IP Library Granted Patent US 12,410,249
Granted Patent B2
US 12,410,249 · App. 17/679,213 · Granted Sep 9, 2025

Low dose antibody-based methods for treating hematologic malignancies

Inventor: Dragan Cicic (Brooklyn, NY)
Assignee: Actinium Phamaceuticals, Inc.
C07K16/2803A61K51/1069A61K51/1093A61K51/1096A61P35/02A61K2039/505
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,410,249
App. No.
17/679,213
Granted
Sep 9, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

This invention provides a method for treating a subject afflicted with a hematologic malignancy comprising administering to the subject an agent targeting a hematologic malignancy-associated antigen, wherein the subject has a low peripheral cancerous cell burden. This invention also provides a method for treating a subject afflicted with a hematologic malignancy and having a high peripheral cancerous cell burden, comprising (i) medically lowering the subject's peripheral cancerous cell burden, and (ii) while the subject's peripheral cancerous cell burden is still low, administering to the subject an agent targeting a hematologic malignancy-associated antigen. Particularly envisioned are the subject methods for treating acute myeloid leukemia using an anti-CD33 antibody labeled with an alpha-emitting isotope, such as 225 Ac-HuM195.

Claims (22)

1. A method for treating relapsed and/or refractory acute myeloid leukemia in a human subject, comprising the step of:

intravenously administering a therapeutically effective dose of 225 Ac-labeled HuM195 to a human subject afflicted with relapsed and/or refractory acute myeloid leukemia, wherein the human subject has a peripheral blast burden below 200 blast cells/μl.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the step of before administering the 225 Ac-labeled HuM195 to the human subject, determining that the human subject has a peripheral blast burden below 200 blast cells/μl.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the human subject is ineligible to receive high intensity chemotherapy.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the human subject is ineligible to receive high intensity chemotherapy.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the step of:

before administering the 225 Ac-labeled HuM195 to the human subject, administering low dose cytarabine to the human subject.

6. The method of claim 2 , further comprising the step of:

before administering the 225 Ac-labeled HuM195 to the human subject, administering low dose cytarabine to the human subject.

7. The method of claim 3 , further comprising the step of:

before administering the 225 Ac-labeled HuM195 to the human subject, administering low dose cytarabine to the human subject.

8. The method of claim 4 , further comprising the step of:

before administering the 225 Ac-labeled HuM195 to the human subject, administering low dose cytarabine to the human subject.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the human subject's peripheral blast burden is 50 blast cells/μl or lower.

10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the step of:

before administering the 225 Ac-labeled HuM195 to the human subject, medically lowering the human subject's peripheral blast burden from at or above 200 blast cells/μl to below 200 blast cells/μl,

wherein the administering step is performed while the human subject's peripheral blast burden is still below 200 blast cells/μl.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the human subject's peripheral blast burden is medically lowered to 50 blast cells/μl or lower.

12. The method of claim 5 , further comprising the step of:

before administering the 225 Ac-labeled HuM195 to the human subject, medically lowering the human subject's peripheral blast burden from at or above 200 blast cells/μl to below 200 blast cells/μl,

wherein the administering step is performed while the human subject's peripheral blast burden is still below 200 blast cells/μl.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the human subject's peripheral blast burden is medically lowered to 50 blast cells/μl or lower.

