IP Library Granted Patent US 12,445,853
Granted Patent B2
US 12,445,853 · App. 18/541,860 · Granted Oct 14, 2025

Protection of a transaction in near-field communications

Inventors: Olivier Van Nieuwenhuyze (Wezembeek-Oppem, BE); Alexandre Charles (Auriol, FR)
Assignees: STMICROELECTRONICS (ROUSSET) SAS; STMICROELECTRONICS BELGIUM
H04W12/47H04W12/06
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,445,853
App. No.
18/541,860
Granted
Oct 14, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Provided are techniques for protecting a transaction in near-field communication. Provided is an electronic device including a processor hosting an application, a near-field communication module, and a secure element distinct from the processor. The near-field communication module is configured to identify the type of terminal emitting a polling frame, addressed to the application, that the communication module receives by analyzing the type of the polling frame. The device is configured to compare the result of the analysis with at least one command received from the terminal during the implementation of an NFC transaction.

Claims (36)

1. An electronic device, comprising:

a processor hosting an application;

a near-field communication device; and

a secure element distinct from the processor,

wherein the near-field communication device is configured to identify a type of a terminal emitting a polling frame, addressed to the application and received by the near-field communication device, by analyzing a type of the polling frame and generating an analysis result, and

wherein the electronic device is configured to compare the analysis result with at least one command received from the terminal during an implementation of an NFC transaction, wherein in response to the comparison result indicating that the type of sender is not reliable, the application refrains from sending critical data.

2. The device according to claim 1 , wherein the electronic device is configured to, in response to comparing the analysis result with the at least one command, send the at least one command to the application with the comparison result.

3. The device according to claim 2 , wherein the electronic device is configured to, in response to comparing the analysis result with the at least one command, send the analysis result to the application with the at least one command and the comparison result.

4. The device according to claim 1 , wherein the application determines whether to respond to the at least one command.

5. The device according to claim 1 , wherein the near-field communication device includes an antenna circuit operable over radio frequencies and configured to identify the type of terminal emitting the polling frame, addressed to the application, that the antenna circuit receives by analyzing the type of the polling frame.

6. The device according to claim 1 , wherein the secure element is configured to compare the type of terminal with the at least one received command.

7. The device according to claim 1 , wherein the near-field communication device is configured to compare the type of terminal with the at least one received command.

8. The device according to claim 1 , wherein the near-field communication device is configured to send data indicating an error to a sender if the comparison result indicates that the type of sender is not reliable.

9. The device according to claim 1 , wherein the comparison is performed by comparing the analysis result with at least two commands received from the terminal during the implementation of the NFC transaction.

10. The device according to claim 1 , wherein the comparison is performed by interrogating a user of the device.

11. The device according to claim 1 , wherein the processor hosts at least one interface software layer adapted to implementing the application.

12. A method, comprising: identifying, by a near-field communication device, a type of a terminal emitting a polling frame that the near-field communication device receives by analyzing a type of the polling frame to generate an analysis result, the near-field communication device being included in an electronic device, the electronic device including a processor that hosts an application and a secure element distinct from the processor, and the polling frame being addressed to the application; and

comparing, by the electronic device, the analysis result with at least one command received from the terminal during an implementation of an NFC transaction, wherein in response to the comparison result indicating that the type of sender is not reliable, the application refrains from sending critical data.

13. The method according to claim 12 , comprising:

in response to comparing the analysis result with the at least one command, sending, by the electronic device, the at least one command to the application with the comparison result.

14. The method according to claim 13 , comprising:

in response to comparing the analysis result with the at least one command, sending, by the electronic device, the analysis result to the application with the at least one command and the comparison result.

15. The method according to claim 12 , comprising:

determining, by the application, whether to respond to the at least one command.

16. The method according to claim 12 , comprising:

identifying, by an antenna circuit of by the near-field communication device includes operable over radio frequencies and configured to, the type of terminal emitting the polling frame, addressed to the application, that the antenna circuit receives by analyzing the type of the polling frame.

17. A system, comprising:

a terminal; and

an electronic device including:

a processor hosting an application;

a near-field communication device; and

a secure element distinct from the processor,

wherein the near-field communication device is configured to identify a type of the terminal emitting a polling frame, addressed to the application and received by the near-field communication device, by analyzing a type of the polling frame and generating an analysis result, and

wherein the electronic device is configured to compare the analysis result with at least one command received from the terminal during an implementation of an NFC transaction, wherein in response to the comparison result indicating that the type of sender is not reliable, the application refrains from sending critical data.

18. The system according to claim 17 , wherein the electronic device is configured to, in response to comparing the analysis result with the at least one command, send the at least one command to the application with the comparison result.

19. The system according to claim 18 , wherein the electronic device is configured to, in response to comparing the analysis result with the at least one command, send the analysis result to the application with the at least one command and the comparison result.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 24, 2024
From: VAN NIEUWENHUYZE, OLIVIER
To: PROTON WORLD INTERNATIONAL N.V.
Reel/Frame 069014/0614 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 24, 2024
From: CHARLES, ALEXANDRE
To: STMICROELECTRONICS (ROUSSET) SAS
Reel/Frame 069014/0617 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Sep 26, 2024
From: PROTON WORLD INTERNATIONAL
To: STMICROELECTRONICS BELGIUM
Reel/Frame 069057/0620 →
Priority Claims (1)
FR 2300007 · Jan 2, 2023 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240224047A1 · Jul 4, 2024
References Cited (12)
US 7450511B2 · Jang · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 9858450B2 · Van Bosch · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10028140B2 · Minami · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10908699B2 · Lee · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 10917514B1 · Chen · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11637591B2 · Spiss · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 12119893B2 · Spiss · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20140263648A1 · Van Bosch · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150163724A1 · Tanabe · 2015 [cited by applicant]
Payload Formats and Universal Data for Near Field Communication. Harnaningrum. IJCA. (Year: 2018). [cited by examiner]
Comparison of Internet of Things (IoT) Data Link Protocols. Rahman. (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
Application of Near Field Communication Technology for Mobile Airline Ticketing. Suparta. JCS. (Year: 2012). [cited by examiner]