IP Library Granted Patent US 12,423,714
Granted Patent B2
US 12,423,714 · App. 18/518,169 · Granted Sep 23, 2025

Method and device for authenticating provenance of wines and spirits

Inventor: Thomas Nolan Andelin (Springfield, VA)
Assignee: Provenance Technology Corporation
G06Q30/0185G06K19/0723G06K19/07722G06K19/07726G06K19/07728G06K19/07798
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,423,714
App. No.
18/518,169
Granted
Sep 23, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

In accordance with at least one aspect of this disclosure, a system for authenticating bottled goods includes, a near field communication (NFC) inlay having an electronic data component, a communication antenna, and a frangible circuit member configured to permanently alter the electronic data component upon breakage of the frangible circuit member, and a ferrite shield mounted to a second side of the NFC inlay proximate the communication antenna for allowing NFC interactions with the electronic data component through a first side of the NFC inlay opposite the second side of the NFC inlay.

Claims (61)

1. A system for authenticating bottled goods comprising:

a near field communication (NFC) inlay having an electronic data component, a communication antenna, and a frangible circuit member configured to permanently alter the electronic data component upon breakage of the frangible circuit member; and

a ferrite shield mounted to a second side of the NFC inlay proximate the communication antenna for allowing NFC interactions with the electronic data component through a first side of the NFC inlay opposite the second side of the NFC inlay.

2. The system as recited in claim 1 , further comprising:

a first liner mounted to a first side of the NFC inlay; and

a second liner mounted to the second side of the NFC inlay opposite the first liner.

3. The system as recited in claim 1 , further comprising:

a transfer mat directly contacting the first side of the NFC inlay;

a first adhesive layer adhering the first liner to the transfer mat;

wherein the ferrite shield is mounted directly to a first area of the second side of the NFC inlay; and

a second adhesive layer adhering the second liner to the ferrite shield and a second area of the second side of the NFC inlay.

4. The system as recited in claim 3 , further comprising a polymer capsule configured to be disposed over a metal capsule that is configured to cover a bottle opening, wherein the polymer capsule includes:

an inner capsule body defining a capsule axis and a receptacle opening and an end surface opposite the receptacle opening, wherein a sidewall of the inner capsule body connects the end surface to the receptacle opening; and

an outer capsule body disposed about the end surface and sidewall of the inner capsule body, wherein the ferrite shield and first area of the second side of the NFC inlay are positioned on the end surface of the inner capsule body between the inner capsule body and the outer capsule body with the ferrite shield being closer to the bottle top receptacle opening than the communication antenna.

5. The system as recited in claim 4 , wherein the frangible circuit member extends axially along the sidewall of the inner capsule body, between the inner capsule body and the outer capsule body, and further comprising:

an RFID (radio frequency identification) component between the inner capsule body and the outer capsule body, the RFID component extending around a first circumferential portion of the sidewall of the inner capsule body, within an axial length of the frangible circuit member but non-overlapping with the frangible circuit member circumferentially.

6. The system as recited in claim 5 , further comprising:

a bottle with liquid contents therein;

a stopper sealing an opening of the bottle; and

the metal capsule disposed over the stopper and a neck portion of the bottle, such that opening the metal capsule to access the stopper and liquid contents requires breaking the frangible circuit member.

7. A method comprising:

requesting a unique blockchain hash for a capsule for preserving provenance of a bottle of product; and

receiving the unique blockchain hash, and associating an NFC inlay of the capsule with the unique blockchain hash, by associating the unique blockchain hash with an NFT (non- fungible token) unique to the NFC.

8. The method as recited in claim 7 , further comprising:

receiving a product verification request signal from a producer of bottled products indicating creation of a bottle of product and mounting of the capsule to the bottle;

verifying correlation of the NFT and NFC inlay; and

issuing a product verification signal upon verifying correlation of the NFT and NFC inlay or issuing an error message upon failure to correlate the NFT and the NFC inlay.

