IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,440,310
Granted Patent B2
US 12,440,310 · App. 18/056,817 · Granted Oct 14, 2025

Method for simulating dental images that include tooth roots

Inventors: Daniel Abraham (Raanana, IL); Chen Porat (Kiryat Tivon, IL)
A61C7/002G06T7/10G06T7/70G06T2207/10081G06T2207/10116G06T2207/30036
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,440,310
App. No.
18/056,817
Granted
Oct 14, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computer-implemented method for monitoring teeth position during treatment includes segmenting three-dimensional dental X-ray image data of teeth in a first treatment state and segmenting optical-scan (OS) image data of the teeth in a second treatment state. The position and orientation of each segmented X-ray crown is compared with the position and orientation of each segmented OS crown to determine any relative position differences and any relative orientation differences. Each segmented X-ray root is repositioned and/or reoriented according to the relative position differences and/or any relative orientation differences, if any, between the corresponding segmented OS and X-ray crowns. The OS crown and the X-ray root are then fused so simulate the roots in the second treatment state without exposing the patient to additional radiation.

Claims (21)

1. A computer-implemented method for monitoring teeth position during treatment, comprising:

(a) segmenting three-dimensional dental X-ray image data of teeth in a first treatment state to produce segmented X-ray crowns and segmented X-ray roots, each segmented X-ray crown associated with a respective segmented X-ray root;

(b) segmenting optical-scan (OS) image data of the teeth in a second treatment state to produce segmented OS crowns;

(c) comparing, for each tooth, a position and an orientation of each segmented X-ray crown with a position and an orientation of a respective segmented OS crown;

(d) determining, for each tooth, any relative position differences and any relative orientation differences of each segmented X-ray crown relative to the respective segmented OS crown;

(e) for each tooth in which at least one of a relative position difference or a relative orientation difference of a corresponding segmented X-ray crown is determined in step (d), changing at least one of a position or an orientation of the respective segmented X-ray root according to the relative position difference or the relative orientation difference of the corresponding segmented X-ray crown;

(f) for each tooth in which the corresponding segmented X-ray crown has the same relative position and the same relative orientation relative to the respective segmented OS crown, maintaining the position and the orientation of the respective segmented X-ray root.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the three-dimensional dental X-ray image data comprise cone-beam computer tomography data.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the OS segmented crowns are second segmented OS crowns,

the OS image data are first OS image data,

the hybrid image data are second hybrid image data, and

the method further comprises:

(h) segmenting first OS image data of the dentition in the first treatment state to produce first segmented OS crowns;

(i) registering, for each tooth, each segmented X-ray crown with a respective first segmented OS crown; and

(j) after step (i), fusing each first segmented OS crown with the corresponding segmented X-ray root to form first hybrid image data that simulates the roots of the teeth in the first treatment state.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the OS image data comprise intra-oral scan image data.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the OS image data represent an optical scan of a mechanical mold of the dentition.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising graphically indicating each difference determined in step (d).

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising displaying, on a display screen coupled to the computer, fused teeth using the hybrid image data.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: (g) fusing, for each tooth, the segmented OS crown from step (b) with the corresponding segmented X-ray root whose position and orientation were determined in step (e) or maintained in step (f) to form hybrid image data that simulates the roots of the teeth in the second treatment state.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 5, 2023
From: PORAT, CHEN; ABRAHAM, DANIEL
To: ORCA DENTAL AI LTD.
Reel/Frame 063231/0333 →
Continuity (3)
Provisional Application 63280702 · Nov 18, 2021
Provisional Application 63280706 · Nov 18, 2021
Related Publication 20230149128A1 · May 18, 2023
References Cited (33)
US 8977339B1 · Wu et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 10010299B2 · Tsuji · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10049457B2 · Abraham et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10460839B1 · Ricci · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20080172386A1 · Ammar et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090003667A1 · Cheng et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20130209961A1 · Rubbert et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20150186748A1 · Cootes et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160038092A1 · Golay · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160063720A1 · Han et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160183866A1 · Tsuji · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160203604A1 · Gupta et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20190148005A1 · Domracheva · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190328489A1 · Capron-Richard et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200175678A1 · Abraham et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200320685A1 · Anssari Moin · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210153976A1 · Chen · 2021 [cited by examiner]
JP 2017143873A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2008150840A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016032397A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020141366A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021215582A1 · 2021 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2022011342A1 · 2022 [cited by examiner]
International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/IB2022/000695, dated Mar. 14, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Miki et al. “Tooth Labeling in Cone-Beam CT Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Forensic Identification.” SPIE Medical Imaging, Mar. 3, 2017, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
L. Wolf et al., “Automatic Cephalometric Evaluation of Patients Suffering from Sleep-Disordered Breathing”, Tel Aviv University, www.cs.tau.ac.il/˜wolf/papers/ceph.pdf. [cited by applicant]
C. Lindner et al., “Fully automatic cephalometric evaluation using Random Forest regression-voting”, p. 1-8, University of Manchester, http://personalpages.manchester.ac.uk/staff/claudia.lindner/_publications/lindner_is… [cited by applicant]
C. Lindner et al., “Robust and Accurate Shape Model Matching using Random Forest Regression-Voting”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Sep. 2015, p. 1862-74, 37(9), IEEE. [cited by applicant]
C. Lindner et al., “Fully Automatic Segmentation of the Proximal Femur Using Random Forest Regression Voting”, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2013, p. 1-11, IEEE, http://personalpages.manchester.ac.uk/staff/claud… [cited by applicant]
Wikipedia, “Deep Learning—Wikipedia”, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_learning. [cited by applicant]
Leonardi et al., “An Evaluation of Cellular Neural Networks for the Automatic Identification of Cephalometric Landmarks on Digital Images”, Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, vol. 2009, Article ID 717102, 2009, 1… [cited by applicant]
El-Feghi et al., “Automatic localization of craniofacial landmarks using multi-layer perceptron as a function approximator”, Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 27, 2006, pp. 544-550. [cited by applicant]
Pei et al., “Anatomical Structure Sketcher for Cephalograms by Bimodal Deep Learning”, Proc. British Machine Vision Conference 2013, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]