IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,411,051
Granted Patent B2
US 12,411,051 · App. 18/665,787 · Granted Sep 9, 2025

Blast exposure assessment system

Inventors: Suthee Wiri (Albuquerque, NM); Charles E. Needham (Albuquerque, NM); David J. Ortley (Albuquerque, NM); Christina DeVito Wagner (Durham, NC); Tim Walilko (Raleigh, NC); Andrea A. Gonzales (Albuquerque, NM); Sara T. Wofford (Albuquerque, NM)
Assignee: Applied Research Associates, Inc.
G01L5/14
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,411,051
App. No.
18/665,787
Granted
Sep 9, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method, system, and computer-readable media for analyzing blast exposure data in which one or more spurious data features are identified, flagged, and removed from a set of pressure data received from a blast sensor. Pressure data sets are grouped based on waveform features to determine one or more incident overpressure parameters associated with a blast exposure event.

Claims (55)

1. A method of analyzing blast exposure data, the method comprising:

receiving a set of blast exposure data comprising pressure data over time from at least one blast sensor;

determining impulse data based on the set of blast exposure data;

identifying at least one instance of false positive data within the set of blast exposure data;

classifying the at least one instance of false positive data from the set of blast exposure data;

accepting a remaining portion of the set of blast exposure data as real blast data that does not include the at least one instance of false positive data; and

identifying one or more blast related features from the set of blast exposure data.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

training a machine learning algorithm based on a set of historical blast exposure data comprising blast data from a plurality of blast sources.

3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising:

identifying a type of weapon associated with a blast source of the set of blast exposure data based on the one or more blast related features from the set of blast exposure data.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of blast exposure data is received from one or more body-mounted blast sensors.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

grouping two or more portions of the set of blast exposure data into a blast event data grouping based on the one or more blast related features.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

estimating an incident overpressure based on the set of blast exposure data.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining that the at least one instance of false positive data is associated with an electrical interference class; and

removing the at least one instance of false positive data associated with the electrical interference class from the set of blast exposure data.

8. One or more non-transitory computer-readable media storing computer-executable instructions that, when executed by at least one processor, perform a method for analyzing blast exposure data, the method comprising:

receiving a set of blast exposure data comprising pressure data over time from at least one blast sensor;

determining impulse data based on the set of blast exposure data;

identifying, using a machine learning algorithm, one or more instances of false positive data within the set of blast exposure data;

removing the one or more instances of false positive data from the set of blast exposure data;

accepting a remaining portion of the set of blast exposure data as real blast data that does not include false positive data and corresponds to a blast event; and

identifying one or more blast related features from the set of blast exposure data.

9. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 8 , the method further comprising:

training the machine learning algorithm to distinguish between real blast exposure data and false positive data, wherein the machine learning algorithm trained based on a set of historical blast exposure data comprising blast data from a plurality of blast sources.

10. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 8 , the method further comprising:

analyzing the remaining portion of the set of blast exposure data to identify a maximum incident overpressure for the blast event.

11. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 8 , the method further comprising:

analyzing the remaining portion of the set of blast exposure data to identify an incident peak overpressure impulse for the blast event.

12. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 8 , the method further comprising:

analyzing the remaining portion of the set of blast exposure data to identify a positive phase duration for the blast event.

13. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 8 , the method further comprising:

analyzing the remaining portion of the set of blast exposure data to identify an impulse for the blast event.

14. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 8 , the method further comprising:

determining, based on the set of blast exposure data, shock wave arrival time for the blast event.

15. A system for analyzing blast exposure data, the system comprising:

one or more body-mounted sensors that capture a set of blast exposure data, the one or more body-mounted sensors configured to be worn by a subject;

at least one processor; and

one or more non-transitory computer-readable media storing computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, perform a method of analyzing the blast exposure data, the method comprising:

receiving the set of blast exposure data from the one or more body-mounted sensors;

determining impulse data based on the set of blast exposure data;

identifying, using a machine learning algorithm, one or more instances of false positive data within the set of blast exposure data;

removing the one or more instances of false positive data from the set of blast exposure data;

accepting a remaining portion of the set of blast exposure data as real blast data that does not include false positive data; and

identifying one or more blast related features from the set of blast exposure data.

16. The system of claim 15 , further comprising:

a removable storage device configured to be coupled to the one or more body-mounted sensors and to store the set of blast exposure data.

17. The system of claim 15 , wherein the one or more body-mounted sensors are positioned with distinct orientations.

18. The system of claim 15 , the method further comprising:

identifying, using the machine learning algorithm, a type of weapon associated with a blast source of the set of blast exposure data based on the one or more blast related features from the set of blast exposure data.

19. The system of claim 15 , wherein the set of blast exposure data comprises a plurality of pressure traces captured by the one or more body-mounted sensors.

20. The system of claim 15 , wherein the one or more instances of false positive data are removed from the set of blast exposure data prior to further analyzing the set of blast exposure data.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 30, 2024
From: WIRI, SUTHEE; NEEDHAM, CHARLES E.; ORTLEY, DAVID J.; WAGNER, CHRISTINA DEVITO; WALILKO, TIM; GONZALES, ANDREA A.; WOFFORD, SARA T.
To: APPLIED RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Reel/Frame 067563/0081 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 17683808 · Mar 1, 2022
Related Publication 20240302234A1 · Sep 12, 2024
References Cited (37)
US 6178141B1 · Duckworth et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 11543316B2 · Wiri et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 12000747B2 · Willens et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20020003470A1 · Auerbach · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20100005571A1 · Moss et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20120170412A1 · Calhoun et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20150051847A1 · Angello et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150143875A1 · Wong et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160267763A1 · Allen et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170196497A1 · Ray et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170367627A1 · Brister et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20200265273A1 · Wei et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20220214124A1 · Leonhardt et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220317145A1 · Bartsch · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230080071A1 · Allen et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230144611A1 · Wiri et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230408325A1 · Wiri et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
CN 111024011A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
JP 20200064883 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
KR 1020110040648A · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017011811A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018093444A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
Przekwas, Andrzej, et al. “Fast-running tools for personalized monitoring of blast exposure in military training and operations.” Military medicine 186.8upplement_1 (2021): 529-536. [cited by examiner]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/826,631 Ex Parte Quayle Action issued Aug. 16, 2024. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Application 21890036.3, Extended Search Report, issued Sep. 9, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Peter Prince et al: “Deploying Acoustic Detection Algorithms on LowCost, Open-Source Acoustic Sensors for Environmental Monitoring”, Sensors, vol. 19, No. 3, Jan. 29, 2019 (Jan. 29, 2019 ), p. 553, XP055685440, DOI: 10.… [cited by applicant]
PCT Patent Application PCT/US2021/058000 International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued May 8, 2023. [cited by applicant]
PCT Patent Application PCT/US2023/014258 International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued Jun. 19, 2023. [cited by applicant]
PCT Patent Application PCT/US2023/023380 International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued Sep. 7, 2023. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/826,631 Non-Final Office Action issued Feb. 29, 2024. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/149,124 Non-Final Office Action issued Mar. 19, 2024. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/317,669 Non-Final Office Action issued Mar. 21, 2024. [cited by applicant]
PCT Patent Application PCT/US2024/27228 International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued Aug. 20, 2024. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/826,631 Notice of Allowance issued Oct. 8, 2024. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/149,124 Notice of Allowance issued Aug. 6, 2024. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/317,669 Notice of Allowance issued Aug. 7, 2024. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/944,513, Notice of Allowance issued Aug. 12, 2025. [cited by applicant]