IP Library Granted Patent US 12,426,952
Granted Patent B2
US 12,426,952 · App. 18/302,444 · Granted Sep 30, 2025

Prediction of postoperative global sagittal alignment based on full-body musculoskeletal modeling and posture optimization

Inventor: Dominika Ignasiak (San Diego, CA)
Assignee: Nuvasive Inc.
A61B34/10A61B34/25G06T7/0012A61B2034/105A61B2034/107A61B2034/303G06T2207/10124G06T2207/30012
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,426,952
App. No.
18/302,444
Granted
Sep 30, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system for surgical planning and assessment of spinal pathology or spinal deformity correction in a subject, the system comprises a control unit configured to align one or more vertebral bodies of a biomechanical model to one or more vertebral bodies of the radiograph. The control unit is configured to receive one or more spinal correction inputs. The control unit is configured to, based on the received one or more spinal correction inputs, simulate the biomechanical model in a predetermined posture. The control unit is configured to provide for display one or more characteristics of the simulated biomechanical model.

Claims (54)

1. A system for surgical planning of spinal pathology or spinal deformity correction in a subject, the system comprising:

one or more processors configured to:

create a musculoskeletal model having one or more vertebral bodies based on a radiograph of the subject;

receive one or more spinal correction inputs including an insertion of a simulated spinal implant between a plurality of vertebral bodies;

simulate the musculoskeletal model in a standing or sitting posture with the received inputs;

correct the musculoskeletal model based on the simulated musculoskeletal model

until a muscle effort criterion is satisfied, update the musculoskeletal model based on an output of an inverse dynamics simulation on the musculoskeletal model; and

after the muscle effort criterion has been satisfied, provide for display one or more characteristics of the updated musculoskeletal model,

wherein correct the musculoskeletal model includes simultaneously optimizing angles of thoracic and lumbar compensation at areas not fused by the spinal correction inputs.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more spinal correction inputs comprises one or more changes in intervertebral height and angle between the one or more vertebral bodies.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to:

determine that a posture optimality criterion has been satisfied by the updated musculoskeletal model.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein to update the musculoskeletal model based on the output of the inverse dynamics simulation on the musculoskeletal model includes:

an update of one or more variables of the musculoskeletal model, wherein the one or more variables include a variable selected from the group consisting of: a spino-pelvic parameter, a lumbar compensation variable, a thoracic compensation variable, a cervical compensation variable, a pelvic tilt variable, a hip flexion variable, a knee flexion variable, an ankle flexion variable, and a variable expressing a position of a body center of mass.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the musculoskeletal model includes one or more ligament parameters, and joint kinematics.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to generate a sagittal curvature of the musculoskeletal model based on positions of one or more vertebral bodies of the radiograph.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein to create the musculoskeletal model includes a modification of an existing musculoskeletal model to correspond to the subject's anatomy by one or more of: scale one or more vertebral bodies, adjust positioning of one or more vertebral bodies, and morph a simulated subject anatomy.

8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to:

simulate the updated musculoskeletal model based on a predetermined posture that includes a standing body posture.

9. The system of claim 8 , wherein the standing body posture is determined according to a position of a center of mass within the updated musculoskeletal model.

10. The system of claim 8 , wherein the predetermined posture includes a sitting posture.

11. A method for surgical planning and assessment of spinal deformity correction in a subject, the method comprising:

creating a musculoskeletal model based on a radiograph of the subject;

applying one or more spinal correction inputs to the musculoskeletal model including an insertion of a simulated spinal implant between a plurality of vertebral bodies;

simulating the musculoskeletal model in a standing or sitting posture with the received inputs, wherein the simulating includes performing inverse-inverse dynamics modelling

until a predicted muscle effort criterion has been satisfied, updating the musculoskeletal model based on an output of an inverse dynamics simulation on the musculoskeletal model; and

after the muscle effort criterion has been satisfied, providing for display one or more characteristics of the simulated and updated musculoskeletal model,

wherein updating the musculoskeletal model includes simultaneously optimizing angles of thoracic and lumbar compensation at areas not fused by the spinal correction inputs.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the one or more spinal correction inputs comprises one or more changes in intervertebral height and angle between one or more vertebral bodies.

13. The method of claim 11 , wherein the musculoskeletal model includes spino-pelvic parameters, ligament parameters, and joint kinematics parameters.

14. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

generating a sagittal curvature profile based on one or more vertebral bodies of the radiograph;

aligning the one or more vertebral bodies of the musculoskeletal model including modifying the musculoskeletal model to match the sagittal curvature profile; and

modifying the musculoskeletal model including one or more of scaling the one or more vertebral bodies, adjusting positioning of the one or more vertebral bodies, and morphing a simulated subject anatomy.

15. The method of claim 11 , wherein updating the musculoskeletal model based on the output of the inverse dynamics simulation on the model further includes:

updating one or more variables of the model, wherein the one or more variables include a variable selected from the group consisting of: a spino-pelvic parameter, a lumbar compensation variable, a thoracic compensation variable, a cervical compensation variable, a pelvic tilt variable, a hip flexion variable, a knee flexion variable, an ankle flexion variable, and a variable expressing a position of a body center of mass.

16. The method of claim 11 , wherein updating the musculoskeletal model based on the output of the inverse dynamics simulation on the musculoskeletal model further includes:

applying one or more logic parameters including any one of (i) maintaining a center of mass over the ankles, (ii) maintaining a constant horizontal gaze, (iii) standing in a posture where postural muscle energy is minimized, (iv) arm positioning matching the patient during imaging, (v) removing coronal plane deformity, or (vi) any combination of (i)-(v).

17. A non-transitory computer readable medium that includes instructions which, when executed, are configured to:

create a musculoskeletal model having one or more vertebral bodies based on a radiograph of the subject;

receive one or more spinal correction inputs including an insertion of a simulated spinal implant between a plurality of vertebral bodies;

simulate the musculoskeletal model in a standing or sitting posture with the received inputs;

correct the musculoskeletal model based on the one or more spinal correction inputs;

until a muscle effort criterion is satisfied, update the musculoskeletal model based on an output of an inverse dynamics simulation on the musculoskeletal model; and

after the muscle effort criterion has been satisfied, provide for display one or more characteristics of the updated musculoskeletal model,

wherein correct the musculoskeletal model includes simultaneously optimizing angles of thoracic and lumbar compensation at areas not fused by the spinal correction inputs.

18. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 17 , where the instructions which, when executed, are further configured to:

generate a sagittal curvature profile based on one or more vertebral bodies of the radiograph;

align the one or more vertebral bodies of the musculoskeletal model including modifying the musculoskeletal model to match the sagittal curvature profile; and

modify the musculoskeletal model that includes one or more of a scale of the one or more vertebral bodies, adjust positioning of the one or more vertebral bodies, and morph a simulated subject anatomy.

19. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 17 , where the instructions which, when executed, are further configured to:

determine that a posture optimality criterion has been satisfied by the updated musculoskeletal model.

20. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 17 , where the instructions which, when executed, are further configured to:

simulate the updated musculoskeletal model based on a predetermined posture.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 15, 2023
From: IGNASIAK, DOMINIKA
To: NUVASIVE, INC.
Reel/Frame 063640/0091 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 16742866 · Jan 14, 2020
Provisional Application 62792349 · Jan 14, 2019
Related Publication 20230248440A1 · Aug 10, 2023
References Cited (131)
US 7346382B2 · McIntyre et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 9861446B2 · Lang · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 11207135B2 · Schmidt · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11311222B2 · Wybo · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11666384B2 · Ignasiak · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11707324B2 · Hobeika · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20050043660A1 · Stark et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060074292A1 · Thomson · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20070172797A1 · Hada · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070288064A1 · Butson et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080009773A1 · Harrison · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20090287271A1 · Blum et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100030232A1 · Zehavi · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100191071A1 · Anderson et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100295848A1 · Grewer · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20110054870A1 · Dariush et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120014580A1 · Blum et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120041562A1 · Shachar et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120265268A1 · Blum et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130131486A1 · Copf · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130173240A1 · Koell et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130218163A1 · Frey · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130325069A1 · Pereiro de Lamo et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140228860A1 · Steines · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140244220A1 · McKinnon · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150100091A1 · Tohmeh et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160012753A1 · Mehdian · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160117817A1 · Seel · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160157751A1 · Mahfouz · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160235479A1 · Mosnier et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160242857A1 · Scholl · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160270772A1 · Beale et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160354161A1 · Dietz · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170135770A1 · Scholl et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170231710A1 · Scholl et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170252107A1 · Turner · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170367738A1 · Scholl et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20190108319A1 · Yamada · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190108645A1 · Ben-Yishai · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190149797A1 · Casas · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190192226A1 · Lang · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200015911A1 · Yi · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210244447A1 · Schroeder · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220013211A1 · Steinberg · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220125535A1 · Janna · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220142562A1 · Alanay · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220189047A1 · Lev-Tov · 2022 [cited by examiner]
CN 1757035A · 2006 [cited by examiner]
CN 109952070A · 2019 [cited by examiner]
CN 109984840A · 2019 [cited by examiner]
JP 2009542327A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2015502766A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019500185A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019514450A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015054543 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015195843 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017064719 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017127838 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018155894 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
Gibson et al (“Development of a Human Spine Simulation System” Book, Advances in Therapeutic Engineering) (Year: 2012). [cited by examiner]
Dao et al (“Multimodal medical imaging (CT and dynamic MRI) data and computer-graphics multi-physical model for the estimation of patient specific lumbar spine muscle forces”, Book Data & Knowledge Engineering vols. 96-… [cited by examiner]
Ahmadi et al., “Kinematic analysis of dynamic lumbar motion in patients with lumbar segmental instability using digital ideofluoroscopy”, European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the E… [cited by applicant]
Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society 18, 2009, pp. 1677-1685. [cited by applicant]
Ailon et al., “Adult Spinal Deformity Surgeons Are Unable to Accurately Predict Postoperative Spinal Alignment Using Clinical Judgment Alone.”, International Spine Study, G., 2016, Spine Deform 4, pp. 323-329. [cited by applicant]
Ames et al., “Impact of spinopelvic alignment on decision making in deformity surgery in adults: A review.”, J Neurosurg Spine 16, 2012, pp. 547-564. [cited by applicant]
AnyBody Publication List, located online on Sep. 29, 2022 at: https://anybodytech.com/resources/anybodypublications/, 90 pages. [cited by applicant]
AnyBody Technology, “ARO Medical breaks the degenerative spiral”, ARO Medical, Version 1.3, Nov. 20, 2013, 1 page. [cited by applicant]