9. The method as recited in claim 8 , further comprising:

receiving a consumer request for verification of the bottle of product bearing the NFC inlay;

sending a query to a block chain to verify a match between the NFT and NFC inlay to a valid unique blockchain hash; and

issuing a consumer verification response to the consumer, wherein the consumer verification response affirms authenticity of the bottle of product to the consumer if the NFT and NFC inlay are a valid match to the unique blockchain hash, and wherein the consumer verification response indicates inauthenticity of the bottle of product to the consumer otherwise.

10. The method as recited in claim 9 , further comprising appending to a ledger entry associated with the unique blockchain hash upon receiving the consumer request for verification of the bottle of product.

11. The method as recited in claim 10 , wherein appending to the ledger entry includes appending to the ledger entry geographic location corresponding to location from which the consumer request for verification is received, time of receipt of the consumer request for verification.

12. The method as recited in claim 11 , further comprising: receiving a signal indicative of breaking a frangible disconnect of a physical system for authenticating bottled goods; and permanently editing the ledger entry associated with the unique blockchain hash to indicate consumption of the bottle of product.

13. The method as recited in claim 8 , further comprising:

receiving a request for commercial verification from a commercial actor; and

issuing a commercial verification response to the commercial actor, wherein the commercial verification response affirms the authenticity of the bottle of product to the commercial actor if the request for commercial verification includes a valid match to the unique blockchain hash, and wherein the commercial verification response indicates inauthenticity of the bottle of product to the commercial actor if the request for commercial verification fails to include a valid match to the unique blockchain hash.

14. The method as recited in claim 13 , further comprising appending to a ledger entry associated with the unique blockchain hash upon receiving the request for commercial verification.

15. The method as recited in claim 14 , wherein appending to the ledger entry includes appending to the ledger entry geographic location corresponding to location from which the request for commercial verification is received, time of receipt of the request for commercial verification.

16. An authentication system configured to execute machine readable instructions on one or more devices to cause the one or more devices to perform a method, the method comprising:

requesting a unique blockchain hash for a capsule for preserving provenance of a bottle of product in response to receiving the product verification signal; and

receiving the unique blockchain hash and associating an NFC inlay of the capsule with the unique blockchain hash, by associating the unique blockchain hash with an NFT (non-fungible token) unique to the NFC inlay.

17. The system as reciting in claim 16 , wherein the method further includes:

receiving a product verification request signal from a producer of bottled products indicating creation of a bottle of product and mounting of the capsule to the bottle;

verifying correlation of the NFT and NFC inlay; and

issuing a product verification signal upon verifying correlation of the NFT and NFC inlay or issuing an error message upon failure to correlate the NFT and the NFC inlay.

18. The system as reciting in claim 17 , wherein the method further includes:

receiving a consumer request for verification of the bottle of product bearing the NFC inlay;

sending a query to a block chain to verify a match between the NFT and NFC inlay to a valid unique blockchain hash; and

issuing a consumer verification response to the consumer, wherein the consumer verification response affirms authenticity of the bottle of product to the consumer if the NFT and NFC inlay are a valid match to the unique blockchain hash, and wherein the consumer verification response indicates inauthenticity of the bottle of product to the consumer otherwise.

19. The system of claim 17 , wherein the method further includes:

appending to a ledger entry associated with the unique blockchain hash upon receiving the consumer request for verification of the bottle of product, wherein appending to the ledger includes appending to the ledger entry geographic location corresponding to location from which the consumer request for verification is received, time of receipt of the consumer request for verification;

receiving a signal indicative of breaking a frangible disconnect of a physical system for authenticating bottled goods; and

permanently editing the ledger entry associated with the unique blockchain hash to indicate consumption of the bottle of product.

20. The system as recited in claim 17 , wherein the method further includes:

receiving a request for commercial verification from a commercial actor and

issuing a commercial verification response to the commercial actor, wherein the commercial verification response affirms the authenticity of the bottle of product to the commercial actor if the request for commercial verification includes a valid match to the unique blockchain hash, and wherein the commercial verification response indicates inauthenticity of the bottle of product to the commercial actor if the request for commercial verification fails to include a valid match to the unique blockchain hash.

