,772
App. No.
17/786,326
Granted
Sep 2, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods for predicting outcome of radiation therapy is described herein. An example method includes receiving respective values for tumor volume of a target patients tumor at first and second time points, and calculating a change in tumor volume between the first and second time points. The method also includes estimating a patient-specific carrying capacity based on a logistic growth model and the change in tumor volume. Additionally, the method includes predicting a volume of the target patient's tumor at a future time point during radiation treatment based, at least in part, on a historical carrying capacity reduction fraction distribution and the patient-specific carrying capacity. The method further includes predicting a patient-specific outcome of radiation therapy for the target patient based, at least in part, on the predicted volume of the target patients tumor at the future time point.

Claims (46)

1. A method, comprising:

receiving at least two images of a target patient's tumor including a first image captured at a first time point and a second image captured at a second time point;

deriving respective values for tumor volume of the target patient's tumor at the first time point and the second time point from the at least two images;

calculating a change in tumor volume between the first and second time points based on the respective values for tumor volume;

estimating a patient-specific carrying capacity based on a logistic growth model and the change in tumor volume between the first and second time points;

predicting a volume of the target patient's tumor at a future time point during radiation treatment based, at least in part, on a historical carrying capacity reduction fraction distribution and the patient-specific carrying capacity; and

predicting a patient-specific outcome of radiation therapy for the target patient based, at least in part, on the predicted volume of the target patient's tumor at the future time point.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first point in time is prior to a beginning of radiation therapy.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second point in time is at a beginning of radiation treatment.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

receiving a respective value for tumor volume of the target patient's tumor at a third time point;

calculating a change in tumor volume between the second and third time points based on the respective values for tumor volume;

estimating a patient-specific carrying capacity reduction fraction based on the logistic growth model and the change in tumor volume between the second and third time points; and

predicting the volume of the target patient's tumor at the future time point during radiation treatment based, at least in part, on the patient-specific carrying capacity reduction fraction and the change in tumor volume between the second and third time points, wherein the third time point is during administration of radiation treatment.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the third time point is at a second, third, fourth, or fifth week of radiation treatment.

6. The method of claim 4 , wherein the future time point is at a sixth week of radiation treatment.

7. The method of claim 4 , wherein the step of predicting the volume of the target patient's tumor at the future time point in radiation treatment based, at least in part, on the patient-specific carrying capacity reduction fraction and the change in tumor volume between the second and third time points comprises:

updating the historical carrying capacity reduction fraction distribution to include the patient-specific carrying capacity reduction fraction for the target patient;

randomly sampling from the updated historical carrying capacity reduction fraction distribution; and

simulating tumor volume dynamics during radiation treatment for the target patient.

8. The method of claim 4 , further comprising weighting the patient-specific carrying capacity reduction fraction for the target patient.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the patient-specific outcome is predicted by comparing a change in tumor volume at the future time point to a threshold.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the predicted patient-specific outcome is one of: i) a percentage chance of success of radiation therapy, ii) locoregional control (LRC), or iii) disease-free survival (DFS).

11. The method of claim 1 , further comprising at least one of: i) treating the target patient based on the predicted patient-specific outcome or ii) administering radiation treatment after the second time point.

12. A system, comprising:

a processor; and

a memory operably coupled to the processor, the memory having computer-executable instructions stored thereon that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to:

receiving at least two images of a target patient's tumor including a first image captured at a first time point and a second image captured at a second time point;

derive respective values for tumor volume of the target patient's tumor at the first time point and the second time point;

calculate a change in tumor volume between the first and second time points based on the respective values for tumor volume;

estimate a patient-specific carrying capacity based on a logistic growth model and the change in tumor volume between the first and second time points;

predict a volume of the target patient's tumor at a future time point during radiation treatment based, at least in part, on a historical carrying capacity reduction fraction distribution and the patient-specific carrying capacity; and

predict a patient-specific outcome of radiation therapy for the target patient based, at least in part, on the predicted volume of the target patient's tumor at the future time point.

13. The system of claim 12 , wherein the memory has further computer-executable instructions stored thereon that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to:

receive a respective value for tumor volume of the target patient's tumor at a third time point;

calculate a change in tumor volume between the second and third time points based on the respective values for tumor volume;

estimate a patient-specific carrying capacity reduction fraction based on the logistic growth model and the change in tumor volume between the second and third time points; and

predict the volume of the target patient's tumor at the future time point during radiation treatment based, at least in part, on the patient-specific carrying capacity reduction fraction and the change in tumor volume between the second and third time points, wherein the third time point is during administration of radiation treatment.