AnyScript.org—Wiki: AnyScript Support Wiki, Main Page, located online on the Wayback Machine on Sep. 29, 2022 at: https://web.archive.org/web/2016022423555/http://wiki.anyscript.org:80/index.php/Main_Page, page last mod… [cited by applicant]
Bae et al., “Impact of Fatigue on Maintenance of Upright Posture: Dynamic Assessment of Sagittal Spinal Deformity Parameters After Walking 10 Minutes”, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2017, 42, pp. 733-739. [cited by applicant]
Banno et al., “Assessment of the Cross-Sectional Areas of the Psoas Major and Multifidus Muscles in Patients With Adult Spinal Deformity: A Case-Control Study”, Clin Spine Surg 30, 2017, pp. E968-E973. [cited by applicant]
Bendilz et al., “Regarding loads after spinal fusion, every level should be seen separately: a musculoskeletal analysis”, Eur Spine J, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Boissiere et al., “Lumbar spinal muscles and spinal canal study by MRI three-dimensional reconstruction in adult lumbar spinal stenosis.”, Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103, 2017, pp. 279-283. [cited by applicant]
Bruno et al., “Spinal Loading Patterns from Biomechanical Modeling Explain the High Incidence of Vertebral Fractures in the Thoracolumbar Region”, Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the Americ… [cited by applicant]
Bruno et al., “The effect of thoracic kyphosis and sagittal plane alignment on vertebral compressive loading.”, Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Res… [cited by applicant]
Claus et al., “Different ways to balance the spine: subtle changes in sagittal spinal curves affect regional muscle activity”, Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34, 2009, pp. E208-E214. [cited by applicant]
Crawford et al., “Change in fatty infiltration of lumbar multifidus, erector spinae, and psoas muscles in asymptomatic adults of Asian or Caucasian ethnicities”, European spine journal: official publication of the Europ… [cited by applicant]
Damsgaard et al., “Analysis of musculoskeletal systems in the AnyBody Modeling System”, Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 14, 2006, pp. 1100-1111. [cited by applicant]
De Zee et al., “A detailed rigid-body cervical spine model based on inverse dynamics”, Journal of Biomechanics 40, Supplement 2, 2007a, p. S284. [cited by applicant]
De Zee et al., “A generic detailed rigid-body lumbar spine model”, J Biomech 40, 2007b, pp. 1219-1227. [cited by applicant]
Dendorfer, et al., Report 21385/08/NL/PA, 2008. [cited by applicant]
Diebo et al., “Recruitment of compensatory mechanisms in sagittal spinal malalignment is age and regional deformity dependent: a full-standing axis analysis of key radiographical parameters”, Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40, 2… [cited by applicant]
Dijkstra et al., “Prediction of postural strategies”, Gait and Posture 42, 2015, pp. S99-S100. [cited by applicant]
Erdemir et al., “Model-based estimation of muscle forces exerted during movements”, Clinical Biomechanics {Bristol, Avon) 22,2007, pp. 131-154. [cited by applicant]
Farahani et al., “Human arm posture prediction in response to isometric endpoint forces”, J Biomech 48, 2015a, pp. 1178-4184. [cited by applicant]
Farahani et al., “Optimization-based dynamic prediction of kinematic and kinetic patterns for a human vertical jump from a squatting position”, Mullibody System Dynamics 36, 2015b, pp. 37-65. [cited by applicant]
Farahani et al., “Prediction of the movement patterns for human squat jumping using the inverse-inverse dynamics technique.”, XIII International Symposium on Computer Simulation in Biomechanics, 2011, 2 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Fukui, et al., “Biomechanical Analysis of Influence of Spinal Fixation on Inlervertebral Joint Force by Using Musculoskelelal Model”, ICBME. [cited by applicant]
Glassman et al., “Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis”, Spine 30, 2005a, pp. 682-688. [cited by applicant]
Glassman et al., “Sagittal balance is more than just alignment: why PJK remains an unresolved problem.”, Scoliosis Spinal Disord 11, 2016, p. 1. [cited by applicant]
Glassman et al., “The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity”, Spine 30, 2005b, pp. 2024-2029. [cited by applicant]
Ignasiak et al., “A rigid thorax assumption affects model loading predictions at the upper but not lower lumbar levels”, Journal of Biomechanics 49, 2016b, pp. 3074-3078. [cited by applicant]
Ignasiak et al., “Multi-segmental thoracic spine kinematics measured dynamically in the young and elderly during flexion”, Human movement science 54, 2017, pp. 230-239. [cited by applicant]
Ignasiak et al., “The effect of muscle ageing and sarcopenia on spinal segmental loads”, Eur Spine J., 2018b. [cited by applicant]
Ignasiak et al., “The influence of spinal fusion length on proximal junction biomechanics: a parametric computational study”, Eur Spine J., 2018a. [cited by applicant]
Ignasiak et al., “Thoracolumbar spine model with articulated ribcage for the prediction of dynamic spinal loading.”, Journal of biomechanics 49, 2016a, pp. 959-966. [cited by applicant]
Intolo et al., “The effect of age on lumbar range of motion: a systematic review”, Manual therapy 14, 2009, pp. 596-604. [cited by applicant]
Jalai et al., “The impact of obesity on compensatory mechanisms in response to progressive sagittal malalignment”, Spine J 17, 2017, pp. 681-688. [cited by applicant]
Kasai et al., “Sex- and age-related differences in mid-thigh composition and muscle quality determined by computed tomography in middle-aged and elderly Japanese”, Geriatr Gerontol Int 15, 2015, pp. 700-706. [cited by applicant]
Klein et al., “Morphological muscle and joint parameters for musculoskeletal modelling of the lower extremity.”, Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 22, 2007, pp. 239-247. [cited by applicant]
