IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,424,498
Granted Patent B2
US 12,424,498 · App. 17/413,523 · Granted Sep 23, 2025

System and method for modification of substrates

Inventors: Sidlgata V. Sreenivasan (Austin, TX); Shrawan Singhal (Austin, TX); Lawrence R. Dunn (Austin, TX)
Assignee: Board of Regents, The University of Texas System
H01L22/12G03F7/0002G03F7/16G05B13/042H01L21/31051
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,424,498
App. No.
17/413,523
Granted
Sep 23, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Various embodiments of the present technology generally relate to substrate planarization. More specifically, some embodiments of the present technology relate a versatile systems and methods for precision surface topography optimization known as planarization on nominally planar substrates. In some embodiments, a method for planarization of a patterned substrate using inkjets can determine the global and nanoscale topography and pattern information of the patterned substrate. Based upon the global and nanoscale topography and pattern information, a drop pattern can be determined and then dispensed on the patterned substrate. A gap between the patterned substrate and a superstrate causing the dispensed drops can be closed to form a substantially contiguous film. The substantially contiguous film can be cured and the superstrate can be separated from the patterned substrate with substantially contiguous film on the patterned substrate.

Claims (18)

1. A method for planarization of a patterned substrate using inkjets, the method comprising:

determining global and nanoscale topography and pattern information of the patterned substrate;

determining, based upon the global and nanoscale topography and the pattern information, a drop pattern;

dispensing the drop pattern on the patterned substrate;

closing a gap between the patterned substrate and a superstrate causing the dispensed drops to form a substantially contiguous film, wherein a thickness of the superstrate is designed to be spatially varying;

curing the substantially contiguous film; and

separating the superstrate and the patterned substrate from the substantially contiguous film on the patterned substrate.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the drop pattern is determined from a model of a process, an optimization scheme, and experimental data.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising loading a digital file encoded with data representing the global and nanoscale topography and the pattern information of the patterned substrate.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the drop pattern is computed using model-based optimization with inputs including the global and nanoscale topography and the pattern information, superstrate geometry, superstrate material properties, planarizing material properties, inkjet drop resolution, inkjet nozzle pitch, and tolerance information.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein a surface of the superstrate is substantially more convex than the surface of the substrate at a location of a spreading front.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the superstrate has a sacrificial film and the method further comprises, ablating the sacrificial film to initiate peeling to separate the superstrate from the substrate.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising prioritizing planarization performance in a sub-region of a semiconductor device die.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the sub-region of the semiconductor device die corresponds to a portion of the semiconductor device die where a highest lithographic resolution is needed during a subsequent lithography process.

9. The method of claim 7 , wherein the sub-region is aligned orthogonal to a scanning direction of a photolithography scanner during exposure, wherein the photolithography scanner is a downstream process whose focus benefits from a surface topography control.

10. The method of claim 7 , wherein the inkjet is aligned parallel to the sub-region.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the gap is closed at a first station and curing is performed at a second station.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein curing is performed at the end of a desired process time, where the desired process time is chosen to be high enough such that bubbles are substantially mitigated and low enough to prevent undesirable parasitics from affecting planarization performance.

Assignments (2)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Apr 7, 2025
From: UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS, AUSTIN OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATION
To: NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Reel/Frame 070762/0568 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 29, 2021
From: SREENIVASAN, SIDLGATA V; SINGHAL, SHRAWAN; DUNN, LAWRENCE R.
To: BOARD OF REGENTS, THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM
Reel/Frame 057020/0766 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62779091 · Dec 13, 2018
Related Publication 20220013417A1 · Jan 13, 2022
References Cited (27)
US 6982783B2 · Choi et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7307697B2 · GanapathiSubramanian et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7325206B2 · White et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 8394282B2 · Panga et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9415418B2 · Sreenivasan et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9718096B2 · Sreenivasan · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9865832B2 · Bibl et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9987653B2 · Sreenivasan et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20050241177A1 · Kolb et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20120006385A1 · Hassan et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20160351409A1 · Takahata · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170106399A1 · Sreenivasan et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170131640A1 · Sreenivasan · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170333940A1 · Sreenivasan · 2017 [cited by examiner]
TW 201003738A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017201431A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018027069A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
Second Notice of Reasons for Refusal for Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-534137 dated Jul. 26, 2024, pp. 1-2. [cited by applicant]
Reddy et al., “Dynamics of Low Capillary Number Interfaces Moving Through Sharp Features,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 17, 2005, pp. 1-6. [cited by applicant]
Snyder et al., “Automated Tuning of High-Order Waveforms for Picoliter Resolution Jetting of Rheologically Challenging Materials,” Precision Engineering, vol. 56, 2019, pp. 143-155. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2019/066207 dated Apr. 21, 2020, pp. 1-4. [cited by applicant]
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2019/066207 dated Apr. 21, 2020, pp. 1-8. [cited by applicant]
David Quere, “Wetting and Roughness,” Annual Review of Materials Research, vol. 38, 2008, pp. 71-99. [cited by applicant]
Reyssat et al., “Impalement of Fakir Drops,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 81, No. 2, Dec. 20, 2007, pp. 1-5. [cited by applicant]
Kusumaatmaja et al., “Anisotropic Drop Morphologies on Corrugated Surfaces,” Langmuir, vol. 24, No. 14, 2008, pp. 7299-7308. [cited by applicant]
Singhal et al., “Mechanics-Based Approach for Detection and Measurement of Particle Contamination in Proximity Nanofabrication Processes,” Journal of Micro- and Nano-Manufacturing, vol. 4, Sep. 2016, pp. 1-7. [cited by applicant]
Partial European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 19 896 567.5 dated Aug. 17, 2022, pp. 1-18. [cited by applicant]