IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,421,695
Granted Patent B2
US 12,421,695 · App. 18/454,678 · Granted Sep 23, 2025

Scraper control method having variable operating modes corresponding to operator experience levels

Inventor: Jake J. Baker (Dubuque, IA)
Assignee: Deere & Company
E02F9/264B60W40/105B60W50/0205B60W50/14E02F9/205B60W2050/0083B60W2050/143B60W2050/146B60W2300/17B60W2556/10
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,421,695
App. No.
18/454,678
Granted
Sep 23, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and method including a scraper may include an operator training routine using in-cylinder position sensing to notify the operator via an operator interface (e.g., mounted onboard display, smartphone, etc.) when they are doing something potentially damaging to one or more scraper components or otherwise injecting inefficiency into work operations. Audible and/or visual notifications may for example be enabled for operators of/below a specified skill level, for specified movement speeds, etc. In an embodiment, to utilize advanced automation capabilities of in-cylinder position sensing, a calibration sub-process is executed to specify a location of the ground plane. The scraper ground plane calibration is requested through an operator interface and prompts lowering of the blade to the ground. Once the blade is detected on the ground plane, e.g., using measured movement characteristics of the blade to determine that the blade has stopped, the in-cylinder position sensor reading is recorded.

Claims (44)

1. A computer-implemented operational training support method for a work unit comprising a work vehicle with an implement for working material, the method comprising:

identifying a current operating mode from at least a first operating mode and a second operating mode, wherein each operating mode corresponds to a respective operator skill level;

in at least the first operating mode, comprising an operator training routine:

monitoring input signals corresponding to current values of respective positions and/or work states for one or more actuators associated with working of material by the implement;

ascertaining one or more operational performance metrics for the positions and/or work states, or combinations thereof, of the one or more actuators based at least in part on the identified operating mode; and

automatically generating output signals to cause audible and/or visual alerts via an operator interface associated with the work vehicle, based on a comparison of the current values with respect to the operational performance metrics.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising monitoring a movement speed of the work vehicle, wherein the output signals to cause audible and/or visual alerts are disabled or enabled dependent on the movement speed of the work vehicle.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein a number of audible and/or visual alerts corresponding to a violation of at least a first operational performance metric is limited to a maximum number for a specified work cycle.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the output signals are automatically generated to cause audible and/or visual alerts based on a determined error condition from a plurality of available error conditions, wherein one or more models comprise identified correlations between respective error conditions and historical values of respective positions and/or work states for the one or more actuators.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the operational performance metrics are defined to enable the audible and/or visual alerts for at least the first operating mode and to disable the audible and/or visual alerts for at least the second operating mode.

6. The method of claim 4 , wherein the operator skill level is determined at least in part based upon historical data correlating the respective operator to one or more of the plurality of available error conditions.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

detecting a trigger for calibration of input signals from at least a first actuator;

responsive to the detected trigger, prompting an adjustment to a position associated with the at least first actuator, such that the implement is brought into contact with a ground plane; and

upon ascertaining that the implement is in contact with the ground plane, recording respective values corresponding to current input signals from the at least first actuator and calibrating the respective values to a ground plane setting.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein ascertaining that the implement is in contact with the ground plane comprises measuring a movement characteristic of the implement and detecting an end of the measured movement characteristic as the implement being in contact with the ground plane.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the adjustment is only prompted responsive to the detected trigger and to satisfying each of a plurality of preconditions corresponding to specified values of respective positions and/or work states for the one or more actuators.

10. A work unit comprising a self-propelled work vehicle and an implement for working material;

a first set of sensors configured to generate data corresponding to operating parameters of the work vehicle;

a second set of sensors configured to generate data corresponding to current values of respective positions and/or work states for one or more actuators associated with loading and/or unloading of material by the implement; and

a controller linked to receive the data from the first set of sensors and the second set of sensors, and configured to

identify a current operating mode from at least a first operating mode and a second operating mode, wherein each operating mode corresponds to a respective operator skill level; and

for at least the first operating mode, comprising an operator training routine:

ascertain one or more operational performance metrics for the positions and/or work states, or combinations thereof, of the one or more actuators based at least in part on the identified operating mode, and

automatically generate output signals to cause audible and/or visual alerts via an operator interface associated with the work vehicle, based on a comparison of the current values with respect to the operational performance metrics.