Lafage et al., “Changes in thoracic kyphosis negatively impact sagittal alignment after lumbar pedicle subtraction osleotomy: a comprehensive radiographic analysis”, Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37, International Spine Study, … [cited by applicant]
Lafage et al., “Defining the Role of the Lower Limbs in Compensating for Sagittal Malalignment”, Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42, 2017b, pp. E1282-E1288. [cited by applicant]
Lafage et al., “Multicenler validation of a formula predicting postoperative spinopelvic alignment”, J Neurosurg Spine 16, 2012b, pp. 15-21. [cited by applicant]
Lafage et al., “Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination: two key radiographic parameters in the selling of adults with spinal deformity”, Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34, 2009, pp. E599-E606. [cited by applicant]
Lafage et al., “Self-learning computers for surgical planning and prediction of postoperative alignment”, Eur Spine J 27, 2018, pp. 123-128. [cited by applicant]
Lafage et al., “Spino-pelvic parameters after surgery can be predicted: a preliminary formula and validation of standing alignment”, Spine 36, 2011, pp. 1037-1045. [cited by applicant]
Lafage et al., “Virtual Modeling of Postoperative Alignment Following Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD) Surgery Helps Predict associations between Compensatory Spinopelvic Alignment Changes, Overcorrection and Proximal Junct… [cited by applicant]
Malakoutian et al., “Role of muscle damage on loading at the level adjacent to a lumbar spine fusion: a biomechanical analysis”, European Spine Journal 25, 2016, pp. 2929-2937. [cited by applicant]
Ota et al., “Age-related changes in the thickness of the deep and superficial abdominal muscles in women”, Arch Geronlol Geriatr 55, 2012, pp. e26-e30. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability in International Application PCT/US2020/013578, mailed Jul. 29, 2021, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application PCT/US2020/013578, mailed Apr. 30, 2020, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ploumis et al., “Ipsilaleral atrophy of paraspinal and psoas muscle in unilateral back pain patients with monosegmenlal degeneralive disc disease”, Br J Radiol 84, 2011, pp. 709-713. [cited by applicant]
Protopsaltis et al., “The Lumbar Pelvic Angle (LPA), the Lumbar Component of the T1 Pelvic Angle, Correlates with HRQOL, PI-LL Mismatch and it Predicts Global Alignment”, Spine (Phila Pa 1976) International Spine Study,… [cited by applicant]
Protopsaltis et al., “The T1 pelvic angle, a novel radiographic measure of global sagittal deformity, accounts for both spinal inclination and pelvic tilt and correlates with health-related quality of life”, J Bone Join… [cited by applicant]
Putzer et al., “A numerical study to determine the effect of ligament stiffness on kinematics of the lumbar spine during flexion”, BMC Musculoskelel Disord 17, 2016, p. 95. [cited by applicant]
Rasmussen et al., “A General Method for Scaling Musculo-Skeletal Models.” In International Symposium on Computer Simulation in Biomechanics. United States. [cited by applicant]
Saha et al., “The effect of trunk-flexed postures on balance and metabolic energy expenditure during standing.”, Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32, 2007, pp. 1605-1611. [cited by applicant]
Scheer et al., “Development of Validated Computer-based Preoperative Predictive Model for Proximal Junction Failure (PJF) or Clinically Significant PJK With 86% Accuracy Based on 510 ASD Patients With 2-year Follow-up.”… [cited by applicant]
Schmidt et al., “The stiffness of lumbar spinal motion segments with a high-intensity zone in the anulus fibrosus”, Spine 23, 1998, pp. 2167-2173. [cited by applicant]
Schwab et al., “Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery”, Spine 35, 2010, pp. 2224-2231. [cited by applicant]
Schwab et al., “Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis”, International Spine Study, G., Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38, 2013, pp. E803… [cited by applicant]
Senteler et al., “Fusion angle affects intervertebral adjacent spinal segment joint forces—Model-based analysis of patient specific alignment”, J Orthop Res 35, 2017, pp. 131-139. [cited by applicant]
Senteler et al., “Pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch results in increased segmental joint loads in the unfused and fused lumbar spine”, Eur Spine J 23, 2014, pp. 1384-1393. [cited by applicant]
Silder et al., “Identification of passive elastic joint moment-angle relationships in the lower extremity”, J Biomech 40, 2007, pp. 2628-2635. [cited by applicant]
Teyhen et al., “Fluoroscopic video to identify aberrant lumbar motion”, Spine 32, 2007, pp. E220-E229. [cited by applicant]
Uribe et al., “Finite element analysis of lordosis restoration with anterior longitudinal ligament release and lateral hyperlordotic cage placement”, Eur Spine J 24 Suppl 3, 2015, pp. 420-426. [cited by applicant]
Van der Helm, “A finite element musculoskeletal model of the shoulder mechanism”, J Biomech 27, 1994, pp. 551-569. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., “Quantitative MRI and X-ray analysis of disc degeneration and paraspinal muscle changes in degenerative spondylolisthesis”, Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation 28, 2015, pp. 277-285. [cited by applicant]
Wilke et al., “In vitro analysis of the segmental flexibility of the thoracic spine”, PloS one 12, e0177823, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Wong et al., “Continuous dynamic spinal motion analysis”, Spine 31, 2006, pp. 414-419. [cited by applicant]
Wong et al., “The flexion-extension profile of lumbar spine in 100 healthy volunteers”, Spine 29, 2004, pp. 1636-1641. [cited by applicant]
Yagi et al., “The paravertebral muscle and psoas for the maintenance of global spinal alignment in patient with degenerative lumbar scoliosis”, Spine J 16, 2016, pp. 451-458. [cited by applicant]
Cited By (1)
US 12,661,239