Continuity (3)
Continuation 16300672
Provisional Application 62342568 · May 27, 2016
Related Publication 20220251196A1 · Aug 11, 2022
References Cited (28)
US 4923985A · Gansow et al. · 1990 [cited by applicant]
US 6683162B2 · Scheinberg et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 11292835B2 · Cicic · 2022 [cited by applicant]
The abstract of Jurcic et al (Journal of Clinical Oncology, May 20, 2015, vol. 33, No. 15, Suppl 1, abstract No. 7050) (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
Thol et al (Blood, 2015, vol. 126, pp. 319-327). (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
The abstract of McDevitt et al (Blood, Nov. 18, 2011), vol. 118, No. 21, abstract No. 768) (Year: 2011). [cited by examiner]
Burnett, et al. “A comparison of low-dose cytarabine and hydroxyurea with or without all-trans retinoic acid for acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome in patients not considered fit for intensive… [cited by applicant]
Caron, et al., “A Phase 1B Trial of Humanized Monoclonal Anitbody M195 (Anti-CD33) in Myeloid Leukemia: Specific Targeting Without Immunogenicity”, Blood, 1994, vol. 83, pp. 1760-1768. [cited by applicant]
Co, et al., “Chimeric and humanized antibodies with specificity for the CD33 antigen.”, J. Immunol. 148: 1149-1154, 1992. [cited by applicant]
De Kruijff, et al., “A Critical Review of Alpha Radionuclide Therapy—How to Deal with Recoiling Daughters?”, Pharmaceuticals, Jun. 2015, ISSN 1424-8247, 321-336. [cited by applicant]
Deng, et al., “Monoclonal antibodies: what are the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodymanic considerations for drug development?”, Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism and Toxicology, 2012, vol. 8, pp. 141-160. [cited by applicant]
Dutta, et al., “The Expression Pattern of CD33 Antigen Can Differentiate Leukemic from Normal Progenitor Cells in Acute Myeloid Leukemia”, Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2014, vol. 30, pp. 130-134. [cited by applicant]
Harousseau, et al., “A randomized phase 3 study of tipifarnib compared with best supportive care, including hydroxyurea, in the treatment of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia in patients 70 years or older”, Blood, … [cited by applicant]
Jurcic, et al., “Phase I Trial of Targeted Alpha-Particle Therapy with Actinium-225 (225Ac)-Lintuzumab and Low-Dose Cytarabine (LDAC) in Patients Age 60 or Older with Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)”, The America… [cited by applicant]
Jurcic, et al. “Targeted alpha-particle nano-generator actinium-225 (225Ac)-lintuzumab (anti-CD33) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).” Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia 13 (2013): S379-S380. [cited by applicant]
Jurcic, et al. “Phase I trial of the targeted alpha-particle nano-generator actinium-225 (225Ac)-lintuzumab (anti-CD33) in combination with low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) for older patients with untreated acute myeloid leuk… [cited by applicant]
Krause, et al., “Differential regulation of myeloid leukemias by the bone marrow microenvironment”, Nature Medicine, 2013, vol. 19, pp. 1513-1517. [cited by applicant]
Kumar, “Genetic Abnormalities and Challenges in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia”, Genes & Cancer, vol. 2, No. 2, 95-107, 2011. [cited by applicant]
Maguire, et al., “Efficient 1-Step Radiolabeling of Monoclonal Antibodies to High Specific Activity with 225Ac for α-Particle Radioimmunotherapy of Cancer”, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2014, vol. 55, pp. 1492-1498. [cited by applicant]
McDevitt, et al., “Design and synthesis of 225Ac radioimmunopharmaceuticals”, Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 57 (2002) 841-847. [cited by applicant]
Mulford et al., “The Promise of Targeted α-Particle Therapy”, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 46, No. 1 (Suppl), Jan. 2005, 199S-204S. [cited by applicant]
Pollard, et al., “Correlation of CD33 expression level with disease characteristics and response to gemtuzumab ozogamicin containing chemotherapy in childhood AML”, Blood, Apr. 1, 20129, 119(16):3705-3711. [cited by applicant]
Rosenblat, et al., “Sequential cytarabine and a-particle immunotherapy with bismuth-213-lintuzumab (H uM 195) for acute myeloid leukemia”, Clinical Cancer Research 16.21 (2010): 5303-5311. [cited by applicant]
SWOG Oncology Research Professional (ORP) Manual, vol. I, Chapter 11A, Leukemia (2014). [cited by applicant]
Topp, et al., “Targeted therapy with the T-cell—engaging antibody blinatumomab of chemotherapy-refractory minimal residual disease in B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients results in high response rate and pro… [cited by applicant]
V.H.J. van der Velden, et al., “High CD33-antigen loads in peripheral blood limit the efficacy of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (Mylotarg) treatment in acute myeloid leukemia patients”, Leukemia, 2004, May 18(5):983-988. [cited by applicant]
Walter, et al., “Acute myeloid leukemia stem cells and CD33-targeted immunotherapy”, Blood, 2012, vol. 119, pp. 6198-6208. [cited by applicant]
Zhu, et al., “Blinatumomab, a bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE®) for CD-19 targeted cancer immunotherapy: clinical pharmacology and its implications”, Clinical pharmacokinetics 55.10 (2016): 1271-1288. [cited by applicant]