11. The work unit of claim 10 , wherein the work vehicle comprises a tractor configured to provide tractive force with respect to a scraper unit comprising a loading container and a scraper blade as the implement.

12. The work unit of claim 10 , wherein the work vehicle has integrated therewith a scraper unit comprising a loading container and a scraper blade as the implement.

13. The work unit of claim 10 , wherein the one or more actuators comprise respective hydraulic cylinder units configured through controllable extension and retraction thereof to drive movement of an ejector, a gate, and a loading container, and wherein the second set of sensors comprise at least one sensor residing in or upon each of the respective hydraulic cylinder units.

14. The work unit of claim 13 , wherein a number of audible and/or visual alerts corresponding to a violation of at least a first operational performance metric is limited to a maximum number for a specified work cycle.

15. The work unit of claim 13 , wherein the output signals are automatically generated to cause audible and/or visual alerts based on a determined error condition from a plurality of available error conditions, wherein one or more models comprise identified correlations between respective error conditions and at least historical values of respective positions and/or work states for the one or more actuators.

16. The work unit of claim 15 , wherein the operator skill level is determined at least in part based upon historical data correlating the respective operator to one or more of the plurality of available error conditions.

17. The work unit of claim 11 , wherein the controller is further configured to:

detect a trigger for calibration of input signals from at least a first actuator;

responsive to the detected trigger, to prompt an adjustment to a position associated with the at least first actuator, such that the implement is brought into contact with a ground plane; and

upon ascertaining that the implement is in contact with the ground plane, to record respective values corresponding to current input signals from the at least first actuator and calibrating the respective values to a ground plane setting.

18. The work unit of claim 17 , wherein ascertaining that the implement is in contact with the ground plane comprises measuring a movement characteristic of the implement and detecting an end of the measured movement characteristic as the implement being in contact with the ground plane.

19. The work unit of claim 18 , wherein the adjustment is only prompted responsive to the detected trigger and to satisfying each of a plurality of preconditions corresponding to specified values of respective positions and/or work states for the one or more actuators.

20. A system for operational training support with respect to a work unit comprising a work vehicle having an implement for working material, the system comprising:

one or more processors communicatively linked to an operator interface and one or more sensors associated with the work unit, and configured to:

identify a current operating mode from at least a first operating mode and a second operating mode, wherein each operating mode corresponds to a respective operator skill level; and

at least during the first operating mode, comprising an operator training routine:

monitor input signals from the one or more sensors corresponding to current values of respective positions and/or work states for one or more actuators associated with loading and/or unloading of material by the implement;

ascertain one or more operational performance metrics for the positions and/or work states, or combinations thereof, of the one or more actuators based at least in part on the identified operating mode; and

automatically generate output signals to cause audible and/or visual alerts via the operator interface, based on a comparison of the current values with respect to the operational performance metrics.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 24, 2023
From: BAKER, JAKE J.
To: DEERE & COMPANY
Reel/Frame 064691/0463 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20250067026A1 · Feb 27, 2025
References Cited (35)
US 5493798A · Rocke et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 6092863A · Hagenbuch et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6247538B1 · Takeda et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 7326023B2 · Hagenbuch · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7458428B2 · Laudick et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7934329B2 · Mintah et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8752372B2 · Ramler et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8948974B2 · Montocchio · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9074546B2 · Asami et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9187879B2 · Suk · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9221659B2 · Fukasu et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9342091B2 · Wuisan et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9347389B2 · Kawaguchi et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9415953B2 · Bonefas · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 9803324B2 · Kean et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9815479B2 · Stander et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9822509B1 · Chi et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9908385B2 · Chundrlik, Jr. et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10133994B2 · Nichols et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10479354B2 · Posselius et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10662613B2 · Ready-Campbell et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10968602B2 · Hendricks · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11591776B2 · Hageman · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11686067B2 · Veasy · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20120136524A1 · Everett et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20170233955A1 · Berning et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180035050A1 · Lu et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180170719A1 · Tasch et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180179732A1 · Bartsch et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20200042023A1 · Garvin · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200238881A1 · Hendricks · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200325653A1 · Hageman et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20220098828A1 · Stander · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230066877A1 · Peat et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
WO 2012157381A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]