IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,422,468
Granted Patent B2
US 12,422,468 · App. 18/220,318 · Granted Sep 23, 2025

Method of testing multi-panel user equipment with spherical coverage

Inventor: Thorsten Hertel (Santa Clara, CA)
Assignee: KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
G01R31/2822H04W24/10
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,422,468
App. No.
18/220,318
Granted
Sep 23, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods, and systems of testing mobile devices in a four downlink (DL) manner are described. Among other improvements, the methods and systems of the present teaching provide a practical way to provide testing of DUTs that reduces not only the complexity of a test of the DUT, but also the time, required floor space/chamber height of the test system, and equipment that are needed to complete the testing to certain requirements, such as set by a standard.

Claims (44)

1. A method for testing a communications device, the method comprising:

locating at least two first test probes adjacent to a device under test (DUT), the first test probe adapted to communicate and operate with the DUT with two signals having orthogonal polarization states;

locating a second test probe adjacent to the DUT, the second test probe being adapted to communicate with the DUT with two signals having orthogonal polarization states;

measuring a first communications value of each of the at least two first test probes;

selecting a best first communications value from the first communications values the at least two first test probes;

selecting the one of the at least two first test probes that provides the best first communication value to operate during the test; and

measuring a second communications value with the second test probe and the selected one of the at least two second test probes.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least two first test probes are disposed at fixed angular offsets from the second test probe, and the first test probe is disposed at a grid point on a sphere.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

after the measuring the second communications value, moving the DUT to a different orientation relative to the at least two first test probes and the second test probe;

measuring another first communications value of each of the at least two first test probes;

selecting another best first communications value from the throughputs of the at least two first test probes; and

measuring another second communications value with the second test probe.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first communications value is a throughput (TP) value, and the second communications value is an effective isotropic sensitivity (EIS).

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first communications value is a first EIS value, and the second communications value is a second EIS value.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, after the measuring the second communications value, adjusting a power level of the second test probe to reach until the second communications value reached a predefined level.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least two first test probes are disposed at predetermined distances from the second test probe and from one another.

8. A system for testing a communications device, comprising:

at least two first test probes disposed adjacent to a device under test (DUT), the at least two first test probe adapted to communicate with the DUT with two signals having orthogonal polarization states;

a second test probe disposed adjacent to the DUT, the second test probe being adapted to communicate with the DUT with two signals having orthogonal polarization states;

a processor;

a memory that stores instructions, which when executed by the processor, cause the processor to:

measure a first communications value of each of the at least two first test probes;

select a best first communications value from the first communications values the at least two first test probes;

select the one of the at least two first test probes that provides the best first communication value to operate during the test; and

measure a second communications value with the second test probe and the selected one of the at least two second test probes.

9. The system of claim 8 , wherein the at least two first test probes are disposed at fixed angular offsets from the second test probe, and the first test probe is disposed at a grid point on a sphere.

10. The system of claim 8 , wherein after the measuring the second communications value, the instructions further cause the processor to:

move the DUT to a different orientation relative to the at least two first test probes and the second test probe;

measure another first communications value of each of the at least two first test probes;

select another best first communications value from the throughputs of the at least two first test probes; and

measure another second communications value with the second test probe.

11. The system of claim 8 , wherein the first communications value is a throughput value, and the second communications value is an effective isotropic sensitivity (EIS) value.

12. The system of claim 8 , wherein the first communications value is a first EIS value, and the second communications value is a second EIS value.

13. The system of claim 8 , wherein the instructions further cause the processor to adjust a power level of the second test probe to reach a predefined level.

14. The system of claim 8 , wherein the at least two first test probes are disposed at predetermined distances from the second test probe and from one another.

15. A tangible, non-transitory computer readable medium that stores instructions, which when executed by a processor, cause the processor to:

measure a first communications value of each of at least two first test probes;

select a best first communications value from the first communications values of at least two first test probes;

select the one of the at least two first test probes that provides the best first communication value to operate during the test; and

measure a second communications value with a second test probe and the selected one of the at least two second test probes.

16. The tangible, non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the first communications value is a throughput (TP) value, and the second communications value is an effective isotropic sensitivity (EIS) value.

17. The tangible, non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the first communications value is a first EIS value, and the second communications value is a second EIS value.

18. The tangible, non-transitory computer readable medium system of claim 15 , wherein after the measuring the second communications value, the instructions further cause the processor to adjust a power level of the second test probe until the second communications value reached a predefined level.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 11, 2023
From: HERTEL, THORSTEN
To: KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 064252/0331 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63411387 · Sep 29, 2022
Related Publication 20240110971A1 · Apr 4, 2024
References Cited (17)
US 8760184B2 · Zelder · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 10122085B2 · Goyette et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10914774B2 · Rowell et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11381325B1 · Gruber · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11754609B2 · Kobayashi · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20150138026A1 · Shay · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20230160936A1 · Obermaier · 2023 [cited by examiner]
CN 112834833A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Joseph Timothy Foley et al., “Low-cost Antenna Positioning System Designed with Axiomatic Design”, MATEC Web of Conferences 127, 01015 (2017), pp. 1-7. [cited by applicant]
“Tailor-Made Antenna Measurement Systems” Smitek, 2019, pp. 1-30. [cited by applicant]
Gregory F. Masters et al., “Coordinate System Plotting for Antenna Measurements”, Computer Science, 2007, 1-10 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; NR; User Equipment (UE) conformance specification; Radio transmission and reception; Part 2: Range 2 Standalone (Release 16),” 3GP… [cited by applicant]
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; NR; Study on test methods (Release 16)”, 3GPP TR 38.810 V16.6.1 (Sep. 2020), pp. 1-171. [cited by applicant]
“WF on NR FR2 OTA testing enhancements,” 3GPP TSG-RAN WG4 Meeting # 104-e, R4-2214357 Electronic Meeting, Aug. 15-26, 2022, pp. 1-9. [cited by applicant]
“New SI: Study on NR frequency range 2 (FR2) Over-the-Air (OTA) testing enhancements,” 3GPP TSG RAN Meeting #95e, RP-220988, Electronic Meeting, Mar. 17-23, 2022, pp. 1-4. [cited by applicant]
“Revised WID: Requirement for NR frequency range 2 (FR2) multi-Rx chain DL reception,” 3GPP TSG RAN Meeting #96, RP-221753, Budapest, HU, Jun. 6-9, 2022, pp. 1-5. [cited by applicant]
Minu Jacob et al., “System for Positioning Antenna Elements of a Dut Within a Quiet Zone of an Antenna Test Chamber,” U.S. Appl. No. 17/896,569, filed Aug. 26, 2022, pp. 1-50. [cited by applicant]