14. The system of claim 13 , wherein the third time point is at a second, third, fourth, or fifth week of radiation treatment.

15. The system of claim 13 , wherein the future time point is at a sixth week of radiation treatment.

16. The system of claim 13 , wherein the step of predicting the volume of the target patient's tumor at the future time point in radiation treatment based, at least in part, on the patient-specific carrying capacity reduction fraction and the change in tumor volume between the second and third time points comprises:

updating the historical carrying capacity reduction fraction distribution to include the patient-specific carrying capacity reduction fraction for the target patient;

randomly sampling from the updated historical carrying capacity reduction fraction distribution; and

simulating tumor volume dynamics during radiation treatment for the target patient.

17. The system of claim 13 , wherein the memory has further computer-executable instructions stored thereon that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to weight the patient-specific carrying capacity reduction fraction for the target patient.

18. The system of claim 12 , wherein the at least two images are computed-tomography (CT) images or magnetic resonance images (MRI).

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 16, 2023
From: ENDERLING, HEIKO; ZAHID, MOHAMMAD
To: H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC.
Reel/Frame 062997/0693 →
Continuity (3)
Provisional Application 63010327 · Apr 15, 2020
Provisional Application 62950296 · Dec 19, 2019
Related Publication 20230038942A1 · Feb 9, 2023
References Cited (40)
US 8768431B2 · Ross · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 11491350B2 · Lou · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20030235816A1 · Slawin · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20080299123A1 · Altevogt · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20090053244A1 · Chen · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100135903A1 · Brown · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20110103657A1 · Kang · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20130004044A1 · Ross · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140271818A1 · James · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150056144A1 · Aboody · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160239956A1 · Kang · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160266126A1 · Shipitsin · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160333083A1 · James · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170106213A1 · Lee · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170150934A1 · Bennett · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170209715A1 · Ruebel · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170216632A1 · Lee · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170309025A1 · O'Rourke · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170348547A1 · Lee · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180012727A1 · Amato · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180078790A1 · Lee · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180092968A1 · Albelda · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180185673A1 · Lee · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180298068A1 · Albelda · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180318605A1 · Da Silva Rodrigues · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180326223A1 · Willcut · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190021684A1 · Ruebel · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190114765A1 · Enderling · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190201717A1 · Shangguan · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200390811A1 · Albelda · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210164056A1 · Spiotto · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220016169A1 · Hong · 2022 [cited by examiner]
Sotiris Prokopiou et al., “A proliferation saturation index to predict radiation response and personalize radiotherapy fractionation,” Jul. 31, 2015, Radiation Oncology (2015) 10:159, pp. 1-6. [cited by examiner]
Sebastien Benzekry et al., “Classical Mathematical Models for Description and Prediction of Experimental Tumor Growth,” Aug. 28, 2014, PLOS Coputational Biology, vol. 10, Issue 8,e1003800, pp. 1-17. [cited by examiner]
Maxwell Lewis Neal et al., “Discriminating Survival Outcomes in Patients with Glioblastoma Using a Simulation-Based, Patient-Specific Response Metric, ”Jan. 23, 2013,PLOS ONE, Jan. 2013 Vol.,Issue 1, e51951, pp. 1-5. [cited by examiner]
Imran Tariq et al., “Mathematical modelling of tumour volume dynamics in response to stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer, ”Apr. 17, 2015,Physics in Medicine & Biology,60 (2015) 3695, pp. 36… [cited by examiner]
Jan Poleszczuk et al., “Predicting Patient-Specific Radiotherapy Protocols Based on Mathematical Model Choice for Proliferation Saturation Index,” Jul. 5, 2017,Society for Mathematical Biology 2017, pp. 1195-1204. [cited by examiner]
Enakshi D. Sunassee et al., “Proliferation saturation index in an adaptive Bayesian approach to predict patient-specific radiotherapy responses, ”Mar. 19, 2019,International Journal of Radiation Biology, pp. 1421-1425. [cited by examiner]
Heiko Enderling et al., “Quantitative Modeling of Tumor Dynamics and Radiotherapy,”Jul. 24, 2010,Acta Biotheor (2010) 58, pp. 341-350. [cited by examiner]
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2020/065942. Mailed Mar. 23, 2021. 9 pages. [cited by applicant]