IP Library Granted Patent US 12,435,263
Granted Patent B2
US 12,435,263 · App. 18/664,761 · Granted Oct 7, 2025

Treatment fluids for acid stimulation operations and methods related thereto

Inventors: Rajesh Kumar Saini (Cypress, TX); Mohammed Sayed (Katy, TX); Amy J. Cairns (Houston, TX)
Assignee: SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
C09K8/74E21B43/16E21B43/26
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,435,263
App. No.
18/664,761
Granted
Oct 7, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Treatment fluids for acid stimulation operations and methods related thereto. Treatment fluids comprise: an aqueous acid solution comprising a mineral acid and an organic acid; and a retardation additive comprising: 1-15 wt % of an oleaginous liquid; 5-30 wt % of a fatty alkyl alcohol ethoxylate; 2-40 wt % of at least one of a fatty alkyl ethoxylated ammonium salt, a zwitterionic surfactant, an alkyl ether sulfate salt, or an alkyl ether sulfonate salt; 4-30 wt % of a co-solvent; and 10-85 wt % of an aqueous fluid, each wt % based on a total mass of the retardation additive. Treatment fluids or retardation additives may be oil-in-water emulsions. Treatment fluids may have 0.5-5 gallons per thousand, based on an overall volume of the treatment fluid of the retardation additive. Methods comprise providing and introducing the treatment fluid into a subterranean formation during a stimulation operation.

Claims (17)

1. A treatment fluid comprising:

an aqueous acid solution comprising a mineral acid and an organic acid; and

a retardation additive, wherein the retardation additive comprises:

1 wt % to 15 wt % of an oleaginous liquid;

5 wt % to 30 wt % of a fatty alkyl alcohol ethoxylate;

2 wt % to 40 wt % of at least one of an alkyl ether sulfate salt;

4 wt % to 30 wt % of a co-solvent; and

10 wt % to 85 wt % of an aqueous fluid, each wt % based on a total mass of the retardation additive, and wherein the retardation additive has a volume concentration in the treatment fluid of 0.5 gallons per thousand (gpt) to 5 gpt, based on an overall volume of the treatment fluid, and,

wherein the treatment fluid forms an oil-in-water emulsion.

2. The treatment fluid of claim 1 , wherein the mineral acid comprises 10 wt % to 30 wt % hydrochloric acid solution, by total weight of the hydrochloric acid solution, wherein the organic acid comprises methane sulfonic acid, glutamic acid diacetate, or any combination thereof, and wherein the organic acid comprises an organic acid solution with an acid concentration of 10 wt % to 80 wt %, by total weight of the organic acid solution.

3. The treatment fluid of claim 1 , wherein the mineral acid comprises a mineral acid solution and the organic acid comprises an organic acid solution, and wherein the mineral acid solution and the organic acid solution are in a ratio of 9:1 to 1:1, by volume of the solutions.

4. The treatment fluid of claim 1 , wherein the oleaginous liquid comprises a terpene, a hydrocarbon, a fatty acid ester, or any combination thereof.

5. The treatment fluid of claim 1 , wherein the fatty alkyl alcohol ethoxylate comprises a linear or branched C 6 -C 18 alcohol ethoxylate comprising 3 to 30 ethoxylate repeat units.

6. The treatment fluid of claim 1 , wherein the fatty alkyl ethoxylated ammonium salt is present and comprises at least one functionalized alkyl group having 3 to 30 ethoxylate repeat units.

7. The treatment fluid of claim 1 , wherein the zwitterionic surfactant is present and comprises a C 12 -C 18 betaine, a C 12 -C 18 sultaine, or any combination thereof.

8. The treatment fluid of claim 1 , wherein the alkyl ether sulfate salt or the alkyl ether sulfonate salt is present and comprises an ammonium salt.

9. The treatment fluid of claim 1 , wherein the co-solvent comprises an alcohol, a glycol, a glycol ether, a glycol ester, or any combination thereof.

Assignments (5)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 28, 2025
From: SAUDI ARAMCO UPSTREAM TECHNOLOGY COMPANY
To: SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
Reel/Frame 071235/0170 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 2, 2025
From: ARAMCO SERVICES COMPANY
To: SAUDI ARAMCO UPSTREAM TECHNOLOGY COMPANY
Reel/Frame 070716/0110 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 12, 2024
From: SAUDI ARAMCO UPSTREAM TECHNOLOGY COMPANY
To: SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
Reel/Frame 067972/0109 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 12, 2024
From: ARAMCO SERVICES COMPANY
To: SAUDI ARAMCO UPSTREAM TECHNOLOGY COMPANY
Reel/Frame 067972/0025 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 15, 2024
From: SAINI, RAJESH KUMAR; SAYED, MOHAMMED; CAIRNS, AMY J.
To: ARAMCO SERVICES COMPANY
Reel/Frame 067421/0313 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63601653 · Nov 21, 2023
Related Publication 20250163314A1 · May 22, 2025
References Cited (22)
US 20100071957A1 · Huang · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20170152432A1 · Vo · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170362489A1 · Jackson · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180244980A1 · Daeffler · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190382649A1 · Jiang · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200270514A1 · Gomaa · 2020 [cited by examiner]
Dasgupta et al., “Reservoir characterization of Permian Khuff-C carbonate in the supergiant Ghawar field of Saudi Arabia,” The Leading Edge 20(7), 706-717, 2001. [cited by applicant]
Rae et al., “Matrix acid stimulation—A review of the art,” SPE 82260, 2003, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Penny et al., “The application of microemulsion additives in drilling and stimulation results in enhanced gas production,” SPE 94274, 2005, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Longeron et al., “Drilling fluids filtration and permeability impairment: Performance evaluation of various mud formulations,” SPE 48988, 1998, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Culec, “Effect of drilling fluids on rock surface properties” SPE 15707, 1989, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Audibert-Hayet et al., “Surfactant system for water-based well fluids,” Colloidal and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects vol. 288 (1), 113-120 (2006). [cited by applicant]
Cawiezel et al., “The selection and optimization of a surfactant package to maximize cleanup of high-density fracturing fluid,” SPE 136812-MS, 2010, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kaufman et al., “Critical Evaluations of Additives Used in Shale Slickwater Fracs,” SPE 119900, 2008, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Galindo et al., “Evaluation of environmentally acceptable surfactants for application as flowback aids,” SPE 164122, 2013, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., “Unique flow-back chemistry for enhancing productivity of low permeability reservoir,” IADC/SPE 155505, 2012, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Al-Anazi et al., “Use of nanoemulsion surfactants during hydraulic fracturing treatments,” SPE-171911-MS, 2014, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Mahmoudkhani et al., “Microemulsion as flowback aids for enhanced oil and gas recovery after fracturing, myth or reality: A turnkey study to determine the features and benefits,” SPE-173729-MS, 2015, 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kim et al., “Choosing Surfactants for the Eagle Ford Shale Formation: Guidelines for Maximizing Flowback and Initial Oil Recovery,” SPE-180227-MS, 2016, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Himes et al., “Improved Method to Evaluate Flowback Additives for Frac Fluids Used in Unconventional Reservoirs,” SPE-187200-MS, 2017, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Nelson et al., “A novel high throughput screening approach for flowback aid optimization,” SPE-189552-MS, 2018, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Yue et al., “Multifunctional fracturing additives as flowback aids,” SPE-181383-MS, 2016, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]