21. The system as recited in claim 19 , wherein the method further includes,

Appending to a ledger entry associated with the unique blockchain hash upon receiving the request for commercial verification, wherein appending to the ledger entry includes appending to the ledger entry geographic location corresponding to location from which the request for commercial verification is received, time of receipt of the request for commercial verification;

receiving a signal indicative of breaking a frangible disconnect of a physical system for authenticating bottled goods; and

permanently editing the ledger entry associated with the unique blockchain hash to indicate consumption of the bottle of product.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 15, 2024
From: ANDELIN, THOMAS NOLAN
To: PROVENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 066468/0225 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20250165991A1 · May 22, 2025
References Cited (92)
US 5297032A · Trojan · 1994 [cited by examiner]
US 5761442A · Barr · 1998 [cited by examiner]
US 5812988A · Sandretto · 1998 [cited by examiner]
US 6009402A · Whitworth · 1999 [cited by examiner]
US 6014645A · Cunningham · 2000 [cited by examiner]
US 6058379A · Odom · 2000 [cited by examiner]
US 6313833B1 · Knight · 2001 [cited by examiner]
US 6345090B1 · Walker · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 6954758B1 · O'Flaherty · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 7165037B2 · Lazarus · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 7376431B2 · Niedermeyer · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 8104678B2 · Yoshikawa · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US RE43435E · Krause · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 8219482B2 · Neri · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 8234201B1 · Canabarro · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 8412605B2 · Griffin · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8452681B2 · Clements · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8825456B2 · Vasudevan · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 9176789B2 · Lowes · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9760910B1 · Tuchman · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 10958211B1 · Sarwat · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 10977110B2 · Matei · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11516014B2 · Walker · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11542080B2 · Gaines et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20020161677A1 · Zumbach · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 20020184134A1 · Olsen · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 20030149648A1 · Olsen · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20050187854A1 · Cutler · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20050192899A1 · Reardon · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20060195391A1 · Stanelle · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20070244795A1 · Lutnick · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20080255910A1 · Bagchi · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080288326A1 · Abramowicz · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080288889A1 · Hunt · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080301019A1 · Monk · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20090024539A1 · Decker · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100023460A1 · Hughes · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100312701A1 · Bosch · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20110145149A1 · Valdes · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110178912A1 · Parsons · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110213731A1 · Cho · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110264581A1 · Clyne · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120029956A1 · Ghosh · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120030154A1 · Nicholson · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120278254A1 · Rosenthal · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120323764A1 · Boberski · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130024395A1 · Clark · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130226764A1 · Battyani · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140156491A1 · Koh · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140229353A1 · Lutnick · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150011962A1 · Roura Fernandez · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150108221A1 · Akamatsu · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150154284A1 · Pfeifer · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160172742A1 · Forster · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160314425A1 · Cunningham · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160371779A1 · Stearns · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20180047071A1 · Hsu · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180276522A1 · Coronado · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190260573A1 · Goto · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190318348A1 · Brenner · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190322426A1 · Verma et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190370716A1 · Kavumpurath · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190379642A1 · Simons · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200019288A1 · D'Amore · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200143367A1 · LeBeau · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200175623A1 · Howie · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200267163A1 · Wilson · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210110477A1 · Spangenberg · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210264520A1 · Cummings · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210284406A1 · McDonald · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210342662A1 · Balgañón Canela et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220058735A1 · Chuzhoy · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220084043A1 · Mickel et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220129980A1 · Son · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220309475A1 · Kurniawan · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220414726A1 · Kerber · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230116345A1 · Chirochangu · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230281604A1 · Robell · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230298117A1 · Barlow · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230419315A1 · Togame · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240106667A1 · Batcher · 2024 [cited by examiner]
CN 108446917A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 113200212A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 113362013A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 113955289A · 2022 [cited by applicant]
EP 3574842A2 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
EP 3671674A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
JP 2022542921A · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018197064A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021046609A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 13, 2025, issued during the prosecution of PCT-US2024-057035. [cited by applicant]
Neo C.K. Yiu, “An NFC-Enabled Anti-Counterfeiting System for Wine Industry”. Dept. of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, 32 pages. [cited by applicant]