Granted Patent B2

US 12,445,929 · App. 18/623,235 · Granted Oct 14, 2025

Inventors: Daniel J McDonald (Cary, IL); Svend Frandsen (Koege, DK)

Assignee: MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC.

H04W36/305H04W4/16H04W24/04H04W36/142H04W76/18

Abstract

Claims (44)

1. A method for providing a fallback solution in a multi-tenant communication system, the method comprising:

communicating between a first RF site at a first radio-access network (RAN) and a second RF site at a second RAN through a first link through a cloud-based call-processing service;

replicating a first portion of a first database at the cloud-based call-processing service at a second database existing at the first RAN, wherein the first portion of the first database replicated at the second database comprises only radio and talkgroup configuration and call activity information for the first RAN;

determining that a second link through the cloud-based call-processing service has failed, wherein the second link established communication between a third RF site on the first RAN and a fourth RF site on the second RAN; and

implementing a fallback mode of communication for the third RF site using the replicated first portion of the first database, in response to the second link going down, wherein the fallback mode of communication:

drops communication between the third RF site and the cloud-based call-processing service;

establishes communication between the third RF site and a local call-processing service;

allows communication between the third RF site and other RF sites existing only at the first RAN through the local call-processing service; and

allows the first RF site to communicate through the cloud-based call-processing service.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of:

determining that a fifth RF site is within a same jurisdiction or county as the third RF site; and

implementing a fallback mode of communication for the fifth RF site, in response to the second link going down based on a fact that the fifth RF site is within the same jurisdiction or county as the third RF site.

3. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of:

determining a history of communication between a fifth RF site and the third RF site; and

implementing a fallback mode of communication for the fifth RF site, in response to the history of communication between the fifth RF site and the third RF site.

4. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of:

determining that a fifth RF site is adjacent to the third RF site; and

implementing a fallback mode of communication for the fifth RF site, in response to the second link going down based on a fact that the fifth RF site is adjacent to the third RF site.

5. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of:

determining that a fifth RF site is configure to fallback with the third RF site; and

implementing a fallback mode of communication for the fifth RF site, in response to the second link going down based on a fact that the fifth RF site is configured to fallback with the third RF site.

6. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of:

determining that a predetermined number of links from the first RAN to the cloud-based call-processing service have failed;

when a predetermined number of links have failed then the fallback mode of communication:

drops all communication between the all RF sites within the first RAN and the cloud-based call-processing service;

establishes communication between all RF site within the first RAN and a local call-processing service;

allows communication between all RF sites within the first RAN through the local call-processing service.

7. A radio-access network (RAN) supporting communication between a first RF site at the RAN and a second RF site at a second RAN through a first link existing through a cloud-based call-processing service, the RAN comprising:

a database comprising a replicated a first portion of a first database at the cloud-based call-processing service, wherein the first portion of the first database replicated comprises only radio and talkgroup configuration and call activity information for the first RAN; and

a fallback core configured to:

determine that a second link through the cloud-based call-processing service has failed, wherein the second link established communication between a third RF site at the RAN and a fourth RF site on the second RAN;

implement a fallback mode of communication for the third RF site using the replicated first portion of the first database, in response to the second link going down, wherein the fallback mode of communication:

drops communication between the third RF site and the cloud-based call-processing service;

establishes communication between the third RF site and a local call-processing service;

allows communication between the third RF site and other RF sites existing only at the first RAN through the local call-processing service; and

allows the first RF site to communicate through the cloud-based call-processing service.

8. The RAN of claim 7 wherein the fallback core is further configured to:

determine that a fifth RF site is within a same jurisdiction or county as the third RF site; and

implement a fallback mode of communication for the fifth RF site, in response to the second link going down based on a fact that the fifth RF site is within the same jurisdiction or county as the third RF site.

9. The RAN of claim 7 wherein the fallback core is further configured to:

determine that a predetermined number of links from the first RAN to the cloud-based call-processing service have failed, and when a predetermined number of links have failed then the fallback mode of communication:

drops all communication between the all RF sites within the first RAN and the cloud-based call-processing service;

establishes communication between all RF site within the first RAN and a local call-processing service;

allows communication between all RF sites within the first RAN through the local call-processing service.

Assignments (1)

Continuity (3)

References Cited (66)